T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
879.1 | hot_hot_hot! | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Wed Jul 12 1995 19:47 | 8 |
|
Showgirls I think is still in the making, and your right it looks\
good, hot & sexy! yahhoooooooooooooooooo!
BR
|
879.2 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Jul 12 1995 22:21 | 5 |
|
I'll probably see it, but it's gonna be tough seeing one of the cast of
"Saved By The Bell" starring....
- Sean
|
879.3 | All woman: | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Thu Jul 13 1995 00:08 | 7 |
|
No it won't; have you seen her? That girl has blossomed into
a women!
you'll enjoy it!
|
879.4 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Trouble with a capital 'T' | Thu Jul 13 1995 10:25 | 4 |
|
"Saved by the Bell"? Is she the same one from "90210" or "Melrose"
or whatever she ended up on?
|
879.5 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Thu Jul 13 1995 17:28 | 3 |
|
No, the one from Saved from the Bell was Tiffany Amber Thiessen and she
went to play a vamp on 90210.
|
879.6 | Premiere: | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Thu Jul 13 1995 20:23 | 10 |
| Her name is Elizabeth Berkley :from saved by the bell.
She is featured in the recent issue of Premiere mag. August
Bob
|
879.7 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Trouble with a capital 'T' | Fri Jul 14 1995 10:28 | 6 |
|
>She is featured in the recent issue of Premiere mag. August
I was hoping you'd say "Penthouse". 8^)
|
879.8 | next time | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Mon Jul 17 1995 16:59 | 2 |
|
I know that will be next, keep watching.....
|
879.9 | stripper movie | SWAM1::MEUSE_DA | | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:46 | 6 |
|
this flick just got an nc-17 rating.
the article mentioned something about "raw sex".
oh gee.
|
879.10 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Fri Sep 22 1995 13:08 | 4 |
| so can anyone speak to the socially redeeming qualities of this
movie???
|
879.11 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | I'll kiss the dirt and walk away | Fri Sep 22 1995 14:10 | 5 |
|
If it had any, I wouldn't bother going to see it.
8^)
|
879.12 | Am I over-reacting here? | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Fri Sep 22 1995 15:32 | 16 |
|
re .3 - The word is "woman", not women.
re .10 - How many movies out there actually have redeeming
social qualities? All too few.
This whole NC-17 thing cracks me up. Violence is fine, blood,
guts, whatever...heck, put it on the 6 o'clock news even, but
nudity?! Heaven forbid!!
As to the film possibly containing graphic sex, that would be
another story, but nudity alone - what's the big deal?! If
folks don't want to see nudity, they obviously should stay away.
Sue
|
879.13 | Showgirls | STRATA::GARRITY | | Tue Sep 22 1992 06:54 | 1 |
| Ok, who has seen "Showgirls"??? I need to know how it is!!!
|
879.14 | | SPSEG::COVINGTON | and the situation is excellent. | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:03 | 5 |
| I didn't see it, but a group of my friends (all male, all early 20's)
saw it and universally panned it. They said it was abysmal and they
were checking their watches to see how much longer they had to endure.
I figure if it misses on its target audience that badly, I'll pass.
|
879.15 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | I'll kiss the dirt and walk away | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:34 | 9 |
|
The "Showgirls" screenwriter said that he wishes high school kids
would sneak in to see the movie, because the message he was trying
to get across was that the "showgirl" life isn't all it's cracked
up to be.
I haven't seen it yet, but I do have the "Rolling Stone" ad on my
wall here. Drool. 8^)
|
879.16 | Target audience may be too young to see it ... | WRKSYS::COULTER | If this typewriter can't do it, ... | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:58 | 16 |
| > The "Showgirls" screenwriter said that he wishes high school kids
> would sneak in to see the movie, because the message he was trying
> to get across was that the "showgirl" life isn't all it's cracked
> up to be.
Sure, it's the *message* that's the most important thing ... :-)
Well, my high-school son and friends (all 17 years old, � 6 months)
went last night. They, too, universally panned it. He did say that
the 12-year-olds (that got out of their movie early and sneaked
next door to "Showgirls") *did* seem to be enjoying it. If their
parents only knew what happens after they got dropped off at the
movies ...
dick
|
879.17 | Topics consolidated by moderator | KOLFAX::WIEGLEB | Horses are fine, so are books | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:18 | 10 |
| The duplicate topic and its replies have been consolidated and moved
from 945 to here.
Please do a "DIR/TITLE=show" (or whatever) before creating a new topic.
The moderators would rather be spending their time on their real jobs.
;^)
Thanks,
- Dave Wiegleb, co-moderator
|
879.18 | two thumbs down by S&E | HUMOR::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:33 | 4 |
| For what it's worth, Siskel and Ebert both gave "Showgirls" a thumbs-down
rating, based on poor writing, mostly.
-- Nina
|
879.19 | free | SWAM1::MEUSE_DA | | Mon Sep 25 1995 18:57 | 9 |
|
went to rent Pulp Fiction. they were handing out the 8 minutes
promo video of this flick for no rental charge.
if you want a good idea what this flick is about, catch the 8
minutes. it just about sums up the movie based on what I have
read.
|
879.20 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | I'll kiss the dirt and walk away | Mon Sep 25 1995 19:05 | 6 |
|
Well, that's California. Might not be available over here on
the right coast.
Which video store?
|
879.21 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Sep 25 1995 21:07 | 11 |
|
Actually, this was a nationwide promotion. Video stores everywhere had
'em. Howie Carr went and got a bunch to give out on his show. The
annoying thing was that these were free promo videos, but all the
stores and rental places were only giveing them out if you
purchases/rented something.
I think they're wondering if this might be a new way to go for promos,
and you may see it a few more times.
- Sean
|
879.22 | right-on! | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Wed Sep 27 1995 16:37 | 9 |
|
I can't wait to see this movie; what is so wrong with women who
are comfortable with their bodies and being nude. And in real
life there are Showgirls in Vegas & stripclubs around America!
So what's the big deal?
Bob
|
879.23 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 27 1995 18:09 | 11 |
| Joyce Kilhawick of Boston WBZ TV panned the film but I noticed that she
continued the trend I've seen with other critics. Almost no critic says one way
or the other if the movie was well made. They all seem so outraged by the
content that they either give a serious review panning the film from a moral
point of view or they talk about the subject matter in words reeking with
cynicism.
Some of the reviews here have been far more informative than anything I've
seen in the papers or on TV.
George
|
879.24 | | SPSEG::COVINGTON | and the situation is excellent. | Wed Sep 27 1995 21:14 | 8 |
| My impression from my friends was that they were thrilled at the
prospect of going to a film to stare at womanflesh (they're all male in
their early 20's, remember?) but found it to be a horrible movie and a
complete waste of their time.
This is from guys who will watch bass fishing on ESPN for an hour
because they left the remote on top of the TV and don't feel like
moving to get it.
|
879.25 | Puleeez! | WECARE::FERRIGNO | | Thu Sep 28 1995 12:06 | 10 |
| .22 Exactly! But the movie wants us to feel "sorry" for the showgirls
because its stated objective is to let the world know what the "real"
showgirl life is like. Terrific. If a woman wants to take her clothes
off and display her no-doubt great body, then she should anticipate
the results of that. As a woman, why should I feel sorry for these
women. They can get a job in a computer company, no? :>{
|
879.26 | unbelievable ... | PCBUOA::DBROOKS | | Thu Sep 28 1995 13:25 | 7 |
| So.
How come there's not a 'Showboys'?
Never mind,
db
|
879.27 | still looking for a positive review | STUDIO::PALUSES | Bob Paluses @MRO | Thu Sep 28 1995 14:43 | 14 |
|
According to an article in the paper the other day,
even the real showgirls in Vegas thought the movie stunk. They laughed
at it's untrue coverage. Without giving away any plot or surprises
(is this possible ?) I guess the theory of the movie is the climb from
stripper to showgirl and clawing your way to the top. Apparently, in
real life, much the opposite happens because the girls interviewed
said that many would be lured from showbiz to stripping because of
the huge pay differential.
They also mentioned how many showgirls have been dancing since they
were children and have formal training in ballet, music, etc and are
expected to choriograph some of their own stuff.
|
879.28 | she got a great reaction from Liz at least | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | reflections from the Grotto... | Thu Sep 28 1995 16:23 | 5 |
| re: Joyce K. on Ch 4
I loved the ending line of her review though, "wished they kept it
zipped up." Poor Liz almost fell off her chair in shock... :-)
|
879.29 | | TROOA::BROOKS | | Wed Feb 28 1996 12:44 | 6 |
| I doubt I'll ever see this film given a comment in a review I read
stating something to the effect of "...the only character worth caring
about is brutally gang-raped... " Not something to entice me to spend
time & money on.
Doug
|
879.30 | DOG MAN GO WOOF! | PGREEN::FLINTM | | Thu Apr 18 1996 05:56 | 6 |
| I haven't seen Congo but i think Showgirls must be up there with the
turkeys. Did anyone notice a story behind the nudity?
mike
|
879.31 | | KERNEL::PLANTC | Mmmmmmm Chocolate!!! Doop!!! | Thu Apr 18 1996 05:57 | 6 |
|
There was supposed to be a story??:))))
Chris
:)
|
879.32 | if you can't beat 'em..... | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Thu Apr 18 1996 10:14 | 11 |
|
"Showgirls" is being re-marketed out in CA, and, if it works,
probably the rest of the country.
The studio is presenting it as a late-night cult film, trying
to give it the "Rocky Horror" treatment, using the same ploys
to get folks to go, i.e., going to trash the film is very
welcome.
- Sean
|
879.33 | | BSS::SMITH_S | | Wed Apr 24 1996 02:03 | 3 |
| Who cares about the plot. Ya gotta admit..whew, that Berkeley(sp)
girl.
-ss
|
879.34 | | VNABRW::RHOTON_J | John Rhoton @AUI - DTN 754-2345 | Sat May 04 1996 17:20 | 5 |
| Maybe it was just because I was expecting so little but I didn't think
the movie was that bad. Mind you, it definitely wasn't one of the year's
best but I have seen worse. I didn't fall asleep in it at least.
John
|
879.35 | | EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERS | No comment | Thu Nov 07 1996 11:41 | 36 |
879.36 | worse movie I've seen in ages! | SUBPAC::GOLDIE | Resident Alien | Thu Nov 07 1996 17:07 | 9 |
879.37 | | BUSY::SLAB | Subtract A, substitute O, invert S | Thu Nov 07 1996 17:29 | 3 |
879.38 | | SUBPAC::GOLDIE | Resident Alien | Thu Nov 07 1996 17:39 | 10 |
879.39 | | EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERS | No comment | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:44 | 10 |
879.40 | | BUSY::SLAB | Subtract A, substitute O, invert S | Mon Nov 11 1996 14:20 | 4 |
879.41 | | SUBPAC::GOLDIE | Resident Alien | Wed Nov 13 1996 08:46 | 11 |
879.41 | P.U. what a stinker! | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Thu Jan 16 1997 03:17 | 12 |
879.42 | a dud for sure for all the hype it got... | SUBSYS::MSOUCY | MentalmETALMike | Thu Jan 16 1997 11:50 | 8 |
879.43 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Fri Jan 17 1997 00:19 | 4 |
879.44 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 20 1997 10:41 | 8 |
879.45 | | BUSY::SLAB | Great baby! Delicious!! | Mon Jan 20 1997 14:13 | 3 |
879.46 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 20 1997 14:40 | 14 |
879.47 | | BUSY::SLAB | ch-ch-ch-ch-ha-ha-ha-ha | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:23 | 4 |
879.48 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:42 | 6 |
879.49 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Tue Jan 21 1997 23:44 | 6 |
879.50 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 23 1997 16:14 | 6 |
879.51 | Don't forget the hot tub scene... | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Thu Jan 23 1997 16:58 | 3 |
879.52 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Sun Jan 26 1997 00:12 | 10 |
| >Rape is violence, not sex.
Sorry. *I* knew my thought process; I expected everyone else to, also.
R, NC-17 and X ratings are based on sex *and* on violence. It was from
that that the comment about the rape scene came.
E
|