T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
390.1 | PS OK, IT PU! | DECWET::HAYNES | | Tue Nov 30 1993 13:51 | 8 |
| I didn't mind Pet Semitary, I thought it was a reasonable
representation of the Book, the one I was dissapointed with was the
mini-series IT....I completely enjoyed the book, I like Tim Curry but
he just didn't seem to portray the total Evil that Pennywise was in the
book....the only one I think I haven't seen was Cat's Eye, and
Tommyknockers (which I considered the book to be a semi-ripoff of
It...)
Michael
|
390.2 | | 5235::J_TOMAO | | Tue Nov 30 1993 13:59 | 35 |
| I don't know anything about the "Stand" yet but I just wanted to comment
about his others. Specifically "Cujo" and "Pet Semetary".
I thought Cujo was more of a disapointment than Pet Semetary for the
following reasons: behind spoiler of course
In the book Cujo I found some of the best parts to be what the woman
was thinking, as she first got stuck (minor annoyance) all the way
through the anguish of realizing she had to fight her own way out - it
was all a "mental" thing the last half of the movie - her against a
rabid dog. The movie didn't even come close to making you understand
and *feel* the way the character did in the book.
Now in "Pet Semetray" (yes it was sub-par for SK but hey its Hollywood)
at least it was about the walking dead and a crazy cat (Hmm I see a
trend here, is SK a pet hater :^}) and seemed to translate better
into a thriller - granted more of a blood/gore thriller but still the
whole story seemed to transfer better than "Cujo"
Also the ending for "Cujo" the movie inhaled air - talk about a sappy
Hollywood ending....another spoiler in case you don't want to know
how either the book or the movie end
In the book the poor child dies and we don't know at what point the
child died - granted extremely sad ending but after the climatic chase
and woman against dog, it just seemd to fit better....yet in the movie
the child lives and everything is just fine - ho hum to this happy
ending - doesn't sound like the Stephen King I've grown to know and
love.
Jt
|
390.3 | Rob Lowe... | 16913::MEUSE_DA | | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:19 | 11 |
|
I was looking forward to this until I saw the actors that would be
playing the parts. One for instance, Rob Lowe. Not my all time
favorite.
Oh well, yet another bad movie of a SK book.
Glad it's on tv, and only have to pay in viewing time.
Dave
|
390.4 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:48 | 5 |
| FYI: See also the Stephen King conference, at MCKNLY::CASTLE_ROCK.
[It's OK to discuss King movies here, but for discussion of the books,
or of King-in-general, CASTLE_ROCK is the appropriate place.]
-b-the-moderator
|
390.5 | | 16393::NEWELL_JO | Graphically Yours | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:54 | 23 |
| As much as I love Stephen King novels (and novelettes)
I don't think his work translates well into cinema works.
And it's basically because King is such a good 'emotional'
writer. He spends a great deal of time getting into the
head of his characters. He can describe feelings and fears
like noone else. Of course this all takes place within
the person, which is very difficult to transfer to the screen.
I saw King being interviewed on the Charlie Rose show a week
or so ago and they asked him if he ever thought he had gone
too far and he said he felt Pet Semitary was over the edge.
The book was, I agree. The movie, ehhhhh, I hated it. When
asked if he had any fears himself and he said only one, that
one of his kids would die before him. He felt that that was the
worst pain a parent would ever endure. I also agree. I love
this man and his writing. I think the only way to put one of
his novels on screen is to do it on the small screen via a
mini-series. The only thing he ever wrote (that I have read)
that worked well in the theater was "Stand By Me" which really
wasn't a full novel but a novelette called "The Body". It
worked because is was short and to the point to begin with.
Jodi-
|
390.6 | The Dead Zone | 58776::S_BURRIDGE | | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:03 | 5 |
| I like "The Dead Zone."
Very well cast, and compelling in a way I can't really define.
-Stephen
|
390.7 | | 9664::CLARK | Can you picture what will be? | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:16 | 10 |
| I generally don't expect the movies to be as good as his books, mainly because
one of the things that King does best with his books is get YOU to visualize
what's going on ... and I think most people will come up with visuals, moods
etc. in their own brains that thrill them much more than what they see on
the screen.
I mean, how could any director have done justice to the bathtub scene from "The
Shining?" :^}
- Dave
|
390.8 | | 7361::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:54 | 18 |
| I really liked "The Dead Zone" as well. Maybe it was because it was a smaller
scope and fit the movie format. The Stand is huge and would take 9 hours or
more to tell it properly on film. It is a story that is literally of global
proportions, far to big for a movie.
I agree that Cujo was really bad. I loved the book, hated the movie. One
major problem was that in the book you got to see the world from Cujo's point
of view. Of course in the movie he's totally reduced to a mindless Hollywood
monster.
The biggest problem in general is that Hollywood views Steven King as the
writer of horror stories where he is really the writer of stories with great
characters, especially great villains who are all over simplified and
monsterized, like Cujo, for the big screen. Once in a while they make the
transformation as they did in "The Dead Zone", but more often they don't.
Well, maybe this time,
George
|
390.9 | Must be the only one to like it. | 12035::MDNITE::RIVERS | Mitchell! | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:15 | 8 |
| Gee, I sorta liked Cujo, the movie. Dunno why. Wasn't the same as the
book, natch, but still liked it. Also liked Christine, the movie, which
came about as close to the book as one seems to come. Misery wasn't
too bad, either. Didn't quite catch the overwhelming sense of
desperation I got from the book, but not a bad job.
kim
|
390.10 | ! | DECWET::HAYNES | | Tue Nov 30 1993 18:21 | 4 |
| Also the fact that the human imagination has no FX budget, so you can
'think' it as complex or as simple as the reader wishes.....
Michael
|
390.11 | | 7892::SLABOUNTY | Being weird isn't enough | Tue Nov 30 1993 19:16 | 10 |
|
"Christine" was definitely my favorite, with "Carrie" being a
close second.
And regarding "Cat's Eye", there are 3 parts to that movie,
with "Cat's Eye" being only one of them. The other two were
[I believe] "Quitters, Inc." and "The Ledge", from "Night Shift".
GTI
|
390.12 | yep, well done | 16913::MEUSE_DA | | Wed Dec 01 1993 18:26 | 8 |
|
Christine, good movie. Almost forgot that one.
The other guy in the movie, drove a really nice 68-69 Charger, which I
wouldn't mind owning.
Dave
|
390.13 | There have been some good King movies | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Fri Dec 03 1993 11:48 | 10 |
| Best Stephen King movies:
1) The Dead Zone - a perfect role for Christopher Walken
2) Christine - great music; the transformation of the kid was great
3) Stand By Me - excellent ensemble acting by the four kids
4) Firestarter - one of my kids' favorite flicks - I like it a lot, too
5) The Shining - "Here's Johnny!" still cracks me up
NAZZ
|
390.14 | | 33438::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Fri Dec 03 1993 18:40 | 7 |
| I don't read Stephen King, but I will watch his movies. As you pointed
out, some of the movies are good, but for some reason don't do great
box-office.
The Dead Zone
Firestarter
Maximum Overdrive
|
390.15 | | 12035::MDNITE::RIVERS | Mitchell! | Mon Dec 06 1993 10:18 | 15 |
| I found that Firestarter, for having a reasonably adept cast, was
either scripted or delivered in such a way that the dialog seemed
hokey, stiff and/or forced. Then again, I seem to recall this was a
Dino De Laurentis film, which (except for Flash Gordon) usually conjure
images of not very good. The book I liked a lot. The film left me cold.
(Drew Barrymore, even when she was supposed to be "cute", does that to
me)
(for those who are about to cry out "Flash Gordon???" in disbelief, I
contend that the usual amount of De Laurentis hokey-ness fit in this
case. The movie was, after all, camp. Pure camp. :)
Cheers,
kim
|
390.16 | dark half | 17576::DIFRUSCIA | | Tue Dec 07 1993 08:52 | 3 |
| I watched the Dark Half last night and I'll give that one two thumbs up
|
390.17 | | 16821::SODERSTROM | Bring on the Competition! | Tue Dec 07 1993 10:49 | 2 |
| I thought the book, Needful Things was one of King's best. However, the
movie was a major disappointment.
|
390.18 | | 9664::CLARK | Can you picture what will be? | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:57 | 3 |
| In of itself, or in comparison to the book?
- DC
|
390.19 | Thumbs down | 58378::P_CHAPLINSKY | | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:18 | 7 |
| I don't like Stephen King's stuff. I started to read "Needful Things"
and stopped at the point were the dog was killed and then the owner...
Anyway, it's simply awful. I must admit I haven't read/seen everything
of his - but I've read/seen a lot and I don't like it. No more. With
little spare time, I am now very selective.
Patricia
|
390.20 | glad I like it | 16913::MEUSE_DA | | Tue Dec 07 1993 18:47 | 9 |
|
re. 19
That's too bad. A lot of people do find Stephen King's writing to be
highly entertaining. I know I do. But, then again my wife isn't into
horror/si-fi and the like either.
Dave
|
390.21 | picking a little nit... | 60716::VISSER | Escaping virtual reality | Tue Dec 07 1993 21:39 | 24 |
| Just a little niggle that has been bothering me through this string...
The tone of a few notes imply that a Stephen King book is made into a
Stephen King movie, and therefore Stephen King has had input into how
the movie turns out. It is more correct to say that the movie is based
on a book by Stephen King. Some of the movies have had no input from
King at all.
Therefore, a movie based on one of King's books may be nowhere near as
good as the book (or vice versa, I guess, but I've yet to see one).
One movie that a lot of people don't associate with King is "The
Running Man". This is based (loosely, because most of the story, and the
ending, is completely different) on a book written by King under the
Richard Bachman pseudynom.
The movie is very funny, in places, and contrasts very strongly against
the dark message contained in the book.
cheers
..klaas..
|
390.22 | | 11770::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Dec 07 1993 22:44 | 9 |
| Klaas,
I agree (and I'm a Stephen King fan), but... but...
Who gave permission in the first place to make the movie? His
reliquishing control is a conscious act for which he can be held
accountable!
Leslie
|
390.23 | laughing all the way to the bank | GLOBBO::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Wed Dec 08 1993 09:09 | 9 |
| > reliquishing control is a conscious act for which he can be held
For enough money I'll relinquish control of my novels, too.
I can only recall one S.K. book-to-movie I enjoyed: Stand By Me.
The rest have been poorly done. But I still read King's books.
So I guess I'm not holding him accountable for quality of screenplays.
John
|
390.24 | an author's nightmare... ;) | 12035::MDNITE::RIVERS | The end of the innocence | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:37 | 16 |
| When you sell the movie rights to a novel, you don't typically get any
say so over what happens to it once its gone. For the purposes of
making a movie out the book, the novel is now in the hands of the
filmmakers. Overlooking the difficulty of turning a novel into a 2
hour script, scripts have a habit of being written by small armies,
none of whom in the author (many book authors can't write a movie
script). As the endless verisons continue, with various input by
directors, producers, whatevers, the end result can be something which
doesn't really do the book justice, and which really CAN'T be blamed on
the author, unlesss you want to blame them for selling the rights in
the first place.
Cheers,
kim
|
390.25 | | 11770::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Wed Dec 08 1993 13:20 | 14 |
| Kim,
I do blame the author for selling the rights in the first place, WHILE
AGREEING to let them use his name and the book's title WITHOUT
retaining any control over the finished product. I know it happens; I
think it's dumb. I know more money is nicer than less money, and only
Stephen King can decide what's more important to him (artistic
integrity on a work that bears his name, or more bux).
Having said that, I'll go see any "Stephen King" movie, and enjoy
it, even while I"m griping about what they should have done/could have
added/shouldn't have changed, etc.
Leslie
|
390.26 | | 33395::BACH | A New York node? | Wed Dec 08 1993 14:15 | 4 |
| "When you talk about turn 400 single spaced pages into a 40 page double
spaced script, you'll have to lose something..."
-Some author regarding this subject
|
390.27 | My two-pence worth... | CDROM::SHIPLEY | Smmeeeeegggg Heeeeeeeeead | Sat Jan 22 1994 22:22 | 24 |
|
Re last few...
I agree with the comments and sentiments regarding the transfer
of a long and complicated story to the screen and the loss of
the detail...
However...
The Dark Half...
The major change of the description and portrayal of the
"other half" from the book to the screen was, I felt, totally
unnecessary and self destructive to what could have been IMHO
an excellent classic horror film, while remaining true to the
original storyline and characters as excellently written by
King.
My favourite King-based film??
Carrie... for introducing me to one of the finest writers
of our generation, not just horror, but real-life fears
and problems described as though he just reads your mind...
|
390.28 | On a TV near you | KOLFAX::WIEGLEB | CB Radio, but with more typing | Tue Jan 25 1994 21:54 | 4 |
| "The Stand" is currently in filming as a TV mini-series (according to
some lengthy article with photos in "Fangoria" or similar magazine.)
- Dave
|
390.29 | The Stand : Casting Info | 35186::CLARK | | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:06 | 11 |
|
I've heard a few factiods about "The Stand" (TV Version), most of
wich I like! It is going to be lengthy (8 hours I Think). Rob Lowe is
going to play Nick Andros? I know it sounds bad at first, but think
about it, it's actually a pretty good choice! I recognized the guy who
is playing Tom Cullen but I can't think of his name at the moment. Here
comes the bad part: Molly Ringwald as Franny. Ouch! It's not that I
dislike Molly Ringwald, but she seems to be too frail for the
character. Any thoughts or arguments on these?
Kevin
|
390.30 | | YUPPY::SECURITY | Security @LDO | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:49 | 12 |
|
re: .17
I think that Needful Things is second only to The Stand in terms of
excellence. Am I to understand that Needful Things has been made into
a film?
Scott
|
390.31 | It was with us, briefly | RNDHSE::WALL | Show me, don't tell me | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:17 | 4 |
|
Yup. Had Max von Sydow in it.
DFW
|
390.32 | :-) | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Fri Jan 28 1994 22:16 | 12 |
| .30> I think that Needful Things is second only to The Stand in terms of
> excellence. Am I to understand that Needful Things has been made into
> a film?
A little scouting about via Notes>DIR/TITL=NEEDFUL would tell you that
note 322 discusses this very movie. This is still a small enough
conference to where we don't need directory notes, which are found in
many of the larger conferences.
I thought the review in 322.0 was very well written.
John
|
390.33 | | 23989::SODERSTROM | Bring on the Competition! | Mon Jan 31 1994 10:04 | 1 |
| Needless Things will be out on video on Feb 28.
|
390.34 | Stand on TV, May 8 | 16913::MEUSE_DA | | Thu May 05 1994 20:38 | 10 |
|
Stand alert.
The TV movie or miniseries starts Sunday night, 5/8.
Yep, another movie vs the book opportunity. Doubtful it will come
close to the book.
Dave
|
390.35 | Excellent movie! | 11666::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Thu May 12 1994 12:27 | 4 |
| So far, this is one of the closest I've seen of a movie to the book.
It's almost word for word.
John
|
390.36 | Can we recast Fran still? | 35210::63388::clark | | Thu May 12 1994 15:11 | 10 |
| Apart from Molly Ringwald as Fran being a complete farce, the TV Movie is
exceptional. Many of the books powerful scenes have lost a bit of edge,
but for TV, I'd say that it has retained the flavor very well.
Did anyone notice a credit in the first part for Jess, who didn't appear
at all? I believe that scene must have been edited out at the last minute.
Kinda wierd, but given Molly's (who would have been in his scene) terrible
acting, I'm glad they removed it!
Kevin
|
390.37 | | 7361::MAIEWSKI | | Thu May 12 1994 16:10 | 18 |
| It's pretty good and what is there is pretty faithful to the book but by
necessity they have left a great deal out. As a result it tends to be a bit
choppy.
For example, in one scene we see people on the road to Nebraska or Colorado,
in the next they have got there, met the other characters, and a few new ones
have shown up who's background is not explained. Of course if they put that
stuff in they would be up to about 16 hours instead of 8.
Fran is terrible and Harold is entirely miscasted. He is suppose to be a nerd
that's rejected by women but he's played by a good looking guy who you would
think a lot of women would like. Also I notice that his skin which had some
blotches at 1st has cleaned up. I guess he was able to corner the market on
clearasyl.
Nick and Randal Flag are great. Most of the others are ok.
George
|
390.38 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Thu May 12 1994 17:32 | 8 |
| I'm reading the book, lagging a little behind the miniseries. I like
the TV version better, to tell the truth; it's well streamlined. The
book is definitely bloated. It's not the number of characters or
scenes; it's the way some of the scenes drag on and on.
As TV goes, it's pretty decent. Beyond that, it's a great exercise in
how to adapt a novel for the screen. (A comparable job is adaptation
of "The Princess Bride" -- again, the novelist wrote the screenplay.)
|
390.39 | he could have been Hawk | 8269::ROCKM2::DROEGE | No point in steering now! | Thu May 12 1994 18:44 | 13 |
| Nit:
Harold's acne cleaned up in the book as well. All that exercise, good
food, fresh air. He lost weight too. By the time they got to Boulder,
Harold didn't realize it but he was a nice looking young man.
That's the tragedy of his turning to the Dark Man; he could have been
somebody in Boulder.
Ahh, poor Harold.
Bonnie
|
390.40 | Tv likes SK | 16913::MEUSE_DA | | Fri May 13 1994 18:36 | 8 |
|
Tv does a better job with SK books than theatical films.
Really did enjoy this miniseries.
Heck, could have watched it for seven nights.
|
390.41 | | 35186::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed May 18 1994 14:56 | 9 |
| I thought they could have made enough traveling sub-plots to keep the
flick alive a few more night, too, without padding the film. I had
to keep explaining why things were happening to folks who had not read
the book.
All things considered, I thought they did the book justice.
(Hated Molly as Fran, yet most of the other other characters were
exactly how I pictured them.)
|
390.42 | Curious | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Wed May 18 1994 16:55 | 3 |
| Did anyone notice how The Stand did in the ratings?
NAZZ
|
390.43 | so-so | 18271::DOYLE | | Fri May 20 1994 10:27 | 15 |
| I thought it was done very well....Loved Gary Sinise as Stu Redmond...
Loved Rob Lowe as Nick Andros.....I do think that I would rather have
had it go for a whole week and catch all the details that were in the
book because it did miss links here and there and left you unsure.....
Like the father of Fran's baby and her father was never told about the
baby and the children of the neighbors of Stu were never mentioned...
the book showed how it happened fast yet gradually and how everything
fell into place...and I did expect to see Tom Cullen playing with the
legos and small details that add character....Larry spending the night
with that woman who threw things at him when he left the next day....
his parties, and how he ended up at his mothers......I could've watched
more by far.......but it was good but could've been much better...
Harold was a poor casting job.....I wanted to see the transformation..
j.m.o. mary
|
390.44 | 2 | 15377::DEMON::COURT | Wit happens. | Fri May 20 1994 12:06 | 7 |
| re: .42
Part I finished in second place, behind "Home Improvement." Didn't
hear anything about the remaining parts (which aired during the next
Neilsen rating period.)
Mike
|
390.45 | The Stand wins gold, silver, and bronze medals ;-) | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Fri May 27 1994 15:27 | 5 |
| Part 2 won the next week.
Part 3 was second.
Part 4 was third.
NAZZ
|
390.46 | | 17617::MAYNARD | The Front Row Kid | Fri Aug 26 1994 15:32 | 2 |
| Just released on video...(August 26)
Jim
|
390.47 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Foreplay? What's that? | Tue May 21 1996 12:24 | 232 |
|
Interesting note here ... Mike Lookinland [Bobby Brady] played
a sentry in this movie. I did not know that.
"Stand, The" (1994) (mini)
[TV series]
The End of the World Is Just the Beginning
USA 1994 Color
Produced by: Greengrass Productions
Sound Mix: Dolby Stereo
Genre(s)/keyword(s): Sci-Fi / Drama / disaster / religion
Certification: Germany:16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directed by
Mick Garris
Cast (in credits order) probably complete
Gary Sinise .... Stu Redman
Molly Ringwald .... Frannie Goldsmith
Jamey Sheridan .... Randall Flagg
Laura San Giacomo .... Nadine Cross
Rob Lowe .... Nick Andros
Corin Nemec .... Harold Lauder
Ruby Dee .... Mother Abigail
Miguel Ferrer .... Lloyd Henreid
John Landis .... Russ Dorr
Ray McKinnon .... Charlie Campion
Sam Raimi .... Bobby Terry
Mike Westenskow .... Paul Burlson
John Dunbar .... Dave Roberts
Ryan Healy .... 4th Teenager
Mike Lookinland .... Sentry No. 1
David Sosna .... Some Man
rest of cast listed alphabetically
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar .... The Monster Shouter
Chuck Adamson .... Barry Dorgan
Anthony Adler .... Dying Janitor
Sam Anderson .... Whitney Horgan
Steve Anderson .... Army Officer
Rick Aviles .... Rat Man
Kathy Bates (uncredited) .... Rae Flowers (uncredited)
Jesse Bennett .... Vic Palfrey
Johnny Biscuit .... Norm Bruett
John F. Bloom .... Joe-Bob Brentwood
J. Scott Bronson .... Man in Convoy
Ervin Butler .... B-Ball Boy
Hope Marie Carlton .... Sally Campion
David Kirk Chambers .... Brad Kitchner
Laura Conover .... Nurse
Bill Corso .... Corpse in Lincoln Tunnel
Ossie Davis .... Judge Farris
Kevin Doyle .... Sarge
Troy Evans .... Sheriff Baker
Bill Fagerbakke .... Tom Cullen
Matt Frewer .... Trashcan Man
Warren Frost .... George Richardson
Cynthia Garris .... Susan Stern
Jeff Gelb .... NY Radio Announcer
Leo Geter .... Chad Norris
Sandra Gimpel .... Woman in Store
Alan Gregory .... Al Bundell
Mary Ethel Gregory .... Alice Underwood
Thomasyn Harlow .... Cynthia
Ed Harris (uncredited) .... Gen. Starkey (uncredited)
Jim Haynie .... Deputy Kingsolving
Thomas Holland .... Carl Hough
Sherman Howard .... Dietz
Ken Jenkins .... Peter Goldsmith
David Jensen .... Major Jalbert
Richard Jewkes .... Dick Ellis
Kevin Kennedy .... Dave Zellman
Patrick Kilpatrick .... Ray Booth
Michelle King .... Reporter
Stephen King .... Teddy Weizak
Robert Knott .... Lou Carsleigh
Brittney Lewis .... Arlene
Richard Lineback .... Poke
Elizabeth Lough .... Young Woman
Jordan Lund .... Bill Hapscomb
Bruce MacVittie .... Ace-High
Frank Magner .... Vince Hogan
Dan Martin .... Rich Moffat
Patrick McKinley .... Flu Buddy Man
William Newman .... Dr. Soames
Kellie Overbey .... Dayna Jurgens
Wendy Phillips .... Lisa Hull
Vince Rodriguez .... Lisa's Driver
Bridgit Ryan .... Lucy Swann
Sarah Schaub .... Gina McCone
Tressa Sharbough .... Marcy Halloran
Julie Simper .... Lila Bruett
Shawnee Smith .... Julie Lawry
Taylor Smith .... Baby Lavon
Adam Storke .... Larry Underwood
Billy L. Sullivan .... Joe
George Sullivan .... Sargent
Millie Teri .... Weeping Woman
Peter Van Norden .... Ralph
Ray Walston .... Glen Bateman
Michael D. Weatherred .... Mike Childress
Rob Weller .... Game Show Host
Max Wright .... Herbert Denninger
Derryl Yeager .... Man in Street
Brayton Yerkes .... Old Man in Store
Written by
Stephen King (also novel)
Cinematography by
Edward J. Pei
Music by
W.G. Snuffy Walden
Production Design by
Nelson Coates
Costume Design by
Linda Matheson
Film Editing by
Pat McMahon
Produced by
Mitchell Galin
Richard P. Rubinstein (executive)
Other crew
Tony Adler (first assistant director)
Julie Anderson (assistant production co-ordinator)
Fabiana Arrastia (art department co-ordinator)
George Atamian (key set dresser)
Pam Bartella (supervising sound effects editor)
Juergen Baum (gaffer)
Susan Benjamin (set decorator)
John Bowen (dialogue editor)
Dan Bradley (stunt co-ordinator)
David Buckley (key set costumer)
Lou Carlucci (special effects co-ordinator)
Roanna De La Cruz (production secretary)
Beth DePatie (production coordinator)
Donna Donato (assistant editor)
Roger Doran (colorist)
Jim Doyle (special effects)
William 'Fleet' Eakland (transportation co-ordinator)
Andre G. Ellingson (special effects)
Miriam Epstein (production assistant)
Star Fields (construction coordinator)
Audrey Fontaine (unit publicist)
Ian Fox (second unit cinematographer)
Kevin J. Foxe (location manager)
Barry Franenberg (property master)
Darren Fuller (production assistant)
Norman Gay (additional picture editing)
Steve Gehrke (script supervisor)
Laura Greenlee (production supervisor)
Barbara Harris (II) (voice casting)
Klaus Hoch (best boy electrician)
Bill Holdsworth (electrician)
Sam Huston (leadman)
Ronnie Jaynes (construction foreman)
Kevin Kennedy (grip)
Joseph King (production assistant)
Lynn Kressel (casting)
Gabby Leff (casting assistant)
Peter Levy (location manager)
Kim E. Lombardi (clearance coordinator)
Marco Londoner (editorial production assistant)
Mike Lookinland (second assistant camera operator)
Bill Marino (audio consultant)
Paul H. Maritsas (cableman)
Christian Martinez (grip)
Grant Maxwell (re-recording mixer)
Peter McIntosh (second unit director)(supervising producer)(unit
production manager)
David Meeks (animal trainer)
Katherine Moore (still photographer)
Mark Emery Moore (camera operator)
Marshall Moore (location manager)
Camille Morris (costume supervisor)
Susan Nowak (unit publicist)
Tena Parker-Liddiard (key hair)
Peter Pastorelli (location manager)(second unit first assistant
director)
Robert Pearce (production assistant)
Alexandra Perce (second unit second assistant director)
Michael Perry (art director)
Robert Perry (boom operator)
Ashley Petersen (make-up)
Connie Pierce (costumer)
Travis Porter (production assistant)
Cate Praggastis (local casting)
John G. Raymer (electrician)
Robert Reeves (production assistant)
Burton Rencher (art director)
Rachel Rencher (production assistant)
Vince Rodriguez (key grip)
Allan K. Rosen (music editor)
Mike Ruschak (re-recording mixer)
Jason Salonen (electrician)
Michael Samson (second assistant director)
Rick Schexnayder (sound mixer)
Chuck Schmitz (special effects)
Heidi Seeholzer (assistant makeup)
David Shaffer (transportation captain)
Alvin Simmons (dolly grip)
Roz Soulam (local casting)
James Sprattley (first assistant camera operator)
Sara Spring (production supervisor)
Matt Springer (production assistant)
Lee Steadman (assistant location manager)
Bill Stephan (on-line editor)
Tom Streich (best boy grip)
Pat Stubbs (transportation co-captain)
Joan S. Thomas (costume supervisor)
Thomas Udell (production accountant)
Diane Vilagi (production executive)
Kevin Ward (boom operator)
Micole Weaver (costumer)
Matthew T. Weiner (second second assistant director)
Doug Weinman (electrician)
Rick Wessler (foley)
Laura Young (sound dailies)
|
390.48 | The good, the not-so-good and the ugly | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Sun Dec 29 1996 06:18 | 20 |
390.49 | There must be some I don't remember offhanda | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruiserball! | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:23 | 19 |
390.50 | | CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE | | Tue Jan 07 1997 15:12 | 5
|