Title: | What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'? |
Notice: | Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS |
Moderator: | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI |
Created: | Fri May 09 1986 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 26 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1327 |
Total number of notes: | 28298 |
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.1 | looked interesting to me. | DAIRY::SHARP | Say something once, why say it again? | Wed Oct 01 1986 18:08 | 15 |
I flipped through this article in a waiting room somewhere recently, and thought the idea was interesting. The basic idea was to analyze different types of relationships based on three emotional factors. I think the factors were intimacy, trust and commitment. Given that you can have a relationship based on any combination of one or more of these (if you've got none there's no relationship) that's a possible total of 7 types of relationships. So if you've got all trust and no intimacy or commitment that's infatuation, if you've got intimacy and commitment but no trust that's a jealous entanglement and that sort of thing. My memory is hazy on the details. Of course, in real life I, T anc C are not binary-valued functions. I don't remember how the article dealt with that. Don. | |||||
81.2 | I'd recommend the P.T. article | JETSAM::HANAUER | Mike...Bicycle~to~Ice~Cream | Thu Oct 02 1986 09:56 | 8 |
I read that article in P.T. and thought is was excellent. The three sides of the triangle could have different lengths (strengths) and the triangle could thus describe any relationship, not just love. I related the model to my own life and made some useful discoveries. Mike |