Title: | NAS Message Queuing Bus |
Notice: | KITS/DOC, see 4.*; Entering QARs, see 9.1; Register in 10 |
Moderator: | PAMSRC::MARCUS EN |
Created: | Wed Feb 27 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2898 |
Total number of notes: | 12363 |
Does somebody knows, what error with Status -255 means ? I could not find anything about it. This error is seen on DEC UNIX platform. The group running on this machine communicates with another group running on a OpenVMS platform. Thanks and regards, Farhad [Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2887.1 | XHOST::SJZ | Kick Butt In Your Face Messaging ! | Thu May 22 1997 12:44 | 6 | |
where are you seeing the -255 ? is this returned from a pams function ? all of our error messages are even num- bers. there is no -255. _sjz. | |||||
2887.2 | Error status -255 | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Farhad Ghavami | Fri May 23 1997 05:08 | 22 |
I know. That why I was wondering and lost! The exact error message logged in the group log file is as the following: *************** dmqjourn (13346) timestamp *************** jrn, message operation error status -255 *************** dmqjourn (13346) timestamp **************** jrn, journal process for group 38 has exited I customer could give me more significative info concerning the error. The customer told me that they had a problem with login on the system that obliged them to reboot the system some weeks ago. The error has manifested itself after the reboot! Today, I talked with the customer. Yesterday, they have moved all DQF files elsewhere and since then the system works without problem. Perhaps DQF files are corrupted oncemore! Farhad. PS: The customer is the last one with corrupted journal files last year in Germany. [Posted by WWW Notes gateway] | |||||
2887.3 | XHOST::SJZ | Kick Butt In Your Face Messaging ! | Fri May 23 1997 09:08 | 8 | |
-255 is definitely corrupt journal files. however, their journal files are probably just fine. there was a problem in V3.2A which was not fixed in the ECO where the journal process thinks the file is corrupt even though it is not. the problem is fixed in V4.0. _sjz. |