[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Movie Reviews and Discussion |
Notice: | Please do DIR/TITLE before starting a new topic on a movie! |
Moderator: | VAXCPU::michaud o.dec.com::tamara::eppes |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 28 1993 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1249 |
Total number of notes: | 16012 |
I thought there was a note for this, but I can't find one.
It is directed by Berndt Capra, younger brother of the writer Fritjof Capra,
on whose work it is based, and who also participated in writing the movie. The
stars are Liv Ullman, Sam Waterston, John Heard, and Ione Skye in a small role
as Ullman's daughter.
It is an odd, talky movie, mainly a vehicle for what I assume are Fritjof
Capra's ideas. (I haven't read any of his writing.) There is a sketchy
"plot": Waterston, a politician who has recently failed to get the Democratic
presidential nomination, visits his old friend Heard, an American poet living
in France. The two of them visit the magnificent medieval monastery of Mont
St-Michel, on the Normandy coast, and there meet Ullman, a disillusioned
physicist who has been living there, reading and thinking. Most of the movie
consists of talk among these three, as Ullman expounds her thoughts on the
current human predicament. These have to do with the need for a shift of
consciousness away from "mechanistic", Cartesian, patriarchal attitudes, toward
a more holistic approach to the world, a recognition of the interconnectedness
of things.
The ideas aren't particularly startling, and the dialogue isn't always exactly
brilliant. I enjoyed some parts more than others. Two strengths of the movie
to my mind are its setting -- the play of light and sea around the monastery
is beautiful -- and the performance of Ullman. I enjoyed watching the
emotions cross her face, as she played the role of the serious, idealistic
thinker.
It's hard to recommend a movie like this, as so much depends on whether the
dialogue interests you. I enjoyed it, but it clearly wouldn't be for
everyone.
-Stephen
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
461.1 | i liked it | DECWET::JWHITE | decline to sign | Tue Feb 08 1994 18:50 | 6 |
|
i saw this a couple years ago at the seattle film festival and
enjoyed it immensely. it's definitely a talk-fest (e.g. 'my dinner
with andre').
|
461.2 | **** | CNTROL::DGAUTHIER | | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:34 | 23 |
| No sex and no violence.
No passionate love scenes, no chase scenes and no explosions or gunfire.
Not a dumb comedy, not a hair-raising action thriller, no horror and
no oversentimental emotion.
Just 3 people puzzling over the direction of humanity in a troubled
world.
vvvv vvvvvvvvv
It was fascinating, thought provoking and very pertinent.
^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
Unlike just about everything else we're bombarded with from the screen,
this one spoke directly to the human predicament without vague
symbolisms or inferences. More was said in 10 minutes of MindWalk than
in an hour of other movies which try to address "the human
predicament".
I loved it!
**** to MindWalk
-dave
|