T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
273.1 | | 27748::PORTERD | | Wed Jul 28 1993 09:33 | 2 |
| I saw a preview on a movie I rented it I think it said coming in
August.
|
273.2 | Scheduled for August 20. | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, ULTRIX compiler group | Wed Jul 28 1993 21:42 | 0 |
273.3 | SPOILER ALERT - My Comments | 3173::SLATER | Bill Slater - 603-884-4953 (DTN 264) | Fri Aug 27 1993 14:47 | 32 |
| Hi,
I saw this movie last night and liked it a lot. A few personal comments:
1) As one who grew up without any positive male role models to speak
of, I found real value in Chuck Norstadt's relationship with
MacLeod (Mel Gibson). As I became a young man, I was blessed to
discover about six people who at different times provided such
guidance, kindness, love, and understanding in various areas of my life.
2) I was disgusted with the treatment of MacLeod by the local
authorities. There was deception on the part of law enforcement
guy by telling MacLeod to show up without legal counsel. In
addition, it was quite apparent from the behavior of people in that
scene, that there would be no element of fairness and a presumption
of guilt of sexual abuse on the part of MacLeod.
3) As one who mentors and coaches youth in computer software and
hardware, and in Judo, I found it to be very sobering reminder
to always be cautious, clear, legal, upfront, and discreet in my
dealings with youth. For example, MacLeod would have been much
wiser to personally consult with the Norstadt's mother if he really
wanted to engage in this mentoring/tutoring relationship. I guess
one just can't be too careful these days.
It is a great movie. I recommend it to anyone whoever thinks they
could or would teach.
Bill
|
273.4 | | NASZKO::DISMUKE | WANTED: New Personal Name | Mon Aug 30 1993 13:21 | 5 |
| We should spoiler alert the previous note....
-sandy
|
273.5 | | CDROM::HENDRICKS | Hatred is not a family value | Tue Aug 31 1993 15:54 | 64 |
| I found this movie fascinating, but I doubt it will break any records
or receive any major awards. It has only a minimum of sex or real-time
violence, although plenty of violence was done most of the characters
at some time in their pasts.
I think it will be most of interest to those who enjoy coming of age
stories and character studies. The scenery is also magnificent and
well-filmed throughout.
I thought Mel Gibson was great -- this was a very different role from
his stereotypical ones. The actresses who play the two girls who are
sisters of the boy who is the main character are wonderful! I thought
the boy who was the star was an excellent young actor.
I know it was supposedly set in 1968, but once they got away from the
city and cars, it didn't seem anything but contemporary to me. I
expected more obvious 60s cliches.
Very minor possible spoilers, but not really....
It was very strange to see a movie that was filmed in my family's
summer house! (The boy's family's house, not Mel Gibson's). The first
strange thing was always knowing what is outside the perimeter of the
screen during any scenes shot in the house.
Strangest of all is that the set decorator got permission from my aunt
to leave up the portraits of my great-grandparents -- when the camera
panned to the portraits on the wall it was very startling to see them!
My great-grandmother died when I was a baby, but my great-grandfather
(the one who bought that house) lived until I was 8, and that was the
place I always went to visit him in the summertime. Needless to say,
it kept jerking me out of the flow of the story ;-)
There were also many other recognizable family mementos left in the
house, but they brought pieces of furniture and decorations in as well.
They deliberately made it look very cluttered, which was a little odd
to see.
According to my aunt, to maintain the authenticity, they recreated the
bedrooms and upstairs bathroom exactly in a warehouse in Camden, Maine.
I couldn't tell the difference, and would have thought it was filmed
right in the house. But those rooms were too small for the equipment.
The other strange thing is that the real kitchen is very long and
narrow. So they duplicated the kitchen exactly in what is really the
dining room of the house. I was watching the movie and could not
figure out what was contrived about the kitchen shots until about
halfway through. I can't believe the trouble they went to to exactly
duplicate the look and feel of the old cabinets which all have long
narrow grooves running top to bottom.
Mel Gibson's house is actually the more beautiful and interesting of
the two houses. The props in that house were mostly antiques. The
place is somewhat intimidating.
Animals also play a larger than usual role in the story. I enjoyed
this.
I need to see the movie again to just focus on the characters and the
story. All in all, it is thought provoking and a bit disturbing at
times, but well produced and acted and worth seeing.
|
273.6 | Reminded me of another movie | 30188::LYONS | | Fri Sep 03 1993 16:32 | 26 |
|
I enjoyed this movie also, but agree that it will not be a box office
"Smash". I thought Mel Gibson's directorial debut was an outstanding
one and he definately has great potential.
The young boy who played Chuck Nordstadt was excellent and will be in
for a memorable career, I'm sure.
The movie made me think of the movie, Dead Poet Society for reasons I
can not really explain. All in all, I thought the movie to be very
good. I hope that Gibson will continue to direct.
One of my favorite scenes (behind spoiler)
is when Chuck asks Macloud (Gibson) about the attraction between men
and women and Macloud tells a story about women being made up of 5%
more water than men and Chuck asks, "Can't we just drain them..." and
then after Macloud bursts into laughter he says, "I think they (meaning
women) are waiting for us to drink more liquids"
I thought that was pretty funny!
|
273.7 | My opinion.. | 17576::BURSCH | I wish things were different.. | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:00 | 9 |
| I also enjoyed this movie..I wouldn't have minded if it was longer
so that you had a better idea of what caused the characters to be the
way they were...I don't think the boy tendancy to stare-off was
explained....and I would have like to understand Mel's character's
background a little more also....I was a little confused about the
significance of the plane ride also,...
It probably won't be a smash...though I think it should be....
|
273.8 | | 35186::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:06 | 1 |
| How did Gibs lose his face?
|
273.9 | | 3270::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sun Sep 12 1993 09:09 | 6 |
| RE: .8 by 35186::BACH
>How did Gibs lose his face?
Too many "Lethal Weapon" sequels?
|
273.10 | Gibs face... | 17576::BURSCH | I wish things were different.. | Tue Sep 14 1993 12:34 | 8 |
| ::BACH
Gibs was in a car accident and half of his face was badly burned....
A great line from the movie..about his face .....He said
"If this is all you see (pointing to the burned portionof his face)..
then you don't see me!
|