T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
14.1 | sexTERRA ?? | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Mr. Gumby, my brain hurts | Tue Jun 03 1986 04:31 | 3 |
| Just what I like --- down to Earth sex! :-)
--- jerry
|
14.2 | Punner! | BOVES::WALL | Not The Dark Knight | Tue Jun 03 1986 09:47 | 4 |
| That was BAD, jerry (chuckle)
:-)
Dave W.
|
14.3 | Depends | SPIDER::GOHN | Don Gohn MLO21-3/E87 223-4384 | Tue Jun 03 1986 14:11 | 13 |
| Re .0:
Good topic. These kind of subjects are what we need more of here; not
just a continuation of DIGITAL.NOTE's 111.*.
I think a person usually decides it's ok to start a new relationship
as soon as s/he gets over feeling burned from the last one. If
you're still feeling vulnerable, then you should wait.
Ofcourse, this descision will also be affected by the degree of your
attraction to the new person.
Don
|
14.4 | whenever it feels right | BEING::MCCULLEY | Hot Stuff, or just a Flamer? | Tue Jun 03 1986 16:30 | 38 |
| I don't know that I agree with .3,
.3> I think a person usually decides it's ok to start a new relationship
.3> as soon as s/he gets over feeling burned from the last one. If
.3> you're still feeling vulnerable, then you should wait.
Sometimes it can be a help to have a new relationship starting,
to help repair/heal the damage from the last one (the well-known
rebound effect). It can complicate matters a lot, depending on
the people and situation involved, it could have either positive
or negative impact. But it might be a long wait otherwise...
Depends on the type of relationship, too. If there is a mutual
agreement that it is for the moment, not trying to force a long-term
involvement, then I'd say sooner is better. But then my own belief
is that any attempt to force a long-term involvement too early is
bad...
I know about this from experience: as I was leaving a job some years
ago I discovered in the course of saying "goodbye" to a friend there
that her marriage was breaking up. Being a good friend I wanted
to help her feel better, and I was confident that there was no risk
of any emotional entanglement since I was leaving in a month to
take a new job about 800 miles away.
Result: we've been married six years now, with our first child due
in 2 weeks!
There were some rough times while we both got it sorted out, she had to
work through a lot of issues and feelings and it took time, I had to be
patient while she did (including our seperation, her attempt at
reconciliation and a couple of short-term relationships trying to sort
out the rebound influence). Then I had to adjust to the results and to
the changes in my own life, we got through that and then I almost
blew it by letting my job overwhelm my perspective (a near miss,
that!).
But now, it's worth it - and getting better all the time!
|
14.5 | Logic versus chemistry | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Sign-up for the VAXination | Sun Jun 08 1986 20:29 | 11 |
| Don't ever wait because of logical reasoning. If you do, you
may miss out on the most important momment of fate your life has
planned for you! Remember, life is short, and the mating process is
even shorter (sorry about the somewhat biological terms here).
It's very hard to rationalize a relationship (or even plan one),
although most everyone tries anyway. If the chemistry is there, you'll
know it. Rationalize it later. I'm still rationalizing my marriage,
but the chemistry is still there.
-DAV0
|
14.6 | Emotion, not logic | MMO01::PNELSON | K.O. is O.K. | Sun Jun 08 1986 23:59 | 4 |
| I don't think it's usually logic that makes us ignore the chemistry.
It's pure emotion: mainly fear and insecurity.
Pat
|
14.7 | Sometimes waiting helps | MANTIS::GOHN | Don Gohn MLO21-3/E87 223-4384 | Mon Jun 09 1986 13:36 | 9 |
| Yes, and sometimes that fear is justified. I'm not saying there should
always be a "waiting period" between relationships, but I do think that
if you are unclear about why your last relationship "went wrong", it
might be advisable to spend a little time gaining some perspective so
that you just don't go on repeating the same mistakes over and over.
Admittedly, there are many situations where this doesn't apply.
Don
|
14.8 | You gotta do what you've gotta do | YOGI::BERNSTEIN | A feeling for the organism. | Wed Jun 11 1986 00:54 | 12 |
| After every relationship, I've told myself "I need a year to
myself, no attachments, no relationship." In 4 tries, I only made
it for 3 months. Now I'm married, and terribly happy that I won't
have to go through all that again. (I signed in blood, no divorce
allowed ;-)
In relation to the discussion, each person has to do what feels
right. If you find someone to talk to, to be with...neat city. Go
for it. Life's no fun without someone (at least one...but that's
at least one other topic) to live it with.
Ed
|
14.10 | REAL-ationships | MMO03::RESENDE | Life and love are all a dream | Sat Nov 01 1986 22:04 | 21 |
| Like Bob (.9), I agree that we are better off not "seeking" relationships. I
like to think that a good way to approach this is to enjoy your friends, make
new ones as the opportunities arise, and grow as you interact with them.
Maybe one of those friendships may evolve into something different, but I think
that friendship must be there before anything else.
Guess that doesn't leave any room for a "lusty" relationship does it? Maybe a
purely physical "relationship" isn't a "real-ationship" in the sense that we
mean here.
Anyone want to advocate the possibility that a true relationship can develop
out of an initially physical relationship?
Steve
BTW, Bob, I disagree that a "Platonic" relationship can be defined as a "casual
friend". I've had Platonic relationships that were pretty emotionally intense,
and "casual friend" sounds more like an acquaintance. And I don't generally
have intense times with "merely" casual acquaintances. There has to be a
deeper bond for that to take place. Platonic in the sense of "non-sexual",
Yes. Casual, No.
|
14.11 | Well, it is possible ;-) | VAXRT::CANNOY | The more you love, the more you can. | Sun Nov 02 1986 13:36 | 15 |
| Re .10:
>Anyone want to advocate the possibility that a true relationship can
>develop out of an initially physical relationship?
I do! I do!
My current relationship started with heavy doses of mutual lust
and a passing acquaintance. Very quickly the acquaintance became my
best friend, and love overpowered the simple lust. This happened
faster than I could have ever thought possible. It's interesting
to speculate how things might have been different if we'd had more
time to become friends first, but it certainly worked well for us
this way.
Tamzen
|
14.12 | Truth and people (doing anything) | AYOV14::ASCOTT | to see oorselves as ithers see us...? | Wed Nov 05 1986 06:56 | 20 |
| I'll second that (it happened to me too, though the relationship went
through a few more changes after that). Guess the problem is defining
what's meant by a "true" relationship - probably true as "of true
value"... though an initially physical relationship can have some moral
worth too.
To me the term relationship seems kind of value-neutral (though the
people involved have value, you can have a "good" or a "bad"
relationship, and things can change over time). But the idea of
"developing a relationship" (shorthand for "developing the (moral)
value of a relationship") can be applied to initially physical
relationships as to other kinds.
I think there's a reference to the idea of growing intimacy, discussed
in another note here. Intimacy seems to have to do with recognising
shared ways of thinking, between the intimates... as you do that (which
takes time), the intimacy grows, the relationship develops, a "true"
relationship may emerge from an "initially physical" one.
Anyone any thoughts?
|
14.13 | The Wise Relationship | HENRYY::HASLAM_BA | | Thu Feb 11 1988 18:41 | 31 |
| As a rule, it is necessary to grieve over a relationship. In the
case of divorce or death, it usually takes at least a year to work
through the pain, anger, loneliness and general feelings of
hopelessness/helplessness. If it is the case of a broken relationship,
some definite soul searching is in order since it takes two to either
make or break a relationship. Personally speaking, after 2 major
disastrous relationships, I had the foresight to seek professional
help (i.e. counseling). Once I was sure that my head was screwed
on straight, I could then look for someone who was also "together".
I recall two specific things my therapist once said that I've tried
to stick with:
1) It is better to like someone first and then love them because
if the love disappears, at least they're still someone you like;
whereas, if you only "love" them, when the love is gone, you've
got nothing left.
2) A general rule of thumb is that you should be verbally intimate
for at least 3 months before you become physically intimate; in
that way, you have a far better chance of knowing your partner than
if you "go for it" early in the relationship.
I have, since that time, met and married a wonderful man. We both
made it a point to discuss exactly what we expect from the
relationship, and each other, and most important, we both agreed
that no matter how difficult it is, we would ALWAYS make a major
effort to communicate and work things out. It has helped us to
grow closer every day.
-Barb
|
14.14 | falling in love and getting hurt | VANISH::GIBBONS | | Wed Oct 11 1989 07:41 | 25 |
| I think it is right to get to now someone as a friend but you have got
to look at it from all sides, there are people that have been hurt
badly from having a relationship with someone and feel that they need
someone to help them get over it but others tend to stay single untill
they are over it. It is very hard to get over them if you love them a
lot and it tends to effect every thing you do in one sense, in the way
that you don't want to do anything or you are very quiet.
I have had that experience and decided to stay single since for the
simple reason i don't wont to get hurt again. I am seeing someone at
the moment but i am unsure and i am not sure weather i want it to
develope any more than it already has.
We have known each other for 5 days in all, as we met at Reading
College, on a course which lasts for one year. After the third week
of talking we both walked to the station together and he stayed with me
until my train was about to leave, and then he went to catch his train
which was due to leave shortly after mine left. The following week he
said that he missed his train and he joked about it and again after
college had finished we walked to the station together and things
happened i didn't mind because i was beginning to get fond of him and
on the 10/10 we went ice-skating and he was speaking to a friend and i
got the impression that Dave the young man at college likes me a lot.
Can someone give me some advise on what i should do please......
|