T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
86.1 | I agree! | FDCV17::FREP15 | | Wed Mar 09 1988 14:10 | 6 |
| < Note 86.0 by SAGE::DERAMO >
-< Maynard Eyesores >-
I agree with you. They are eye sores!
|
86.2 | $$$ | FHQ::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Wed Mar 09 1988 14:55 | 10 |
| Ditto.....
I think it comes back to who you know, and how much it will
cost to get the variances (if you know what I mean), not only
an eyesore, but I certainly believe it was done illegally although
I'm not going to start anything over it. Just an opinion, not
a libel statement.
Mark
|
86.3 | maynard eyesoar | LDP::FILZ | | Thu Mar 10 1988 14:04 | 5 |
| I feel the same way unfortunately there is not much the zba or planning
board can do about appearances. If the builder meets of the requiremnts
and not abbutters complian about it, he get an ok to build. Even
if the zba said no the state wil say yes
|
86.4 | | SKETCH::BASSETT | Design | Thu Mar 10 1988 15:37 | 8 |
| ...and what about that apartment bld right across the street from
the main street parking lot, next to the Sit 'n Bull. It is a gross
yellow color! YUCK!
But! They are in the process of fixing up the apartments behind
the post office......
Linda
|
86.5 | an ugly piece of history | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Period Three Implies Chaos | Thu Mar 10 1988 15:57 | 11 |
| re .4:
> ...and what about that apartment bld right across the street from
> the main street parking lot, next to the Sit 'n Bull. It is a gross
> yellow color! YUCK!
That building may be ugly, but before you start a petition to have it torn
down, you may be interested in knowing that that building is the original
Mill building, and is older than the rest of the Mill.
-Mike
|
86.6 | | SKETCH::BASSETT | Design | Fri Mar 11 1988 14:42 | 9 |
|
No petition being started here.
Gee, for a minute...I thought you were going to say you lived there!!
|
86.7 | It may be the same in any town, but....... | FRSBEE::DEROSA | because a mind is a terrible thing | Fri Mar 25 1988 08:55 | 12 |
| You gotta understand.....Maynard is a small town and unfortunately
certain builders/developers can get away with building eyesores
or junk like that because their relatives/brother-in-laws/buddies
ARE on the planning boards or building commitees, etc. Being a townie
I see this all the time and there nothing anyone can do about it...
But if the average home owner wants to build an addition or deck
or something simple they give you alot of sh** about it and make
you jump through hoops to get it approved......
my $.02
|
86.8 | Good experience with ZBA | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Fri Mar 25 1988 09:43 | 12 |
| Just to balance the discussion: I'm an average Maynard homeowner, and I
went before the Zoning Board of Appeals for a lot line variance a couple of
years ago. Certainly there were red tape and lots of waiting involved, but
no more so than any bureaucratic procedure. I found the Board members to
be knowledgeable and reasonable. And I'm not even related to any of them :-).
They need to be careful to follow the proper legal procedures; since
there's so much money involved, expensive lawsuits against the town are
sure to follow any improper actions they may take. I expected bored
bureaucrats, and was pleasantly surprised when I found them to be genuinely
interested in maintaining the neighborhood's character and the neighbors'
property values.
|
86.9 | | LDYBUG::PEARCE | All things bright and beautiful | Mon Mar 28 1988 16:08 | 8 |
|
I'd like to add my 2 cents also. Everytime there has been a new
construction or major change in the properties surrounding our
property, we received a letter from the zoning board to be present
at the meetings.
- Linda
|
86.10 | Ques. RE: Zoning Board Mtngs | BETSY::WATSON | No_Mad | Tue Mar 29 1988 10:19 | 9 |
| re: -.1
What was the purpose/intent of you being present during zoning board meetings?
Was it to voice any concerns or reservations you might have regarding the
intended construction in your neighborhood? Have you attended any meetings,
and if so, did you feel it was worth your while? (i.e., did it do you any
good?)
Kip
|
86.11 | | LDYBUG::PEARCE | All things bright and beautiful | Tue Mar 29 1988 12:49 | 24 |
|
Sorry, I should have elaborated a bit more.
I was just trying to say that residents/businesses can't just go and slap a
building up without the neighbors being involved in the process. At
least the ones who are adjacent to the construction. Yes, the meetings
are to voice concerns, etc.
I have not attended these meetings mainly because I've
never been overly concerned with the new buildings or business.
Unless it's something totally outrageous or may cause injury,
I feel people should do what they want with their property.
(That's my personal opinion, I'm not trying to get on a soapbox)
But, in regards to a construction behind my house, one of my neighbors
was concerned about right of way to park their car. Their driveway
is behind the house and access would have to be thru the business
parking lot. They attended the meeting and apparently made out well.
At least I haven't heard anything to the contrary. (News travels fast
in my neighborhood.)
- Linda
|
86.12 | Abutters rebutting... | PRAGMA::GRIFFIN | Dave Griffin | Tue Mar 29 1988 14:31 | 19 |
| I've received a notice from the Zoning board, and have attended
a meeting. I'm sure the circumstances change from case to case,
so people may have more sway than we did.
In my case, a neighbor wanted to sell a very small field and have
it rezoned as a building lot. The other neighbors felt that the
resulting building would not fit the character of the neighborhood,
that it would look "odd" forced in there sideways (which they would
have to do to make the house fit), etc. The developer was there
with all the pretty drawings and invitations to see similar houses.
The primary issue for this case was the lot size - not the affect
of the building on the area - and the variance was denied on these
grounds. Still, the board spokesman said that the voicing of our
dismay at the situation was not overlooked in their decision-making.
An interesting experience...
- dave
|
86.13 | the entire street attended the meeting.... | ERASER::KALLIS | Why is everyone getting uptight? | Tue Mar 29 1988 16:47 | 13 |
| These things vary from case to case. In our neighborhood, we have
a house accross the street that's on a large lot. The person who
owns the house used to live there, but moved away and made it into
a rental property.
After several years, he decided to subdivide the lot into two so
that he could build a new house for additional rental income. Although
everybody living on the street was against the rezoning, and although
we raised points about possible public safety (parking conditions
might preclude adequate fire protection for homes at the end of
the [dead-end] street), it made no difference.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|