| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1089.1 | They're dug in there like an Alabama tick... | POLAR::TYSICK | Knight of the Soundtable | Tue May 28 1996 12:38 | 12 |
| I (IMHO) think Predator kicks P2's butt!
A better cast in the first one...although the second wasn't lacking
much in talent either...
Better story...more action...great one liners...excelent F/X for
'87.
What do you think?
|
| 1089.2 | | SCAMP::FORTIN_C | Worked the Bars & Sideshows.... | Tue May 28 1996 14:01 | 2 |
|
P2 sux.....no Ah-nuld.
|
| 1089.3 | I won't be back... | STRATA::GARRITY | | Tue May 28 1996 22:34 | 4 |
| Actually Arnie was making T2 at the time. That was the reason he wasn't
involved in Predator 2. I thought Glover did ok in part two. What was
good in part two was that you got to see the alien a lot more. I
thought they were both entertaining, but the first one was better.
|
| 1089.4 | No "Body" | ODIXIE::LOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 06:19 | 6 |
|
> P2 sux.....no Ah-nuld.
And no Jesse "I ain't got time to bleed" Ventura!
|
| 1089.5 | We already knew | BRAT::MONBLEAU | | Mon Jun 03 1996 14:11 | 5 |
| Thye had to be differentkinds of movies. In P1 thre was more suspense
as they slowly revealed the aliein creature to us. In P2, we already
knew what the creature was so they had to make up for the lack of
mystery with more action - which they did. I enjoyed both films by
not bothering myself too much with comparisons.
|