T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
285.1 | My opinion only .. | RDGE00::BURRELL | We have the Technology ... | Thu Apr 16 1987 11:47 | 30 |
|
Well the NAT course I was on was interesting but that was all.
It was like watching a documentory on T.V. in fact it was like
watching LOTS of documentorys as the course has around 10 video
tapes ( I seem to remember ).
They are presentated by this American gentleman that tries to
show you how you can make yourself into a superman/superwoman
by a mixture of self hypnosis/self Brain Washing.
Similar to the "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better"
chants, in NAT you clear your mind, and have positive phrases
that you think to yourself while trying to see in your mind
what you want to achieve and more importantly, try to imagine
the emotion achievement would produce.
Personnaly I felt a bit of a nanna sitting in bed ( your supposed
do this first thing in the morning and last thing before you
go to sleep ), reciting a phrase you write on bits of card.
Also the attitude of the presenter was annoying and sort of "I know
what I'm talking about so you'd better listen".
As somebody said in another note - He would make a great con-man.
New Age Music has no relevence as far as I can see except that
( for me ), it is equally boring.
Paul.
|
285.2 | You get out of the course what you put into it... | CAMLOT::DAVIS | Waitin' for the caffeine to kick in. | Thu Apr 16 1987 12:40 | 25 |
|
New Age Thinking / Investment in Excellence is taught by Lou Tice of
the Pacific Institute and facilitated by folks within Digital who
have been to the institute for facilitator training.
To my knowledge, there is no relationship between music designated
New Age and the NAT course.
The concepts taught by NAT are used by Olympic athletes worldwide to
perfect their performance... affirmation and visualization. The
concepts can be adapted to any facet of life or business. I've only
been involved with the course as a participant so take it for
that...
The concept says that if you picture/visualize/affirm yourself
(safely) doing or being "there" ... you define the target "there"...
and you repeat it often enough, you will find yourself being
naturally uncomfortable in your present situation... and will move
naturally to correct for the difference. It's based on Gestalt.
That's the technique.... but a lot of what the course contains is
building up your confidence to take the first steps of defining the
target...kept, by the way, completely to yourself.
Marge
|
285.4 | | PARITY::DDAVIS | Dotti | Thu Apr 16 1987 15:19 | 36 |
| I work in Mfg/Eng Training & Development in Tewksbury, and we deliver
the seminar New Age Thinking/Investment in Excellence. The following
is the "Focus and Objectives" for the course:
New Age Thinking/Investment in Excellence (NAT/IIE) is primarily a knowledge
seminar. The knowledge acquired is not a substitute for skills.
Participants are provided with information which they may apply to
improving their relational skills, after the course. Adult development
is a process and NAT/IIE represents a learning experience from which
participants may move to acquire the additional knowledge and skills
they need to set and achieve personal and professional goals.
The NAT/IIE seminar is a structured learning experience which focuses
on personal and professional growth opportunities. The seminar teaches
basic concepts of human behavior and explores the linkage between
thought and action. All seminar material is based on the premise
that human beings have untapped potential which remains inaccessible
due to self-erected barriers created by previous behavioral
conditioning. Using a combination of video tape instruction,
participant manuals for individual work, and small group discussion,
the seminar assists participants in identifying those barriers which
inhibit their own use of potential.
The primary objective of the seminar is to trigger awareness of
these barriers where they exist in the mind and experience of each
participant. A secondary objective of the seminar is to provide
each participant with a technique - affirmation and visualization-
which is designed to increase use of untapped resources. The seminar
format takes participants through a series of steps from awareness
to insight to identification of areas of application of seminar
concepts.
If you think you might be interested in enrolling in this course,
send me mail.
-Dotti.
|
285.5 | What I Know About The "New Age" | TSG::MCGOVERN | | Thu Apr 16 1987 17:33 | 43 |
| Here's what I know about the New Age:
o The term NA refers to the coming astrological age, the age of Aquarius.
This age supposedly ushers in an era of people working together,
not like the "everyone for themself" attitude seen now.
o NA thinking involves new attitudes about body, mind, spirit. The
idea is that body/mind/spirit are one entity, not separate as we
consider them today. Much emphasis is put on balancing all aspects
of life (body/mind/spirit) and so be able to live with life, not
fight against it. This is all very hard to explain: the idea is
that the western way of life, with it's emphasis on material, not spi-
ritual values, is not the way to go. All very earthshoes and granola,
but more focussed than I can make it sound. Much of the holistic
approach to health care is NA-oriented. Accupuncture, work with
crystals (like amthyst and quartz), studying auras and chakras (Hindu-
defined energy centers in the body) all fit into this category.
I believe in almost all of it, but if I have bronchial pneumonia, I'm
going to the MD for some antibiotics.
o NA music is a category designed by the marketing groups of the major
record labels. When the original labels (Windham Hill, for example)
started, they didn't call themselves NA. But when CBS, RCA, etc
found out that William Ackerman and George Winston sell, they found
their own artists and started marketing the stuff under the NA label.
Generally speaking, NA music is gentle, meditative (some would say
repititious), and acoustically-based. Not all of it is like this:
many of the artists hate this label because their music is not
"spacy" but they get sold out of the NA bin because of the company
they work for.
o Beware hucksters selling products/workshops about NA anything (this
is not in reference to the course mentioned in previous replies;
I know nothing about it.) Like anything else, some people will
use any label to sell things. Some of the NA courses pervert the
concepts of self-actualization and self-empowerment to focus
on the aggrandizement of personal power without responsibility.
I mean, it's great to get yourself free, but not to aggressively
ride over others.
A bit long, but that's what I know about it.
MM
|
285.6 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Thu Apr 16 1987 17:34 | 3 |
| Re .1, I know what you mean about courses like that. I just hate
that kind of crap. That type of thing gives me a really BAD attitude.
|
285.7 | The crossroads between yesterday and tomorrow | SPIDER::PARE | | Thu Apr 16 1987 17:35 | 6 |
| Although there are courses and products that use the word, New Age
really refers to a movement toward self-awareness, cosmic conciousness,
spiritual awakening and mysticism, and entails a re-evaluation of
our value systems. The new_age music is designed to produce an
alpha state for relaxation, stress-reduction or self-hypnosis.
New Agers are merely seeking tomorrow.
|
285.8 | There is (of course) a Notesfile... | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler!? | Thu Apr 16 1987 17:50 | 6 |
| For more information on New Age/whatever you can look in HYDRA::HOLISTIC, which
if I had known the term when I first started the file, might be called
HYDRA::NEW_AGE... :-)
Jim Baranski
HOLISTIC Moderator...
|
285.9 | Wow, like groovy man ! | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Fri Apr 17 1987 06:51 | 1 |
| re.7 Reminds me of why i gave up pot - and the Grateful Dead :-)
|
285.11 | . | CEODEV::FAULKNER | personality plus | Fri Apr 17 1987 09:28 | 5 |
| this topic does not belong here.
it is almost worthy of its own conference.
it is impossible to totally explode and explain the theoretical
practices of mind set changes in one note.
not worth trying.
|
285.12 | | MANTIS::PARE | | Fri Apr 17 1987 10:28 | 4 |
| re: .9
I suppose you don't listen to The Who, Pink Floyd, and Crosby Stills
Nash and Young anymore either .... tsk, tsk, tsk :-)
(and they wondered where all those flower children had gone):-)
|
285.13 | generic name are not descriptive | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Fri Apr 17 1987 11:10 | 4 |
| I think that the class/seminar might more acurately be called 'Creative
Visualization', or 'Positive Thinking', rather then New Age Thinking...
Jim.
|
285.14 | Not The Point | TSG::MCGOVERN | | Fri Apr 17 1987 12:24 | 2 |
| RE: .12 I sure do listen to all the old R&R I used to, and just
as loud, too. That really has nothing to do with it.
|
285.15 | failure to communicate | MANTIS::PARE | | Fri Apr 17 1987 13:13 | 2 |
| some confusion here. .12 is refering to .9 (as a joke response)
not to the note that you wrote...sorry for the misunderstanding.
|
285.16 | Not my scene... | RDGE00::LIDSTER | still hangin' in there... | Sun Apr 19 1987 14:05 | 14 |
| re: .0
I attended NAT in the UK which was given on a series of Video
Tapes - when, in my ignorance, I disagreed with the points being
made, I had no opportunity to challenge which I found very frustrating.
For the course itself, I think the "marketing" is better than
the "content" - I walked out after the first day and have never
regretted it. Not my scene - I prefer to learn, not be TOLD, which
was the impression I was left with.
be lucky,
Steve
|
285.17 | I don't like NAT | PUFFIN::OGRADY | George, ISWS 297-4183 | Thu Apr 23 1987 13:59 | 17 |
|
I was "lucky" enough to be (:-{)in the 1st new age thinking course
offered in the Maynard area, about 3-4 years ago. I found it boring,
boring, and more boring. It was like a brainwashing clinic. You
can overcome this and that by positive thinking. Always think
positive, AKA, ignore the real. We were forced to go by our manager,
it was his course. The course was poor, all video tapes, not much
discussions. That has changed. ITs always much better to have
2-way vs 1-way communications!
Overall, it remined me of a mix between a college pysch course and
Pat Robertson.
Just my opinion...
GOG
|
285.18 | positively a waste of time !!! | NZOV03::STUART | my cat is called Lucy !!! | Fri Apr 24 1987 07:23 | 15 |
|
re. 6,16,17
I totally agree... I had to attend NAT here in NZ... yuck!!!
re. 0
Last day of the course they dimmed the lights... made us all lie
on the floor and 'free our minds of thoughts'... whilst they played
some NA ??? music...
I'm sure someone did fall asleep :)
|
285.19 | no thoughts to begin with | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Apr 24 1987 09:02 | 10 |
| All this is very interesting. Thank you all for taking time to explain
this to me.
I think I understand better what some of the references to New Age
Thinking mean, enough to at least ask a semi-intelligent question
if I had to.
If I ever start having trouble with insomnia, I know where to go! :)
--bonnie
|
285.20 | Doesn't sound like it was very good | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Sat Apr 25 1987 17:31 | 8 |
| I'd like to say that I think that there is a lot to 'New Age' (such as it means
to me) thinking.
But then again, It doesn't sound like the seminar was presented very well; how
could anybody expect to get new ideas across by "making" smeone attend a
seminar!
Jim.
|
285.21 | Any good reports out there? | PCCSSE::PEACOCK | I CAN will always beat IQ | Mon May 11 1987 15:19 | 14 |
| Let's say that I am underwhelmed with the responses that I read here. I
like to think that I keep an open mind when it comes to new ideas, but there
seems to be a definate direction to the opinions here.
Is there anybody out there who attended any of these classes who has
something good to say about them? It has been suggested by my management
that I attend such a class, and I would like to believe that I will be
getting something out of it besides a couple of days away from the office.
Or should I apply the "supermarket theory"? - I will find at this class
whatever it is I go into it looking for, and not much else...
- Tom
|
285.22 | NEW AGE THINKING RULES OK! | RDGE98::PAYNE | | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:59 | 9 |
| Digital has many departments who have a first reply of
NO, CAN`T, WON`T, NOT MY PROBLEM ETC.
We took a Department in the UK from a failing organisation
to a successful operation providing company profits and employee
satisfaction.
We did this with the help of New Age Thinking. People with a negative
attutude now find it difficult to work here!
|
285.23 | I tried | WFOV11::BRENNAN_N | | Fri Aug 19 1988 13:58 | 27 |
| I would like to say, I have had the seminar on New Age Thinking.
The corporation is full of folks who resist changes. I found that
New Age Thinking made me skillful in dealing with some changes.
Just the Attitude Check was enough. I found that once I looked
at something a little differently, I was able to deal with it a
little better.
On the other end of the stick, an excersise we had been assigned
dealth with remaining totally calm for 24-hrs. Normally, I am a
kinda hyper person and jump to situations sometimes. My assignment
was to relax and pretend that the guy on the rotary just didn't
cut me off, or that the dogs had bitten the paperboy again and my
inground pool sprung a leak and a $2200 liner was ruined, never
mind I lost my job that day and they towed my car from its parking
spot. All of these things happening and I was supposed to deal
with it. By the way, it all happened in a 24-hour period. Was
I upset, no, I've had New Age Thinking. I dealt with it in my usual
character.
I went home, beat the dog, kicked the cat and refused to eat my
supper. The next day, I went to work and everything was fine.
I was taught, how to deal.
Actually, the course was presented excellently and really was awed
at some of the information.
To Better Days and Happy Endings, Nancy
|