T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
198.1 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | wandering spirit | Thu Jun 03 1993 11:01 | 5 |
| I thought it was quite funny in places. I liked it. It's the first
time I ever liked Tim Robbins in a movie.
Lorna
|
198.2 | | 29881::REILLY | Sean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983 | Thu Jun 03 1993 21:56 | 20 |
|
It got annoying.
I guess that's not a knock on the pacing, cinematography, dialog,
etc., but a knock on the lopsided politics.
"Bob Roberts" made it seem like one party in the USA was noble,
caring, and generous, while one was deceitful, cold, and immoral.
Since I think both parties carry a heavy burden of corruption, this
got to be too biased for me. After seeing Tim Robbins performance
at the Oscar's, I can see why.
You know, I wouldn't mind seeing an actor/musician/entertainer come out
with a conservative piece of work or stance every once in a while - just
for balance. I wonder (not really) why that doesn't happen much. Don't
mean to get political, but hey, its the kind of issues the movie
raises.
- Sean
|
198.3 | | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Not so genteel as real gentlemen | Fri Jun 04 1993 13:08 | 7 |
| > You know, I wouldn't mind seeing an actor/musician/entertainer come out
> with a conservative piece of work or stance every once in a while - just
You mean like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, John Wayne,
Jack Webb, John Milius, ...?
Ray
|
198.4 | | 21689::BARNDT | Ann Marie Barndt | Fri Jun 04 1993 13:21 | 7 |
|
I think you can add Tom Selleck to the list. The heavyweights in Hollywood
are far more liberal than the general public; I don't think we can ever
expect balance. We do get "every once and awhile", but I don't think
that's enough to attain balance.
Ann
|
198.5 | | 12368::michaud | Jeff Michaud, DECnet/OSI | Fri Jun 04 1993 13:39 | 4 |
| > The heavyweights in Hollywood are far more liberal than the general public;
I disagree. I believe the general public is much more liberal
than the conservatives will let you know .....
|
198.6 | | 25415::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:34 | 23 |
| Almost all pictures that come out today strongly support conservative values.
Cops area almost always shown as good guys, the bad guys are always shown as
being psychotic and having no redeeming value which supports the conservative
notions of a clear distinction between good and evil.
Whenever an after-life is shown (such as in Ghosts or Heaven can Wait) it is
always based on the conservative Heaven/Hell model. When was the last time you
saw a departed spirit run into Athena or get reincarnated?
Relations with the "other woman" almost always fail in the movies despite the
fact that just about everyone in the baby boomer generation is living with
someone who they became involved with while married to someone else.
When prostitutes are shown in a positive light, such as in Trading Places or
... I forget, the one with Julia Roberts and Richard Gear ... they have always
turned their last trick and are shown leaving the business. In most other cases
they usually end up dead.
I agree that back in the late 60's and early 70's there was true diversity
and different points of view were shown on the big screen, but today's movies
almost always stay within the lines and promote conservative values.
George
|
198.7 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | wandering spirit | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:51 | 5 |
| re .6, I agree. Seems to me there are more conservative views
expressed in movies these days than liberal.
Lorna
|
198.8 | Hollywood usually is as conservative as it gets | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Boston Shootout - June 18,19,20! | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:59 | 4 |
| In fact, a movie like "Bob Roberts" stands out simply because it
breaks away from the typical ultra-conservative Hollywood mainstream.
NAZZ
|
198.9 | "This land is my land, this land is my land..." | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Not so genteel as real gentlemen | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:56 | 22 |
| Although Bob Billion's political heart was worn on the left sleeve
(which I find refreshing nowadays), it flopped in the way that
Hollywood attempts at electoral politics usually flop. It was
hopelessly, offensively, naive. As a liberal, I have to support as
many mildewy tile grouts as the conservatives do. Liberal politicians
are just as proud of their corruption and hypocrisy as any other public
servant.
The "Saturday Night Live" business was done well enough, but otherwise
they lost too many opportunities. In particular, Gore Vidal's
holier-than-Frank-Fay New England Democrat (!) sunk the movie for me.
The first intellectual to attack the Kennedies surely could've handled
something a little more realistic.
Oh, I know, it was supposed to be propaganda, and propaganda is
_supposed_ to be simplistic. Yeah, that's why satire makes lousy
propaganda. Failed satirical propaganda doesn't achieve much.
Altman's "Nashville" is still the best movie about American politics
in the post-Preston-Sturges period.
Ray
|
198.10 | | 29881::REILLY | Sean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983 | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:22 | 22 |
|
� You mean like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, John Wayne,
� Jack Webb, John Milius, ...?
These guys represent conservative values? Wow, do I get to pick the
liberal representives, now? :^)
Some of that list portary characters that are the comic book versions of
conservative thinking. I guess Arny has been seen in many a Republican
circle, so I'll give you that. After thinking about it, I guess you all
do have a point about the industry. Wasn't trying to be controversial.
I was thinking of cases where I see entertainers as individuals (rather
than the industry as a whole) deem it necessary to become a mouthpiece.
Most use their particular media to make a serious social comment that is
generally liberal - "Bob Roberts", "Roger and Me", "Do The Right Thing",
etc.
Anyway, I must admit it was fun to see the homage to Dylan - I especially
enjoyed the take-off on his cue-cards video.
- Sean
|
198.11 | Hollywood thinks the boss is always the bad guy | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:18 | 22 |
| Remember that the prime movie audience is the late teen/early adult
American. Hence American movies tend to gravitate toward the eighth
grade level or so. Thus all the morality you'd expect from someone
at that stage. This includes the values discussed earlier as well as
the not too subtle (yet unwarranted) messages about Evil Businessmen.
I'm hard pressed to come up with movies that reflect the reality of
running or working for a small, honest enterprise.
On the other hand, I'm surprised at the way Hollywood portrays the
various "spook" agencies. Some films that come to mind are _Hunt for
Red October_, _Patriot Games_, _Silence of the Lambs_ and even _Sneakers_.
It seems as though Hollywood is convinced FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. are
borderline infallible, which some might call the "Conservative view".
My opinion of these agencies is somewhat lower; Waco is more their norm
rather than the exception, imo. And I'm a conservative.
John
"This land is your land,
This land is my land,
Sure looks like one of us
Has a bad deed to this land." -- Dave Barry
|
198.12 | | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Not so genteel as real gentlemen | Fri Jun 04 1993 18:45 | 12 |
| If "Bob Roberts" isn't a "comic book version" of the left, I don't know
what is. (: >,)
As for the rest of your list:
- "Roger and Me" wasn't made by an "entertainer".
- "Do the Right Thing" was not, as far as I can see, either liberal
_or_ conservative. (My guess is that the Celtics fan with the bike was
meant to be a liberal.)
Ray
|
198.13 | | 3759::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sat Jun 05 1993 20:19 | 8 |
| RE: .9 by ESGWST::RDAVIS
>Altman's "Nashville" is still the best movie about American politics
>in the post-Preston-Sturges period.
Better than "All the President's Men"? I've never seen "Nashville".
What would you say makes it the best movie about American politics?
|
198.14 | Lone Gun | 28218::PETERS | Be nice or be dog food | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:53 | 8 |
| Rep .11 I agree with you in everything but the infallibility of the
FBI+++. In most movies except the ones note they are shown as American
Secret police with little or no morals and few successes especially in
comedies like One Red Shoe and Hudson Hawk and action shows like
Magnum Force and Die Hard. Even FBI pictures like Point Break and
Silence of the Lambs the majority of the FBI is shown to be incompetent
and the case is solved by luck or one lone agent.
Jeff Peters
|
198.15 | This isn't Dallas, this is Nashville | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Not so genteel as real gentlemen | Mon Jun 07 1993 14:27 | 19 |
| > Better than "All the President's Men"? I've never seen "Nashville".
> What would you say makes it the best movie about American politics?
"Nashville" predicted the "outsider" syndrome which has dominated
American politics since Nixon's reign; more generally, the movie is
concerned with the (sometimes grisly) ways entertainment and politics
work together to influence "real life" in an age when media
manipulation is the source of most power. Movies like "The Candidate"
looked more realistic at the time, but "Nashville" covers much more
ground, and with the force of a prophecy. Even its tag-team structure,
following character A until the camera trips across character B, is
suggestive of a democracy of individuals who deceive themselves both as
to their own uniqueness and as to the universal validity of their
opinions.
"All the President's Men" is not nearly cynical enough, since it treats
journalists as good guys. Nice little suspense movie, though.
Ray
|
198.16 | Bob Roberts...Satire on endless tape... | 29376::KANNAN | | Wed Jun 16 1993 19:47 | 13 |
|
Above all, this movie was repetitive and boring after a while. Cynical
humor and satire works only the first time around. Additional satire
has to explore other absurdities, unexpected the better.
You've got to watch only the first half-hour of this movie to get the
idea. The rest repeats itself every half-hour with a Oliver Stonesque
monolog from the incumbent senator for relief (not much of one though).
After the "Player", I was expecting a lot from Tim Robbins. If you had seen
this movie first, you wouldn't have seen the "Player".
Nari
|
198.17 | | 29124::MCABEE | and his pet rattlesnake, Lefty | Thu Jun 24 1993 12:37 | 13 |
| > You've got to watch only the first half-hour of this movie to get the
> idea. The rest repeats itself every half-hour with a Oliver Stonesque
> monolog from the incumbent senator for relief (not much of one though).
I might agree that most of the political satire was palyed out pretty early,
but I really believe that "the idea" slowly emerged and was briefly stated in
the final interview with the reporter who kept dogging Roberts. Look at the
cameo players. I don't think they were there for laughs or for simplistic
political satire. In fact, this is not really a political satire. It is
a vehicle for sending a message to the American public.
Bob
|
198.18 | They could have explored a lot of other political strangeness..... | 29376::KANNAN | | Thu Jun 24 1993 14:16 | 9 |
|
They could have had a wealth of material on which to explore other
absurdities of political life, but they seems to have chosen not to;
cynical manipulation of religious beliefs, pork barrel politics,
big industry or interest group pressures, sexual misadventures,
real or perceived charges of harassment, tangling with Sam Donaldson-like
media creatures,......
Nari
|
198.19 | | 29124::MCABEE | and his pet rattlesnake, Lefty | Fri Jun 25 1993 11:05 | 13 |
| > -< They could have explored a lot of other political strangeness... >-
> They could have had a wealth of material on which to explore other
> absurdities of political life, ...
Yep, and that would have made a richer political satire but, again, I don't
think rich political satire was the intent. The last few minutes of the movie
reveal the real intent and message in the words of the radical(?) journalist
and the incumbent senator.
Bob
|