T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
6.1 | I'm gonna tell on you! | MERIDN::DOLAN | | Mon May 12 1986 01:01 | 29 |
| Pat, "trust me"!! ;>)
Business issues (Internal Use Only, Company Confidential, etc.)
are goverened by policy and a pre-employment agreement. If business
trust is broken, the employment relationship can be terminated.
In "confidential" personal communications (and I would not include
VAXNOTES) problems usually arise when the "rules" were not stated
before the information was communicated. I believe it is important
that both parties understand the reasons for, and the results of,
not passing information to certain individuals or groups.
Then you have the cross between business and personal.
As a manager I may be asked to listen to information that may be
harmful to DEC. I have to make it quite clear before the communication
begins, that I may have to make a value judgement and further
communicate the information.
Now you have two trust issues...Do I trust this individual with the
information, and do I trust his/her judgement? Gets complicated even
between individuals who know each other. For people who have never seen
each other it comes down to maturity and motives.
But, please, don't tell anyone I said this........
-greg-
|
6.2 | | MTV::KLEINBERGER | Gale Kleinberger | Thu May 15 1986 10:46 | 36 |
| I think trust is a very vague word.... and means so much...
When there was a discussion going on in Marketing and
Security_Information about Sales Update, I was one of the ones in
there fighting that what was done was right - I was told that that
information was for public type knowledge... I trusted the person
who told me, but I also trusted myself enough to call the editor
of Sales Update and have a very long talk with her about what I
was percieving and had been told... [So I was wrong.... that is
usually the case 8-)...]... But the trust on the professional issue
had to lay with me... if there was reason to doubt, I had to have
enough trust to go look the material up myself.
I trust a peer in the office to work with me, and to give me the
information I need, becuase we are DEC and we work for the good
of the company. I trust my manager to stand behind me and back
me up, and to be there if I need him.
In my personal life, I trust my kids to do what I tell them to do,
until they give me reason to not trust them. And then I point out
what they have done wrong and trust them again.
With my personal relationships - I always trust people - I have
been hurt more than once and burnt VERY badly because of it, but
even the people who have hurt and burnt me, I still would trust
with my life, because I believe in life, and I believe that people
are good, you just have to keep trying to find that good in them;
whether they want that good found or not.
Trust comes from within, and has to be developed from within...
if you can't trust, you are not living a rich life, and I feel sorry
for you...
Gale
|
6.3 | By taking responsibility | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon May 19 1986 23:51 | 18 |
| Thank you Gale. You've said very nearly what I would.
Trust, like love, is an action that we perform. People are
fallible by their very natures. If you trust them, inevitably
they will eventually fail you. If you allow that failure to
prevent you from trusting, you are doomed.
On how we can trust strangers to do what is right, I can
recommend one other thing. Make sure that the rules of the game
are known, and don't put up with violations of those rules. It is
important that we make the system trustworthy. As an example we
have to trust the security of our net (the only other choice is
to not do business over it and that is too expensive to
consider). We must continually uphold it. When, as will
inevitably happen, it is compromised, we each must take actions
to fix the problem.
JimB.
|
6.5 | The cost of no trust | NY1MM::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Sat May 24 1986 13:38 | 10 |
| Both "trust" and "no trust" has costs.
The cost of "no trust" in business, at least, is the waste of time
and money in making contracts "air tight" with specific clauses
for non-performance penalties, as if both parties could do better
to defraud each than to fulfill the contract.
The cost of "no trust" on a personal level is the burden of anxiety
and suspicion that one who trusts no one carries throughout their
life.
|
6.6 | NO LIMITS | ZEKE::FARR | if...imagine | Wed Jan 06 1988 03:42 | 15 |
| On Paul Harvey's the rest of the story I remember hearing the origin
of the term "best man". It was said that in the days of the Norse
and castles that the groom and his chosen men would storm the castle
to steal the bride. The groom would take one man into the interiors
to find his bride while the rest of the band would fight in the
courtyard. Once the groom had his maiden in hand (or over shoulder)
he wuold find it difficult to fight so his "best man" was with him
to see that he got out with his life and his lady love.
My own saying is simpler " When it's getting deep and it's going
to hit the fan, I'd give him my left one to hold just in case I
lose the right one." There are just those times when there is no
limit on trust because circumstances won't allow limits. Should
that ever happen to you I hope you have someone to trust or may
God help you (because you'll need it or Him)
|
6.7 | decision | NEXUS::COYHIS | | Fri Feb 10 1989 21:40 | 1 |
| trust,like love,is a decision
|
6.8 | s | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Wed Nov 15 1989 12:52 | 1 |
| Perhaps a series of decisions?
|
6.9 | Trusting | NAMBE::RMOORE | | Mon Mar 18 1991 08:45 | 18 |
|
If the basis of peace is God, the secret of peace is trust.
Alfred Edersheim
Trusting means looking forward to getting something we dont yet
have for a man who already has something doesn't need to hope and
trust that he will get it. Rom 8:24
He who trust men will make fewer mistakes than he he woh distrusts
them.
When you are flying on plane, riding a cab, a bus or any other kind
of vechile you have to some kind of trust in them, dont you?
The man that trusts God is the man that can be trusted.
RM
|
6.10 | | WLDWST::SCARBERRY | | Mon Oct 28 1991 14:10 | 7 |
| re.9
Exactly!
When you buy a hamburger in the cafeteria, you have to trust that it is
edible. You have to trust that the building will hold up while you're
in there. People trust a lot more than you think.
|
6.11 | | TENAYA::RAH | Hit next unseen | Mon Oct 28 1991 17:58 | 3 |
|
you have to to trust that the hamburger did not meow at least once
during its lifetime, which is trusting a lot to Tobin...
|
6.12 | there are limits | DELNI::STHILAIRE | for instance me, baby | Tue Oct 29 1991 08:07 | 5 |
| re .11, if I couldn't trust that a hamburger never meowed, I simply
could not go on! (Better that it had spoken in English.)
Lorna
|
6.13 | | CFSCTC::MACKIN | Jim Mackin, OO-R-US | Tue Oct 29 1991 19:14 | 9 |
| <<< Note 6.12 by DELNI::STHILAIRE "for instance me, baby" >>>
-< there are limits >-
>>> re .11, if I couldn't trust that a hamburger never meowed, I simply
>>> could not go on! (Better that it had spoken in English.)
>>> Lorna
A modest proposal, I think.
Jim
|