T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
255.1 | | 8269::MARTINN | okay,now what?.... | Thu Jul 15 1993 04:25 | 22 |
|
I have heard critics *label* a movie as a 'man's movie' or a 'women's
movie' which I think is ridiculous!!!! *Labeling* of any kind creayes
seperatism and is this case negative seperatism. I feel this is just
*another* way of someone else deciding what, due soley on the basis of
our gender, we should like/dislike/relate to/ect. So if I'm a female I
can't or should I not suppose to like action flicks and the kind or if
I'm a man should I feel less 'manly' because I enjoy the tear-jerkers?
What one person may percieve to be more male/female is NOT how everyone
must percieve it! Perception is an INDIVIDUAL thing!!!! And even *if*
there was *absolutes* in movies (or anything for that matter) would
that not be a great opprotunity to *learn* how the other side views
different things and provide a deeper understanding? I say that
because I feel by *labeling* a movie male or female creates a barrier
that will make some people decide to not see a movie.
Heck, I've seen movies that were *labeled* sci-fiction and felt it was
more drama or comedy. So even when the intentions are innocent and
harmless it still comes down to an indiviual perception.
Natalie
|
255.2 | | 5259::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Thu Jul 15 1993 10:43 | 7 |
| My own unsupported opinion is that a "woman's movie" focuses on character
development and exploration while a "man's movie" focuses on plot. My
wife tends to like character analysis ("Driving Miss Daisy" "Steel
Magnolias", that sort of thing) while I basically am nuts about any sort
of B-movie sci fi.
Steve
|
255.3 | Another way to look at it | 3D::COULTER | If this typewriter can't do it, ... | Thu Jul 15 1993 11:40 | 8 |
| Perhaps much of the distinction in the labels stems
from the observation in the epigram:
"Men share experiences; women share confidences."
|
255.4 | JMO | 8269::MARTINN | okay,now what?.... | Fri Jul 16 1993 02:11 | 4 |
| re. *both* -2 &-3
That *still* is a *generilized* way of looking at it and does NOT
neccasarily (sp?) reflect EVERYONE's viewpoint or way of life.
|
255.5 | | SMAUG::LEHMKUHL | H, V ii 216 | Fri Jul 16 1993 10:33 | 8 |
| Natalie,
You need to relax a bit. Epigrammatic remarks
are going to be, by definition (Got a dictionary?
No, apparently not.) generalizations.
Chris
|
255.6 | now where's that asbestos suit I had made... | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:03 | 15 |
| You can bet the movie industry internally rates movies as "Mens"
or "Womens". This is necessary to allocate promotional monies.
I don't think you'd ever see an ad for "Howard's End" in the middle of
a football game, nor an ad for "Die Hard III" during Oprah.
"A River Runs Through It", heavily populated with men, is nevertheless
a "Woman's movie" since it is heavy on character study and light on plot.
"Thelma and Louise", despite their gender and the movie events, is a
"Man's movie" since it focuses so heavily on the plot line. Is it
_really_ all that different from "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid"?
As George wisely noted in .0, this is a matter of opinion. That's mine.
John
|
255.7 | | 29052::WSA038::SATTERFIELD | Close enough for jazz. | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:39 | 15 |
|
I basically agree with Natalie. I find the labeling of films as men's or
women's films to be egrerious and insulting. Does because my favorite film is
_Wuthering Heights_ make me less of a man? Does the fact that I like _Platoon_
make me more of a man? If your personal tastes in art and entertainment are
dictated by your gender then you're really missing out on a lot. I love films
and I enjoy all kinds of well made films, from _An Affair to Remember_ to
_Terminator II_.
This subject was handled with humor in _Sleepless in Seattle_ and that's the
way I prefer to approach it. I don't take the notion seriously for a second.
Randy
|
255.8 | | 8269::MARTINN | okay,now what?.... | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:01 | 13 |
| >Natalie,
>>>>>>>>You need to relax a bit. Epigrammatic remarks
>>>>>>>>are going to be, by definition (Got a dictionary?
>>>>>>>>>No, apparently not.) generalizations.
>>>>>Chris
Sure I'm the one who needs to relax?
re.7
Thanks....maybe you stated it better than I did. :^)
|
255.9 | true facts. | 17655::LAYTON | | Thu Jul 22 1993 12:05 | 6 |
| I read somewhere that movie theatres will be REQUIRED to check ID's to
make sure only males check in to Men's movies and vice versa.
There will be a rating system so that we will know which is which.
Carl
|
255.10 | more fax | 17655::LAYTON | | Thu Jul 22 1993 12:09 | 12 |
| 1. Would it not be reasonable to assume that a movie that draws more
women than men be called a "Women's movie"?
2. Would it not be resonable to assume that those characteristics that
are common to movies in 1. are predictors of who a movie will appeal
to?
Why would anyone have a problem with these concepts???
duh
Carl
|
255.11 | | 8269::MARTINN | okay,now what?.... | Sun Aug 01 1993 06:48 | 5 |
|
re. Why would anyone have a problem with these concepts???
Because it's stereotyping!
|
255.12 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | you gotta sin to get saved | Mon Aug 02 1993 12:36 | 13 |
| I think there are undoubtedly some movies that appeal more to women
(romantic comedies, movies with all female leads, movies about women),
and some movies that appeal more to men (action movies, war movies,
science fiction). There are, of course, exceptions to this. There are
women who loved Top Gun (maybe...somewhere...:-)...), and men who loved
Fried Green Tomatoes. But, in general, I believe more men, than women,
loved Top Gun, and more women, than men, loved Fried Green Tomatoes.
I don't think it's evil or bad (stereotyping) to admit that this is
pretty much the way things are.
Lorna
|
255.13 | | 5793::STARR | Who needs love? | Mon Aug 02 1993 13:13 | 12 |
| In just last Thursday's USA Today, they had a listing of the Top Ten male
and female movies.
MEN: Raging Bull, Full Metal Jacket, Donovan's Reef, All The Marbles, King Of
The Cowboys, Bring Me The Head Of Alfredo Garcia, Safe At Home, The
Silencers, The Naked Prey, and anything by the Three Stooges.
WOMEN: Now Voyager, A Summer Place, Two For The Road, Georgy Girl, Women In
Love, Romeo And Juliet, The Way We Were, Mahogany, Ice Castles, and
anything by Shirley Temple.
alan
|
255.14 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | you gotta sin to get saved | Mon Aug 02 1993 14:43 | 34 |
| These are my Top Ten Favorite Women's Movies:
(movies that *I*, at any rate, think of a women's movies)
1. Thelma & Louise
2. Fried Green Tomatoes
3. Leaving Normal
4. Housekeeping
5. Enchanted April
6. Desert Hearts
7. Mystic Pizza
8. The Cemetary Club
9. The Color Purple
10. Steel Magnolias
In contrast, these are my Top Ten Favorite Romantic Movies:
(which may, or may not, also be women's movies)
1. When Harry Met Sally
2. Truly, Madly, Deeply
3. Crossing Delancy
4. A Room With A View
5. L.A. Story
6. Sleepless In Seattle
7. Prelude To A Kiss
8. Love With The Proper Stranger (Natalie Wood & Steve McQueen)
9. The Long Hot Summer (Paul Newman & Joanne Woodward)
10. Desiree (Marlon Brando & Jean Simmons)
Lorna
|
255.15 | There were a LOT of good romantic movies in B&W | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Wed Aug 04 1993 13:46 | 6 |
| re: .14 Glad you liked L.A. Story enough to put in on your list.
It's one of my favorites too.
Did you forget Casablanca, or really not think it that romantic?
John
|
255.16 | it's okay, but not a favorite | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Wed Aug 04 1993 14:57 | 4 |
| re .15, Casablanca is a guy's movie. :-)
Lorna
|
255.17 | Stereotyping...use both hands? | 17655::LAYTON | | Fri Aug 27 1993 13:37 | 8 |
| RE a few back...
There is nothing wrong with stereotyping, unless it is done to
denigrate a group of people because of their race, religion,
nationality, etc.
Carl
|
255.18 | | 5259::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Fri Aug 27 1993 14:40 | 3 |
| I just hate denigrators ...
Steve ;^)
|
255.19 | | PCBUOA::BELLOWS | | Fri Aug 11 1995 14:08 | 6 |
| And yet, when someone refers to a "woman's movie" they do it in
derogation. Apparently feelings and, dare I say it, relationships, are
the realm of the inferior. Only the important things like car crashes,
buildings exploding, and destruction in general, and don't forget those
large-breasted women, are for men. Because only they understand real
life. That other stuff is silly and therefore the realm of women.
|
255.20 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Holy rusted metal, Batman! | Fri Aug 11 1995 14:54 | 3 |
|
Now that we're all in agreement, can we carry on?
|