T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
326.1 | Disappointed | 29067::J_RABKE | | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:38 | 19 |
| Kim Basinger does a good job with a BAD Script
Spoiler Warning
She is supposed to be a sophisticated/ high tech safe cracker...
So when she needs to get into the cabin where the parole officer has
her kid, what does she do? She SMASHES the glass?
When the parole officer finds himself facing the tiger... he RUNS?
Hey stupid, what about using the SHOTGUN you're carrying, duh..
When she finally beats up on the Parole officer and then drops the
shotgun at his feet. I hate, when the unarmed hero/heroine disarm an
opponent and then leave the weapon for the opponent to recover. The
only realistic scene of this type was in the Steve McQueen/ Tom Horn
movie, where McQueen (Horn) shoots the ambusher in the street.
If she was such a great safe cracker, why didn't she have any money
socked away?
I predict: this will be in the $1 cinema/video store before the month
is out
Regards
JDR
|
326.2 | | 7892::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | I'm just a little crazy. | Mon Aug 15 1994 17:14 | 18 |
|
I liked it, but I think I was expection more action than
what was here. It was more of a "family drama", it seems,
than a cops/robbers movie.
Spoiler comment:
And the parole officer gets rammed through the gate into the
"wilderness", has the sense to grab his shotgun for protect-
ion, but doesn't have the sense to go back through the gaping
hole created by his car and instead goes right to the intact
section of the fence.
8^)
GTI
|
326.3 | | ISIDRO::LUISGON | | Sat Feb 18 1995 15:49 | 5 |
| I saw it yesterday, and it was even worse than expected.
Did you ever see McGyver on TV ? Much better than this film
Luis
|
326.4 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Trouble with a capital 'T' | Mon Feb 20 1995 08:44 | 6 |
|
Well, I don't think the main intent of this movie was to be
better than McGyver.
They're different, after all, and really not very similar.
|