Title: | What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'? |
Notice: | Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS |
Moderator: | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI |
Created: | Fri May 09 1986 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 26 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1327 |
Total number of notes: | 28298 |
First of all, I want to say to all of you, thanks. I've found all of you to be an open and close group of friends. When I joined this conference, I really didn't know what to expect. I figured I would be some time before contributing to the conference, but as you know I've become somewhat active. I would even go so far as to say you all have influenced and changed me in some way (I think for the better). I feel one's mind is broadened when opened up to others and that never hurts. The reason I first joined HUMAN_RELATIONS is because of my future goal in life. That goal is to retire in about 10 years and take up the full time life of sailing. I don't know if it will ever come about but it's something to work for. We all need dreams and goals don't we? Ten years is still a long way off and I keep in mind that situations change, so I'll remain flexible. I do hope I can some day share this dream with someone close to me. This then brings up my topic: If all of you would close your eyes for a couple of minutes and picture yourself with your Spouse or SO living in very close quarters. Why significant other? "Other" doesn't seem like an appropriate description for one who should be so significant. Also consider the two of you and maybe your offspring together for an extended period of time confined to this very close space. Your situation would be some what akin to being locked up in one room for a month or two at a time without being able to get away from each other. You can't just get up and go talk to a another friend. You don't have the ability to walk water (Maybe Steve's lucky being an eagle, they can fly - but do eagles get sea sick?). You have living quarters which very much borders on being claustrophobic. Did I say Borders? For many it is. Questions: (some don't have to be answered but at least thought about, others may bring up more questions.) How close do you feel you have to be with your family before you begin your voyage? How do you think you would cope with the normal every day family situations, ie: needing time for yourself, needing time with your spouse away from the children, quarrels, arguments. Do you define your own space and set time aside for yourself? Do you set up some very definite rules or just guidelines? What do you think they might be? There are other factors which I might throw in. Consider not seeing land for a month. That is stress itself for most everyone. You begin to feel very insignificant when you realize how large our world really is. When you get caught in a strong gale or hurricane which may last for up to 3 weeks, you begin to realize how powerless you really are. This is just a couple of emotional forms of stress. What others might be aroused? How would you cope? I'm sure you might have some questions of me on this topic so here's a couple I've anticipated. First - I don't plan to go out and build a boat and just take off. That is inviting total disaster. I figure there should be a number of years that the family should spend together taking first short weekend trips and working up to summer trips. Finally, taking a couple of extended trips which would confine you to 2 to 3 weeks without sight of land. All one step at a time. Second -What if? What if your family finds it too much? My only answer to that is I am remaining open minded and flexible. If it's too much then the only answer in my mind is "You don't go". You change your plans and goals. I do realize this has to be a total commitment on everyone's part but for the topic, let's consider the commitment to be there and we're on our way to the South Pacific! This might seem to apply to sailing at first, but I think it also applies to every day life. I've spent about two years thinking about it in some form or another so please give it some thought. As this topic might develop, I'll put in my thoughts too whether they might be right, wrong, or so far out in left field. Maybe I need to start formulating what my ideal companion might be. "Tomorrow may rain, so - I'll follow the sun" Lee
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
61.2 | The family that sails together... | MMO01::PNELSON | longing for Topeka | Mon Sep 08 1986 00:09 | 40 |
I know what I want to say, but whether I can verbalize it is another question: here goes. First of all, this question is of interest to me partly because I am a person who generally needs a great deal of space, probably more than most people. And secondly because I love sailing more than any activity I've ever done, well *almost* (-;. I, like Suzanne in .1, believe you don't have to have physical separation to give someone the space they need. For me, part of it is just knowing someone and being totally comfortable with them. One of the most stressful things I know of is spending a long period of time with someone you don't know all that well, worrying about inadvertantly offending them with something you say, always being on guard. On the other hand, being with someone who doesn't make you squirm when the conversation lapses for a long pause, someone with whom you are totally at ease, is quite relaxing, at least to me. Lee, I think you covered rule number 1 when you indicated you wouldn't just go off to sea with someone till you had "tested the waters" so to speak by spending time with the person and even going on extended sailing trips. Now, I'm about to start theorizing because I've never spent a long time cooped up on a boat with anyone. But I have sailed for years. I hardly remember a time when there wasn't *SOMETHING* that needed doing to the boat. It's not like you just sit there and look at each other for days on end. The squall you mentioned would be a real adventure for the two of you to share, and what a feeling to come through it unscathed!!! I daresay there wouldn't be a boring moment, that's for sure! It just seems to me that there would be plenty of time to spend, if not physically alone, at least mentally alone while the other person is taking care of the literally hundreds of duties that have to be performed on a boat. Like I said, I've never done this, so what I'm saying is just speculation. But with the right two people and with the proper planning I don't see why a relationship couldn't flourish under those circumstances, and emerge from the adventure stronger than ever because of the intense experiences that were shared. Pat | |||||
61.3 | Reading Suggestions | TSE::GRAY | Bruce Gray, Test Sys Eng, TWO | Tue Sep 16 1986 01:12 | 16 |
Being a sailor, you probably already read "Cruising World" magazine, but if not, check it out. They often have articles by and about people who take extended cruises. Often these are more on a nuts and bolts theme, but some offer advice on how to handle people relations in the confines of a boat. Also, through the magazine you might be able to correspond with others on this topic. Also, you might want to read a couple of books by William F. Buckley, who has done a couple of trans-Atlantic trips. (One of them is "Airborne" and I don't remember the other title.) I found them to be enjoyable reading and he does touch on relationships among the crew members. Good luck with your dream - I hope it can become a reality for you. Bruce | |||||
61.4 | "Mr. Christian, I wish to see you on the Quarterdeck." | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis the Menace | Tue Sep 16 1986 10:01 | 35 |
Back in the early '70s, when I was working on Beacon Hill and dreaming of chucking it all and sailing around the world on my twelve foot sloop, a converted North Sea sailing trawler put into Boston Harbor and word went round that it was manned by a floating commune on its way to the South Pacific. I went down with a friend at lunchtime to chat them up at the dockside and upon showing serious interest was invited back for a communal supper. Well, aside from the fact that their idea of organic, macrobiotic rations would have caused a mutiny on Old Ironsides, I quickly realized that, no way, could I ever spend any length of time at sea with these people. They were altogether too serious. They all ate together in one big mess (non-salts read dining room) in what had been the fish hold. They slept in an assortment of separate cabins with their SOs (I don't think they were called that then, but it was a definite male/female pairing that implied "we only need each other"). At that time in my life I was a rather exuberant type who tended to shuffle along with a Chaplineque gait whilst audibly diddling Irish tunes. They probably would have fed me to the fishes before we'd passed Provincetown. Needless to say, I did not sign articles, but within the year I had left my job and moved to Washington D.C., where I read in the newspapers of the fate of the floating commune. They had made it as far as the Carolinas or thereabouts when they just couldn't get along together anymore and they all split up. The vessel was the "Tangaroa". Maybe if I had gone with them, I could have lightened them up a bit, but I doubt it. A long voyage together on a small boat can be a lot of work, both in sailing the boat, and doing the dishes, and taking the head apart when it backs up, but if there isn't a fair ration of fun it can get pretty grim in the long haul. Choose your mates well. | |||||
61.5 | getting there ? | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Thu Sep 10 1992 12:00 | 6 |
Hi Lee. it's about six years later since your dream in .0 about sailing. Are you feeling closer to that retire-in-ten goal ? I'm just curious. /Eric |