T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
95.1 | incident? | VLNVAX::DMCLURE | Peace in the fast-lane | Tue Oct 14 1986 02:57 | 5 |
| Pardon me, but I've been through alot of "incidents" lately,
which incident might you be refering to? SEXETERA? Or something
more recent?
-davo
|
95.2 | Intolerance is offensive | CEDSWS::REDDEN | impeccably yours | Tue Oct 14 1986 07:27 | 4 |
| I simply cannot stand people that are more intolerant than I. No
matter how hard I work at reducing my tolerance, some jerk will
show up and prove that I am not yet the master of intolerance.
The intolerant jerk offend me. 8^|
|
95.3 | Incidents & Accidents, Hints & Allegations | ANYWAY::GORDON | Hayduke Lives! | Tue Oct 14 1986 09:02 | 16 |
| re: .1 (davo)
I was refering to the incident with this file. I was tempted
to pose this question when the furor was raised over the erections
note, but decided I might be accused of inciting flaming. There
have been some other (minor?) incidents lately as well. I'm not
trying to start a flame forum here. I tend not to offend easily,
at least as far as human anatomy/sexuality goes, and I haven't found
this conference in the least offensive. In view of that, I was
wondering what people *do* find offensive...
...Survey says...
--Doug
{I will contribute my own list of offensive items soon}
|
95.4 | Guess I'll start this conference going! | ODIUM::ROACH | | Tue Oct 14 1986 11:06 | 19 |
| Guess I'll have to start this conference going. The following is
a list of things I find offensive:
* Walking past a bunch of men taking a coffee break and they all
stop talking to stare. (I find this very intimidating and unecessary.
I like to be treated equally)
* Someone who does not use deoderant
* A man who makes advances and knows you are faithfully married
* Women/men that collude
* Being stereotyped
This is all I can think of right now because I have to go.
MSR
|
95.5 | don't flame unless you are guilty!!! :-) | REGENT::KIMBROUGH | gailann, maynard, ma... | Tue Oct 14 1986 12:09 | 8 |
|
persons who choose to show themselves as an authoritarian on any
given subject just to hear themselves speak.. and then do in with
the maximum amount of time/disk space/energy that they can exert!
later, gailann
|
95.6 | I'm not sure about it | ROYCE::RKE | cryptic and possibly amusing comment | Tue Oct 14 1986 14:16 | 6 |
| Re -2. Sorry, I don't understand why not wearing deoderant should be
offensive, or perhaps that's where I've been going wrong......
Ritchie.
|
95.7 | | MRMFG1::A_PEIRANO | I like IT | Tue Oct 14 1986 14:34 | 9 |
|
When people who have no reason to lie....LIE
Not offensive,but more in the line of dis-likes (depending on my
mood)
Strong perfume or colonge (not necessarily cheap stuff either)
People who don't show up on time
Have to go ,but will add more later!!!
Tony....
|
95.9 | a few | STUBBI::B_REINKE | | Tue Oct 14 1986 17:40 | 11 |
| People that make personal attacks on my life style or family.
Jokes that are racist or grossly sexual.
People who stare at or make rude remarks to/about handicapped
people.
People who are so convinced they are right that they put down
others ideas/opinions.
Snobs
|
95.10 | Sometimes wondering why I moved here... | HERMES::CLOUD | Life is an E ticket! | Wed Oct 15 1986 01:24 | 11 |
| Individuals who make assumptions about me just because I was
born and raised in California.
I get sh*t like...."Oooooohh, you're from California? You gotta
be wicked wierd, or something" "Like, totally!" "Had any good
earthquakes lately?"
Some folks are just plain ignorant!
Phil
|
95.11 | More than anything else... | RDGE00::KERRELL | Do not disturb | Wed Oct 15 1986 06:22 | 3 |
| Not being asked beforehand...
Dave.
|
95.12 | Yuck! | EUCLID::LEVASSEUR | Live Free or Try | Wed Oct 15 1986 10:07 | 16 |
| People who feel that they are totally without fault, are better
than anyone else.
People who are pigheaded and ridged, you can only see things their
way and they're willing to commit mayhem to get you on their side.
People who are willing to ruin someone else's reputation to make
themselves look good.
Pushy people with big egos in general, I avoid'em like the plague.
General scum that profit from someone else's misery and suffering.
ARRRGGGHHHH!!!! I'm getting pissed just writing this!!!
Ray
|
95.13 | Can you believ this one? | USFSHQ::LMARTEL | | Wed Oct 15 1986 13:03 | 11 |
| Offend me? Hmm.....
Men....who assume that making a dinner date with you is going to provide
more than dinner.....
Just recently - Man spent ~~ $50. on Lobsters/shrimp for a dinner
date - boy was he disappointed!
I was more than offended - ooooooooo!
|
95.14 | What do you expect when you pay? | RDGE00::KERRELL | Do not disturb | Wed Oct 15 1986 13:10 | 3 |
| re .13 How quaint! The _man_ still pays where you live? Oh for equality.
Dave.
|
95.15 | To clarify the deoderant bit | ECCLES::ROACH | | Wed Oct 15 1986 13:10 | 11 |
|
Re 6. To clarify my statement about "People who don't wear deoderant
are offensive".
In my country, America, body odor (underarm, feet and personal places)
is a complaint that a number of people have. I find it hard to work
beside someone who smells badly from lack of bathing or use of
deoderant. But I hear that in other countries this is not so.
I'm sorry I'f I have offended anyone, but this is my opinion and
that's what is asked of this notes file.
|
95.17 | personal cleanliness habits vary | HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Wed Oct 15 1986 14:06 | 8 |
| The deodorant issue bothers me, too, but standards are different
in other parts of the world, and probably were in the US also until
pretty recently. Not everyone can afford the water to shower every
day, for example. I felt guilty about "wasting water" that way
when I was in Israel a few years ago, but I took my usual shower
anyhow (though as fast as possible) because I felt "dirty" if I
didn't, not to mention what my complexion does if I don't shampoo
every morning (YCCH-O!).
|
95.18 | A.F.F.A. | FDCV13::CALCAGNI | | Wed Oct 15 1986 14:29 | 25 |
|
My turn.
* Phonies! Even in some of the notes I've read they say one thing
one place then something completly different elsewhere.
* Slobs., forget the deodorant issue, slobs.
* A political backstabber!
* Someone who tries to do your job, and has no idea what is going
on!
* Lazy people.
* Know it alls!!
* Dirty ashtrays, tight underwear!
To name a few, and turnons that would take a book!
Cal.
|
95.19 | management!!! | PUFFIN::OGRADY | George, ISWS 297-4183 | Wed Oct 15 1986 15:38 | 6 |
|
...having a bad day....
GOG
|
95.20 | Small things, small minds.... | FINBAR::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Wed Oct 15 1986 16:07 | 9 |
|
Pettiness. People who attribute overwhelming importance to
underewhelming things, and who will mess up other people's lives
over them.
Of course, just getting angry about it probably makes me petty,
too. Recursive offense....
Dave W.
|
95.21 | But we *do* know everything!!!! | NISYSI::KING | Vote no on question 5 | Wed Oct 15 1986 16:25 | 10 |
| Here's one I haven't seen yet.. FLAME ON!!!!
People who don't listen !!!!!!!! half way through a conversation
they'll say something like "Could you please repeat that?"
Augggggg If you're going to take time to talk to me please listen
also you might learn something. Flame off.
REK
OH, people who think their shit don't stink!!!!
|
95.22 | These People?? | MRMFG1::A_PEIRANO | | Wed Oct 15 1986 16:32 | 1 |
| Rick.....you mean the ones who think they fart ESTAY LAUDER (sp)???
|
95.23 | Apply soap where needed | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Wed Oct 15 1986 16:42 | 5 |
| Re .21, .22:
Let's keep the language a bit tamer, please! I don't want to see
this note degenerate into offensiveness itself.
Steve
|
95.24 | | BARTOK::MAHONEY | | Wed Oct 15 1986 16:57 | 10 |
|
Just a thought and a small one at that.
I find that things that bother me about other people 85% of
the time, I have been, or am guilty of doing.
Comments?
Brian
|
95.25 | Honest to a fault | ATFAB::REDDEN | impeccably yours | Wed Oct 15 1986 17:11 | 4 |
| re: .24
I can't stand people who are honest enough with themselves to
admit things like that.
|
95.26 | | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Michael | Wed Oct 15 1986 18:07 | 8 |
|
People telling me things I already know.
Basically, anything people say
8-}
|
95.28 | it's hard looking in a mirror | USMRW4::AFLOOD | BIG AL | Wed Oct 15 1986 20:07 | 11 |
| re: 24 (I think)
It is a common psychological practice for people to not like things
about other people that they in fact know are facets of their own
personality. above reply is very accurate about people in general.
keep that in mind when you say that don't like something that you
see in somebody else.
al
|
95.30 | Good point. | VLNVAX::DMCLURE | Peace in the fast-lane | Thu Oct 16 1986 20:48 | 9 |
| re: .28,
> It is a common psychological practice for people to not like things
> about other people that they in fact know are facets of their own
> personality. above reply is very accurate about people in general.
Yes, I think the term here is "Projection".
-davo
|
95.31 | | ODIXIE::PROSPECT | K.O. is O.K. | Thu Oct 16 1986 22:05 | 5 |
| Snobs who think the beautiful state of Alabama is Redneck-ville,
U.S.A.
Pat Nelson
Alias PROSPECT
|
95.32 | Careful | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Thu Oct 16 1986 22:19 | 14 |
| This note is rapidly degenerating into a "can you top this" list
of arbitrary dislikes. I read the base note as asking what is it
that you see/hear/smell/etc. that makes you cringe inside. Yet
I fear that if people really start relating things that offend them,
this note will itself become offensive. As an example, those of
you who read SEXCETERA probably remember the single note that
touched off quite a storm. I found THAT note extremely offensive.
So much so that I absolutely refuse to describe it to ANYONE. But
what if I decided to describe it here as something that offends
me? Get the picture?
Unless someone has some good suggestions as to how to handle
this topic, I think we should drop it.
Steve
|
95.33 | Oops - Set Responses/NoOffense | ANYWAY::GORDON | Hayduke Lives! | Fri Oct 17 1986 00:05 | 27 |
| Oops!
I really wasn't trying to be controversial with this topic...
What I really had in mind was more like this...
I am very slow to offend on what some people find "sexually"
offensive but there are several other things I find offensive...
Here is one example:
o Missionary Religions -- I have no formal religious beliefs
of my own, and I do support everyone's right to have and express
their own beliefs, but I am *very* offended when people try to convert
me. I'm willing to have a rational discussion (as rational as a
religious discussion can be) about beliefs with someone, but I will
not actively try to convert anyone to my views, and I am offended
if they try to convert me to theirs. Coming to my door with their
"message" is incredibly offensive!
I wasn't shooting for people to say "I think sexual acts between
two adults and their pet elephant in public places" is offensive.
I was looking for people to give classes of what they find offensive
as opposed to down & dirty details...
Please, decorous responses only...
--Doug
|
95.34 | DESTRUCTIVELY CRUMMY NOTERS | RDGE00::EARLY | | Tue Oct 21 1986 10:07 | 14 |
| I find it difficult to understand why everyone gets so hot under
the collar (see many of the previous notes).
Surely there are enough things to dislike about things/people in
this world as it is.
Yes I find it unneccessarily offensive when people run of at the
mouth just for the sake of hearing(seeing) themselves talk.
Why doesn't some bright spark open a conference entitled
"What I like about me/others". Lets get more positive about life.
|
95.36 | | PARITY::DDAVIS | | Tue Oct 21 1986 11:22 | 11 |
|
re: 34 -
Bob, I was just thinking the same thing - why are there so many
negative responses? I agree with you that we should look for the
"silver lining" instead. There are so many good things out there
like: a full moon, a pat on the back, a kiss behind the ear, a
hug, hot soup, cold beer. YEAH. That makes me feel better. Thnx.
Toodles,
-Dotti.
|
95.37 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Tue Oct 21 1986 12:04 | 4 |
| Re .34:
Who needs another conference? Just start a new note in this
one!
Steve
|
95.38 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Tue Oct 21 1986 12:06 | 3 |
| Re .36:
I think that was Joan Early, not Bob.
Steve
|
95.40 | Dull bees. | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Michael | Tue Oct 21 1986 14:20 | 5 |
|
What offends me the most are benign drones who spread
rumors about others in other notesfiles.
|
95.42 | THE EARLY BIRD STRIKES ONCE MORE | RDGE28::EARLY | JOAN (THE EARLY BIRD) EARLY-READING UK | Wed Oct 22 1986 09:58 | 13 |
| I have at last succeeded (thanks to Steve) in changing my
signature tune. I am pleased that we have now got a note
about what we like.
Guilty, Guilty, Blush ......Yes I will add a note there
also, I shall now GOTO and enter.
Thanks for the support, it encourages me to write a few more.
Some of you I have already built a mental picture of, its
almost as though I have met you already.
|
95.43 | Dirt Mouth | MRPRD8::TRAINING | Take it all in STRIDe. | Fri Feb 13 1987 10:25 | 6 |
| What offends me the most are women who swear alot. (you know, the
ones who use the "F" word like an all purpose adjuctive).
You want to ask these people where they learned to speak.
Ray H.
|
95.45 | reply to .44 | MRMFG1::TRAINING | Take it all in STRIDe! | Fri Feb 20 1987 14:51 | 13 |
| Hi: reply to .44
The question was "What offends ME?"
Now in my case, being a man, (and in my own opinion) swearing by
another man is not as offensive to me as hearing a woman swear.
I'm not talking about the occasional swears that happens in the heat
of anger or passion, but the women who are "F"ing this and "F"ing that
three or four times a sentence.
Sorry if this sounds like the ol' double standard but that's the
way I feel.
Respectivly;
Ray H.
|
95.46 | F***ing dull | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | Shakin' the bush, boss | Tue Feb 24 1987 07:00 | 10 |
| re. 44-45 I am mostly disappointed when someone who
cusses a lot shows no variety. f*** and d*** get worn
out rather quickly. There are a lot of good bad words
out there dying of neglect. Spanish has a lot to offer,
also German. Be original, refer to hygiene ahd habits,
sexual preferences and incompetence. Anything worth
cussing is worth insulting. :-) :-)
What offends me ? Butt-breath in an otherwise attractive
woman.
|
95.47 | C | SAHQ::JBENNETT | | Tue Apr 28 1987 20:18 | 28 |
|
Speaking strictly for myself as a member of DEC's gymps and blinks
brigade, the thing that offends me most are people who insist on
helping me in the way that THEY want to help me regardless of my
needs.
LET ME EXPLAIN:
I appreciate *** ALL *** help I recieve, but there are ways that
people can be more helpful.
Don't just up and help me. Please, if I have not asked for help, but
you think that I may need some assistance, just ask if you can help,
don't just automatically do it for me. Since the time that I became
disabled, I have been striving for independence. (It may take me A
LITTLE longer to do a task, but in the long run it is better for my feelings of self worth.)
If I say yes, that I do indeed need help; please ask HOW you can
help.
Most importantly DON'T be offended if I say "no thank you".
Jim,
P.S. Stay out of the handicapped parking spots if you don't have
a permit.
(I'm disabled: "Could someone please help me down off this soapbox?")
|
95.48 | unfair | MRMFG1::PLACEMENT | | Fri Jul 17 1987 12:03 | 12 |
| reply to .47
In reguards to handicapped parking, now I'm not handicapped, but
I'm sure I'm not the only person who has seen some non-handicapped
person park in a handicapped parking space just because it is
closer to the building and they don't want to walk across the
parking lot. [this insensativity burns me up]
These lazy people should be glad that they are able to
across that parking lot instead of depriving someone who
really has trouble getting around and has a need for
these parking spaces. These people should be told off, but good.
|
95.49 | | VLNVAX::RWHEELER | F.I.D.O. | Fri Jul 17 1987 12:55 | 16 |
| reply to 95.48 in reply to .47
>>> In reguards to handicapped parking, now I'm not handicapped, but
>>> I'm sure I'm not the only person who has seen some non-handicapped
>>> person park in a handicapped parking space just because it is
>>> closer to the building and they don't want to walk across the
>>> parking lot. [this insensativity burns me up]
Just say in a loud voice (so that they can hear you) - Boy
those people in that handicapped space don't look handicapped
to me - They must be RETARDED.
/robin
|
95.50 | Be satisfied instead of angry | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Fri Jul 17 1987 13:41 | 10 |
|
re: .48
Ah, yes, the Steve Dallases of this world...
It is our habit, in my circle of acquaintance, to summon the
constabulary on observing such a violation. In Worcester, at least,
the police seem to particularly relish writing these people up...
DFW
|
95.51 | Using a handicap as a slur may not help... | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Fri Jul 17 1987 13:45 | 14 |
| Personally, rather than using a word like "retarded" which
started as a term (or part of a term) to describe an actual
handicap about which people can do nothing to an insult, I would
use a non-term like "thinking impediment" or suggest that they
were "morally handicapped", or maybe be blunt enough to just
suggest that they were rude.
Of course with my Miss Manner's hat on I always try to correct
by assuming that the fault is unintentional--"Excuse me, did you
fail to notice the handicapped sign". This is not only more
polite by less embarassing in the chance that they reply "No,
I'm going in to pick up my quadropeligic grandmother."
JimB.
|
95.52 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Noto, Ergo Sum | Fri Jul 17 1987 14:53 | 1 |
| Mea culpa. In a hurry, if four spaces are open, I use one.
|
95.53 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Fri Jul 17 1987 14:55 | 24 |
|
I used to have a [British] handicapped parking permit - since moving
to America I have generally settled for a DEC handicap parking for my
commute, and living with my (relatively minor) handicap when parking
elsewhere. Even though I could get a NH handicap plate, I decline to
do so as many, many people are far more handicapped than I am.
However this parking thing burns me. Yesterday I parked next to a handicap
space in an otherwise empty parking lot. In the handicap space was a
Ford F250 truck with no handicap plates. The sign however was hardly
visible over the hood as the suspension had been jacked up several inches
(further proving that the driver was not handicapped - he/she would
have been quite incapable of climbing into the cab if handicapped).
I went to report the matter, but as I reached the pay phone I saw two
very healthy looking (male) youths go to the truck and climb in, and
then proceed to drive out forwards knocking down the sign. I needless
to say phoned the Merrimack police and gave them the number and description
of this truck.
Incidentally in the old days when I drove a Land Rover, I would frequently
simply double park behind offenders blocking them in. They were often
sitting fuming when I returned...
/. Ian .\
|
95.54 | handicap might not show | WEBSTR::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Fri Jul 17 1987 14:55 | 10 |
| One should remember, also, that not all handicaps are visible.
One of my neighbors is a youngish woman who suffers from rheumatiod
arthritis. She can walk, does not appear handicapped, but cannot
walk great distances or climb too many steps, etc.
She's constantly being harrassed for parking in handicapped spaces
that she doesn't need.
--bonnie
|
95.56 | just wondering | JACUZI::DAUGHAN | fight individualism | Fri Jul 17 1987 15:44 | 9 |
| a quick question here:
do people who have sever asthma or heart conditions qualify for
HP plates?
i know at work they have just expanded the handicapped parking
the signs now say medical permit parking only.
sometimes not all is as it seems.
kelly
|
95.57 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Fri Jul 17 1987 15:50 | 12 |
| � do people who have sever asthma or heart conditions qualify for
� HP plates?
I am a chronic asthmatic: I have been told by several people who I
believe to know that in New Hampshire if a doctor certifies that the
condition causes walking difficulties then you qualify.
I can certainly confirm that in England both qualify (I, as an asthmatic,
and my father, as a cardiac patient, both have British disabled parking
permits).
/. Ian .\
|
95.58 | | ERIS::CALLAS | CO in the war between the sexes | Fri Jul 17 1987 17:23 | 6 |
| re .56:
Most places, yes. A friend of mine in Maryland has a dashboard handicap
permit so he can use it the two or three weeks of the year he needs it.
Jon
|
95.59 | Its the car that gets it .... its got the plate.. | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_hiker | Mon Jul 20 1987 14:37 | 23 |
| re: .48
I was told (when I was crippled for a short term) due to leg surgery,
that the "HANDICAPPED" spaces are for the VEHICLES which have the
"HANDICAPPED" plate/sticker; regardless if its being driven by a
handicapped person or not. And , if you (I) do not HAVE a one of
those plates/stickers, no matter how great your (mine) handicap; being
on crutches; limping, sprains or what have you - you may NOT park
in those spots.
I get thoroughly "burned" when I see a very old person who must
walk from a remote parking spot; while some large, healthy, person
hops from their brothers/fathers/whoevers vehicle with the "magic
plate" in a handicapped spot.
One must remember: It is the VEHICLE that is entitled to the HANDICAP
courtesy, and not the person.
I would like to see a change, where it is the person who gets the
privilege, and NOT the vehicle itself, based on spot checks and
local citizen reporting, with very stiff fines to abusers.
.bob.
|
95.60 | injured .vs handicapped | YODA::BARANSKI | What, I owe you money?!? | Mon Jul 20 1987 16:04 | 8 |
| Not only that, but if you break your leg, or have a cast, or crutches, that does
not allow you to use a handicapped spot, or get a plate/sticker to use a
handicapped spot. You are "injured", not handicapped....
I think that this is wrong... Shouldn't people temporarily handicapped get the
same treatement?
Jim.
|
95.61 | | RITZ::GKE | from a *new* side of the pond! | Tue Jul 21 1987 11:16 | 25 |
|
No a person temp. injured should not get the same treatment as a
handicapped person.. ie. the right to just park in a parking area
that is meant for a handicapped person... I agree they should be
able to go down and get a temp. sticker which gives them a limited
right to use a handicapped space but it should be issued for short
periods of time and renewed if needed.
I like the next feel very sorry for a person that is very old, has a
broken foot or even someone in advanced stages of pregnancy that has to
walk a long distance.. but let us not confuse this with a life long
condition of having to manage with wheel chairs, braces, crutches,
oxygen or other equipment that makes getting around difficult and long
distances painfull. Maybe the answer for temporary conditions could be
a few designated "medical" spaces that could be used by people with
temp. permits.
My grandmother is getting on and has problems with shortness of
breath.. we (us in the family) always deposit her at the door and
have her wait when leaving while we fetch the car.. she does not
drive and we have not taken a space marked handicapped when she
has able bodied people around her to see to her comfort.
gailann
|
95.62 | | RUTLND::SATOW | | Tue Jul 21 1987 11:51 | 14 |
| re: .59, .60
Gee, I wasted a lot of walking the last couple of weeks. While we were on
vacation, we borrowed my father's car frequently; he has handicapped plates
(no, the plates weren't handicapped, but they indicated the person who
registered the car was). We never parked in a spot reserved for the
handicapped. In my opinion, any non-handicapped person who parks in such
a spot IS handicapped -- morally.
I think the problem that .59 points out is a problem of enforcement; unless
a person is assigned to monitor the spots reserved for the handicapped, I
don't see any way of enforcing the law other than to use the license plates.
Clay
|
95.63 | temp. permit is a good idea | WEBSTR::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Tue Jul 21 1987 12:25 | 16 |
| The need for a temporary permit of some kind is real.
For many years my mother provided transportation for an elderly
neighbor who suffered from emphysema, phlebitis, and degenerative
arthritis. The neighbor was completely qualified for a handicapped
license, but he didn't own a car. My mother had to pull up beside
the hospital or doctor's office or whatever, help him out, leave
him to wait while she parked the car and hurried back, then help
him inside. (He wasn't capable of walking for more than a few feet
without help, even with a walker.)
Some kind of indication that the vehicle was only temporarily carrying
a handicapped person would have been helpful to both her and the
neighbor.
--bonnie
|
95.64 | Try the State House | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed Jul 22 1987 14:14 | 5 |
| RE:.59 .63
I have a friend in New Hampshire who has a child with CP. She dosen't
have HP plates, but she does have a state permit, which she displays
while transporting the child in her special chair.
|
95.65 | Just don't park where they can see you! :-) | SSVAX::LAVOIE | | Wed Jul 22 1987 15:27 | 20 |
|
If you are anything short of a *PLATE* in Hampton, Seabrook, or
Salisbury kiss your car goodbye. For starters you get a ticket upon
which policemen make funny comments about possible brain damage
from sun stroke. Then they wait five minutes. If you don't return
to get chewed out they call in a tow truck (honest) for and I quote
"for blocking emergencies arteries for special needs". Then on top
of that you have to pay all the fines which goes with it. Starting
with the ticket, tow truck, impounding fees, and everything else.
Sometimes if you are a real jerk to them they walk around your car
and find things wrong with it.
We saw this happen to a guy who must have been brain damaged. But
then again these are the same people who have your car towed for
overheating on the main boulevard even if you leave for three
minutes.....
Debbi
|
95.67 | | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | This statement is false | Mon Jul 27 1987 12:40 | 9 |
| re .-several
Why is it any better for a person who was injured who is temporarily
(2-3 months) in a wheelchair or on crutches than it is for someone
who has to use these for their entire life. Note: I am talking
about walking *today* from an outlying spot to the door.
Elizabeth
|
95.68 | Reply to Base Note | 3D::WALTON | | Tue May 03 1988 19:55 | 30 |
| $ set flame_on
1. Pedantic snobbery in notesfiles: For example, showing off a lot
of formal training in music, and treating others as inferior if they
are not as arrogant. (as described in 95.5).
2. People who ask, "Where are you from? Well, whhyyyyy did you come
all the way hererrrre?" (as in 95.10!). --usually in a syrupy voice!
3. Accusers who attribute their *own* badness to others.
4. Nosy people who think it's their *duty* to mind others' business.
5. Pushy people who think they are so "GREAT" they can give themselves
extra "rights" to take advantage of others.
6. False martyrs: "Do-gooders" who always "know best" what's "good for
you" and pretend their selfish actions are *altruistic*!
7. People who come from an attitude "THIS IS YOU" - and *they* decide
who that shall be!
8. Power_plays ! often disguised with dishonesty
9. Holier_than_thou ! expects others to grovel
10. "Moralistic" hypocrites who make others look bad (see 95.12,
ruining others' reputations), while they sin in secret.
$ end_flame
|
95.69 | ONE OF THE GREAT MYSTERYS OF LIFE | CURIE::MARCOMTAG | | Thu Dec 22 1988 08:24 | 6 |
| ONE THING THAT OFFENDS ME IS WHEN YOU BECOME GOOD
FREINDS WITH SOMEONE....AND YOU GO ALL OUT OF YOUR WAY
TO PLEASE THEM....THEY THEY TURN AROUND, AND DECIDE THEY
DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU ANYMORE....
****CAN YOU FIGURE IT OUT? I SURE CAN'T*******
|
95.70 | ??? | YES::CLARY | Outta control_y | Thu Dec 22 1988 10:14 | 5 |
| Maybe it's the CAPSLOCK.
8^) 8^) 8^)
Bob
|