T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
63.1 | Let it be | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Sun Sep 07 1986 22:56 | 6 |
| Yes, I have a comment. Drop it. It's clear your former girlfriend
is uncomfortable with the idea of seeing you again, for whatever
her reasons. She knows where you are - if she ever changes her
mind, she'll get in touch with you. Don't push it, or you may find
yourself even more upset than you are now.
Steve
|
63.2 | Better to "let go"?? | REGENT::MOZER | HCC ;-) | Sun Sep 07 1986 23:42 | 17 |
|
RE: .0
I agree with Steve (-.1) in that it sounds to me like you're not
"over" your emotional attachment with her and that seeing her again
may just cause you pain, maybe even more if her husband is there.
If you desire is truly to continue in a firendship with her, there
isn't anything wrong with that in my opinion (one of my current
"best" female friends is someone I used to date seriously and who
is now in a live-in relationship). Maybe she's not sure of her
feelings being re-kindled, not trustful of your motives, or maybe
her new husband is the jealous type, or any combination of those.
Whatever her reasons, I don't feel it's in your best interests to
pursue it. A friendship of this type only works if BOTH parties
desire it and can handle it emotionally.
Joe
|
63.3 | Mebbe she still has .... | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Michael | Tue Sep 09 1986 08:13 | 6 |
|
WHy you pushing ? Still feelings eh ?
If you ask me (What ? You didn't ? tough) your 'x'
was never a 'so'.
|
63.4 | Don't think I'm pushing... | ANYWAY::GORDON | Dept. of Magic & Wizardry | Tue Sep 09 1986 08:57 | 31 |
| Re: All of the previous...
Not pushing. Although I wasn't really looking for advice (I
had already decided on a course of action), I do tend to agree with
those who gave it. I do not intend to "push", but I believe in
a civilized world, you should be able to be friends even after
marriage. As I said, I will extend an invitation to them both
to the next party I throw. If they come, great. If she tells
me they won't/can't/won't-ever come, I will bow out gracefully.
A friendship is too valuable to throw away without some effort on
my part.
Michael - depends on your definition. The overall picture was
a year of a "serious relationship" and a year of just being close
friends. Not looking to either rekindle the flame or break up the
marriage - just would like to be friends again.
I'm still friendly with several of my old "girlfriends" (for
lack of a better term) from college. When I visit, I have had their
current 'SO's react all across the spectrum. One guy refused to
let one of them sleep in the same house with me (she slept at his
and I slept at hers). Those I have met, I've liked for the most
part, we've gone out as a group, and I felt no active hostility
from them nor directed any at them.
Maybe it's because I can't understand the {desire/need/urge}
to restrict my friends based on marital status that I posted this
here. Comments anyone?
--Doug
|
63.6 | Time will tell | JUNIPR::DMCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Tue Sep 09 1986 13:26 | 31 |
| I think everybody goes through periods of uncertainty and insecurity
in which they feel threatened by the SO's old "ghosts in the attic". I
guess when people fall in love, they usually expect to be the most impor-
tant thing in that person's life. This would mean that they would typically
want to (at least pretend to themselves) that their new SO has never had,
nor will ever be bothered by, old lovers/friends/aquaintances from the past.
Obviously, nobody you will meet was born yesterday, and the chances of
this person never having had a "significant other" in their past is almost
impossible. Nevertheless, people do tend to fall into the trap of believing
that they can provide for this fantasy be trying to wipe-out their past for
their new SO. Have you ever gone through your new SO's old photographs
with him/her and selectively pitched certain photos which cause jealousy?
It's the same principle, and it's usually based on insecurity.
Jealousy works in strange ways on the brain. It defys all logic, and
typically has little basis for its own existence, but it never fails to
make itself known. A good way to observe jealousy in it's unsuppressed
form is to watch a (sheltered) baby of around two years old deal with a
newborn baby brother/sister as they go through the initial pains in dis-
covering that they now have to compete for mommy's attention. It usually
subsides after the baby realizes that mommy still loves them too, but it
sure is a painful experience at first.
As to the party .0 mentioned throwing: don't be surprised if they don't
show-up, but maybe someday they'll be able to come to terms with the past
and feel more secure about themselves to the point where they might actually
come to another such party. Then again, maybe the situation is a little
more complicated by other factors (who knows?).
-davo
|
63.7 | Not for me thank you! | CECILE::SCHNEIDER | Audrey - DTN: 249-1558 | Tue Sep 09 1986 13:51 | 28 |
| Besides the issue of past relationships I would also throw out there
are people who appear to feel quite strongly that couples should
always be a pair.
Don was out sailing last Saturday and I was off doing personal errands
and what not. He took a friend's sister out sailing and had a
conversation early on that went something like:
Her: "She doesn't mind you out sailing without her?"
Him: "No, she had other things she wanted to do."
Her: "You don't care that she's off doing (... tones of do you
really know what she's doing...) stuff by herself?"
Him: "No...
As far a Don could tell she really couldn't comprehend a relationship
that didn't include the two people spending all non-work time together.
I will admit that we were both quite appalled by the whole thing
since we've always treated time as something that was: some yours,
some mine, and some ours. I also found myself feeling profoundly
greatful that I've never been in a relationship where the other
person expected all free time to be together time!.
Ah well,
Audrey
|
63.8 | Right on, Audrey!! | REGENT::MOZER | HCC ;-) | Tue Sep 09 1986 14:44 | 26 |
|
RE: .7
Audrey, I just can't resist REPLYing to your REPLY. GREAT for you
and Don!!
Your (and apparently Don's) attitude towards your time away from
work is (in my opinion) a VERY mature attitude!! Being able to
give each other some "space" to "do your own" things, rather than
either giving those things up or forcing the other to do them, while
still reserving time for each other (rather than drifting apart
by doing little/nothing together), is what I feel not only makes
a relationship work, but also helps it to last!! The trust you
showed in each others is praiseworthy, to say the least!!
I strongly feel that the people who feel a NEED to spend every
non-working hour together are not "so in love", but jealous and
untrusting of each other when out of sight of each other!!
WANTING to spend time together is a positive, NEEDING to can be
a negative in a relationship.
It's sure nice to know that there are others who feel as I do about
sound relationships not having to be proven by doing everything
together!!
Joe
|
63.9 | Was it really because of him? | MORIAH::ERIC | Eric Goldstein | Wed Sep 10 1986 04:31 | 10 |
| re .0
Obviously you know her better than I do, but ...
Are you certain that she refused to see you because *he* objected? I've known a
few people who, for reasons of their own, refuse to have anything to do with
their ex's after marriage, even though they'd been on good terms before. In
fact, they may cut off whole groups of friends at that time. I think it's
silly, but it happens. "I don't think that would go over very well..." may have
just been an excuse.
|
63.10 | Friends & Lovers | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis the Menace | Wed Sep 10 1986 09:28 | 27 |
| When we were getting married, my wife was pleased that, with a couple
of exceptions (2 geographical + 1 ice queen) my former lovers were
still my friends. In fact, four of them were guests at the wedding
and one of them played the bagpipes for a recessional at the end
of the service.
More than a decade later we still see some of them once or twice a
year and there has been some sharing of confidences and mutual support of
our separate relationships.
For the first year of our married life we were hardly out of each
other's sight. We moved back to New England just after the wedding
and spent the summer at my family's cottage in Rockport, Mass.,
caring for my invalid aunt. One day I took the train up to Boston
for a job interview and we realized that it was the first time in
three months of marriage that we hadn't been within hailing distance
of each other. In the fall we settled in Maine and took over the
running of a small letterpress print shop, working side by side
10+ hours a day.
I think that being so close in the early days of our marriage helped
make us confident in each other so that we do not feel threatened
or jealous now that we sometimes go our separate ways socially.
Dennis J. Ahern
(unlisted ELF)
|
63.11 | Friends = Xlovers ?? | JETSAM::HANAUER | Mike...Bicycle~For~Ice~Cream | Wed Sep 10 1986 09:41 | 12 |
| Dennis (re 63.10):
Your thoughts re old friends make me wonder:
Do you ever want to have even a brief affair with one of these X's?
If not, why not? And what do you have in your current relationship which
precludes this?
If so, how do you handle the emotional urge when it does strike?
Mike
|
63.12 | Old Lovers, Old Friends | SPIDER::PARE | | Wed Sep 10 1986 14:05 | 20 |
| Maybe women see this differently than men do but if I starting seeing
(as a friend) a man that I had once loved and been close to, I would
have a real hard time keeping from loving him again.
I found the previous note on cheating fascinating. If men really
do consider "emotional" relationships as cheating and not "physical"
ones, then former lovers are the greatest threat to a relationship
because even if a woman isn't sleeping with them she may very well
still care.
The previous note on cheating pointed out that the woman viewed
" physical" relationships as cheating and that is so much easier to
deal with. If your man can be trusted you don't have to worry,
regardless of how many female friends he may have.
It's been my experience that "people" are going to do what they want
regardless, so....you might as well find someone you can respect,
trust and admire and then let him alone to do what he chooses....(and
hope he chooses to be with you, at least some of the time).
MP
|