| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 965.1 | all said "Crawford nice to look at, movie not" basically | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | Ericaceaous to the extreme... | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:17 | 4 |
|
It's getting panned by all the critics. Even the clips looked bad
to me as well...
|
| 965.2 | Seen the ad (photo of her in his face)?! | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:32 | 3 |
| The two morning DJs on WAAF were trashing it this morning.
Sue
|
| 965.3 | fwiw | HUMOR::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Tue Nov 07 1995 17:48 | 3 |
| Two thumbs down from Siskel & Ebert.
-- Nina
|
| 965.4 | do it over? | MKOTS1::HIGGINS | | Wed Nov 08 1995 09:23 | 4 |
| I heard that they asked Cindy if she would be willing to reshoot
her scenes...
NOT a good sign.
|
| 965.5 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | Make it so!!! | Wed Nov 08 1995 10:56 | 7 |
|
oh well....at least she didn't give up her day job! :)))
Chris
:)
|
| 965.6 | I liked it! | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Fri Jan 31 1997 03:52 | 10 |
| Leave it to me to be different! I liked the movie. I wouldn't give it
any awards or go out of my way to see it again, but it was fast paced
and entertaining. Cindy Crawford in her action debut was far better
than Pamela Anderson Lee, in "Barb Wire" or Vanessa Williams in
"Eraser"(although "Eraser" is a better film overall), IMHO.
** out of ****
Gary S.
|