T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
202.1 | Cut the rope | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 05 1987 07:49 | 10 |
|
Listen to the song "True Colors" - then blow them off...
No One deserves to be used and walked all over - even by complete
strangers - let alone "friends".
Joe Jas
|
202.2 | I've been there | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Thu Feb 05 1987 09:38 | 32 |
|
Call me dense, Gale, but I'm not quite sure what you're saying...
Are these people only acknowledging your existence when they need
something from you? That's pretty nasty, but I wouldn't call them
'fair weather friends.' I'd call them leeches, particularly if
they aren't willing to reciprocate at all. Notice I did not say
capable, I said willing. We all run into situations where we would
like to help but we can't.
To me, 'fair weather friend' has always suggested a person who is
willing to be with you as long as things are going well for you,
but as soon as things get rocky they're gone with the morning breeze.
This sort of person is just as contemptible.
I understand your feeling very well. This is a crossroad I have found
myself at many times. If one has something people want (some skill, a
good ear, whatever) it is inevitable that you should confront this.
While it seems very practical to simply suggest that you look out for
yourself, it opens you up to the feeling that 'well, if you're going to
blow them off, aren't you being a fair weather friend, too?
Your note suggests to me that some recent event has brought these
feelings to the surface. If this is the case, I think you should
take a little time to examine what has suddenly made you feel this
way. In either case, I think you ought to make your feeling known
to these people. If your friendship is worth salvaging, it should
come out then. Be prepared, however. It may only make you more
angry, and dropping them by the wayside and getting on with what
you have to do may become necessary.
DFW
|
202.3 | You shouldn't be angry with yourself! | NORDIC::TRUDOJ | | Thu Feb 05 1987 14:07 | 18 |
|
My husband is always getting on my case about letting *friends*
walk all over me. I happen to be one who always see's the good
and avoids looking at the bad in people.
I'm talking about friends who expect you to be there when they
need something, but where are they if you need them.
One instance I'll remember always was with a friend I work with.
It seem's she was always walking on me but when she ended up working
for me it got out of hand. Talk about taking advantage of someone.
I'm sorry to say I could not resolve this problem (I tried talking
to her about it, but it was to a deaf ear) and I had to end the
friendship. To this day we work together but we do not socialize
outside of work.
I hope you can resolve your problem without having to lose the
friendships. But keep in mind "Do you really want to consider
people like that your friends? In that case, who needs enemies."
Good Luck... JoLynn
|
202.4 | Friends/Acquaintances | PRESTO::MITCHELL | | Thu Feb 05 1987 15:29 | 21 |
| I wouldn't even consider calling these kind of people "friends".
To me a friend is someone with whom I share a mutual respect and
understanding. Someone who will be there for me in time of need,
and who I will be there for when they need me. All others come
under the classification of "acquaintances".
I also had been used and abused by so called "friends" in the past.
But, this girl has learned a lot, and is quite selective when it
comes to friendship.
In my case, I've found that my longest and most enduring friendships
have been with men. I've found them more loyal and true than women.
This could be because I had two brothers and no sisters, and so
can relate better and share confidences with men easier than with
women. Also found that men respect confidences, whereas some so-
called woman friends had a tendancy to talk about confidences with
others. I'm not saying all women are like this, just in my personal
life I've found men to be my truest and dearest friends.
kathie
|
202.5 | Friend is a word too often used | NOVA::BNELSON | California Dreamin'... | Thu Feb 05 1987 17:27 | 28 |
|
This is a tough thing. I know I try very hard to give as much as I
receive from any friendship, but of course there are those who don't ( I tend
to think there's not too many though, as I've only known one like that ).
It's funny, but I had a "friend" in high school exactly like that. He
would call me only after exhausting all other possibilities. I didn't know
this for awhile, and even when I did find out I still kept on with it. My
problem is I like people a lot, and I find it difficult to break off any
type of friendship completely. Eventually, though, I decided that I had wasted
enough time on this person, there were plenty of others out there more worthy
of my time, and stopped calling him. That was years ago and I've never regret-
ted that decision.
I can sympathize with how you're feeling, Gale; it's a rude awakening
to find out that someone you like and trust only considers you their "friend"
when no one else is around. Ask yourself if you wish to have "friends" like
that. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote an excellent essay on friendship; you'd have
no trouble deciding after reading that!
Good luck.
Brian
|
202.7 | Reality Test? | LSMVAX::MCATEE | JOHN | Fri Feb 06 1987 15:24 | 11 |
| Gale, it sounds like you're the real friend (i.e. "that I should
be there for them") but are questioning them. The ideal friend-
ship should have no strings attached and should allow for the
exchange of feelings like you have expressed. Perhaps it is time
to test the friendship(s) with such an exchange to see if (1) it
is real and strong or (2) it is one-sided. Do you really want to
find out?
Good luck with a tough issue.
-John-
|
202.8 | | WHOARU::WONG | The Mad Chinaman | Fri Feb 06 1987 22:31 | 28 |
| On a scale of one to ten....
Are they:
10 SO/Best Friend
9 Close friend/Girl Friend/Boy Friend
8 Good friend
7 Talkable friend
6 Friend
5 "Hello" person
4 Acquaintance
3 Stranger
2 Someone you don't like at all
1 Someone you hate
As they go down the scale, they should pass the point where you
might feel obligated to be nice to them.
I like to assume everyone I meet is nice; I create a "reserve" of
niceness for every new acquaintance. Everytime that person does
something "not-so-nice", they use up part of that reserve. Once
they use up that reserve I might still be nice to them but I don't
feel guilty if I'm not.
The Mad Chinaman
|
202.9 | Webster anyone? | OWL::LANGILL | | Mon Feb 09 1987 16:19 | 2 |
| Sometimes a word needs definition. What is a friend and what are
your expectations of a friendship?
|
202.10 | They can't seem to make time for you. | NANOOK::SCOTT | Looking towards the sun | Mon Feb 09 1987 19:11 | 26 |
|
I think I know what Gale is referring to, but then
maybe I'm wrong. Haven't had a good guess lately so here
goes. It's kind of like when friends ask you out to share
an evening you're always available or if not you reply "I'ld
really love to but I've got to go visit my mother (or
something to that effect). When you have something special
in mind and want company, you end up calling all over and
get the usual "Sorry kid, I've got other plans for that
evening."
I may not be referring to the exact same situation, but
a lot of feelings are based on how we interpret what someone
says to us and how they say it. When you start getting too
many "Sorry kid" answers from too many friends rather then
"Really wish I could/ Gee I'ld love to", how can help
interpret it as "TIME TO GET NEW FRIENDS" and kiss the old
ones goodbye.
Seems as of late, everyone is too busy.
Waiting for the spring SUN,
Lee
|
202.11 | | WFOVX3::KLEINBERGER | misery IS optional | Tue Feb 10 1987 07:47 | 27 |
| Update:
What I *really* meant was a boy/girl couple on the net that whenever
they broke up, I am supposed to be around to talk to, to send 90
mail messages an evening to, etc, but whenever they are back together,
they can not answer a mail message I send to them. They break
up again, and boom, I get a mail message from both of them, and
I'm supposed to be readily available to go out with either of them,
etc...
What did I do? I finally decided that *I* was being used... totally
deleted them from my mail account, took their name off of my distribution
list, and mailed them mail telling them what I did... not only did
I do that to them, I also did it to several other *net* friends
that I felt were using me... The funny thing was not one responded
to the mail I sent them... their life is going too well for them
at the moment... The real test (shock?) will come when I get a
mail message from them, and I return it with a copy of the one I
JUST sent them...
Fair? I really don't know, but I am getting tired of being a Dear
Abby for someone who didn't really need a friend, they needed a
pacifier.
Gale
(P.S. Where in the HECK is that Spring Sun????????? :-).......)
|
202.12 | definition | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with you. | Thu May 14 1987 16:46 | 11 |
| old saw: "Home is where, when you have to go there, they have
to take you in."
resharpened: "A friend is one, when you have to have someone to talk
to, they have to listen."
Rick
Merrill
|
202.13 | poetry | YAZOO::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Thu May 14 1987 17:17 | 2 |
| re .12 That's not really an 'old saw' it is the heart of a poem
by Rober Frost - The Death of the Hired Man :-)
|