T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
224.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Feb 27 1987 18:17 | 5 |
| I would save the mail, inform the person that if I got another
one I would report it to their manager, and follow through if
necessary. I actually did this once with excellent results -
I did not have to tell their manager.
Steve
|
224.2 | The ball is in your court. | NUTMEG::MCKIEB | | Sat Feb 28 1987 14:50 | 10 |
|
It depends on what you want to happen to the person who sent you
the abusive mail. If you just want the mail to stop I agree with
224.1. However if you really feel threatened you could also bring
the mail to personnel. This is certainly grounds for strong
disciplinary actions (possibly dismissal from DEC). The person
who sent you the mail has to crazy to have put themselves i nsuch
a position....
Brian
|
224.3 | Just delete the stuff before reading it... | TORA::GKLEINBERGER | misery IS optional | Sat Feb 28 1987 22:16 | 14 |
| Mike,
I would also possibly ignore it..... use the Delete Key even
before reading it.... I don't advocate attempting to get anyone
*fired*, no matter what happens.... (unless its an outright breach
of security)... this person sending you the mail might have a family
to support, etc... can you live with them going on welfare over
something you did??? I surely couldn't... Whenever I get mail
from someone I don't want to get mail from, I just delete it, even
before reading it...
My 3 cents worth...
GLK
|
224.4 | You have the right to remain abusive? | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Mon Mar 02 1987 11:24 | 17 |
| "Having a family to support" and all that other stuff is something
people have to think about for themselves. The burden for sending
abusive mail is on the SENDER and I don't think a recipient should
put up with continued abuse just because seeking relief could cause the
sender to "go on welfare". C'mon! Who has the "right" in this
situation? Does the sender's right to continue abusing someone
override the recipient's right to peace even if you want to introduce
the 'blackmail' aspect as in "if you report my obnoxious behavior
you'll get me fired and then it'll be on YOUR head"?
I do advocate a warning in the interest of fairness, since the
consequences can indeed be devastating, but that's it. After a
fair warning, people HAVE to be responsible for themselves and their
actions. Personally, I would hesitate to air anything that resulted
in my getting abusive mail to the powers that be at DEC. I'd go
for a quiet and very firm personal approach... and then I'd slash their
tires! ;-D
|
224.6 | Moderator redirecting this discussion | VAXRT::CANNOY | Go where your heart leads you. | Mon Mar 02 1987 13:28 | 7 |
| I would like to see this discussion move from discussing *any*
particular incident, to discussing the problem in general as it
applies to DIGITAL employees.
I set .5 hidden as it was not pertinent to discussion of the issue.
Tamzen, Moderator
|
224.7 | and dats de truff | CEODEV::FAULKNER | square circle | Mon Mar 02 1987 14:17 | 7 |
| My advice is.
forward the mail back to the person
tell person you are deleting the mail before you read it.
tell them to please stop as you have work to do and it does not
help your stress level to continually receive harrassing mail.
|
224.8 | there must be a problem/reason??? | PICA::DROWNS | this has been a recording | Mon Mar 02 1987 14:48 | 7 |
|
I would guess you know this person? One of you is having a problem
with the other...why don't you solve the problem?
bd
|
224.9 | Anonymous: Speaking from experience | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon Mar 02 1987 15:50 | 29 |
| I am posting this for a noter who wishes to remain anonymous.
*********************************************************************
Having been on the receiving end of a harassment charge which was the
result of a 3 word mail message, which I thought was friendly and very
innocuous, I'd like to see people try to handle these differences first
on a one to one level without involving management or personnel.
I got a call out of the blue from personnel, which told me that a
charge had been filed. To say that I was flabbergasted is an
understatement. I couldn't see how what I sent could be considered
harassment, but since it was, I had *NO* defense. There is absolutely
nothing you can do, once a harassment charge has been filed. You are
not allowed to confront your accuser, no explanation is accepted by
personnel. You are placed on immediate 30 day warning and if there is
any contact between you and your accuser, you will be fired immediately.
If I had received MAIL first telling me that what I had sent was
offensive to the recipient, I would have apologized and had nothing
more to do with the person. I'd like everyone to at least have this
chance.
Now, if this request has already been made and the abuse is still
continuing, then obviously higher levels of management need to be
brought into the affair. I guess each person has to judge what is
abusive MAIL and whether to simply ignore it and immediately delete
anything further, or whether to push back. We all have different levels
of tolerance.
|
224.10 | Unreal. | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Inhuman Decorum in Human Relations | Mon Mar 02 1987 16:06 | 5 |
|
I would like to thank the Anonymous Author of .9
for his/her honesty. It really does say alot about
about Personel and reaffirms my opinion about them.
|
224.11 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Mar 02 1987 16:08 | 9 |
| I too have had problems with messages which I thought were
innocuous, and even helpful, that were taken as insulting by
the recipient. Thank goodness I never had Personnel get involved.
I fully agree that one should try to work out these problems at
the lowest possible level, starting with the two people involved
by themselves. In almost every case, that will be all that is
necessary.
Steve
|
224.12 | NOT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!! | SSVAX::LAVOIE | | Fri Mar 06 1987 16:19 | 13 |
|
HI MIKE! (I got your name right!)
The best bet is to keep a copy in a special file and contact the
person themselves then start up the ladder. As for the dingbat who
sent it......well if I remember correctly in the back issues of
the DTW there was an entire page devoted to what is and is not proper
use for the system.
Check with your system manager there may be a way to bar that specific
account from sending mail to you!
Sunshine
|
224.13 | | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Inhuman Decorum in Human Relations | Fri Mar 06 1987 17:49 | 7 |
|
I can do that... [Don't estimate the power of "Guido - Nerd
Extraordinaire], in fact I did it last night.
Only wish I could do that with Ma Bell!
Mark
|
224.14 | | TURBO::NEWSHAM | I'd rather be Camping | Mon Mar 09 1987 15:30 | 6 |
| Mike,
Refer them to the Policies and Procedures Book. Section
6.03...
Red
|