T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
100.1 | In Balance | KRYPTN::JASNIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 16 1986 13:38 | 7 |
|
Hate is to Love as (the chinese concept) yin is to yang. You
cant have one without the other and, in the most stable state, they
are in balance.
Joe Jas
|
100.2 | Hatred, not good to harbor | EUCLID::LEVASSEUR | Like A Poorly Drawn Cartoon | Thu Oct 16 1986 14:43 | 30 |
| Take it from one who has hated much in his life, it does destroy
the hating party as well as possibly the object of the hate. I think
that normally there is a balance of love/hate in relationships.
I truly loved my wife, but there were times that I had visions of
leveling a 357 at her, she had the same feelings. I don't think
you have to love someone before you hate them. take a woman who
is brutally raped by a stranger, she never loved or knew him. I
think that the worst hatred is the one that is born out of past
love. The viscious relationships that can develope between two
people after the breakup of a marriage or other deep love relation-
ship.
Why does hate destroy the hater, well in my case it happened
many times. I had a close friend who really *purposely* did me
in. I kept running into him and we'de wind up slugging it out
and doing all we could to ruin each other socially. I was obsessed
with having the last say adn finishing him off. This tales large
amounts of energy to maintain, it festers and engulfs the party.
Finally I approached him and made the first move to bury the
hatchet, he was shocked and broke down crying, then took a swing
at me. Well after all the poison drained from the sore, we began
talking again. It was a cleansing process and the feelings of
intense hatred disappeared. The Bible does make a good point,
Don't let the sun go down on your anger, resolve it, get it
out in the open, lest it fester into smouldering hatred. Today I
try not to hate, but there are plenty of bimbos out there just
dieing to push it. I dunno, just my thought
Ray
|
100.3 | Hatred is an unnecessary bug | VAXWRK::NORDLINGER | To reach the unreachable STAR | Thu Oct 16 1986 17:25 | 37 |
| > Hate is to Love as (the chinese concept) yin is to yang. You
> cant have one without the other and, in the most stable state, they
> are in balance.
I, respectfully, disagree.
Hate is not symmetrically parallel to love. (i.e. Hate <> ~Love)
Love is much more than the opposite of hate.
Because I believe the above is a dangerously seduction
rationalization I offer two arguments.
reason 1:
Love includes: (or at least is used to denote linguistically)
infatuation
lust
compassion
devotion
passion
affection
...
Hate is not used to denote the opposite of all the above and
the many more connotations of love.
reason 2:
Love, especially in an eastern sense, is used as a term
of mystical unity with either a Godlike force (Hinduism:
the Upanishads) or unity with mankind (Buddhism).
Hatred does not imply the negation of the above though
may lead one to such an undesirable consquence.
John (Compassion <> ~Hate)
|
100.5 | poetic answer | DAIRY::SHARP | Say something once, why say it again? | Fri Oct 17 1986 14:50 | 15 |
| Fire and Ice
by Robert Frost
Some say the world will end in fire.
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire,
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that, for destruction, ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
(this is from memory, sorry if I didn't get it perfect.)
|
100.6 | practical answer | DAIRY::SHARP | Say something once, why say it again? | Fri Oct 17 1986 14:56 | 7 |
| One of the opinions regarding love (separate note - sorry, I can't remember
the author) is that love is an active promise that must be renewed
constantly. I think hatred is the same way. Anger can't last, and if your
partner in enmity doesn't reciprocate your feeling of hatred you'll soon run
out of reasons to continue to be angry.
Don.
|
100.7 | Hatred looks self feeding to me | ATFAB::REDDEN | losing the sought illusion | Fri Oct 17 1986 15:11 | 9 |
| re: .6 Hatred needs constant renewal or it will fade
That is absolutely not consistent with my observations. From what
I have seen, hatred is self feeding. It bias the haters view of
the world to insure that reasons to hate continue to flow in. I'm
inclined to say that, if I have a reason for feeling very badly
toward someone, then what I feel is anger rather than hatred, but
that may be just semantics.
|
100.9 | Look for the positive | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Fri Oct 17 1986 16:07 | 23 |
| I respectfully submit: h**e is an extremely negative
force, feeding the negative forces of the universe.
Forgive me if this note would be more applicable to
DEJAVU. I was taught by a "higher being" to eliminate
the word from my vocabulary. It is a word that is
tossed around very casually, yet it generates and
represents very negative feelings. I can honestly
say, after 8 years of not using that particular word
(which I consider the only true profanity), I do not
feel negative feelings as strongly. If you do not
use the word, you gradually reduce or eliminate the
emotion. You, and the universe, are so much the better
for that. Conversely, I feel so much more positive, so
much more loving these days.
H**e is one word (the only word) I have forbidden my child
to use. I have explained to him why I do not want to hear
that word from him.
"Guard your thoughts carefully, for they have lives of their
own."
|
100.10 | hate is self destructive | STUBBI::B_REINKE | | Fri Oct 17 1986 16:47 | 10 |
| Hatrid corrodes the vessel that contains it.
When ever I found that I disliked someone to the degree that
I would call the emotion hatrid, it became self-destructive
both physcially and mentally
(and had relatively little effect on the person I was upset
with.)
Forgiving the person and giving up the hatrid freed me from
an incredible and painful burden.
|
100.12 | Balance does not include hate | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sat Oct 18 1986 14:47 | 12 |
| I, too, will respectfully disagree that a balance of love and
hate is seither stable or desirable. Hatred is destructive to
both the hater and the hated. It should be rejected. Love is
very positive and returns more than it costs. It should be
fosttured and nourished.
Anger is, so far as I can tell, unavoidable, but it needn't turn
into or fuel hatred. When it arises it must be acknowledged
and dealt with, but it must not be allowed to feed on itself
nor to feed hatred.
JimB.
|
100.13 | ..... | YAZOO::B_REINKE | | Sun Oct 19 1986 00:33 | 15 |
| re .11
How nice a reply from the eagle, now I feel I'm really a noter
:-).
It wasn't that I can't handle it - I did handle it. I decided
that it was much too personally desctructive and found ways to
transmute it.
My husband likens hatred (and I don't believe I misspelled it *three*
times in that last note!) to manure. It isn't very useful if you
hang on to it but if you turn it into the field and let it decompose
it can eventually grow some good crops.
Bonnie
|
100.17 | Thanks for the hatred!!! | ATFAB::REDDEN | Listening slowly | Mon Oct 20 1986 10:34 | 9 |
| A wierd colleque noticed some of the material on my screen and commented
that we should be thankful for people that hate us. I asked him to
explain and he said that being hated makes us more careful, more
aware of our own feelings, and generally purifies us. Further, he said,
the gift of hatred comes at a high cost to the giver, and it was rude to
accept it without appreciation. Like I said, he is weird, but I sense a
kernel of truth in that perspective. It certainly seems like a better
approach than returning the hatred in kind. On the other hand, it seems
like masochism. I'm not sure what I think of this - your opinion please?
|
100.18 | ..from Ignorance. | RDGE43::KOSKUBA | | Mon Oct 20 1986 10:39 | 48 |
| re .1 This would look better in CLICHES.
The Cause of Hate is Ignorance.
As someone somewhere said: - The only sin is Ignorance.
If we believe that - and why not, it reduces all sins to only one
- then clearly that's where hate comes from.
If anyone who hates someone tries to fully understand his/her actions
and those of the other side then after a few moments/weeks/years/decades
(whatever time it takes) the hate will dissolve along the way
(or should we say - along The Way ).
Prejudice also comes from ignorance but is obviously different from
hate. Not much time should be needed to see that.
Survival value of hate:-
Speaking in general, anything which threatens our survival (physical,
mental, our identity, etc...) would generate some hostile reactions
in us.
If you are in a position to do something about the threat, there is no
reason for hate to enter the picture.
However, if you can't/are unwilling to do anything, hate is a good
emotion to push you in the right direction - either because you can't
escape the threat or the person/animal/ET/etc. threatening you are
object of your love, some sort of taboo or similar. Hate then can
be used to overcome any such objections. That's probably why people
link love and hate together. But hate is not a reversal of love but
rather is needed to suppress/overcome it.
From this you can see why it is destructive, because to feel
hate we have to be somehow suppressing our actions(sometimes that
may cause us less damage than letting go and suffer consequences).
The real cure (if it is desired) is to try to understand both sides.
The above would, I hope, explain why intensity of hate increases
the closer the object of hate is to us - both in a social sense
(e.g. wild vs. domestic animal or stranger vs. friend) and in
a biological sense ( worm vs. dog ).
We should not confuse fear and hate.
Fear is negative in the sense that it causes us to retreat from
the threat. Hate is positive in the sense that it makes us want
to do something about the threat( I don't deny that it is a negative
emotion, though).
|
100.20 | Ancient saying.... | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Michael | Mon Oct 20 1986 12:40 | 10 |
|
Without Hate, you would not know love.
- Me.
|
100.21 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Mon Oct 20 1986 13:57 | 5 |
| au contraire-I have never "hated" a child, much less
my own son, yet I love him more than anything in this
world. Without the negative feelings, I love more
fully and purely. Only negative input limits the positive
feelings.
|
100.24 | Is anyone being honest with themselves? | HOMBRE::CONLIFFE | Boston in 89!! | Tue Oct 21 1986 14:38 | 30 |
| | But it appears that within this file is about
| the ONLY place where there are not people who find hate and intolerance
| for <drunk-drivers, rapists, whatever> a perfectly natural "human" way to
| relate to others.
I've noticed an interesting thing: contributors to this file IN THIS FILE
show remarkably little intolerance, hatred or bigotry IN THIS FILE (with
the possible exception of attitudes towards those people who stay home and
become housewives or househusbands :-) ).
However, in other notesfiles, I see a disturbingly high level of intolerance.
It is interesting that things come out so much more reasonable in this file. Or
maybe it is because the intolerance (in other files) is not towards things
which matter to the human race (rapists, murderers, drunk-drivers, nuclear war)
but more to things which really don't matter to anyone in the long run. Things
like which team will win the World Series, what is the better VCR tape format,
which sort of car is best, are condos better than houses, what is the "best"
way to bring up children, what is a good place to work and many others of
similar information content.
I've seen (in other notesfiles) debates on these (and other) topics in which
the levels of hate displayed by the contributors is frightening. And no, I'm
not talking about SOAPBOX which has hate, bigotry and stupidity in its Charter!
It seems a little strange that supposedly intelligent people can show so much
intolerance about such trifles, especially when you come to this notes
conference and people are congratulating each other on their lack of hatred.
Perhaps it is just that everyone is on their "best behaviour" in this
notesfile.... (-:
Nigel
|
100.25 | Birds of a feather flock together | ATFAB::REDDEN | Listening slowly | Tue Oct 21 1986 18:44 | 6 |
| I suspect that folks that choose to participate in this conference
do so, at least in part, because of the low level of irrational
flaming/intolerance/hatred, etc. Further, I tend to suspect projection
in the observation that participants are on their best behavior
in this file. Candidly, I skip over irrational raving, and appreciate
a conference where my time is not wasted with non-thought.
|
100.27 | We Will We Will ROCK YOU ! And beat you and make you... | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Let's Go METS ! | Wed Oct 22 1986 12:50 | 4 |
|
Well said Bob.
|
100.28 | The positive side of hating | RANI::HOFFMAN | | Sat Oct 25 1986 17:17 | 16 |
|
I have just gone through those 27 replies, all dealing with
hatred. I just hated it.
Let's face it, hatered is good. It relieves, it purifies, it
releases. After hating for a while, one can be at peace with
oneself and the world. I love to hate.
It's true one must keep a close watch - keep it under control;
do not let it get the better of you. But, knowing THAT, already
guarantees control.
So, don't be shy, hate for a while; it'll do you a world of
good.
-- Ron
|
100.29 | I strongly disagree... | YODA::BARANSKI | Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The Way! | Sat Nov 01 1986 15:16 | 13 |
| I couldn't disagree with you more.
You hate someone when you don't know or understand them. It's easy to hate
someone that you don't know. It's easy to kill someone that you don't know.
It's a lot harder to hate if you know and understand...
Maybe I am atypical, but there haven't been any people that I've hated, once
I've gotten to know them, and understand why why do what they do. Fear, sorrow,
pity, etc, yes, but not hate. But I could be wrong, I suppose; there is the
domestic violence hate, but I feel that at those points, there is not much
understanding taking place.
Jim.
|
100.30 | | MANTIS::PARE | | Fri Nov 07 1986 13:28 | 5 |
|
Be carefull who you hate. Hate binds you as tightly to a person
as love does.
Mary
|