T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2879.1 | | DECWET::SIMONICH | Make it look easy | Thu May 15 1997 12:38 | 16 |
| Q1. After install dmq windows client, I received and sent to server
and client by Test Utility. But DECmessageQ CLS security Utilityc
is not activate. What happen ? PC sample programs for VB are very
good(no error).
Do you mean the Security Utility won't run, or that it reports an error when
it starts up ( "Error getting security file" )? If it's the error getting
security file then it probably means that you started the CLS without
specifying the use of a security file.
Q2. After put value to MRQ on VAX/VMS, Can I read this data on win95?
my test program(c++) return : nomoredata/waiting...(get/getw)
Yes you can read from an MRQ on Win95. Did you send a message to the MRQ
before you tried to read it?
|
2879.2 | | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | | Thu May 15 1997 14:11 | 13 |
| >>Do you mean the Security Utility won't run, or that it reports an error when
>>it starts up ( "Error getting security file" )? If it's the error getting
>>security file then it probably means that you started the CLS without
>>specifying the use of a security file.
How can I specify a security file ?
>>Yes you can read from an MRQ on Win95. Did you send a message to the MRQ
>>before you tried to read it?
Ofcourse, I send a message to the MRQ on server(VMS). And my put/get
test programs for MRQ worked very well on VMS. I confirmed pending
messages on MRQ by use monitor utility(VMS).
Thanks,
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
2879.3 | | DECWET::SIMONICH | Make it look easy | Fri May 16 1997 11:59 | 8 |
| > How can I specify a security file ?
The V3.2 CLS for VMS doesn't support client security. That feature will be
added in V4.0. I should have mentioned that, but it's described in the client
kit release notes. For V3.2, CLS client security is only available on UNIX
and NT.
Pat
|
2879.4 | are we supposed to NEED the security file? | WHOS01::ELKIND | Steve Elkind, Digital SI @WHO | Tue May 20 1997 10:54 | 6 |
| Pat,
Does the .1 response imply that you need to spec a security file in the
CLS section? We've been running v3.2A with nothing specified (as we
are not using it and don't want to), and it works fine. Is this some
behavior that changes in v4.0 for Unix?
|
2879.5 | | DECWET::SIMONICH | Make it look easy | Tue May 20 1997 12:50 | 7 |
| No, the security file is not required. If it's not used then the CLS doesn't
attempt to control client access. In this situation the Security Utility
will not be useful, because it can't get the security file from the CLS.
So the Security Utility is only useful if the CLS is using a security file.
Pat
|