[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference bookie::movies

Title:Movie Reviews and Discussion
Notice:Please do DIR/TITLE before starting a new topic on a movie!
Moderator:VAXCPU::michaudo.dec.com::tamara::eppes
Created:Thu Jan 28 1993
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1249
Total number of notes:16012

727.0. "The Jungle Book" by EVMS::MARION () Thu Dec 22 1994 10:52

    I saw The Jungle Book last weekend in a sneak preview and I
    loved it.  This is the new one using real people and animals
    rather than cartoon.
    
    The scenery is beautiful as are the hero and heroine.  The bad
    guy's are dastardly, the monkeys are cute, the big cats are
    magnificent and John Cleese is his usual weird, sweet self.
    
    I don't remember the original book but have it on good authority
    that they've changed the story quite a bit.  There's a romantic
    theme underlying the story which may bore small children, and
    some of the animal roles have been changed a bit.  I think it
    stands on it's own as a good story, but don't know how it might
    effect folks who really liked the original.
    
    I give it ***.5 out of ****.
    
    Karen.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
727.1MDNITE::RIVERSWhee!Thu Dec 22 1994 14:0334
    I caught this on a sneak, too (fancy that).  I also liked it, although
    I am a fan of the book and even rather like the animated version(s) by
    Disney and Chuck Jones. 
    
    The original story *is* significantly changed, and the movie was a
    pretty loose adaptation. On the other hand, it was fun to watch, had
    lots of lovely scenery, animals, game performances by folks like Sam
    Neill, John Cleese, Jason Scott Lee, and Cary Elwes (who really did
    need to be born when they made swashbuckling movies, really).  Nothing
    is too terribly unpredictable here, and the villian of the story is
    sort of turned into an eco-terrorist (and also doesn't get enough
    screen time, in my opinion), but hey, it's the 1990's. Whaddya want?
    
    I saw it in a theater with OODLES of young children and while their
    attention was occassionally seized by dramatic or funny parts, by and
    large, it was a theater experience I'd not want to suffer through
    often.  We could have stayed to watch "The Santa Clause" for free
    afterwards, but my "kids in the theater" threshold had been exceeded so
    we went home and did the video thing instead.  Yeah, I'm old and
    crotchety. 
    
    There's a point to the above paragraph though, which is to say that
    older children may well be entertained (along with adults), but small
    children, based on our sample size of oh, a billion 8-and-under tots
    surrounding us, will probably get bored during most of it.  
    
    It's a sweet, harmless, lovely to behold film.  I'd recommend it if
    you're in the mood and like animals.  I was and I do, so there ya go. 
    :)
    
    *** out of ****
    
    
    kim
727.2DONVAN::KEEFETue Jan 03 1995 09:5615
    I took my two squirts to see this, 4 and 6, and they loved it, in spite
    of being scared to bits most of the time.
    
    Come to think of it, when I see something like "younger children might
    be scared" in reference to a movie, I don't get it. So what? My kids 
    love to be scared by wild tigers and such.
    
    I liked it too. Great scenery and especially animal work. The credits
    listed about fifty animal trainers. And Jason Scott Lee is perfectly
    cast.
    
    Re. -1, I don't think you missed much not seeing The Santa Clause. 
    Kids weren't scared at that, and it didn't make much of an impression
    on them any other way either.
    
727.3I ENJOYED IT TOO!ICS::GROEZINGERWed Jan 04 1995 15:048
    Saw this over the New Year holiday with the 8 billion kids and 
    loved it.  Jason Scott Lee is terrific (isn't he always?) and 
    Cary is perfectly cast (per my boyfriend ;-).
    
    Go see it and have a very enjoyable evening.  The animals are
    incredible!
    
    
727.4OOTOOL::CHELSEAMostly harmless.Wed May 17 1995 14:4012
    This is just out on video; I rented it last night.  (Between Jason
    Scott Lee and Cary Elwes, how could I resist?)
    
    If you have little kids, you might stick to the animated version.  This
    one has gruesome deaths and mouldering skeletons, rather like an
    Indiana Jones movie.  Not a lot of gore though.  But you might do what
    my mom did -- preview the film, then cover their eyes if there's
    something you think they'd rather not see.
    
    It's a good-looking movie, the performances are all entertaining (kudos
    to Jason Scott Lee; the "wild boy" thing is often overdone), and the
    animals all perform with verve, too.  Definitely worth renting.
727.5Another viewSWAM1::MILLS_MATo Thine own self be TrueMon May 22 1995 13:3539
    We rented this last night, and except for my 5-year old son, were
    pretty disappointed. True, the scenery was beautiful, too much so, if
    you know what I mean (we were watching a PBS program on Indian
    railroads prior to watching this, so the comparison really hurt), in 
    fact, almost all of it looked like it was filmed in a backlot rather
    than on location. The animals were great, but this was Disney
    at its worst. What I mean is that everything was taken to extremes.
    
    More after the ff:
    
    
    
    
    Sam Neill was his usual wooden self. Can he act at all? His character 
    was just a caricature. Cleese was OK, but I expected him to break out in
    a Monthy Python skit any moment.
    
    Jason Scott Lee was miscast, IMHO. He is SOOO much better in martial
    arts type stuff, and wasn't given enough chance to show his stuff. Cary
    Elwes was good, but his character was comic-book bad.
    
    The story was completely changed to a supposed romantic comedy-drama,
    but didn't deliver. For any adults with the most rudimentary knowledge 
    of British-Indian history, the situations are extremely improbable, and
    very '90's PC.
    
    When this was being previewed in theaters I expected a modern
    treatment of the topic, and instead got an almost carbon copy of
    Greystoke, the legend of Tarzan. 
    
    How do I know?  The latter was shown on local TV Saturday, and we
    watched it, then rented JB on Sunday. The scene with Mowgly catching
    the fly was lifted almost exactly from Greystoke.
    
    A good film for younger children (4-8), older will probably be bored.
     
    
    
    Marilyn