T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
198.1 | slowly recovering... | WHOARU::WONG | The Mad Chinaman | Sat Jan 31 1987 21:52 | 27 |
| ah...the memories...
I had a long distance relationship back when I was in college...the
lady in question lived in New York and was going to school in
Pennsylvania. (My home was in Boston).
During the time that we were together, we had a very close
relationship. Her mother even introduced me (to a relative) as her
future son-in-law.
Unfortunately, she needed someone around all the time. I only saw
her every two weeks or so (during the summer). She broke it off
after a month into the next semester.
One of my mistakes was that I wasn't selfish enough. She had a
choice of going to Temple (In Philly) or SUNY Albany. I told her
to go to Temple instead of SUNY even I was 10 minutes from SUNY
(at RPI). I was thinking ahead for her future and I wanted her
to go to what I thought was the better school...I always regret
that....
...shit...what a bummer...
The Mad Chinaman
|
198.2 | Didn't work for me... | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sat Jan 31 1987 22:40 | 18 |
| There were a lot of things that broke up my relationship with my
first finac�e, so it's hard to be sure exactly how much distance
contributed. I tend to think that it was factor, but only an
aggrevation of others.
Betty's family never approved of me--I wasn't Armenian and I
wasn't working class. Our relationship stood up to their
disapproval while I was there, but when I was 750 miles away,
and could only see her occassionally and they were there 24
hours a day, the end was probably inevitable. Until it did end,
we did just about everything to keep in touch. She came out to
Ohio once. I hitched back and forth every 2 to 3 weeks. We spent
lots of time on the phone and we wrote plenty of letters.
I'll try to think about it a little more and see if I can
contribute anything else.
JimB.
|
198.3 | a long-distance relationship that lasted... | AIMHI::KRISTY | Woobie's Dial-A-Hug | Sun Feb 01 1987 05:04 | 14 |
| I'm not sure if this constitutes a long-distance relationship, but
I met Daryl (my hubby) while I was in college. He had a job with
the Computer Services Group that supported my college. I had met
him on the computer and because of lack of vehicle of my part and
his job being a three-hour drive away, we didn't see each other
much for the first 4 months of our relationship. Luckily summer
came around and we were able to spend a lot of time together. The
time apart made the few times we were together very special and
luckily, it lasted. We're coming up on our 5th year of marriage
(in August) and it's gotten better since the beginning. We've been
separated (by job needs) a couple of times but it hasn't stopped
us yet and I doubt it ever will!
*** Kristy ***
|
198.4 | She used to be mine | MOJAVE::PURMAL | | Sun Feb 01 1987 17:03 | 38 |
| I had a hot and heavy romance with a woman in college during
the spring semester. She planned to spend the summer with her
Grandparents in San Diego, then with her father in Utah. Then she
would come back to the San Francisco area for a week before heading
off to Germany to spend a year in Munich going to school.
I had a difficult time during our initial seperation while she
was in San Diego, but as the summer wore on I got used to the
seperation. We spent a lot of time on the telephone and ran up
some enormous bills. We didn't write that often because the phone
was more natural for us. When she came back at the end of the
summer I didn't get too excited because I knew she'd be gone in a
week. She was just the opposite and my attitude disappointed her.
When she got to Germany, she had a difficult time and wrote
me once or twice a week. I responded about three weeks after she
left for the first time. During that year her interest decreased
and mine increased, but she still came back to me after the year
was over. Near the end of her year in Germany I was the one sending
letters once or twice a week, and she was responding monthly.
I displayed the classic "Lonely Puppy" syndrome hanging all
over and emotionally suffocating her. She became more and more
attracted to my best friend and was his by the end of June. The
circumstances of their initiation of the relationship broke my trust
of them and I was quite hurt.
I do think that things would have been different if I'd have
been less intense upon her return from Germany. In retrospect
though I believe that all things turned out for the best. The
following year of college was the best year of my life thus far
and I found my wife.
My best friend and my ex girlfriend got married and have a little
girl. We had them over to our place just last weekend, and are
still friends.
Tony Purmal
|
198.5 | | FAUXPA::ENO | Bright Eyes | Mon Feb 02 1987 14:29 | 17 |
| My long-distance relationship didn't start out that way. When I
was in college, I got involved and then engaged to a man in the
Air Force. About nine months before we were going to get married,
he got transferred to Virginia (I was going to school in N.H.).
I did pretty well at first, but after he had been gone for a time,
I stopped missing him and got so involved in my own life that I
wasn't able to picture how he would fit back into it.
The separation was definitely a factor in ending the relationship
(I brough up breaking the engagement by letter and we ended it when
he was on leave), but a positive one for me. I was definitely
infatuated, but it wasn't the marriage kind of love. And it turned
out not to be for him, either, because he married someone else three
months after we split.
G
|
198.6 | Long distance = $$$$ in phone bills | BARTOK::COCHRANE | Send lawyers, guns and money. | Mon Feb 02 1987 16:35 | 21 |
| My mother says I should own part of "Ma Bell" by now. I earned
most of it in college, with two long distances romances back to
back (some people never learn). The first lasted less than three
months, and differences rather than distance did us in. The second
I nearly married. He lived in Connecticut and I in Massachusetts.
We saw each other about once every two or three weeks, usually
for three or four days at a time (staying with parents). We certainly
got to know each other's families well enough! What probably did
us in was lack of trust. After a while I started wondering what
he was doing when he wasn't with me, and he started thinking the
same things about me. The relationship lasted about two years.
We didn't write much, but spent exorbitant amount of money on
phone bills. Talking was more natural for us. Ironically enough,
we weren't on speaking terms when we broke up. We were very close,
and it still hurts sometimes. But, I *did* enjoy the freedom I
had - I could go out with my girlfriends on week-ends, catch a
movie, spend time with my family - without impacting my relationship.
However, I also wished I could have spent more time with him - I
think in the end, that could have made a difference.
Mary-Michael
|
198.7 | I survived the distance... | WFOVX3::KLEINBERGER | misery IS optional | Mon Feb 02 1987 20:02 | 24 |
| Steve,
I have just survived a long distance romance, although my SO
and I only had 65 miles between us. We have not had a weekend to
ourselves since June, as we spent the weekend with me there, or
him here. Our phone bills were a little higher, as I REFUSED to
use VAXPHONE, since written communication was the demise of my last
relationship, and we worked harder to have quality time with me,
and with the girls.
Now, I am moving back to within 10 miles of him, so we don't
have to worry about the distance anymore, infact just this evening,
we decided we were going to miss *our weekends* together.
I think the key to long distance is LOTS of communication, little
surprises (I was in Maynard, and left him a balloon in his car -
funny, he knew immediately it was from me :-)...), such as a card
in the mail, or leaving a "love you" note in his drawer to find
after I had left on Sunday, and the willingness to work the extra
mile it takes. Really *loving* the person helps too 8-).
Gale
|
198.9 | Topic title is a contradiction in terms! | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Feb 03 1987 11:14 | 33 |
| We met in college in March and spent a heady, tumultous summer
in the throes of passion until I left in September for another school
4 hours away. Pretty quickly I began to resent having to
compartmentalize my life; during the week I was a student living
here and on the weekends I was a lover living there. Time passes
very quickly because you are always looking ahead to the next
weekend. You grow old too fast and miss too much of what is right in
front of you. Life takes place right here and right now - period.
Sunday nights caused me pain and boredom at the thought of another
long lonely week ahead, so much so that it got to be not worth the
thrill of Fridays. And of course not EVERY moment together is
positively thrilling, but the hurried nature of this type of
relationship puts too much pressure on quality to make up for quantity
and cannot withstand normal human mood fluctuations. How you part
on Sunday night becomes a CONSTANT major issue.
I learned all this before he did and initiated the breakup.
This all took place about 8 years ago, and if you had asked me as
soon as five years ago if I thought proximity would have changed
things I would have said yes. I did "wring my hands" for awhile over
my decision to change schools and what I had imagined it cost me, but
I don't any longer. Life is dynamic, ebbing and flowing and not
a straight line to an end point of THE relationship. Sure I lost him,
but I didn't lose "the ultimate" because no such thing exists.
I learned all these things and I learned that I will never engage
in such a relationship again because it just doesn't work for me.
A lover is one who shares my life and no long distance person can
do that.
|
198.10 | Et tu Sanday? | CHAPLN::MAHLER | I drank WHAT? - Socrates | Tue Feb 03 1987 11:59 | 9 |
|
Are you talking about distance as in miles [physical]
or distance in communication. They really are
not too much different and both have caused pain.
Like Sandy said, it's not worth the very low feelings
to wait for the high feelings.
|
198.11 | physical distance causes emotional distance | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Feb 03 1987 13:18 | 13 |
| Hi Michael!
You don't share day-to-day things - you don't even KNOW the day-to-day
things of the other person and spend your time together "catching
up" instead of going forward, and the rest of your life slipping
backward in terms of the relationship. Telling your lover of happy
things since you last were together can bring suspicion and telling
your lover of your pain can cause a burden. Knowing you will soon
part again makes you not have to live with your words and they can
become hollow.
Physical distance brings about distance in communication and that's
the death knell for love.
|
198.12 | Year in Alaska! | VINO::EKLUND | Dave Eklund | Tue Feb 03 1987 14:20 | 28 |
| Here's a slightly different side of being separated. Many
of my generation got caught up in the Viet Nam era with the
draft and all. I ended up spending a year at a remote radar
station in Alaska. This was actually a preference over southeast
Asia. There were no females within 20 miles of my site (and no
road covering the 20 miles...).
There are several very vivid memories of those awful times.
Many marriages and relationships dissolved for those I knew. I
was "lucky". My son turned from one year old to two years old,
and barely knew me when I returned. I viewed the year as a large
hole in my life - just biding my time.
Our marriage survived, but the bitterness of "losing" a year
never went away. I feel that on the positive side there were no
women where I was. It must have been even more difficult for those
who found themselves separated, but with other women/men around,
and the opportunity for more normal relationships.
Phone bills were high, and we kept in touch through audio tapes.
They are cheap and convenient, and more personal, especially for
those who hate to write (without a terminal!). I recommend it,
especially for those on a fixed budget.
In the end, you sure do come to appreciate the things that were
not possible during the separation. I sure know that things can
be worse!
|
198.13 | I have to agree with .11: Ciccolini | YODA::BARANSKI | Happiness is not wanting *too* much... | Tue Feb 03 1987 16:42 | 0 |
198.16 | I want my man HERE or not at all. | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Wed Feb 04 1987 16:01 | 30 |
| Hi Bob - I can appreciate your situation, but I still say long
distance relationships all experience the same negative stresses
that I've outlined. If you are in a committed long distance
relationship then you may deal with those stresses differently than
if you weren't, but the stresses themselves are the same. Motivation
certainly can and does overcome them.
For me, though, knowing the inherent stresses of a long distance
relationship I would not actively pursue such a situation. There
are cases, I suppose where people just "find" themselves in this
situation but again, this goes back to one of my fundamental tenets
- I never just "find" myself in situations. My eyes are always
wide open and knowing what I can and cannot deal with, I must act
accordingly given the circumstances. A military man would not be
high on my list of 'baskets to put all my eggs in' simply because their
first allegiance is to some outside force and I know I can't live
my life at the whim of some unseen, (to me), force. So my chances of
ever finding myself separated from an SO because of the military are
nil. Likewise, after learning what I did about LD relationships the
hard way, while in college, I stopped looking for an exclusive
relationship while I was still a transient myself.
Were a 'settled' relationship to threaten to become long distance due
to job transfer, (which can and does happen at any time), then the
relationship MUST be downgraded to wistful friendship. I'm assuming
all the possiblities to avoid the LD distinction have been explored
and rejected. Pining from afar is boring at best and very self
destructive at worst and people who can't handle it, (like me), are
wise to take every step necessary to insure that it doesn't occur,
or to engage in self-preservation tactics should it somehow occur anyway.
|
198.17 | It can and does work | STUBBI::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Wed Feb 04 1987 22:12 | 8 |
| Well, I've now been married nearly 20 years to a man who I dated
on weekends in college. We kept in touch by phone and letter during
the week and found the chance to comunicate by paper helped us
learn about each other. At the time we were both attending single
sex colleges so this type of dating pattern was considered normal
by all of our friends. We tended to use the weeks to concentrate
on our studies, and the weekends to conentrate on each other.
Bonnie
|
198.18 | Lake Geneva to Nashua | VAX4::JOLLY | | Thu Feb 05 1987 12:59 | 38 |
| I met Sharon on a bus tour of the United Kingdom in '85. She was
was from Wisconsin and would be attending a college in the suburbs
of Chicago. When we first met, we didn't get along too well. But
by the time we got to Scotland, we would leave the tour group and
go sight see by ourselves. And we had FUN!! We had a lot in common,
but just a few differences in background, which made find out about
her very interesting.
When the time came to go home, we promised each other that we would
stay in touch. So for the next six months we wrote and called each
other once or twice a week. Just by talking on the phone, we got
closer. We would catch up on what was what, but at the same time
we would talk about our dreams and goals in life. We "coached" one
another when we were down, and cheered when we did good.
To make a long story short, I went to visit her on her spring break
and the proverbial "Bolt from the Blue" struck and I was head over
heels in love, as was she. (It's soooo nice that it happened that
way!!!!! :^) ) For the past year, I've been walking on cloud 9,
and I hope I never have to come down.
I think Gale in .7 hit the nail on the head. Communicating is very,
very important. Not just "getting caught up" on day-to-day things,
but where WE'ER going, what OUR dreams are, and how we feel about
anything.
Trust is important too.As is wanting to work at the relationship.
It's very hard to cope sometimes, but all I have to do is call and
hear her voice, and everything is ok. And I don't think there is
anything that we can't work out together. That helps with dealing
with being physically apart, too. The phone takes away the physical
distraction over, say, looks, money, status,etc., and let's you
get into the person themself.
Sorry to go on and on. You all caught me missing her and it's so
nice to have you here to help. Thanks!!!!
Kevin J.
Ps- The phone bills and plane tickets are murder!!!!!
|
198.19 | Frendship - ok, Relationship - NO WAY | NANOOK::SCOTT | Looking towards the sun | Sun Feb 08 1987 01:54 | 30 |
|
I have to agree with Sandy on the stress of a Long
Distance relationship. It's hard emotionally and for me, I
tended to ignore the traits of the woman I was dating. I
was working at a customers site and flying home every two
weeks to a month for a weekend. This went on for about 1
1/2 years. We ended up married but I soon found out that I
didn't marry the woman I thought I was dating.
I found I didn't know anything about her until it was
too late. I had thought of postponing the wedding but she
was so set on it, I just didn't have the heart. Should have
listened to my feelings. I should have spent the time to
get to know her better.
I don't think you can get to know someone by seeing
them once in a while no matter how well you communicate thru
letters or phone. You've got to have that time together and
I feel the best way is to live together before making that
decision. For myself, I'ld rather forget the relationship
if it has to be Long distance. If you're willing to make
the commitment to get married then you should be willing to
move together and postpone the marriage until you're sure -
even if it means moving across country or across state.
The sun doesn't shine thru clouds of distance.
Lee
|
198.20 | one case | CGHUB::CONNELLY | Eye Dr3 - Regnad Kcin | Sun Feb 08 1987 22:19 | 16 |
|
A friend of mine got married when he was in grad school near
San Francisco to a woman who was going to grad school around
Los Angeles. (For the benefit of any Taxachusetts-ian who
has never looked at a map of anything west of the Connecticut
River, that is a LONG way.) They had known each other (long
distance) before grad school too.
After 3 years of school and visiting on weekends, they finally
both graduated and got to live together. A year or so later
they were getting divorced!
Maybe the moral of this is that relationships that thrive in
long distance mode (for instance, many famous correspondences)
will wilt under the heat of living in close proximity, and
possibly vice versa.
|
198.21 | From an anonymous noter. | VAXRT::CANNOY | Go where your heart leads you. | Fri Feb 13 1987 12:20 | 29 |
| I am posting this for someone who wishes to remain anonymous.
********************
I've been involved with someone on the opposite coast of the US for
over a year now. Being separated doesn't really cause me any stress.
This must be partly because I enjoy my own company enough to like
spending time alone, and partly because I'm involved in so many
activities that I rarely have a free evening.
This kind of affair can really sharpen your sense of living in the
present, which I think is a good thing. You know that even if it
lasts a long time it almost certainly can't last forever, and you
have to enjoy it for what it is.
And it works! It's wonderful! I'm not looking for anything different!
I don't imagine it's for everyone, but like any situation you find
yourself in, you have to make the best of it.
Right, trust and communication are important. We keep up with each
other's day-to-day lives by electronic mail and by keeping running
letters going. Keeping up a correspondence with someone close can be
therapeutic, the way keeping a diary is therapeutic. Our phone bills
are higher than they would be otherwise but not outrageous, and if I
weren't spending money on plane tickets I'd probably be spending it
on something else!
|
198.22 | It can be done and it's GREAT! | HOMBRE::CONLIFFE | Store in a horizontal position | Mon Feb 16 1987 15:42 | 28 |
| Long distance romance has worked for me in the past.
Once upon a time, somewhere around a decade ago, I fell in love with
a woman who lived in West Berlin, Germany. At the time, I was living
in Biel, Switzerland, and commuting to Eberswalde in East Germany via
West Berlin.
I spent a couple of happy months with her in West Berlin (spread out over
about a year); we wrote to each other and phoned each other, and enjoyed
each others company even though we were apart for much of the time. We traded
recipes, we went to see the same movies (although not together, of course) and
compared notes on them, we exchanged recommendations for books to read, etc
etc. We got to know each other really well (mentally) and, when we could, we
got to know each other physically.
Then I moved to Montreal, Canada, and we continued the relationship from
there. Of course, we didn't get together as much, but we had lots of fun
when we did. And we shared some marvellous descriptions of the way we both saw
the world.
I still have some of the letters from her, and I'll treasure them always
in a little private part of my heart.
So a long distance romance can work. The only major difference that I saw
between this and a more local relationship is that it's a little unrealistic to
expect or demand fidelity in such a situation!! E.G.
"Have you been faithful to me?"
"Oh yes, lots of times!!!"
Nigel
|
198.23 | Hoping for the best! | SZOFNA::MLONGO | | Wed Feb 18 1987 02:46 | 2 |
| As I am about to embark on one, I'll keep you all informed!
|
198.24 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Tue Apr 28 1987 16:08 | 24 |
| I had an experience some years ago. A friend of mine from high
school, who I had a *serious* crush on, got in touch with me at
college. He was living about 6 hours drive away. He visited me
once a month for about 4 months, and this to me was enough to make
him my SO. He then moved to about an hour away, and saw me on most
weekends. Unfortunately, he was very different from what I had
anticipated, as he came out to see me more and more often, or I
went to see him. He was involved in some things I did not approve
of (namely taking powerful drugs often), and he began to show some
character traits that I had not seen at a distance. Honestly, I
began the relationship with every intention of making it last, but
as I grew to know him more, over the following few months, I did
not see what I had expected. He did not talk a lot about the
relationship, so I did not know what his intentions were.
Unfortunately, just as I decided to start seeing him as a friend
only, he decided to tell me he expected we'd get married....ouch
(on both parts).
Truth be known: make SURE you know the person well, know their
intentions, and keep the lines of communication open. Relationships
don't take care of themselves, especially as the miles are long,
and the time together is short.
jody
|
198.25 | Moved by moderator | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Tue Sep 22 1987 23:32 | 77 |
| ================================================================================
Note XXX.0 LONG-DISTANCE LOVE AFFAIRS 5 replies
CSMADM::GOINS 17 lines 21-SEP-1987 16:44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My name is Kim and I am involved in a Long-Distance Love Affair
with a guy who is on TDY (Temporary Duty) in Thule Greenland for
a year. We communicate by cassette and letters and he calls me
every Monday for 10 minutes. We are planning to relocate
together when his year is up. He gave me his Grandmothers
diamond about a month before he left and asked me to marry
him, but then backed out 10 days later. He said he didn't
think it was fair of him to ask me to wait a year. I've know
him for 7 years. We were best friends first.
Anyway, I was just curious if anyone out there is or has been
involved in a long-distance love affair and how they deal with
it.
Any feedback will be appreciated!
================================================================================
Note XXX.1 LONG-DISTANCE LOVE AFFAIRS 1 of 5
PLDVAX::ZARLENGA "I'm Jack, Phil's brain is on hold" 0 lines 21-SEP-1987 17:18
-< only if he can dance and weave his chest hairs ! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Note XXX.2 omitted]
================================================================================
Note XXX.3 LONG-DISTANCE LOVE AFFAIRS 3 of 5
SSDEVO::YOUNGER "This statement is false" 28 lines 21-SEP-1987 21:29
-< Yes. I don't learn from one experience. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I have been involved in long-distance love affairs before.
If it's more than short term (about 3 months), I no longer believe
they work.
The first time was while I was in college. We had been in love
previously (we had known each other since grade school). It was
for certain a long-term long-distance thing. Eventually, phone
calls and letters became fewer and shorter, then disappeared entirely.
We still call each other occasionally, but it was too hard keeping
up the emotional closeness when we were over 1000 miles apart.
The second (the one that worked) was with someone I had gotten to
know in college. However, it was known from the beginning that
the separation was only until he graduated at the end of summer.
Only about 3 months of separation. We lived together for 4 years,
then broke up for reasons I won't discuss here.
The third was someone I met through DEC, we exchanged Mail, talked on
the phone, talked on VAXphone, visited each other, fell in love...
But, alas, separation makes the heart fonder - OF SOMEONE ELSE! Seems
to have been true for both of us, but more me than him, and it fizzled,
but we remain friends.
All in all, I think it is a pretty nice way to break up, but no
way to continue a relationship over a long period of time. Can
be exciting though.
Elizabeth
================================================================================
Note XXX.4 LONG-DISTANCE LOVE AFFAIRS 4 of 5
NFL::GOINS 7 lines 22-SEP-1987 09:31
-< Ooooooops! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEVE,
Sorry about the duplicate topic, will continue my replys
on the original note (#198).
P.S. Phil, very observent of you!
[Note XXX.5 omitted]
|
198.26 | My experience | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Tue Sep 22 1987 23:38 | 20 |
| I started this note when I had just begun a long-distance romance.
It all went well until she backed out of our plan to have her move
close to me - saying she just couldn't do it, and didn't know when,
if ever, she'd be able to do so. I could handle a definite waiting
period of months, but to have it stretch out indefinitely into
the future was more than I could take.
We still care for each other, but the passion is gone. The miles
are just too much of a gap to allow us to continue this way for
a long time. (And it is not possible at this time for me to move
to be with her.) We part as friends.
It is very sad and very painful. I will not enter into another
long-distance relationship and advise against it for anyone else.
For a few months, if you know each other well already, it can
be handled, but especially for a new relationship, you tend to
rush into commitments in an effort to bind the two of you together,
and it rarely works out in the end.
Steve
|
198.27 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Miracle and Magic! | Sat Oct 03 1987 01:39 | 53 |
| Until recently, I've been out of H_R since about the beginning
of the year. I haven't even attempted to get caught up, but I
was pointed to this note by #407. Long distance romances seem
to be my fate.
The first woman I ever had serious feelings for (other than my
kindergarten crush) came from Iowa, and I met her when I was
Salzburg, Austria for a month back when I was 15. Arlene managed
the almost impossible feat of being even more shy than I was,
and when we parted after the month, we never kept in contact.
My second great love came in my senior year of high school. She
was from a different town, and our first date was her senior prom.
The next fall, I commuted to Boston for school (Northeastern),
while she went out to UMass-Amherst. While now I consider that
distance a walk in the park, at the time it seemed like the other
side of the world. Things only went a few more months before she
found someone else there at school.
About ten years ago, I started getting involved with a crowd of
people in Minneapolis (why and how would take too long to explain,
and it's irrelevant here), and started making lots of trips there,
usually about 3-4 per year. My friendships with some of the women
there blossomed into something serious. One of them and I have
been an "item" for the last seven years.
It's rough. Actually, it's more like hell at times. I've been
wanting to move to Minneapolis almost since I started visiting
there, but for one reason or another, I haven't managed it. For a
long time, Karen's and my relationship has been as satisfying as
can be expected under the circumstances, but the strain has been
telling the past couple of years. It's interesting to see a pre-
vious reply point out something that I've observed about this
relationship. At the beginning, everything was fast and furious,
the phone bills were huge. As time wore on, things slowly faded.
Where we used to talk at least one a week, now it's more like once
a month, if that. We've talked not a few times about calling it
quits because it doesn't look like we're going anywhere. Since this
past spring, it seems to be over for all practical purposes. The
only thing left is to "officially" acknowledge it.
But it seems I never learn. Even as my relationship with Karen is
in its final death throes, I'm finding myself getting involved
with another woman over a large distance, an even larger distance
at that. At least with Minneapolis, I could drive there for a
weekend. Will this one work? Maybe yes, maybe no. I'll never find
out unless I try. So far, it seems to be going fine.
As hard as they are, I still won't pass by a possible relationship
just because it's long distance. You never know --- that long
distance lover may just be the Right Person.
--- jerry
|
198.29 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Miracle and Magic! | Tue Oct 06 1987 01:36 | 31 |
| re:.28
It's only a game *if you LET it* be a game.
Certainly, you have no control over what the other person says or
does. If the other person wants to play it as a fantasy, then you
have to either accept it, or quit. No doubt there are some people
who think of a long distance romance as just a variation of phone
sex. Well, there's really nothing you can do about that.
My current long-distance relationship started out as a simple
exchange of friendly discussion, with a little casual flirting.
When I started to realize that things looked like they might be
getting serious, I asked her straight out what she was feeling
about what was going on with us, whether where we were going was
where we wanted to be. I had had a coupl eof bad experiences
before with non-communication and deliberate mis-communication,
and I didn't want that to happen again. Talking it out helped a
great deal, and paved the way for a much stronger relationship.
The worst thing you can do in a relationship --- long distance
*or* short --- is to assume that the other person's thoughts and
feelings about your relationship is the same as yours.
You apparently got burned one time. I'm sorry that happened,
but you should remember that that can happen in a short-distance
relationship just as easily. I certainly don't advocate long-
distance romances, but I don't feel that one should necessarily
avoid them at all costs, either.
--- jerry
|
198.30 | 2,000 miles is too long | CLOSUS::WOODWARD | I'm FALLing for Colorado | Tue Oct 06 1987 11:11 | 17 |
| This is a long-distance relationship story with a happy ending. 8^)
In January, I met a man who lived in Colorado while I was living in
Massachusetts. We fell in love, to put it simply, and realized that the
distance between us was a frustrating barrier. We sent Mail, both VAX and
Postal Service, and we had some lovely phone bills. We wanted to be together,
so we decided to do something about the distance.
I decided to move to Colorado. At first it seemed I didn't have a chance at
getting a job at CXO. Then, a manager made a position available for me. By
July, I was a Coloradian, with a new job at DEC.
It's so nice to be living down the street from my fiance instead of 2,000 miles
away. We are so happy to be together and we really believe that there were
strong forces that made our relationship possible. The chances of everything
working out smoothly were slim, but we made it!
|
198.31 | I break rules and keep the comm lines open! | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | An Elfin Miracle! | Tue Oct 06 1987 12:34 | 18 |
|
Though it's certainly not the rule, long distances romances *can* succeed,
but it's up to the two people involved to make it work. It depends a lot
on attitudes and expectations, and (my favorite subject) trust and respect.
I'm involved in a long distance relationship right now and I'm not about to
quit just because the odds are against it working out. This is not a game
to me. There are real feelings involved. Plans are being made, dreams are
coming true. He wants to make this work and so do I!
But if he sincerely decided it wouldn't work, I'd have to let him go. I
can't *make* him love me or hang in there. And vice-versa. A relationship
is a relationship whether it's close to home or miles away. It's what people
do with it that makes it count.
Regarding the here and now, my soulmate and I are beating the odds.
***Carol***
|
198.33 | here's a good one for you | SWSNOD::DALY | Serendipity 'R' us | Wed Apr 13 1988 19:07 | 21 |
| I have recently married a man whith whom I have had a long dist.
romance for 13 years. After we announced our plans, people would
ask me "Are you going to move down there, or is he going to move
up here?" to which I would answer flatly "NO". Why should we go
and change around a situation that has worked out so well for so
many years? We live three hours apart, but see each other nearly
every weekend and have for all of the 13 years.
To be honest, I think the reason that we didn't marry long ago is
because we both expected the miles that separate us to pose a problem.
It took us 13 years to figure out that just wasn't so. We have
never been "into" forceing each other to do anything we didn't want
to do (just by our nature). Even when we started talking about
tieing the knot, we decided that if we decided not to get married
it meant just that. It didn't mean we'd break up. That was a great
way to take all pressure off the decision. That's how I know it
was the right one.
It can work!
Mairon
|
198.34 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Send in a daemonologist | Thu Apr 14 1988 02:28 | 2 |
|
Is that 3 hours driving, flying, or walking?
|
198.35 | | SWSNOD::DALY | Serendipity 'R' us | Thu Apr 14 1988 17:26 | 11 |
|
RE: .34 by RANCHO::HOLT
Three hours driving - done mostly by him. I hate to drive and he
tells me that he doesn't mind. At first when he said that, I didn't
believe him. I figured the drive would get mighty old after a while,
but he still does it nearly every week end without complaint.
During his "busy season", which is Sept and Oct, I do drive down
nearly half the time, but I hate it.
Marion
|
198.36 | N.Y. & N.H. | HYSTER::THEIL | Geez Dehr!!! | Tue May 31 1988 17:02 | 36 |
| My long distance relationship didn't start out that way. Carl and
I met over 4 years ago at work (not DEC) in N.Y. We fell in love
and dated for 2 years. Things were not going very smoothly and
I was realizing that I needed time and space. I moved to N.H.
in Sept. 86, Carl remained in N.Y.
We kept in touch but I kept reminding him that I only wanted to
be friends (even though I knew I hadn't stopped loving him).
I did a lot of things, a lot of growing and experiencing things
I had never been exposed to.
Carl asked me to marry him this past April and I was never so happy
to accept anything in my life. The distance between us gave us
time to grow and figure out what was really important in our lives.
I am not saying that this is true for everyone, but if the love
is real, then yes, it can work!!!!
We see each other twice a month (he drives up one weekend and I
drive down the other). Friday's are wonderful when I know I will
see him and Sunday's are not depressing at all because the week
ahead only means that I have time to myself to do things for myself
and so does he.
We are getting married next July. I will be moving back to N.Y.
but we'll hopefully only live there for a year or two.
This is true for Carl and I:
If you love something, set if free.
If it comes back to you, it is yours.
If it doesn't, it never was!
Denise
|
198.37 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Tue May 31 1988 20:54 | 12 |
|
Or if it doesn't then hunt it down and kill it.. :-) (only
JOKING!)
Question Denise, now that you're used to your weekends by
yourself, how hard do you anticipate it to adjust to married
life? (coming home to the same person all the time rather than
yourself) Just curious how you and others would handle it seeing
as how today, many people "need" thier space. Including me.
mike
|
198.38 | I like your little addition to that poem, Mike... | HYSTER::THEIL | Geez Dehr!!! | Wed Jun 01 1988 09:30 | 20 |
| RE .37
Good question Mike. I have given it a lot of thought. I have had
total freedom for two years now. Part of the reason why I felt
I wasn't ready for marriage was that need for total freedom. I
am not saying it's easy to give up some of my time to myself, but
what makes it easier is knowing that my fiancee is a lot like me
and needs some space of his own too. We both have very busy lives
with work and other activities, so we understand each others need
to have some time for ourselves (by ourselves).
I never thought I would be saying this but, when you are really
in love with someone, it isn't as big a sacrifice as you think.
You both have to be willing to let the other person breathe. If
you can't breathe, you will suffocate!
Just some of my thoughts,
Denise
|
198.39 | renewed interest after separation doesn't work | VIDEO::OSMAN | type video::user$7:[osman]eric.vt240 | Wed Jun 01 1988 11:00 | 16 |
| Denise, in your case, the separation, time, and distance, allowed
something to shift in one or both of you so that now you'll get
along well when back together.
In my case this has never worked. Whenever I've separated from
someone with whom things weren't working, yes, I've often felt
a renewed interest for the person. However, whenever we act
on that renewed interest and get back together, the same problems
come up again.
In my experience, I can't trust renewed interest as a sign of
improvement. The only true improvement is that which we can create
somehow while staying together. If we can create improvement
WITHOUT leaving each other in a separation, then we've got something.
/Eric
|
198.40 | Time and Space | HYSTER::THEIL | Geez Dehr!!! | Wed Jun 01 1988 12:29 | 24 |
| RE: .39
Eric, I understand and agree with you. But, in my case
it's not "renewed interest" that put it all back
together. Neither of us ever lost interest. I always
knew in the back of my mind that I loved him and really
didn't want to lose him. I really took a chance by moving
away. I could have lost him forever. That time and
space was a challenge for us both and fortunately it
worked for us instead of against us. It gave us a
chance to see what is really important...namely,
the other person! We are much more sensitive of each
others feelings. I am not saying that all of the old
problems are gone. I'd be lying if I said we have no
problems. I am saying that because of the "growth"
period we've had, we can both deal with them on a much
more mature level.
I realize how fortunate I am and am very grateful for
that!!
Denise
|
198.41 | Glad you liked the addition to the poem.. :) | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Thu Jun 02 1988 00:02 | 10 |
|
Sounds like you took a hell of a chance Denise.. I'm glad
it has paid off for you.. And I agree with you. Myself,
I NEED my time by myself but when I become involved with someone
I really like and end up loving, I tend to like to spend time
with them and not need "all that time" by myself.. Just when
things get hectic or are going fast.. I hope I can adjust as
well as you are hoping too when the time comes for me.
mike
|
198.42 | Another Happy Story (so far) | CURIE::LEVINE | Insert Witty Remark Here | Wed Jan 04 1989 17:30 | 65 |
|
I realize that this topic has been quiet for a while, but it's so near
and dear to my heart that I couldn't resist replying.
I met Neal ten months ago (March), and knew two things off the bat -
that we would have a significant long-term relationship together, and
that he would be going to Medical School in Albany in the fall (I live
in Boston). Did the fact that he would be moving make me think twice?
Absolutely not!!! This was not the kind of opportunity to pass up!!
We had five months together in Boston before he left. A couple of months
before he left, reality (and panic) struck. The worst part was that he
was starting his first year, and neither of us knew what to expect.
Albany is only 2 1/2 - 3 hours from Boston, which we knew was manageable.
The big question was how much time Medical School would take up for him
(as you can imagine, it's alot).
Our greatest fear was that the relationship would stagnate and we would
grow apart. I'm happy to say that the exact opposite has happened, and
we're growing closer and closer together :-). The notes I've read about
LDR's have all mentioned them being basically tough, and more often hellish.
I'll second that! I'm not a person who needs tons of time to herself, in
fact, spending alot of time with my SO is very important to me. Before
meeting Neal I would have loudly asserted that long distance relationships
were not for me! But as hard as this one is, it's worth it!!!!
We talk every night, which is a little expensive, but in my eyes necessary
to the relationship (always after 11 pm - that helps alot). Keeping in
touch with each other's daily life is incredibly important - it really
helps keep us close. We never have to become re-acquainted since we're
each other's chief confidants.
I go out to see him most week-ends I can, when he doesn't have impending
exams (works out to every other week-end or more on an average). Even
then it's frustrating, as he has to study all day Saturday and Sunday.
I'm getting to know Albany awfully well, run all my week-end errands there,
and usually get more done than I do at home. Sometimes he gets to comes
home, but overall the strain of Medical School makes things an order of
magnitude tougher. Still - our visits are wonderful.
What I'm trying to say, as many of the replies do, is that IT CAN WORK!!
I realize that five months is not a huge amount of time, but our relationship
has actually gotten better as time has gone on. If you really love, trust,
and communicate with your SO, there's no reason why distance has to put an
end to a romance. It certainly is a huge strain, but like anything difficult,
you're closer and have a much stronger relationship if you make it through.
I can't believe that I have 3 1/2 more years until he's done with med school.
I have no idea how things will go, but my advice to anyone considering a
long distance relationship is that if you're really serious about the
other person, or think that you may become so, go for it! It is not easy,
and to me it doesn't make sense to put yourself through it if there isn't
a time in sight when you can be together (the proverbial light at the end
of the tunnel - I'm living for this summer when we'll both be in Boston).
Sometimes it's so hard that I wonder why I'm putting myself through it,
but every time that I'm with him, or talking with him, I know that I don't
want anything else. :-}
If your about to embark on a long distance relationship - take heart. As
the other replies have already said - things could end wonderfully. :-)
- Sarah
|
198.43 | Keeping up the confidence | QUARK::HR_MODERATOR | | Sat Jan 14 1989 11:28 | 40 |
| The following note has been contributed by a member of our community who
wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by mail, please
send your message to QUARK::HR_MODERATOR, specifying the relevant note number.
I'm having problems dealing with a long distance relationship. If
there's anyone out there that can give some helpful hints on how to
cope better, I'd appreciate your input.
My boyfriend is in the Service, in November he got stationed down south
for a couple years. We have been seeing each other a little over a
year now but became have become more serious over the last 6 months.
By the time he left, we knew that we cared about each other enough to
continue the relationship and there had been slight talk of marriage in
the future. I felt confident enough when he left to be able to hold
out until we were both ready for marriage or at least ready for me to
join him. I knew we both still needed more time to be sure that was
what we wanted. We call each other a couple times a week (major phone
bills!!!!) and I visited him a Christmas time. My problem is keeping
that confidence. We both agreed not to see anyone else and I don't
have a problem with that, its being able to stop all the crazy
thoughts that go though my head. I wonder if I'm wasting my time,
because there's no definite plans for the future. Sometimes I get
frustrated because I don't even know the next time we'll be able to see
each other although we've made tentative plans for the end of Feb. but
between our schedules we don't know if we'll actually happen. I don't
know, there's all kinds of barriers.
Enough of the sob story, I'm sure there's people going through much
worse situations but if anyone has any suggestions, please help me out.
I think I'm causing myself unnecessary worry and confusion but
sometimes this situation gets to me.
Thanks
|
198.44 | GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | SSDEVO::GALLUP | No guts, no glory....swish,swish...splat! | Tue Jan 17 1989 20:07 | 70 |
|
GOSH!!!!! I sure now THIS problem like the back of my hand!
I've been through three serious long distance relationships
that have failed miserably because one or the
other of us gave up because the "craziness" was just too
much. I DON'T want to discourage you because long-distance
relationships can perhaps be the strongest kind of
relationship, but they are D*MN HARD!
You worry about how the other person is doing when you don't
here from the in awhile, you get upset over the fact that you
don't know when you will get to see each other again, you
pocketbook suffers tremendously (i'm still in severe debt)
cuz of plane tickets and phone calls, you work yourself up
into a migraine cuz there is no definate end in sight to the
separation... These are all feelings I had when I was going
through the same thing...
After the last relationship I re-evaluated the whole thing
and decided that to make it work again I would have to take one day
at a time, enjoy the time together but NOT let the time apart
upset me, look forward to the little things (like cards and
letters and small presents) because those are the BIG things
in relationships like this, understand that the man in my
life would be going through the same things I would.
ABOVE ALL------TALK! If you feel like crying to him, DO
IT... let him know you're feeling crazy and unsure and all
that...tell him the little things mean a lot and understand
that he needs the little things too. The ability for the two
of you to communicate has to be so much stronger than a
normal relationship because THAT IS ALL YOU HAVE!!!! Develop
the lines of communication...and it doesn't have to be
expensive... a stamp is only $.25. Also, don't let your
frustration frustrate you even more...don't let the crazy
feeling make you more crazy....let it go...let it happen!!!
Realize that it is going to be a part of your relationship
and that will make you stronger...talk about it...
Also, the worst thing you can do is revolve your life around
him...get out with friends, do things, be what you want to
be. I know that I spent too many nights sitting at home
waiting for that phone to ring...it only makes matters harder
to bear...
-----
Gosh...I make it seem like it is soooooo hard to get through
a long distance relationship, but I'm not going to lie to
you... IT IS!!!! But I think you already understand that.
I'd also like to state that I've been through one more long
distance relationship (after the first three) that was a
resounding success... (we parted friends after finally being
together...and are still best friends today). You are going
through something VERY TOUGH....but if you take it for what
it is, and live it day by day without frustrating yourself
over the future, you'll make it so much easier, as well as
make you so much happier...
I bid you good luck...its a hard road, make no mistake about
that, but if you make it through, your relationship will be
so much stronger for it...
kath
(PS: call me funny, but right now I'm contemplating another
long-distance and I kinda rather like the idea...its very
tough, but the close feeling you get when you know you've
made it through makes me know its worth it...)
|
198.45 | they can work | DPDMAI::BEAN | endnode on the ethernet of life | Sun Jan 22 1989 21:35 | 37 |
| hi...
don't know if i can help or not... but, we'll give it a try.
getting involved in a LDR makes certain (i think, unusual) demands
on you...on both of you. there is the obvious separation, and all
the stress it brings; but there is the (not so obvious) requirement
that you understand some things about yourself that you might not
be normally aware of.
you sound young (from your letter) and that might work against you.
i don't mean to make overly broad generalizations here, but youth,
with all its blessings, also brings a certain amount of impatience
and lack of self-knowledge. i believe that for a LDR to be successful,
both parties must KNOW what they want from the relationship...and
be honest with themselves and each other with that knowledge. young
people frequently don't have the experience to KNOW this. a LDR
also requires a degree of openness that normal relationships frequently
do not enjoy. this has nothing to do with age or experience. but
it has a lot to do with KNOWING what you want and a willingness
to express that knowledge to your partner and admit it to your self.
kathy (re: -1) mentioned that you should continue to go out with
your friends and not close yourself in. i absolutely agree with
that. but, i would like to offer that your friends should include
both sexes. being able/willing to go out (say to dinner, or for
drinks) with a friend of the opposite sex may stress your partner,
so openness here is paramount. as is honesty and trust.
LDR's can work. they can be fun. they can be rewarding. they
can enhance your relationship.
but, they can alss be painful.
be honest with yourself first. do your best to be a true friend
to yourself.
tony
|
198.46 | Good Luck!! | CURIE::LEVINE | Insert Witty Remark Here | Mon Jan 23 1989 13:07 | 41 |
|
Hi. If you've read .42, you know that I'm also going through this. I
definitely understand what you mean about feeling confused. The question
"Why am I doing this to myself?" goes through my mind anywhere from once
a week, to once an hour. I love my SO, and it's really painful to not
have him around. It's hard to be sure that you're doing the right thing
by maintaining a long distance relationship when sometimes all you see is
that you're making yourself miserable.
One question that you have to ask yourself is whether your SO is worth the
frustration you're putting yourself through. It comes down to "I love him
enough to wait for him, even if the waiting is really hard," or "he's a
really nice person, but I want more from a relationship, and I'd rather find
someone who can give me what I need." I don't think that it's possible to
make this decision and never have to re-examine it. One of the things that
makes LDR's so tough is that there's almost always some doubt.
On the up side, a long distance relationship can work!!! You can really
grow from the experience. Not only will your relationship be stronger, but
you'll be a stronger person for having gone through it. And if this person
is really so special, the relationship is worth some temporary frustration
and unhappiness. How does it feel when you're with him? Could you see
yourself dating someone else? Would you want to? Is he being supportive
of you and sensitive to what you're going through? This is probably alot
tougher for you since he's in a totally new environment, while the only
change in your life is that he isn't there.
Above all, realize that feeling frustrated and confused is 100% natural.
Alot of the confusion can be alleviated by talking with your SO. It's only
fair that he know how you're feeling - you don't do him any favors by
pretending that things are hunky-dory. As to feeling frustrated, if you
figure out how to get around this one, please tell me!!! I think that it
just comes with the territory.
Good luck with this!! As I've also discovered, when people tell you that
it's tough, they aren't kidding!!!!
Sarah
PS - Feel free to send mail
|
198.47 | THANKS FOR THE REPLIES | MARKER::S_WILLIAMS | | Fri Jan 27 1989 15:40 | 26 |
| I want to thank you for your thoughtful replies. I'm glad I decided
to make the entry because your advice,opinions,ect really helped.
This is the first LDR that I have been involved in and I'm glad
to know that I'm not alone in my frustrations and confusion. My
boyfriend is very supportive and feels the same way. I actually
realized that we both felt the same way when I expressed my concerns
to him (one of your many suggestions) and he came out with his. It
was almost a relief. I quoted alot of what was said in here. He
doesn't know about notes file so I took the credit for some of the
insightful thoughts (He'll never know).
Usually I'm a pretty optimistic person, with the combination of
the replies, a little bit of optimism and a dash of faith, I know
we're going to be able to make it. Maybe making a statment like
that is what made .45 believe that I was young. I think its a combo
of be some what young (23) and never having to go through this before,
give me time, I may feel differently.
I read somewhere, I believe in the LDR file that "Tough times don't
last...tough people do". I loved it. I believe at this time of
my life, thats going to have to be my motto.!!
Thanks again
Sandie (unanonymously)
|
198.48 | yes, perhaps a long-distance romance in the making... | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Wed May 03 1989 18:03 | 30 |
|
o.k. thanks, I couldn't resist replying to this subject ("long distance
romances")
I have a friend in a DEC plant over 1000 miles away from here.
Is it a romance ? I guess it's getting closer to that, but I can't
say for sure.
I can only say I feel much for her, and what keeps me from feeling more
is my vulnerability.
We met when she wrote something in a notes file and I sent her mail
commenting on it.
We started sending mail back and forth, then started missing each other
even though we've never met.
Then we each sent our pictures, and we both were attracted to each
other.
I hope to meet her one day. We've toyed with the idea of just picking
a city and both flying there to meet.
L, I hope you're listening !
love, Eric
|
198.49 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Time to live your dreams... | Thu May 04 1989 11:09 | 8 |
|
ahhhhhh...the life and times of network romances! I think we
should write a novel! :-)
|
198.51 | one flight is better | YODA::BARANSKI | If it ain't simple, it ain't Love | Thu May 04 1989 13:12 | 5 |
| It's probably cheaper and simpler if one or you flies to the other and you
split the cost. One round trip twice the distance is cheaper then two round
trips half the distance and you will also have a place to stay.
Jim.
|
198.50 | Moderator confusion... | QUARK::LIONEL | The dream is alive | Thu May 04 1989 13:31 | 6 |
| I moved replies .48 and .49 from another note (47), to which I had mistakenly
moved .48 earlier. And I also removed from note 47 some replies which seemed
to be commenting on my confusion. My apologies to anyone who was
inconvenienced or confused (more than I was, that is!)
Steve
|
198.52 | Suuuurrrrrre!!!! | FDCV01::ROSS | | Thu May 04 1989 15:04 | 9 |
| Re: .50
Steve, your explanation is.....................er.............um,
a bit confusing. :-)
I'll ask for a clarification tomorrow night at the party. (Sometime
between my cigarette breaks.)
Alan
|
198.53 | long distance romancer/romancee | MUSKIE::GUNDERSON | | Sun May 14 1989 10:34 | 20 |
|
RE: .48
Eric,
I'm listening..........................
In reading some of the replies to your note, I think the best is
to fly to where one of us lives, but the plans are in the making
right?
As far as "long-distance romance in the making"........lets let
fate decide what the future holds. Theres always many, many
possibilities.
Boston - here I come!
"L"
|
198.54 | networking | MUSKIE::GUNDERSON | | Sun May 14 1989 10:41 | 12 |
|
RE: .49
I'm fairly new to the DEC world........tell me, do network romances
happen often?
Your suggestion on writing a novel sounds interesting and I have
heard of others meeting this way to which have been referred to
as "DECmates". I guess when you think about it, we seem to spend
more time at our place of occupation than we do at home.
|
198.55 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Why I'm here I can't quite remember | Sun May 14 1989 13:43 | 18 |
|
RE: .54
>tell me, do network romances happen often?
Words on a terminal are very seductive. Thru fantasies you
can imagine any sort of emotion behind someone's words. Yes,
network romances happen quite often. The problem is that
many people don't realize that fantasy and reality rarely are
ever the same...
attraction over the net rarely guarentees attraction in
person.
kath
|
198.56 | | GALACH::CONLON | | Sun May 14 1989 14:08 | 20 |
| Sometimes the network generates romances in unexpected ways...
My SO and I met over the net (and later we exchanged mail from
a great distance for a period of about a year, off and on, mostly
due to his interest in moving here for career reasons.)
There was no romance between us (only friendship) until he actually
moved here. Once we met and started dating, the year we had
known each other as casual friends through notes and mail really
made it *nice* for us (as a great friendship base to go with the
romantic part of the relationship.)
Now, we've been seeing each other for almost a year. The only
part that gets confusing is when his family asks when we "met."
(Well, we "met" in Notes almost three years ago, we "met" through
mail two years ago, and we "met" in person one year ago.)
The response he usually gets from that is - "Huh??" :-)
I don't even *try* to explain it to my family. :-)
|
198.57 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Sun May 14 1989 21:58 | 19 |
| there was a phenomenon a friend of mine told me about called
"compusex". It was two people, meeting each other through compuserve
or some other type of computer interchange, often for the sole purpose
of writing interactive of back-and-forth-electronic mail that was
sexually stimulating. Seldom did these people meet, though, since
they were often very remote from one another. I knew of at least
3 computers in the Boston area (Lola was the name of one of them)
which encouraged this. So yes, words on a terminal can be seductive.
Chances are, a lot of people here at DEC meet friends around the
country via computer. Some of them have been said to fall in love
before they even met......
But I think a long distance relationship via computer when you've
never met is very different from meeting, falling in love, then
moving apart....
-Jody
|
198.58 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Starfleet Security | Mon May 15 1989 00:07 | 14 |
| re:.54
Long distance romances certainly aren't very common, but I don't
think they're all that rare, either. One of the most exhilirating
things about a network romance is that one gets to know the inner
person without prejudices about physical appearance.
While this sort of thing has become more prevalent due to computer
networking, I hasten to point out that it happened even in the days
of low-tech. Back in the mid-1800's, the well-known poets Robert
Browing and Elizabeth Barrett fell in love via mail before they
ever met physically.
--- jerry
|
198.59 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Why I'm here I can't quite remember | Mon May 15 1989 00:22 | 16 |
| RE: .57
> ...or some other type of computer interchange, often for the sole purpose
> of writing interactive of back-and-forth-electronic mail that was
> sexually stimulating...
> ...So yes, words on a terminal can be seductive.
Words do not have to be sexually stimulating for them to be
seductive. Innocent, non-sexually stimulating exchanges
thru mail can in and of themselves be very seductive.
|
198.60 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Mon May 15 1989 00:50 | 6 |
| re: .59
> Innocent, non-sexually stimulating exchanges
> thru mail can in and of themselves be very seductive.
A very accurate observation, Kathy.
|
198.61 | Pandora's box opens to reveal... | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon May 15 1989 15:10 | 12 |
|
uh oh ! L, you're braver than I thought, revealing yourself in here
as the one about whom I was referring.
But yes, to answer your question, of course plans are in the making,
and we're looking forward to meeting in Boston and going to MV in June.
I'm scared, but looking forward to it at the same time. It's even
more scary now, since everyone can read these notes here. But if
I'm being honest about my feelings and intentions, what's to hide ?
/Eric
|
198.62 | a safe and secret place\ | IMAGIN::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Mon May 15 1989 16:25 | 16 |
| Meeting over the net seems a very acceptable way for people to get
to know each other. Certainly in the context Jody was refering to
it's the ultimate safe sex.
My problem is that I find myself relating to people more over the
net than in person. It's much easier to reveal yourself to someone
when you don't have to look at them. And there's a safety in not
having your appearance dictate who you are. It's ultimately
sterile though and if you never follow up with a meeting something
is missing.
RE: the Brownings. Emily Dickinson conducted almost all her
relationships through letters. She secluded herself and died a
virgin never having had a real life up close love. There's a
sadness in that. I sometimes worry that I'm investing myself in
electronic relationships to avoid real life in the same way. liesl
|
198.63 | it's just a fantasy...oh.oh.oh.oh! | DEC25::LITASI | Time and Tide | Mon May 15 1989 20:42 | 26 |
|
Good point Liesl! It is indeed very safe to have a network
relationship. You can transfer all of your desires to a
fantasy lover when a "flesh and blood" lover is too scary.
When I was separated, my primary social life was people
I met through notes. Yes, many were men ;^) (you know who
you are!) I just about fell in love a bunch of times.
I learned alot about myself this way, and kept from making
some mistakes because I couldn't physically act on the
impulses I had.
I also learned about heartache and intense longing for
someone who couldn't be there for me. He felt the same
and it had to end. Hopefully, we will always be friends.
Now I know that I am ready for a "real" person. I'm still
not ready for the ultimate committed relationship, but I'm
not living in a fantasy world anymore. Network Romance
or network "lust" as I now call it, can thrill and excite,
but is never as satifying as having a real person to hold
and touch.
Sherry
|
198.64 | I want it ALL!! | REGENT::NIKOLOFF | Long ago is not far away | Mon May 15 1989 20:55 | 7 |
|
oh, geez,,,,,I don't know Sherry, I kinda like them both...;^)
Mikki
|
198.65 | the network knows | SWSCHZ::GUNDERSON | | Mon May 15 1989 23:33 | 20 |
|
Sorry Eric, we've been found out..........
To those in reply:
One thing I can say safely (and it has nothing to do with sex) is
that it seems as though you can get to know someone from the inside
out through "networking" messages. After that, it doesn't matter
what they look like, as long as they've got what it takes inside.
Of course, in some respects we all react upon our sight, but my
cohort and I have sent pictures to each other and we seem to find
each other attractive - I honestly don't think it would really
matter at this point though.
Regarding "safe sex" via networking - this could prove to be
interesting (ha, ha). Boy has this conference taken a turn.
"L"
|
198.66 | Don't take it personally | QUARK::LIONEL | in the silence just before the dawn | Tue May 16 1989 01:41 | 41 |
| Having noticed that I started this topic some 2+ years ago...
The cynic in me says that you only THINK you are getting to know
the "inner person" over the network, but you're only seeing
a part of the whole person. What you are typically not prepared for
is that actually being WITH said person may shatter all of your
deeply cherished beliefs about your mutual compatibility. Sometimes
there's just "no chemistry", sometimes the reality of being together
in person brings to the forefront the fears that you were able to
safely pretend didn't exist. Sometimes you'll find you fell in love
with someone completely different than the person you met.
And sometimes it will work the way you want it to. But don't bet on
it.
Somewhere around .25 I wrote that I would never do it (have a
long-distance romance) again. And I didn't - until the next time,
that is. I have had a few since then. And I won't do it again
(until the next time :-))
Seriously, I've found I need more from a relationship than what
a long-distance romance can offer. And it keeps my phone bills
down too.
I no longer tell people not to go ahead with an LDR they are planning,
as all of the predictions of disaster just slide right off with a
"Oh, it's DIFFERENT for us!" I know, I've been there. I just say
"enjoy it but try not to take it too seriously." You have to learn
this lesson for yourself.
One of the advantages is that, for some people, it shows them that they
really do have the capacity for love. But if it doesn't work out, and
it usually doesn't, the sense of failure can be crushing.
A good book to read, not just for long-distance romancers but for
anyone who is looking for love, is "A Fine Romance" by Dr. Judith
Sills. I don't agree with everything she says, but one of her basic
tenets shines like a beacon. And it's what I've chosen for the
title of this note.
Steve
|
198.67 | open minded | MUSKIE::GUNDERSON | | Tue May 16 1989 11:31 | 11 |
|
RE: .66
Steve,
You seem to be rather against long distance romances. I guess I
feel that anything is worth a try (within reason). There's always
at least a friendship that come out of long distance "networking".
-Lynn
|
198.68 | | QUARK::LIONEL | in the silence just before the dawn | Tue May 16 1989 12:24 | 13 |
| Re: .67
No, Lynn, I am not against network romances. In fact I am for them. They
can make you feel wonderful, and you get to meet some really special people.
I just wanted to suggest that a lot of the things we tell ourselves about
LDRs aren't really true. But also that it doesn't matter.
I have no regrets whatsoever about the LDRs I've had. The friendships that
can come out of them can be wonderful.
Relax and enjoy yourself.
Steve
|
198.69 | give me reality or give me nothing | BSS::BLAZEK | dance the ghost with me | Tue May 16 1989 12:40 | 16 |
| Following what Liesl suggested about getting too acclimated to an
electronic means of communication, I've found that in my current
relationship with a non-DECcie, I've had some adjustments to make
regarding my communicado mindset. More than once I've had just a
millisecond of shock when I realize I can't send him mail to tell
him something or invite him someplace, that our communication is
entirely based on <drumroll> REALITY. It's tough getting used to
but I definitely prefer it.
No matter how well you think you know someone long-distance and/or
electronically, there's a world of difference between words on a
screen and sitting face to face with someone, whether that someone
is a romantic interest or not.
Carla
|
198.70 | liesl? No way... | YODA::BARANSKI | life is the means, love is the ends | Tue May 16 1989 13:27 | 10 |
| "RE: the Brownings. Emily Dickinson conducted almost all her relationships
through letters. She secluded herself and died a virgin never having had a real
life up close love. There's a sadness in that. I sometimes worry that I'm
investing myself in electronic relationships to avoid real life in the same way.
liesl"
liesl, I could *never* imagine vivacious you being anything like the above!
:-)
Jim.
|
198.71 | not restricted to DEC... | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Tue May 16 1989 14:50 | 10 |
| re: mailing to non-DECcie friends
I do that pretty often. It's the friends who aren't techno-weenies
I can't get through to. But I get mail from all over....MIT, Rutgers,
WPI, Berkeley, PR1ME, Apple, NASA, everywhere. The GATEWAYS notesfile
is great for finding pathways to just about anywhere you want to
go. Just keep the traffic down a bit and use NetMail% and you're
all set to talk to the world.
-Jody
|
198.72 | Gee, does this stuff really happen? | PH4VAX::MCBRIDE | Pikes Peak or Bust!!! | Wed May 17 1989 10:06 | 9 |
| So, he gathered up his courage, scheduled his vacation, bought the
ticket and made the plunge. He WENT to visit his Net Other. In
Denver, while waiting for the second leg of the jaunt, he got involved
in a conversation with the pilot of that filight and the cabin
crewchief. They asked what the nature of the business was at his
destination. He told them that he was going on a blind date. They
asked how that had happened. He told them about Vaxmail and Vaxphone.
As he was departing the flight at the destination, the cabin crew
chief handed him a gift wrapped bottle of Champagne.
|
198.73 | I love it | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Starfleet Security | Fri May 19 1989 05:18 | 7 |
| re:.72
� Gee, does this stuff really happen? �
God, I hope so. That story is too good to be untrue.
--- jerry
|
198.74 | A truer story never was told... | PH4VAX::MCBRIDE | Pikes Peak or Bust!!! | Fri May 19 1989 10:35 | 4 |
| Given the choice between a series of $150 phone bills and VaxPhone
the choice is easy to make. Thankfully, DEC hasn't figured out
a way to bill anybody for the net traffic. When they do...Noters
and remote relationships will suffer. Meanwhile...enjoy!
|
198.76 | | QUARK::LIONEL | in the silence just before the dawn | Fri May 19 1989 13:28 | 10 |
| Re: .75
And spoken hugs and kisses are no substitute for those given "in person".
You can feel wonderful while on the phone to your romantic partner, but
when you hang up, what have you got?
Still, there are benefits in long-distance romances, just as there are
hazards.
Steve
|
198.78 | I got it!!! | PH4VAX::MCBRIDE | Pikes Peak or Bust!!! | Fri May 19 1989 17:52 | 4 |
| re: .77
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! I LOVE it!!!!!!
|
198.79 | hugs and kisses | SWSCHZ::GUNDERSON | | Wed May 24 1989 21:24 | 16 |
|
RE: .76
> And spoken hugs and kisses are no substitute for those given "in
person".
You can make those "hugs and kisses" a reality-in person if your
willing to go the distance.
It all depends on the importance of the matter to you.
I know when I hang up the phone from an LDR - I have a good feeling
and a far-away friend.
-Lynn
|
198.81 | | SWSCHZ::GUNDERSON | | Thu May 25 1989 18:54 | 10 |
|
RE: .80
> Ah yes, so true.
So Mike.........lets hear some input :^)
-Lynn
|
198.83 | | SWSCHZ::GUNDERSON | | Fri May 26 1989 09:22 | 15 |
|
RE: .82
I like the way you put that - you seem to have an open mind to LDR's.
Something may come out of the situation and then again maybe not, but
at least if you try you'll never be asking yourself questions as to
what could've happened.
As I stated before, it all depends on the importance of the matter.
Thanks for the reply.
-Lynn
|
198.84 | an LDR will be an SDR for a few special days | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Fri May 26 1989 21:12 | 19 |
|
Hello Lynn and Mike and everyone else.
Yes, I'm still hear, all ears as it were.
I'm a firm believer in finding out.
So that's what Lynn and I are doing. Within a few weeks (yikes!) we'll
meet each other and see what happens.
Yup, it's scary. But I want to do it. I only know from talking with
Lynn that I feel good about her and about meeting her.
Whatever happens, we sure won't know by merely continuing to write mail
and talk on the phone.
So, here I come !
/Eric
|
198.85 | Never again - until next time | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Never in my wildest dreams... | Fri Jun 02 1989 19:00 | 21 |
| It's taken me awhile, but I'll add my $0.02 into this.
I'm now in my 4th LDR. After each one, I say "never again". What
this really means is that I won't do it again - until next time.
I've had mixed results from them. The first one - we were in school,
and didn't really have the resources to make it work. It eventually
died. What amazes me about that one now is that it *did* last 2
years. The second one actually worked. I graduated from college
before my SO did, so we were forced into an LDR for a time. We
made it work, he came to live where I did, and we stayed together
for another 3 years, then broke up for totally unrelated reasons.
The 3rd seems to be a standard "network romance", it was nice, then
I found someone I liked locally, and the LDR was gone. In some
respects, though, this one still worked. We're still good friends.
Now I'm into the fourth. The only reason I'm willing to do this
is because he seems to have most of the things I'm looking for in
an SO, and there are ways to get rid of the LD part, when it can
be arranged and we're sure enough about it to seriously work on
a relocation for one of us.
Elizabeth
|
198.87 | | IAMOK::KOSKI | If dreams came true, wouldn't that be nice | Wed Aug 02 1989 17:27 | 11 |
| re .86
How unique Notes are. You need only to make a pointer to a two year old
note.
That's sad to read, the ending of a 2 1/2 year relationship. I
certainly hope you don't regret moving to CO, you are staying aren't
you?
I guess it's time to try CO_SINGLES...
Gail
|
198.88 | :-) | SSDEVO::GALLUP | catching halos on the moon | Wed Aug 02 1989 17:58 | 7 |
|
>> I guess it's time to try CO_SINGLES...
YES! YES!! I wish someone would!
/kath_bored_COLO_SINGLES_moderator
|
198.89 | Japan<-->Boston = Long commute | WITNES::FUNK | Correspondence to XIBITA::MM_TEMP | Thu Aug 03 1989 11:51 | 31 |
|
Well, I noticed this note a long time ago, and I thought I might
enter in my own experience.
I'm a summer temp, working at Digital 4 summers straight now, trying
to make money for college, to which I will be returning in the fall.
My girlfriend of 10 months was accepted into a program abroad.
For the entire year. In Japan. We both met at school in Ohio.
She lives in Newport, R.I. and I outside of Boston. We spent much
time together at school and during the summer when we weren't working.
Of course, we wished we lived closer to each other, but the drive
and phone bills could be a lot worse.
I have no intention of ending the relationship because of distance.
I have never felt more happy, fulfilled and complete when I am with
her. I never thought love could be so good. She'll be in Tokyo
for 11 months, after that she'll come back to New England. I don't
have any delusions that the relationship with thrive, but it certainly
can't die unless we don't try to make it work. I have very high
hopes for us. I might even visit her!
This is only a temporary separation, we plan to be closer to each
other next summer. I can only say the above speaking for myself.
I believe I and she have the strength to make it. Many couples in
our situation might not. All the advice I can say is: Look into
yourself and perceive the situation. You must have confidence,
communication, and strength besides the love. I hope this note
gives strength to others embarking on a LDR.
/Greg Aharonian
|
198.90 | note of encouragment | EDSVAX::CONFSCHED | | Tue Jul 03 1990 14:03 | 23 |
|
It's been 11 months to the day since I wrote .89 and now I can give
you all an update which can be encouraging to others going
through a long-distance relationship.
Rachel and I are still together and she is now back from Japan.
The relationship survived the distance through _lots_ of communication,
both mail and telephone. There were some rough times, especially
the couple of months after she left the states. Luckly, she went
through crises when I was strong enough to help her & encourage her,
and vice versa. Having made it through the long distance (almost
11 months), we are both better people for it, being able to survive
distance, isolation, and loneliness. We both have matured, too.
She and I are still happy together, happy that the relationship
lasted because it is a great thing, and that we overcame distance
to be together. I plan to spend much time together this summer,
including tomorrow (the 4th).
I don't know if this helps anyone, but at least it is a happy ending!
/Greg Aharonian
|