| I was on the Hollywood Reporter's site, and they asked users of the
site to tell them what the user's thought of this film.
Here are some of the responses:
"Walked out after 30 minutes of being assaulted by sound, bad lighting,
terrible dialogue and mugging instead of acting."
"The film's only redeeming value is a $60 million-dollar object lesson
in the perils of 'form over content' filmmaking. It works for
commercials and MTV but it's death in the theaters."
"I think you were a little hard on this film. I'd rate it a B-minus."
"I enjoyed 'The Fan' quite a bit. It was well acted, with De Niro
turning in another strong performance and Snipes doing a quite good
job. Tony Scott's direction was on par as usual and the soundtrack was
excellent."
"Tony Scott's direction made this film really watchable."
"Tony Scott -- go back to commercials."
"Billion-dollar director or not, Tony Scott laid an egg. Probably
couldn't see the dailies, his ego-sized cigar got in the way."
"This film is an example of what's wrong with BOTH Hollywood and Major
League Baseball."
"De Niro should drop these redundant, repetitive roles."
"Every time I saw De Niro I was breathless and scared."
"Good acting and directing but no suspense."
So, I guess you pretty much either love it or hate it.
E
|
| I caugt this recently on video and thought it wasn't bad. Deniro plays
a psycho(again) and does a good job. Snipes, IMHO, was perfectly cast
as the superstar baseball player(gee, someone who looks like an
athlete, playing an athlete. What a novel concept)! Barkin is somewhat
amusing as a Sports Radio personality but she really isn't around as
much as I thought she would be.
There are a couple of times when the film kind of confuses the viewer,
because of the way the film was shot and they get a little carried away
with the F-word (but what R rated film doesn't these days) but overall
I can't complain.
I found the movie to be very entertaining, a bit disturbing and there
is a nice plot twist at the end.
*** out of ****
Gary S
|