T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
952.1 | | GRIM::MESSENGER | Bob Messenger | Fri Oct 06 1995 17:10 | 11 |
| Not to go too far down the rathole, but...
> Most likely people get this phrase from "Dark Side of the Moon" which
> was an album by Pink Floyd. It was the #1 selling rock album of all
> time. In addition to the title song it's the one with "Brick in the
> wall" (about the Berlin wall), "Money", etc.
"Another Brick in the Wall" (pts I, II and III) is from "The Wall", not
"Dark Side of the Moon".
-- Bob
|
952.2 | | SPSEG::COVINGTON | and the situation is excellent. | Mon Oct 09 1995 10:02 | 7 |
|
Farther down this bottomless pit of a rathole...
It's not the number 1 selling rock album of all time. It's the album
that spent the longest amount of time on Billboard's Top 200 chart.
It's been there continously since its release, unless it fell off in
the past few years. But greatest number of albums sold, no.
|
952.3 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | A swift kick in the butt - $1 | Mon Oct 09 1995 10:21 | 4 |
|
I think Michael Jackson's "Thriller" still has that honor, fol-
lowed by Fleetwood Mac's "Rumors".
|
952.4 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:01 | 5 |
| That's funny, I heard on the radio once that it had passed one of the Beatles
albums (Abby Road I think) to become the #1 best selling record of all time.
Maybe they were having the same argument at the radio station.
George
|
952.5 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:58 | 1 |
| And "Another Brick in the Wall" is not about the Berlin Wall.
|
952.6 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 12:05 | 8 |
| Well again, must be dueling opinions.
A few years back when the Berlin wall was being torn down I heard a report
that they gave a concert in Berlin and sang that song because it had been
written about the wall. There was something about them knocking down a wall of
Styrofoam bricks in a symbolic gesture of the real wall being knocked down.
George
|
952.7 | rathole continued | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | Enterprise poverty | Mon Oct 09 1995 12:38 | 5 |
| The "wall" refered to in Pink Floyd's album "The Wall" is the
psychological and emotional barrier which the protagonist has built
around himself. It is not a reference to the Berlin Wall.
Clive
|
952.8 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | A swift kick in the butt - $1 | Mon Oct 09 1995 13:07 | 5 |
|
So, how 'bout them Red Sox?
8^)
|
952.9 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Mon Oct 09 1995 14:08 | 15 |
| The song was written in the late '70's and had to do with the
institutionalization of minds and souls, such as that which happens in
the public school system. The theme was along the lines of conforming
in a way that would continue to support the establishment (being
another brick in the wall). This could apply to the Berlin wall, but
it could also apply to the American public school system, corporate
culture, the current conservative bent in America, the
straight-jacketing of the mind during the '50s, or any other kind of
enforced conformity.
They played it at the Berlin wall 'cause, well, um, it does have the
word wall in it.
If you saw the film, you saw a lot of English school students in their
uniforms walking in a line and they all had the same face.
|
952.10 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Mon Oct 09 1995 14:09 | 1 |
| Who are the Red Sox?
|
952.11 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 14:40 | 13 |
| The Red Sox are a baseball team that last won the Championship the year after
the revolution of 1917 that brought the Communists to power. This revolution
enabled them to build a wall a half century later while the United States was
building a space program that took us to the moon despite the setback during
the Apollo 13 mission. Meanwhile the band Pink Floyd wrote a song about a wall
which some people claim is based on the Communist wall while others say it has
a more philosophical meaning. The space program ended, communism ended, the
wall came down, Pink Floyd played a concert, people got confused about the
dark side of the moon, and still the Red Sox have not been able to win another
championship.
But we go to the games anyway, they have to give us that.
George
|
952.12 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:05 | 6 |
| Thanks for clarifying that, but you left out the bit about Roger Waters
leaving the band (was it before the concert, or after? For some
reason, I think he was the only PF member there, but then I have
trouble remembering yesterday).
b2
|
952.13 | Conference Discussion | NPSS::RAUHALA | CABIN BOY | Mon Oct 09 1995 18:52 | 2 |
| Note 952. is write locked. What's going on around here?
this file is out of control... where is the moderator???
|
952.14 | | CHAYNA::EPPES | Nina Eppes | Thu Oct 12 1995 18:28 | 13 |
| > Note 952. is write locked. What's going on around here?
> this file is out of control... where is the moderator???
Well, this moderator was on vacation, and another one (Dave Wiegleb) has been at a
conference. I asked Jeff Michaud to keep an eye on things in the meantime.
I assume he created this topic to try to keep the file IN control. :-)
Please try to keep the discussions related to MOVIES. There are other notes
files for trivia, music, baseball, etc. etc. See the notes file
TURRIS::EASYNET_CONFERENCES if you want to locate some of those...
-- Nina
|
952.15 | right on!! | STRATA::GARRITY | | Thu Nov 02 1995 04:46 | 1 |
| good job Steve!! I was hoping someone would put a stop to this!
|
952.16 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Mon Nov 06 1995 11:02 | 1 |
| but food allergies are so important...
|
952.17 | feel free | HERON::KHAN | | Thu Nov 09 1995 05:06 | 9 |
| .15
You can also add : avoiding going out, too many cars, pollution ....
Come on there are things a lot more important in life.Just getting
disguted by this "return" of "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS" and anyway here we
are supposed to be talking about powder so stick to it, please.
Powder: awesome, U just can't tell whether it's good or bad; worth
seeing though.
|
952.18 | | SPSEG::COVINGTON | serpent deflector | Thu Nov 09 1995 08:56 | 3 |
|
Scotty, set your sarcasm meter to "stun."
|
952.19 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Wed Nov 15 1995 13:40 | 5 |
| re: .11
Who or what is your comment directed to or at?
And what does it mean?
|
952.20 | and the answer is.... | SWAM1::MILLS_MA | To Thine own self be True | Wed Nov 15 1995 16:34 | 1 |
| My guess is Harry Connick, jr.....
|
952.21 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | To tell you the truth, Not so much! | Thu Nov 16 1995 04:26 | 9 |
|
re .14
no that would have been my comment from .12 about Harry being a sick
puppy while this comment was directed at .11
Chris
:)
|
952.22 | my mistake | SWAM1::MILLS_MA | To Thine own self be True | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:33 | 1 |
| OOOOps! I should have checked the reply numbers better.....
|
952.23 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | To tell you the truth, Not so much! | Wed Dec 13 1995 09:33 | 7 |
|
I've heard of Sandra Bernhart, the comedienne. One of Madonna's
friends. She does alot of impersonations.
Chris
:)
|
952.24 | ...Sorry :-} | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Wed Dec 13 1995 09:59 | 7 |
| re -.1
>>She does alot of impersonations.
Yeah, her best is that of a comedienne!
Sue
|
952.25 | More digression 8^) | ASIC::MYERS | Apps with attitude | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:11 | 8 |
| Our 3.5 year old is named Sarah and she has quite the personality,
hence, we call her Sarah Bernhardt, too. However, when that stubborn,
acting up side comes out (where did she ever get that!!! 8^) ) we call
her Sarah Heartburn, the evil twin.
I believe that the original Sarah Bernhardt did have a wooden leg.
/Susan
|
952.26 | | POLAR::LYLE | cats in heat are NOT toys | Thu Jun 20 1996 07:07 | 3 |
|
'je ne sais quoi'????
|
952.27 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Thu Jun 20 1996 07:46 | 6 |
| Joy of life.
We all see what we wish, I guess.
E Grace
|
952.28 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Thu Jun 20 1996 09:58 | 6 |
| > <<< Note 1107.6 by SNAX::NOONAN "sing the soul's blues" >>>
> Joy of life.
"Je ne sais quoi" means "I don't know what".
|
952.29 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | The Truth is out there..... | Thu Jun 20 1996 10:17 | 4 |
|
try joie de vivre = joy of life
|
952.30 | Alors! | CHEFS::HANDLEY_I | Per Ardua Ad Alcohol | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:22 | 4 |
|
Je ne comprends pas!
I.
|
952.33 | "Let me Hear you body talk?"... Wot does that mean? | TRUCKS::BEATON_S | I Just Look Innocent | Mon Jun 24 1996 09:26 | 5 |
| I thought Olivia was never better than when she starred in her "Let's
Get Physical" vid....
;-)
|
952.31 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | The Truth is out there..... | Mon Jun 24 1996 10:56 | 3 |
|
let me hear your body talk = body language = sexual innuendo = schwing!
|
952.32 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Do you wanna bang heads with me? | Mon Jun 24 1996 11:38 | 5 |
|
Olivia can't get much more obvious than:
"There's nothing left to talk about unless it's horizontally."
|
952.34 | | MFGFIN::EPPERSON | I saw a chicken with two heads | Thu Jul 11 1996 00:25 | 2 |
| Actor! Actor! Actor!
|
952.35 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Fri Jul 12 1996 02:39 | 8 |
| RE: .19
That wasn't a typo. I spell it 'acter'. It's just my little way of
reducing sexist language. (*8
E
|
952.36 | | COMICS::MILLSS | ID4: Don't make plans for August ! | Fri Jul 12 1996 13:04 | 12 |
| Re .21
> That wasn't a typo. I spell it 'acter'. It's just my little way of
> reducing sexist language. (*8
So by your argument, are languages that have different genders for different
nouns sexist ? Should we consciously mangle our language just make it PC ?
Simes.
(Tongue planted firmly in cheek ;-))
P.S. Are we destined for the "rathole" bin, here ?
|
952.37 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Baroque: when you're out of Monet | Fri Jul 12 1996 13:08 | 7 |
|
Try listening to church hymns that you've been singing for 20
years now, only to find out that "my brother" has become "each
other", etc.
It's happening everywhere.
|
952.38 | rathole for sure | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Sat Jul 13 1996 05:03 | 4 |
| No, I just don't feel that what I do should be dimunized simply because
I'm female. -ess is the diminutive of the male defaul 'actor'.
E
|
952.39 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Sat Jul 13 1996 12:09 | 11 |
|
> <<< Note 1107.26 by SNAX::NOONAN "sing the soul's blues" >>>
> -< rathole for sure >-
> No, I just don't feel that what I do should be dimunized simply because
> I'm female. -ess is the diminutive of the male defaul 'actor'.
"actor" is already gender-neutral.
Not only that, but "-ess" isn't diminutive, it's female.
|
952.40 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | The Truth is out there..... | Mon Jul 15 1996 05:08 | 11 |
|
the whole idea that because its female is diminuitive is a load
of Horse Hockey!!
That's just in your own mind! And if you choose to propogate that
attitude by butchering the language to prove a point, well that's
your choice but I think by doing that, you are becoming what you
claim to dislike.
Chris
:)
|
952.41 | Save the English Language ! | COMICS::MILLSS | ID4: Don't make plans for August ! | Mon Jul 15 1996 05:47 | 14 |
| Re .25
> Try listening to church hymns that you've been singing for 20
> years now, only to find out that "my brother" has become "each
> other", etc.
I don't go to church or sing hymns, so couldn't comment ! We all know that
language does evolve over time, but mangling it to prove a point is another
thing entirely.
I'll shut up now before I go completely off topic (more than I already have)...
Simes.
;^)
|
952.42 | I didn't like Cable Guy | DONVAN::KEEFE | | Mon Jul 15 1996 11:41 | 9 |
| > ...dimunized simply because...
Made more dim? Dim-sized instead of down-sized?
I thought acter came from: I act,
he is acter than me,
but she is the actest of all.
Sorry. Cable Guy, Cable Guy!
|
952.43 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Tue Jul 16 1996 01:02 | 5 |
| Since this has become totally ratholed, and there are too many
inaccuracies about the English language in this whole thread, I'm
dropping the subject.
E
|
952.44 | Re-"acter", etc. - From your moderator | THEBAY::WIEGLEB | Look at the dirty water...and swim | Tue Jul 16 1996 02:30 | 6 |
| This horse has been beaten long past its demise. Let's drop the
"language" rathole and move on.
Thanks,
- Dave, yer moderater
|
952.45 | | SSDEVO::LAMBERT | We ':-)' for the humor impaired | Tue Jul 23 1996 13:54 | 9 |
| re: 1024.114
> I think the point about the spoiler was lost on you but
I think not. Perhaps the gross spelling error and correction was lost on
you?
-- Sam
|
952.56 | | BUSY::SLAB | Catch you later!! | Thu Jan 02 1997 20:22 | 5 |
952.57 | | COMICS::MILLSS | "Jump! Jump now!" ...Kosh | Mon Jan 06 1997 08:54 | 5 |
952.68 | | WRKSYS::LASKY | | Mon Mar 17 1997 08:25 | 6 |
| .78 Slab,
Did you write this?? If you did you should quit Digital and go into
the biz! Very good and funny, thanks for the list.
Bart Lasky
|
952.67 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Kenny Rogers | Mon Mar 17 1997 10:51 | 8 |
| > .78 Slab,
> Did you write this?? If you did you should quit Digital and go into
> the biz! Very good and funny, thanks for the list.
Shawn write that, agagagagagagaga.
Shawn grabbed that off the Internet/USENET, but just forgot to
credit his source :-(
|
952.66 | They're on to ya man... | POLAR::TYSICK | Chasing the tail of Dogma | Mon Mar 17 1997 11:06 | 1 |
| UhOh...busted!
|
952.65 | | BUSY::SLAB | A Parting Shot in the Dark | Mon Mar 17 1997 11:14 | 6 |
|
No, I didn't write it, but give me some credit here, eh, Jeff?
I received it from my sister's boyfriend and I didn't know the
source. If I did I would have given the proper credit.
|
952.64 | | WRKSYS::LASKY | | Mon Mar 17 1997 15:46 | 5 |
| Slab,
Sorry for the pain this has become (it sure was funny though!!).
Bart
|