T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1158.1 | info (such as it is) from Internet Movie Database | BOOKIE::chayna.zko.dec.com::tamara::eppes | Nina Eppes | Wed Aug 28 1996 13:35 | 60 |
| [Internet Movie Database] [FireFly ad]
101 Dalmatians (1996)
1996
[Merchandising Links ][release-date ][official-site ]
Genre/keyword: dog
Certification: USA:PG
Directed by
Stephen Herek
Cast (in alphabetical order)
Glenn Close .... Cruella de Ville
Jeff Daniels
Hugh Laurie
Joan Plowright
Joely Richardson
Written by
Dodie Smith (book)
Cinematography by
Adrian Biddle
Music by
Michael Kamen
Film Editing by
Trudy Ship
Produced by
John Comfort
John Hughes
Other crew
Kevin Day .... gaffer
Gary Donoghue .... best boy
Links with other movies
remake of
One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)
Cast your vote for 101 Dalmatians (1996) (1=awful, 10=excellent)
__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9__10__
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Search-Help-Index
Copyright � 1990-1996 The Internet Movie Database Ltd
Graphics for this site provided by AmeriSites Website Development.
|
1158.2 | SAME SIZE? | PCBUOA::CHENARD | | Tue Sep 03 1996 11:51 | 13 |
| They probably bred the puppies for the same
reason they used a dozen or more baby pigs for
Babe - the puppies/pigs thru the whole movie
have to be the same size and since it usually
takes 3 or more months to make a movie, those
animals don't stop growing. Dalmation puppies
probably aren't as available as you might think.
I am assuming that the puppies were born at
different times to keep the supply of puppies
at the right age for the whole movie.
Mo
|
1158.3 | | BUSY::SLAB | Dogbert's New Ruling Class: 100K | Tue Sep 03 1996 14:41 | 3 |
|
I would have expected Angelica Huston to be cast as Cruella.
|
1158.4 | | SHRCTR::PGILL | | Wed Sep 04 1996 12:01 | 6 |
|
Angelica? Good thought but when you see Glenn in this role you'll
never imagine anyone else doing it. She looks perfect!
I can't wait to see it - I'll probably enjoy it more than my
5-year-old.
|
1158.5 | Puppies | WMOIS::TARDUGNO | | Wed Sep 04 1996 22:25 | 4 |
| Crazy as it sounds...I'm waiting for this movie to come to the theatres
it looks like Glen Close will be a riot..and not to mention all those
beautiful puppies....I'm looking forward to seeing this and hope
its a good production..
|
1158.6 | Four tickets please... | KAOFS::P_CHAPLINSKY | | Thu Sep 05 1996 11:21 | 7 |
| I am excited for the release of this movie too! I saw the previews
when we took the two little ones to the "Hunchback of Notre Dame".
Glen looks perfect as Cruella. I loved the animated version but
this looks to be even better. Very promising, judging from the short
clip.
PChaplinsky
|
1158.7 | puppies... | WMOIS::TARDUGNO | | Sat Sep 07 1996 19:40 | 7 |
| RE: P_Chaplinsky
Lets hope its a great~ reproduction from the animated one....
I'd like to buy this, if its good, when it gets released for sale,
later on...
I think Glen Close is a terrific actress...and not to mention the
P U P P I E S ^^^!!! oooo they are sooo cute...
|
1158.8 | Sorry in advance... | COMICS::MILLSS | "I have always been here" ...Ambassador Kosh | Mon Sep 09 1996 06:30 | 8 |
| > P U P P I E S ^^^!!! oooo they are sooo cute...
I love Dalmatian puppies, too ! I couldn't eat a whole one though...
Apologetic Simes %^)
(Sorry, couldn't resist it!)
|
1158.9 | pups^ | WMOIS::TARDUGNO | | Wed Sep 11 1996 20:27 | 8 |
| re: .8
maybe I can get them to go niPPing at your heels haha
I did see on Entertainment Tonite, some of the pratfalls
the Puppies do and it does look like a fun movie...
just like, kick back and make like a KID again...I WISH!!!
|
1158.10 | | TROOA::BROOKS | | Tue Nov 26 1996 12:46 | 4 |
1158.11 | | EDSCLU::JAYAKUMAR | | Tue Dec 03 1996 09:15 | 3 |
1158.12 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Tue Dec 31 1996 08:34 | 10 |
1158.13 | yes it was | PASTA::PIERCE | The Truth is Out There | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:26 | 5 |
1158.14 | | MPGS::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Thu Jan 02 1997 11:47 | 13 |
1158.15 | This movie is very good | KAOFS::P_CHAPLINSKY | | Fri Jan 24 1997 10:16 | 15 |
| For my son's 5th birthday, eight of us, four adults and four children,
finally went to see this movie. We loved it! My daughter who turns
four this weekend has asked me to see it again; I promised to buy the
movie when it's released on video. I can't wait to see it with her.
Each character was perfectly casted for their role. There were two
major villains a la "Home Alone" which is perfect as they're not too
scary for the little ones.
This was a good movie to see on the big screen. I'm glad it was still
playing this past weekend. It made for a successfull birthday party.
If you have children don't miss this one!
PChaplinsky
|
1158.16 | | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | Sic Transit Gloria Mundi | Wed Jan 29 1997 04:19 | 10 |
| The wife and I went to see this one recently. We both loved it without
reservations. Even the bits where they got it wrong (racoons and skinks
are not native to the British Isles, and our Police cars haven't made
that nee-nah-nee-nah noise for years) didn't detract from the film.
.15>> If you have children don't miss this one!
Even if you don't have children, don't miss this one.
Clive
|
1158.17 | Nice, but disappointing | NEWVAX::BUCHMAN | Rosalie's Uncle | Mon May 05 1997 16:19 | 69 |
| Just saw the video, and, well, ho hum.... Maybe this is just one for
the kids, or those who haven't seen the original or read the book.
Those puppies were awfully cute, of course, and it was interesting to
see how well trained the various animals were. And yet, you didn't get
a feeling for the animals as characters, which I think is the real
strength of the original story and which was handled wonderfully in the
animated movie. Nobody appreciated the fact that Pongo had "perhaps the
greatest mind in Dogdom", or that the Colonel was a fumbling old
character who nonetheless (with prodding of his nominal subordinates)
got the job done. And though you saw a lot of dogs barking, and dimly
apprehended that messages were being passed to and fro, it had nothing
of the punch and tension of sending an alert to the Twilight Bark and
waiting desparately for a reply.
> There were two major villains a la "Home Alone"
This was a problem in itself. There just wasn't much suspense. Most of
the times, the inept villians seemed virtually no threat to the
puppies.
<better put this behind a spoiler...>
The pups were elsewhere while the villians were being subjected to
repeated Home-alone style pratfalls. Then the police quietly picked
them up when they had enough. (the Skinner guy was pretty scary, but
in the end he did very little). And Pongo and Perdita did little aside
from meet the pups in a barn and lead them partway home.
Contrast this to the animated movie--it was full of suspense! The
tension in the scene where Pongo and Roger await the puppies, and when
Roger resuscitates one, was very well done. The way he stood up to
Cruella was first rate. Then, the puppies are stolen. Pongo gets the
idea to send word on the Twilight Bark -- can all the dogs in London
find fifteen pups? WHen word comes back they are found, they trek
Voverland through harsh weather and arrive at the DeVil place just in
time to fight the Badduns and escape with the pups. The scene where
they find shelter at the dairy barn almost brings tears to my eyes!
Then Pongo gets the idea to disguise the whole crew as Labradors by
rollign in the soot, and finally he and Perdy -- not the London police
-- get all 99 puppies home intact.
As for villians, Glen Close was a pretty good imitator, but who can
beat the image of the crazed Cruella De Vil bearing down on the truck
full of puppies from behind, teeth showing and a mad gleam in her
eyes?
If anything, this movie was more a homage to the old one than a decent
flick in its own right. I kept getting the feeling I was watching a
medieval passion play, where the story line is well known to all the
audience and the characters merely pose and ritualistically declaim
their expected lines. Too bad; I was expecting a real masterpiece, like
Babe.
MHO,
Jim B.
|
1158.18 | Not all that bad | NEWVAX::BUCHMAN | Rosalie's Uncle | Thu Jun 05 1997 11:54 | 49 |
| I feel obliged to temper my earlier criticism. Some parts of the movie
-- mainly the first half -- improve with repeated viewing (and with a
three-year-old in charge of the VCR, that's what you get!).
Basically, the whole first half of the movie is great, once you resign
yourself to the fact that the animals will not be characters in their
own right. The intro of Cruella De Vil is superb -- Glen Close carries
herself so well in this role! She is utterly believeable. In fact, she
dominates the film so naturally that Emma as often as not refers to
this movie as "Cruella". The fact that she was given short shrift in
the latter half of the movie is the fault of the writing, not of her
performance.
Horace and Jasper are so close to their animated counterparts as to be
eerie. My favorite Jasper scene is where he stands atop DeVil Manor and
cheerily explains to Cruella that he doesn't know, at the moment, just
exactly where the puppies might be.
The early interaction between Roger and Anita is quite good too. I
think Emma knows that if she puts in the video before bedtime, she's
guaranteed that I won't turn it off until at least the wedding scene.
It's funny how, in movies, it's considered so romantic to get married
after the briefest acquaintance; if anyone did that in real life, we'd
say they were crazy foolish. (Yet I know one such couple, married after
one date; they have nothing in common, but have been happy together for
twenty years and three kids.)
A good way to watch this movie is with a child with a short attention
span. You can watch the first half over and over again, and divert the
child before the disappointing second half.
One trend that I dislike and that this movie is guilty of is that of
the good guy becoming somewhat sadistic. This is the "Home Alone"
syndrome. In the animated 101 Spotted Dogs, the bad guys took their
share of pratfalls, but it was typically due to their own bumbling. The
few times that the good guys actively went after them (Pongo and Perdy
attacking the Badduns at DeVil Manor), they were only doing what was
necessary. But in the live action flick, the good guys or their allies
repeatedly set traps for their advesaries, and take joy in inflicting
pain on them. I don't think this is a message I want to instill in my
next generation. During the first few viewings, for instance, Emma (who
is too young to have much concept of good guys vs. bad) would start
crying when her favorite character, Cruella, would be plunged into a
vat of molasses or kicked through a window into a pigsty. I had to
reassure her that Cruella was okay, she just fell down and got dirty.
Now, Emma doesn't protest during these scenes; I don't think that's
really progress.
At length,
Jim
|