T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
127.1 | My mother says... | MINAR::BISHOP | | Wed Oct 29 1986 19:08 | 8 |
| "Two refusals of dates means 'go away'", that's what she told
me. When I've gotten the second refusal, I've sometimes told
the woman involved what my mother recommended. Sometimes I've
been told she was right (good, then I know what's going on),
sometimes I've been told "No, don't go away" and have been
offered an alternate arrangement for a date (also good, right?).
-John Bishop, Old Wives' Tale Dept.
|
127.3 | Women...sigh... | ARMORY::MIKELISJ | Success is an Illusion... | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:11 | 11 |
|
> Did it ever occur to you that a
> woman can have a wonderful time with you (and still not
> want to see you again for reasons that are none of your
> business?)
Women are strange like that...:-)
-jim-
|
127.4 | I agree with Susan | ANT::WOLOCH | | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:26 | 18 |
|
Well said, Susan! (re: note 2). Women that say they enjoy the "first
date" are probably being honest. Don't assume she had a lousy time
just because she doesn't actively pursue you. MANY women feel very
threatened when after just one date a man is in HOT pursuit of an
other date with her. Some people need more space than others. Just because
a woman may have had a nice afternoon or evening with you DOES NOT
mean that she is ready to pursue a relationship with you.
It puts alot of pressure on the other person if you expect some
kind of explanation as to why she may not want to see you. There
are many people that just like to date, rather than develop a
relationship. (Of course if you were "involved" in a relationship
with her and she didn't want to see you, then she certainly should
provide you with an explanation!)
Just my two cents,
Nancy
|
127.5 | Shoe on the Other Foot | CSSE::HAKIM | | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:41 | 12 |
| Of course we have to consider the scenario the other way around
as well. There are many of us women, I am sure, who have gone out
on that first date, did have a very nice time, and then told at
the end of the evening..." I'll keep in touch" or "I'll call". Now
I ask, after a couple of weeks have gone by and the phone doesn't
ring, what does the woman do? She's really interested but also
takes the silence as.."he's really not interested"...should she
pursue him or leave it alone? Should she drop a gentle reminder
that she still exists or should she just drop it?
Ann
|
127.6 | It's just nice to know | SEDSWS::KORMAN | TGIF | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:47 | 10 |
| re .2 & .4
It's not so much asking for an explanation of *why* she doesn't want to see
you again, rather it is knowning the *fact* that she doesn't want another date
that is important (to me, anyway)
Dave K
PS of course, you can interchange he/she in all of this!
|
127.7 | A vote for old-fashioned honor | NOVA::BNELSON | The Stars My Destination | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:53 | 22 |
|
Now I'm really confused. I don't recall Steve saying ANYTHING about expla-
nations, or heavy pressuring. Merely that after seeing someone the first time,
he inquired if they would be interested in a second meeting and received some
sort of affirmative response. In my mind, a person should know at that point
whether they wish to do so or not. You shouldn't throw your gun lightly, but
once thrown you should stick to it! To later keep putting off a person with
excuses like, "I'm really busy" ( come on, who isn't?! ) or even worse to ig-
nore them is just low-down.
Steve, for what it's worth, I agree with you! I believe in honesty. I also
believe in keeping my word ( remember that old saying, "A man's word is as
good as his promise"? I think that should go for _everyone_! ); it's a
question of integrity. It's not much consolation, but I feel that if someone
treats me this way ( and some have ), then they aren't the kind of person I
would like to be with anyway.
Brian
|
127.9 | Honesty is the best policy | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Thu Oct 30 1986 10:00 | 19 |
| Re .6 and .7:
Thank you Dave and Brian, you read my questions correctly. I consider
myself an honest person, and try to be honest with everyone. Therefore
it hurts when someone isn't honest with me. As I said in the base
note, I'm not concerned with rejections - for which no explanation
is required, and I certainly agree with John in .1 that two rejections
should mean "give up" - but to be simply delayed indefinitely is
what is really aggravating.
Nancy, I understand quite well why someone would not want to have
a second date, and agree with your suggested reasons. I just wish
to be told "No", not "Later", if "No" is really what is meant.
I also see your point about intense interest - but that's hard to
predict in advance. Some people like it, and consider anything
less a sign of non-interest, others, like you apparently, don't
care for it. Fine. Just be honest about it, that's all I ask.
Steve
|
127.14 | Yes I would listen | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Thu Oct 30 1986 13:13 | 25 |
| Re .12:
Let me be more specific. The behavior that bothered me in
a specific instance was:
1. First, agreement that another date was desireable and
a general timeframe for such date.
2. At a later time, when I made several suggestions for
a next date over a period of a few days I got a "I'll call
you at such-and-such a time". No call.
3. Finally, after an inquiry in which I probably looked like
a fool, I was told "I'm busy - I'll get back to you in
two weeks."
4. Two weeks, three weeks later, nothing.
5. Five weeks later, a pleasant "hi" note, in which no mention
of asking for another date was sent. No response.
I never suggested that I insist on "iron-clad commitments". I only
believe in courtesy. It was probably the specific commitments to
contact me which were reneged upon that bothered me the most. A
simple "Sorry, I'm no longer available" would have been just fine.
On the whole, I'm probably too naive - I tend to believe what people
tell me. Maybe I should become more cynical and distrustful, and
play "the game" like most everyone else. How horrifying.
Steve
|
127.15 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Thu Oct 30 1986 13:27 | 20 |
| Re .13:
> Dear Suzanne... :-) What in blazes does THAT mean? Except in the trivial
> case where both folks work together and can easily interact by "doing
> lunch" once a week or so ... How DOES one remain a "friend" with women?
> We believe that unless she sees us as a potential "SO" ... somehow there
> is never any occasion to get together and the few that do occur become a
> stressful event for one or both parties ... 8^( We believe most women
> are too ego-centric to make _real_ friends - even for other women. )^8
Sorry, I must disagree. I find it very easy to have friends who
are women, with no romantic potential at all. I have several, with
whom I often talk about a wide variety of subjects, including
personal feelings, etc. Many men find it impossible to think of
women as anything but "sex objects", and vice versa. I like to
think of women as fellow humans, with varied experiences, backgrounds
and viewpoints. A close platonic friendship between a man and a
woman is very special indeed.
Steve
|
127.16 | EGOCENTRIC??? | ANT::WOLOCH | | Thu Oct 30 1986 13:32 | 31 |
|
FLAME ON to scorch your little tail feathers .13.
Women are too egocentric to make real friends??? (Re: YOUR quote)
Huh????
Why is it so difficult for you to accept the fact that a person
may go on a date, have a good time, but NOT want to develop a
relationship???
Some people go on a date, have a good time and then start to plan
their lives around the other person. It takes TIME to get to know
someone. And the other person may not feel the same way.
I don't seem why anyone should get so bent out of shape over ONE
date. If it is the first date, then you may not know the other
person very well anyway.
If I was on a date and someone said to me, "Thank you Nancy, I had
a wonderful time, but I don't want to see you again.", I'd be hurt.
But If we parted and he said thank you and I never heard from him,
I would simply think he had a nice time but he didn't want to
pursue anything. ITS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.
If two people like each other, then the communication continues
and that second date will effortlessly happen.
My two cents (again),
Nancy
|
127.17 | common courtesy | USMRW4::AFLOOD | BIG AL | Thu Oct 30 1986 13:45 | 33 |
| Wellllllllllll
I have had the opportunity to meet several women through the singles
notes. Although only one of them succeeded in becoming a second
date, several of them have turned into mail/notes friends whom I
converse with several times a week. I would prefer to be told if
the other doesn't feel compatible/interested in further meetings
right up front, because that establishes the situation very cleanly.
I also prefer to discuss with that person why they have those feelings
just so I can learn from the experience. Maybe I said or did something
that came across the wrong way - by asking I can understand and
be careful not to repeat same mistake again. Likewise if I went
out with someone and didn't have an interest in them I would be
very willing to discus the same with them.
I totally disagree with the eagle (sorry steve) about women being
ego centric. THey are no more so than the male population, maybe
even a little less. I haven't met any women who collect notches
on their bedpost, but sure have met many males who did.
Regarding Steve Lionel's point about the courtesies of reply to
date invitations. Plain human consideration should dictate that
a person would have the courtesy to either say no not interested
or yes I will get back to you and then get back to you. Sometimes
it is hard to read between the lines and recognize that someone
isn't getting back to you because they aren't interested and aren't
considerate enough to be honest up front with their feelings.
my two cents worth
al
|
127.18 | | REGENT::KIMBROUGH | gailann, maynard, ma... | Thu Oct 30 1986 13:47 | 41 |
|
I feel that a date is simply a time set aside for two people to
find out if indeed they are compatible.. if so they pursue future
dates if not.. then that should not be a big deal.. you went out,
hopefully had a good time even if you did not find each other
thrilling, met a new person, learned a little (again hopefully) and
that was that.
With the exception of two times in the years I have been dating
I have yet to go out on a date that I did not have a good time,
made the best of it even if it was not a person I knew I would
necessarily go out with again, and learned a little about a new
person.. good, bad or otherwise. Sure I have had my share of evenings
that were a real live flop but it only served to strengthen my
standards by which I judged the good by!!
Basically I think if you look at a date in its proper perspective
that you will always manage to make the best of it...
1. a date is a time set aside to interact with another person
and to see if there is any basis for future dates.
2. a date is also a time set aside to interact with another person
in order to access that there is NO basis for planning a future
date and to come to the decision that you would NOT want to
go out with this person again!!
Making up your mind not to take every date that failed to yield
future dates as a loss is a great stride toward boosting your self
confidence.. If you made the best of a time out with another person
than there is no reason to feel anything but happy about having
shared said time!.... I wonder sometimes if so much of
the rejection and pain people seem to experience after as little
as one date is that they are looking at every date they have as
a prospective relationship... just view it as a "getting to know
someone time" and nothing more and you find that you have nothing
to loose and everything to gain!
later, gailann
|
127.21 | ...plastics... | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis the Menace | Thu Oct 30 1986 15:41 | 20 |
|
Remember how much trouble Dustin Hoffman had in getting that second
date with Katherine Ross in "The Graduate"? Talk about persistance.
My wife-to-be and I went out together for several weeks before she
knew we were dating. I first met her at a Folklore Society hootenany
in Washington DC and invited her and her brother to a supper I was
organizing before an upcoming Clancy bros. concert. Then there
was a brunch I was organizing for some visiting dancers. Her folks
had just retired and moved back to Oregon so I also invited her, and
her brother, to my place for Thanksgiving dinner. Also present
were a girl from another folk dance group and another couple. My
w-t-b thought I was going with this other girl, but it was
all orchestrated as a way of getting to know her without setting
up any expectations. For all she knew I could have been interested
in her brother. We knew each other two months before we got engaged
and then got married five months later. That was almost fifteen
years ago and I haven't had a date since.
|
127.22 | Plain and simple... | HERMES::CLOUD | Life is a beach...SURF'S UP! | Fri Oct 31 1986 00:24 | 32 |
| re: .18...gailann's first paragraph
Thank you very much Gail...I think that says it all
in a nutshell. 'Nuff said!
<Minor FLAME>
This is a very hot subject, and I wanted to step in
there with my two cents just about every reply. Basically,
I don't think people should make such a big deal out of a first
date. If they don't want to go, they don't have to! The same
goes for the second date. If they feel pressure from someone they
don't know, then it's all in the mind!
I also don't think that Suzanne should make such sweeping
generalizations (I think it was her first reply) about how
women act or feel in general. Women are alike and yet wonderfully
different all at the same time...as are men. Your first date
should be an adventure in learning. The purpose of a date is
to get to know one another to the best of your abilities (as
I'm sure this has been said before in this topic)...PERIOD!
If there is a possibility for a second date, take it. This
goes for both men and women. If she/he does not want to go
out again, then drop it. It wasn't meant to be. That's not
counting all those (not us! 8> ) persistent individuals out
there that can't take no for an answer. Let 'em eat dust!
<Minor FLAME off>
Phil
|
127.26 | Rules? Why do there have to be rules? | NACHO::CONLIFFE | Boston in 89!! | Fri Oct 31 1986 09:03 | 36 |
| Dating is a game, one with well defined (if unwritten) rules and
conventions. If you are going to "play the game", then you should abide by
the same conventions and rules as the rest of the "players", otherwise you
are often going to be frustrated and disappointed.
No one (with the possible exception of those who make a virtue out of brutal
'honesty') likes to hurt another human being. Face it, rejection hurts -- it
hurts both the one rejected and the one doing the rejection. And refusing an
additional date is a particularly personal form of rejection, especially if the
first date was viewed as a success. That's why we (the human race) have adopted
various conventions and techniques by which the fact of rejection can be gently
assimilated by the rejectee without loss of face by either party.
Remember that the person doing the rejection doesn't want to hurt you, and
doesn't want to humiliate you. Equally, the person doesn't want to enter
into a pointless confrontation as to WHY they don't want an additional date.
Their goal is simple; they are trying to minimize pain -- yours and theirs!
And, if the person (with whom you are trying to make a second date) is
undecided, then repeated phonecalls and MAIL messages will probably annoy
rather than impress.
You know (as an aside), whenever I hear a paraphrase of the statement "All
I want is an honest answer", I am reminded of an old 'Perishers' cartoon
which I once saw. One of the ongoing situations in 'The Perishers' (a
British cartoon strip reminiscent of "Charlie Brown") was that Marion (the
little girl) was madly infatuated with Marlon (the little boy) who was not
in any way interested in Marion. In one notable strip, Marion has cornered
Marlon against a wall. She asks him
"Do you want to go out with me? I want a straight answer"
to which he replies,
"Well, honestly, NO"
She then hits him over the head and shouts
"PUDDENHEAD! That was the wrong straight answer!"
Nigel
|
127.27 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Fri Oct 31 1986 10:36 | 15 |
| Ok, let's forget "All I want is an honest answer." I'll settle
for "All I want is AN answer!" Many of the replies to this note
focus on my supposedly wanting a reason for rejection, which I never
asked for. I can deal with rejection just fine, thanks - I've had
enough practice. Rejection is NOT the subject of this note, but
my muddled text in .0 probably confused a lot of people.
I'm starting to agree with Suzanne's suggestion that one NOT try
to arrange for a second date while on the first. It's too easy
to make commitments you really don't want to keep. But if you do
get a request for a second date, don't say "Yes, but later" when
you really mean "No".
Steve
|
127.29 | Still in favor of honesty | NOVA::BNELSON | The Stars My Destination | Fri Oct 31 1986 11:32 | 39 |
|
Hmm, looks like Steve is giving up on me! :-) Can't say as I blame
him, though. As for myself, I still believe in honesty. Let's face it: to
say "Yes" when you mean "No" is an out-and-out lie. Whether or not the second
( or third, etc ) date takes place is not as important as how the other person
handles it. It makes me wonder, when someone does something like that: if
that person can't be honest with me, I wonder how honest they are with them-
selves... Of course, that's something only each person knows for him/her self.
As Steve said, we're not looking for reasons WHY the rejection is taking
place, no long explanations are necessary. Sure, I know it's tough to reject
someone; but if we're going to be fair in this ( something I admire greatly ), I
think it's only right that there be a little pain for each party. Why should
the rejectee do all the suffering?! To say, "Call me later this week" is just a
cop-out. It seems like most of the important things in life have some price
attached to them, and I think everyone should be willing to pay it. It bothers
me a lot less to have someone say, "Let's remain friends" than it does for
someone to lead me on.
Rejection, after it's happened a few times, isn't that bad. You just
say, "Ok, let's move on". No big deal. But at least in that situation you
KNOW where you stand; and I think that's the worst part of the other situation,
the not knowing where you stand. The feeling that you're drifting in Limbo is
not at all pleasant. Or fair. How is a person supposed to know?! Maybe you
really ARE busy! And are still interested in another date. That's what your
words say, even if your heart doesn't agree. I'll try a couple more times,
and then give up. It's just not worth my effort or time.
But, we're all different, and you can't expect everyone else to handle
things the same way you would. Wouldn't it be nice, though?! :-)
Brian
|
127.30 | DITTO!!! | NOVA::BNELSON | The Stars My Destination | Fri Oct 31 1986 11:42 | 16 |
|
RE: .28 --
Right!!! My sentiments exactly. Why should the number two equate to
"RELATIONSHIP"?! Sheesh, I just like to have a good time. If something hap-
pens, it happens; generally both people know it if it does. And if it doesn't,
companionship and good times are just as important. Thanks, Eagle, this was
something I meant to bring up but kept forgetting.
<sigh>...
Brian
|
127.32 | Desire is the nature of this suffering | VAXWRK::NORDLINGER | In a GALAXY far, far away | Fri Oct 31 1986 13:29 | 16 |
| > He said, "I'd ask someone else out."
> (Are we making this too complicated here?) He
> didn't seem to see the problem with any of that... :-)
I'm in agreement with this lad. The whole thing should
be taken lightly (he obviously was very well raised :^)
This contains many imbedded wisdoms. For example, if you're
not so serious you don't appear desperate; if your not so
serious you're more attractive. I'm not not claiming to
appear the clown but don't make things melodramatic. This
seems like it would be especially true if you're already
gifted with a fine wit as somemany of you have demonstrated.
|
127.34 | | MTV::FOLEY | Boom shacka-lacka | Sat Nov 01 1986 02:01 | 26 |
|
ahhhh, the infamous second date... Just ask at the end of the
evening! "I had a good time tonight, Would you like to go out again?"
If yes then say "Great! Me too! How about I call you sometime
this week and we work something out?" If NO is the answer then
you just say "WEll, thanks for a nice evening and it was nice to
meet you, goodnight" If you get the run-around then try calling
later.. I usually try a couple of phone calls and if it doesn't
look promising then I forget it..
As far as women as friends go, I don't know what I'd do without
them.. I find it harder to make MALE friends than I do women friends!
Having a completely platonic relationship with a woman is very easy.
Just treat them like you would like them to treat you. They ARE
different from male friends but they can be good friends..
On your first date act yourself. If a person can't accept you
for being yourself then they'll neither be a good friend nor good
relationship material. Yea, I'm a little more careful of what I
might say or I'll be very polite (as opposed to "just" polite :-))
but I won't be anything other than myself. I'm not interested in
people who won't accept me for what and who I am. (and the sooner
they get to know ME the better...)
mike
|
127.35 | Read between the lines | SMAUG::GARROD | Reagan left his brain in Hollywood | Sat Nov 01 1986 20:16 | 14 |
| Human Relations are strange precious things; that's what makes them
so much more rewarding than predictable concrete things. I find
myself heartily agreeing with the sentiment 'don't put somebody
through the pain of an explicit rejection when there was no committment
in the first place'.
If somebody is interested in persuing something you'll know it,
NOBODY is ever too busy to perue a relationship they want. BUSY
is always a codeword for NO.
I used to be a person that always insisted that things were black
or white, how one learns!
Dave
|
127.36 | Second verse, same as the first | CURIUM::JACKSON | | Sat Nov 01 1986 20:49 | 23 |
| There was a time when I was terrified to ask for a first date, for
fear of rejection. Eventually, I came to recognize when a person
was interested or not, thus minimizing the risk of rejection. Asking
for first dates became relatively easy.
Having lots of first dates, I came to find that the real problem
was not the first date, but the second date. Often, I'd have a good
time on a date, but then I'd really dread asking for that second
date, again for fear of rejection. Often I'd get the feeling of
why bother asking, I *know* I'm going to be rejected. But it's better
to know that to wonder, so I'd force myself to call and ask. I usually
found that the times when I was most certain of rejection, rejection
was what I got.
I've finally realized that there's a good reason for that. When
someone really likes you and wants to see you again, they let you
know one way or another. In this respect, second dates aren't really
much different from first dates. It's just that it hurts more to
be rejected for a second date because you've spent some time with
someone, developed some feelings for that person, and made a bit
of an emotional investment.
--
Seth
|
127.37 | I truly am *busy*... | ANYWAY::GORDON | Random Emotion Generator | Sat Nov 01 1986 22:46 | 21 |
| re: .35
I would disagree that BUSY == NO...
For example, no matter who (how beautiful, rich, famous...)
tried to get a date with me next week, I am too busy. I am committed
to my theater group for the next 7 days running, and the next two
weekends following those. Throw in a business trip to Burlington
VT, and a night to do my laundry and I'm pretty well tied up. I'm
also not a big one for long-term plans. Eliminating the next ten
days would be likely to cause me to issue a status of SS$_BUSY,
and a request to catch me later...
(Anyone who might like to stake out some time with me during
November, please call now, I don't have much left! ;-{) )
I recently had a dinner date cancel under ambiguous circumstances.
My response on the day of the cancellation was "That's the way it
goes sometimes..." and the next day I sent a brief note "Would you
care to reschedule dinner?"
--Doug
|
127.38 | go away, I'm busy | CURIUM::JACKSON | | Sun Nov 02 1986 15:41 | 7 |
| If a person wants to go out with you but is truly busy, generally
that person will make sure that you know this. If the person just
makes the excuse of being busy and doesn't make you feel encouraged
to ask again, then it's a pretty good bet that BUSY is a code word
for NO.
--
Seth
|
127.39 | Too busy noting to go out... ;-} | ANYWAY::GORDON | Random Emotion Generator | Mon Nov 03 1986 09:29 | 8 |
| I would have to agree (even in light of my previous note defending
busy people). The is a difference, and despite my assertion about
not making long range plans, I would certainly try to pin down a
mutually agreeable day past when the play opens. I think my note
was more me playing Devil's Advocate and a bit of a dig for declaring
an "absolute generality"...
Doug_who_believes_that_all_general_statements_are_false_including_this_one
|
127.40 | An existential approach... | SZOFNA::MLONGO | | Fri Jan 02 1987 20:33 | 27 |
| You know, its curious, but on many occasions when I have found
myself enjoying an experience or the presence of another person
I catch myself thinking about the future, how to prolong what I
am feeling etc... What bothers me is that while my mind is off
somewhere else, I am not really able to experience what is going
on in the present. I think that there often is an imedeate need
to posess the source of the good feeling or at least insure that
it will happen again (a "second date"). Occasionally, in an effort
to combat this feeling, I will play a game in which I pretend that
I will never see this person again and that as a result of this
constraint I WILL savour and cherish every moment that I have with
this person NOW! talk about INTENSITY! try it sometime...
For example; Recently I participated in a two-day Aikido retreat.
During the course of the day many techniques were practiced. Each
technique was always practiced with a partner. Some the the moves
(for those who are familiar with Aikido) are very graceful and dance
like. During on of these sessions I was paired with a strikingly
beautiful woman to whom I was very attracted. During our practice
I felt a delightful sense of playful energy as we both tried to
see how close and how fast we could execute the move without colliding.
All of a sudden I found myself thinking; "How am I going to ask
her for her number and should I ask her out for coffee, lunch, dinner
etc..." BOOM, we collided! So I said to myself; "Martin, you are
not going to ask her out, you are, however, going to enjoy every
moment you have with her". I still relish the thought of the
excitement/energy that we shared...
|