T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
15.1 | Wild yes, Sex no | MMO01::PNELSON | K.O. is O.K. | Sun Jun 08 1986 23:55 | 12 |
| I've been to some wild office parties, but none where any sex went on.
Just a group of good Digital friends, drinking more than we should,
shooting tequila, playing loud music, having food fights (outside of
course) and generally being had by a good time.
I believe the office parties you see in the movies are purely fiction;
I can't imagine behaving the way they do in those and facing the
people at work on Monday.
If anyone disagrees, I'd be interested to hear...
Pat
|
15.3 | Turn back the clock about 10 or 15 years... | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Sign-up for the VAXination | Mon Jun 09 1986 03:28 | 21 |
| Ok, I'll admit that things are pretty tame around here (Massachusetts
that is), but I also know that it's been around 15 years since the infamous
Woodstock rock concert - where documentary film proves that sexual behavior
of that era was much less inhibited (for example). Remember the Hippies?
My theory would be that office parties of the early to middle seventies
(which I date as the peak of the counter-culture movement), would have been
much wilder in terms of sexual behavior. Alot of this would depend upon
what sort of office we are talking about. Having worked in the film
industry, for example, I can assure you that alot of these wild parties
seen in films are based on actual occurrances (film industry parties).
It's been five years (seems like yesterday) since I was out in
California, however, and I imagine that even California has since
experienced the "cold-shower phenomenon" of the current post-sexual-
revolution era. My interest lies in discovering how wild things ever
got at office parties during the early to middle seventies, and/or
whether I am correct in this sort of historical analysis. If I am
right, then where were the real hot-spots? (no pun intended).
-DAV0
|
15.4 | | YOGI::BERNSTEIN | A feeling for the organism. | Wed Jun 11 1986 01:08 | 5 |
| I think the computer industry in general, DEC in particular,
is not the best place to look for wild office parties. Try Madison
Ave, or the fashion industry. (just guessing, really)
Ed
|
15.5 | The grass is always green when the media shows it | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Thu Jun 12 1986 00:12 | 15 |
| As a long-haired hippy who was at Woodstock, I saw a couple
hundred thousand people, a mess of mud, a bunch of rock stars,
some Hog Farmers, a couple of helicopters bringing in doctors
and supplies, lots of trucks bringing in food for a half million
people, cars crawling along bumper-to-bumper covered with
people, a lot of craziness, drug dealers and drugs, heard a lot
of music, and succesfully told the rain to go away. I didn't see
a naked anything 'til I got back and read about us.
As far as I can tell, Woodstock and the '60s were just as tame
as anyplace else with the exception of blatant open drug
dealing. The coverage it got is about as accurate as the Playboy
office party cartoons, I'd say.
JimB.
|
15.6 | Ignore history and it gets replaced with myth | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Thu Jun 12 1986 14:11 | 32 |
| Sorry, I shouldn't make it seem like I'm "looking" for these parties,
I should have said (re. .0) "...that I have been expecting to find all my
life". I'm afraid this is one case where curiosity killed the cat (the
cat being the one who actively looked for and found this sort of group).
Apparently these "cats" are not going to talk about anything here and I
can't say I blame them.
As far as the fashion industry, you're right there (I forgot about
this segment of society), I've also worked in this arena, but my involve-
ment was even less of what I considered to be a "real-job", so what I
experienced was probably too superficial to qualify as a general assessment.
I guess what I'm really thinking about here is sort of a historical
pendulum which has historically swung back and forth from liberal right
to conservative left in something like 20-year cycles. Following this
model, I would say we are still in full swing to the right - but it's hard
to say just how far it will go this time. By the way, my 20 year number
isn't based upon anything other than a guesstimation at this point, but
I seem to remember hearing other cyclicly-related patterns based upon a
20-year cycle, so I'm throwing this one out to the lions to see what
happens.
It would be nice to get some other historical perspectives on this
subject so that we might be able to fine tune theroies a bit. Try to
be objective, don't get anybody in trouble here (i.e. don't mention any
names - unless, of course, you are announcing an upcoming Wild Office
Party).
-DAV0
p.s. It was brought to my attention that most DECies probably don't
understand what an "Office" is.
|
15.7 | Ooooops! | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Thu Jun 12 1986 14:19 | 12 |
| re. -1,
> I guess what I'm really thinking about here is sort of a historical
> pendulum which has historically swung back and forth from liberal right
> to conservative left in something like 20-year cycles. Following this
Sorry, lost in dichotomies again. This should have been "liberal left
to conservative right".
-DAV0
p.s. Note my nickname: DAVe - just to the left of center (0).
|
15.8 | I'll Drink to That! | GENRAL::TAVARES | | Thu Jun 12 1986 18:35 | 20 |
| With reference to .5: I remember the '60s on the west coast. The
Hashbury was a series of dirty coffee shops with drugged-out looking
people waiting for something to happen. The sexual revolution was
an occasional soapboxer on a street corner trying to shock passerbys
by telling women that they should freely engage whomever they wish.
Berserkly, specifically Telegraph Ave. was usually either a) filled
with tear gas, b)filled with druggers and bikers, or c) so dirty
that I didn't care to go there. Maybe I missed something...
I have a friend who swears he attended Woodstock as a member of
a group from IBM!
Reminds me of a story told by Robin Knox Johnson, the first person
to sail solo, nonstop, around the world. He was giving his lecture
to a group of old British Cape Horn sailors, and told them of how
he negotiated Cape Horn (notorious for storms) in relatively calm
weather. After the lecture, on of the old sailors came up to him
an whispered: "Be careful about spreading that story around, lad,
we don't want to ruin our reputations!"
|
15.10 | Where do you plot on this chart? | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Tue Jun 17 1986 02:51 | 16 |
| re. 15.9,
I hadn't really thought about keyboard keys, but this model may
help explain how it works a little better...
Idealist +y Righteous
Left | Right
|
|
-x DAV0 +x
----------------------
|
|
Radical | Reactionary
Left -y Right
|
15.11 | CS&N revisited... | DONNER::MARTIN | Constantly changing, always the same. | Sat Jun 21 1986 11:37 | 18 |
|
Ah yes, Woodstock. The ole water water everywhere but not
a bit to drink routine. August, 1969 I was living in Newburgh
NY working at IBM in East Fishkill when a friend asked me if I
wanted to check out this concert over in White Lake. White Lake
I said, where the hell is White Lake? No sweat, he said. it's
about 17 miles past Monticello we'll be there in no time. Five
hours later... Bethel NY. We were stuck, no turning around now.
Cars were abandoned all over the hiway back to the race track
in Monticello. People were actually walking 17 miles or more to
experience a festival of music, art and humanity, MASS HUMANITY.
What a trip...
Well I could go on and on about those three days back in August
of 1969, suffice it to say the events there, changed my life. What
a trip...
Cary...
|
15.12 | In search of the wild office party | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Mon Jun 23 1986 13:49 | 18 |
| I missed Woodstock, along with most of the Woodstock clone concerts
of the (1969-1972) era. The first rock concerts I began going to weren't
until late 1972 and they changed my life as well, but it seemed as though
each concert I attended was a little more tame than the one before it
until now where there is little difference between a rock concert and
a night out at the bars or even the ballet.
This is another interesting parallel worth exploring to determine
the existence of the seemingly mythical "Wild Office Party" of the late
sixties - early to mid seventies era which I had so assumed was the
standard. Could it be that Iowa City, Iowa along with the greater
midwestern (Chicago) area is/was actually wilder than the rest of
the world when it comes to Office Parties?
-DAV0
p.s. Ever wonder why the midwest is such a fertile farming region?
|
15.13 | Better a has-been than a never-was | STAR::MURPHY | Dan Murphy | Fri Aug 08 1986 13:20 | 44 |
| It's been a while since this topic was active, but I'm just catching up,
so...
Re. WOP ("wild" office parties): Terminology - "office" party suggests to
me a party held at the office, e.g. the infamous christmas parties as
depicted in Playboy cartoons. In my experience, office gatherings at DEC
have all been pretty tame. (Well, there was this sales meeting I heard
about...) If we include house parties of deccies, there were a few back in
the early-middle 70's that I was aware of where some of the attendees wound
up in bed with one another during the course of the evening. Not very wild
by Hollywood standards, I guess. Don't know if it's the calendar decade or
mine that makes things seem quieter now. Perhaps the age group that's
doing the partying now isn't doing the talking (or noting).
I've also wondered if there are statistical differences in this sort of
thing by industry, i.e. computer people vs. others. A friend in a
sociological profession told me, only half-jokingly, that most everyone was
expecting to get laid (or at least propositioned) at conferences. This
hasn't generally been the case at computer industry conferences in my
experience (or have I not been paying attention?) Usually, it seems that
hackers are too busy hacking to fool around.
Re. Woodstock: Ah, yes. I too "was there", trudging through the mud and
miles of motionless cars. I did actually reach the stage area, but gave up
and headed home the next morning because of the hassles. It was only
driving home and listening to reports on the radio that I realized that
this was a "significant event" and I must really have had a swell time.
Still, as the legend grew in the succeeding years, I got a lot of milage
out of being able to say "I was there".
Re. Berkeley, etc: There were times in the late '60s when it was pretty
exciting and before things had become too ugly or drug-stupified. I
recently came across a publication of the Sexual Freedom League that
was handed to me on the streets of Berkeley in the late '60s. It seems
wonderfully fresh and even naive in view of all this history since then,
and it has some beautiful reproductions of detailed pencil sketches.
Yes, I guess the pendulum is swinging to the right. Last week's Newsweek
was busy declaring the demise of Playboy and the bunny empire in the wake
of the Meese Police and changing interests. I've observed that the
characteristics that we tend to identify with a particular decade seem to
come to the fore around the middle of the decade -- e.g., most of the '60's
stuff actually happened between about 1965 and 1975. Perhaps what we're
now seeing is to be the real character of the '80s.
|
15.14 | Please go on! Anyone! I'd hate to think DG parts better... | JUNIPR::DMCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Sun Aug 10 1986 04:00 | 27 |
| Now we're talking! This is exactly what I had hoped to hear from
somebody (anybody)! You can't believe how good it is to hear from
someone else who can relate to this strange turn of events in recent
years.
At times (since moving to New England), I have felt as though
there must have been a giant space-ship which came and picked-up all
of the wild folks from earlier times and taken them all away to some
other planet, and that I had somehow over-slept and missed out (easy
to do when you're an All-Night-Noter - ANN - DEC acronym #43278).
I suppose some of it is that college life (in Iowa City at least),
and Hollywood, and Chicago, all rank as some pretty wild places to
have an office party (I did work during most of high school and
college as well as my semi-real jobs after college).
However, I do still think it's more than just the computer industry,
(although a couple was recently fired somewhere for being caught having
sex late at night on company property - how ridiculous this would have
seemed five years ago!), I think it's that general trend which has hit
everyone everywhere. Just going by rumors so far, anyone else care to
comment?
-DAV0
p.s. just back from a semi-wild semi-office party (Friday night at
the Sheraton Boxborough), where were you?
|
15.15 | Box Boredom | FANTUM::SECRETARY | | Mon Aug 11 1986 16:31 | 7 |
| I was there, pretty tame is more like it.There have been wild office
parties, however, names held to protect the guilty!
-Lucifer ` '
^ * *
(__ v
^v^
|
15.16 | A well kept secret? | STAR::MURPHY | Dan Murphy | Tue Aug 12 1986 18:21 | 5 |
| I suspect you did as well in Iowa as anyone did in the east or west coast
schools. The best stories I've heard from friends and acquaintances about
"wild" college life come from the likes of St. Louis, Michigan, etc.
Fer sher, if you want real social boredom, just go to any of the
engineering schools (MIT, Cal Tech, etc.)
|
15.18 | | FDCV13::CALCAGNI | | Thu Aug 14 1986 15:31 | 54 |
| < Note 15.5 by HUMAN::BURROWS "Jim Burrows" >
Hummm will try again!
I'm new at this so please bear with me.
Couldn't take reading about Woodstock without
putting in my two cents.
Just joined the company about a month ago and
find it very refreshing from the previous company
I worked for..
Any how..I was at Woodstock,and Walkins Glen,plus
a few others in Canada.
It was great! And I did see a lot of nudity.But
it wasn't in a sexual way if you know.It was sort
of natural.People bathing and trying to stay cool
especially at Walkins Glen..It was hot! They kept
spraying us with huge hoses from water trucks.Plus
we were starving!! Hooray for the hog farmers!
There was sex,yes but not orgys.
As for office parties.There is a time and place for
everything..
Later.
Cal.
ex
ex
done
done
-< The grass is always green when the media shows it >-
As a long-haired hippy who was at Woodstock, I saw a couple
hundred thousand people, a mess of mud, a bunch of rock stars,
some Hog Farmers, a couple of helicopters bringing in doctors
and supplies, lots of trucks bringing in food for a half million
people, cars crawling along bumper-to-bumper covered with
people, a lot of craziness, drug dealers and drugs, heard a lot
of music, and succesfully told the rain to go away. I didn't see
a naked anything 'til I got back and read about us.
As far as I can tell, Woodstock and the '60s were just as tame
as anyplace else with the exception of blatant open drug
dealing. The coverage it got is about as accurate as the Playboy
office party cartoons, I'd say.
JimB.
|
15.19 | re.18 Whoops!! | FDCV13::CALCAGNI | | Thu Aug 14 1986 17:37 | 9 |
| Whoops!!! Now that someone helped me!!!
We'll proceed.
thanks Conni
Cal.
!
|
15.20 | Work Hard - Party Hard (the mellow way) | JUNIPR::DMCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Fri Aug 15 1986 02:40 | 38 |
| re: -1,
No problem. I've only been noting for a few months myself and
I seem to remember omiting the /NOEXTRACT command with my first REPLY
as well. Believe me, this utility is a piece of cake to use once you
get the hang of it.
As to the search for Wild Office Parties...well, obviously people
out there either aren't telling any secrets over the net (not too foolish),
or they are suffering from a mental block. I can't say I blame them for
either of these reactions (you have to guess which I am doing).
As a result, I have decided that I am asking too much to be playing
a pubic (ooops, I mean public) version of "spin-the-bottle" here, so I
have decided to instead focus on some of the "safe" aspects of Wild
Office Parties.
How about massage? Does anyone know of any recent office party
which featured various levels of massage by members at the party? Or,
better yet, does anyone either recieve or provide an occasional head,
neck, or back-rub, etc., to fellow worker(s) on the job? Is this an
unusual event, or is it so common that it goes unnoticed?
The reason I ask is that massages are so common in the film/acting
profession that n'er a day goes by without getting (or at least witnessing)
at least one massage to some degree or another. It helps a great deal to
relieve stress, and is a very basic exercise in most acting workshops.
I personally like the "rake and pull" method of head massage. This
works by running your fingers through someone's hair gently, and then
slowly wrapping your fingers around clumps of hair so that you can then
sqeeze your fingers into a fist and effectively pull on the hair in a
very slow and progressive movement - finally letting go and starting
over with a new rake movement.
Any comments?
-Dav0
|
15.21 | a yes for massages | NCCSB::ACKERMAN | End-of-the-Rainbow_Seeker | Fri Aug 15 1986 14:41 | 12 |
| hmmmmmm, is it safe to answer?? :-)
I have received and have given messages at work. I've been here
long enough with some of the others to know there is nothing "sexual"
associated with it. Without mentioning names, there are a few people
who can see it on my face when I'm getting tensed-out. Without
a word they'll just come up and start massaging my trapezius and
neck. I usually say something encouraging like "I'll give you an
hour to stop that" :-). Likewise, if I see them having a rough time,
will return the favor; no sweat. I'll tell you, the massages have
been lifesaving a couple of times...
|
15.22 | massage IS a bit sexual, I think | REGINA::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Mon Aug 18 1986 12:03 | 23 |
| In other environments I've been in, the casual back or head massage
has been a common and wonderful "added touch". It would be nice
to have it at work here, both to have it done to me, and for me to
feel accepted enough to offer it to someone else. Unfortunately,
our office doesn't do it yet.
I question your claim that "there is nothing sexual
associated with it".
I am quite capable of giving or receiving a casual massage without
allowing it to lead to more sexual involvement. However, it still
seems sexual to me. I do feel mildly turned on when receiving a
message, and I do tend to only offer massages to those that I feel
at least some sexual attraction towards. Also, my willingness and
desire to continue massaging someone rather than lose interest,
become tired, or become bored, seems to be fueled by my excitement
(again, mild, not hot) of having the privilege and enjoyment of
touching them.
Gee, maybe this needs a new topic. "Wild office parties" isn't
quite what we're talking about here !
/Eric
|
15.23 | A topic looking for a discussion. | JUNIPR::DMCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Mon Aug 18 1986 14:55 | 13 |
| re: .22,
I suppose you're right about massage deserving it's own topic.
Placing it (or anything else, for that matter) in the "Wild Office Parties"
topic merely connotes a sexual association which may be unwarranted for
the sake of the art of massage.
I probably won't get to it right away, but if someone would like to
discuss massage, then by all means start-up a topic!
Anyway, back to Wildness...anyone else have an idea for this topic?
-Dav0
|
15.24 | "Hey, let's get stoned and consult the _I_Ching!" | VAXUUM::DYER | The Weird Turn Pro | Fri Oct 17 1986 04:00 | 8 |
| I would say that the _Playboy_ wild office parties bear as much
resemblance to reality as the _Playboy_ photographs. Perhaps
if you brought an airbrush to the next party . . .
The only places I know of who have wild office parties with sex
and all that stuff are somewhat-left-of-center professional
political activist groups.
<_Jym_>
|
15.25 | airbrush?...party?...hmmmmm... | VLNVAX::DMCLURE | Peace in the fast-lane | Fri Oct 17 1986 19:09 | 16 |
| Hmmmmm... I do have an airbrush... maybe I should bring it to
the H-R party tomorrow. A little black-light paint and we could do
some body painting in the nude. This was something which we always
joked around about doing, but never dared actually do.
While I missed my father's 40th birthday (mainly because my brother
and I got thrown out of the house for the evening), I discovered a
few dabs of flourescent paint on the carpet the next morning and was
met by a barrage of denials of "any knowledge of such activities".
I guess I'll never know what exactly went down at THAT party, but ever
since then I've been looking forward to *my* 40th birthday party!
-davo
p.s. just 11 years to go!
|
15.26 | Moved by moderator | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri May 06 1988 01:33 | 16 |
| ================================================================================
Note XXX.0 Living dangerously! 1 reply
JULIET::SCOTT_AN 11 lines 5-MAY-1988 18:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've been to a few DEC parties, but never at the office. That
is a no no. I agree with you, there is a time and place for
everything. As far as wild, they were, but no sex. Maybe
alot of flirting, but that's all. Although, you never know who
might have needed a ride home.
I don't think there are too many sexy wild office parties. I
agree it would be difficult to face everyone on Monday. Although,
when drugs and alcohol are involved, I guess anything's possible.
I'll stick to home videos with my boyfriend, I'd like to be around
in five years and healthy!
|
15.27 | topic revisited... | ANGORA::JLUDGATE | Wage Peace | Sat May 28 1988 02:16 | 19 |
| Darn! I wanted to reply to this note when it was two years old,
but it looks like somebody snuck in here.
IMHO with regards to Wild Office Parties:
These were a combination of rumor, bragging, and a smidgeon of fact
thrown in to make sound good. Sure, Hollywood and certain industries
have had WOP's, but this is nothing new. Hollywood was almost shut
down in the thirties because of them. That, in my mind, comes closest
to my definition of WOP (a party thrown by the office with major
hanky-panky/wild times going on). Outside of that mythical city,
you won't find too many companies which will sponsor such parties.
Something which is commonly mistaken for this is the private party
at which several co-workers so up which power the old rumor mill.
These parties are simply dependent on the people with whom one chums
around with.
jonathan------------------------------------------------------------0---
|
15.28 | WOP!! or WOOPIE! | PIGGY::BELEVICK | | Fri Aug 19 1988 16:27 | 54 |
| The last two companies I worked for were famous for WOP!!! I had
attended quite a few of these WOP's in which everyone got a bit
drunk and flirted, talked dirty, took off from the office to wherever
they ended up to. Both companies were small. Although I personally
did not take part in the screwing around scenes, I can say that
I had good sources for finding out the nitty gritty of some of these
little affairs. With both companies the VP's were almost always
the source of the fooling around. In fact I beleive that my not
participating in all the events was definately the reason for my
layoff at one place. I enjoy partying, it does not matter with
who, but will not let myself get that "quote, unquote" down and
dirty about it. The last place I worked for threw some fantastic
office parties, usually for a specific holiday or occasion to
compensate employees for their hard work and effort. Every Christmas
for example this particular company would throw a huge office party
around Christmas as well as the usual party at a good Restaurant
or so. The office parties were either catered or everyone would
pitch in and bring something. The company would go out and buy
cases and cases of beer and booze, we would hire entertainment,
one year it was a belly dancer in which oe of the salesman danced
and undressed to the dancers movements to a point (he left his skivvies
on) and we all had a great time. About a year or so after leaving
both companies I had found out (from very reliable sources and my
own knowledge of the people) that; at one place a couple of people
were found doing some very unusual (believe me when I say unusual)
obscene things in some very funky far out places of the offices
from time to time, not to mention quite a few involved to boot!
(in one session that is!). I am still in touch with a few people
from the previous place and am informed that there are quite a few people
who continue this behavior (1 salesman bringing a couple or so of
the usual willing women to the usual hotel for a few hours "LUNCH?"
so to speak). Of this is a regular weekly thing involving more
than 90% of the company. I am not one to believe stories of this
nature especially form a nudy magazine, but do know the people very
well involved in these situations and most definately can say that
some real life situations can put publications' stories to shame.
These things occur more often than not, they usually involve a
"click". An outsider would have a very hard time pinpointing a
potential situation right under their nose. I look back and can
see where these things more often than not did get out of hand (HA,
HA no PUN intended) and at th time never even realised it going
on right in front of me. In fact I suspect there is a bit of it
happening with some people I know here at DEC! Well enough said
for now. Have a few good very juicy stories but am not sure if
or how I should mention them! Anyone interested in hearing about
facts I can provide them.
I can't be the only who has seen and heard of these things happening!!!
Seriously, let's face it, these days there are too many people trying
too HARD to get it, despite all the risks. Just open your eyes,
it's there.
|
15.29 | Yes, it happens | IAMOK::GAMESTER | | Mon Dec 19 1988 16:08 | 8 |
|
No. you're not the only ones. Ours were similar, although the parties
were never at the office. The people took off to do their "thing"
and we all heard about it the following work day. I was able to
stay out of that sort of trouble. I also almost got myself into
that mess as well on an occation.(At my first party, I was so naive...)
I do admit to flirting though.
|