T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
30.1 | | 21752::AWILLIAMS | Bear left. Right, frog... | Wed Feb 10 1993 07:59 | 8 |
| Beth,
I believe the movie's called "Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey"
and the voice-overs of each animal get worse. Two of them are provided
by Don Ameche and Michael J. Fox. I'll leave it to the readers as an
exercise to figure out who's who...
- Skip
|
30.2 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Wed Feb 10 1993 08:52 | 4 |
| Thanks; I munged the title appropriately. [And I'll definitely take
ear-plugs. ;-)]
-b
|
30.3 | Outstanding! | 16821::POGAR | Resident Movie Critic & Costner Fan | Thu Feb 11 1993 02:03 | 19 |
| Well, I saw this one Sunday with my 6-year old daughter, a friend, and
her 6-year old niece.
All I can say is -- bring plenty of Kleenexes!
I saw five movies this past weekend, and this one was, by far, the best
of the bunch. It was thoroughly entertaining, bittersweet, beautifully
filmed, and flawless, IMHO.
Michael J. Fox's voice was kind of a cross between Doc Hollywood, The
Hard Way and Alex Seaver. The other two voices, I had trouble figuring
out and was genuinely surprised at who they were.
Excellent movie - take the whole family.
10/10
Catherine
|
30.4 | | HUMOR::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Thu Feb 11 1993 12:56 | 11 |
| Voice-overs for the animals? Oy, vey!
We saw a sneak preview of *previews* for this movie at the Disney-MGM Studios
just after Christmas (not the movie itself, mind you, just an extended preview).
It gave no indication that the animals had voice-overs. How disappointing...
Well, I suppose I should reserve judgement until I actually see the movie. :-)
By the way, I believe it was filmed in the Canadian Rockies.
--Nina
|
30.5 | me and cats don't mix | 29067::K_BOUCHARD | | Thu Feb 11 1993 17:50 | 9 |
| This sounds like it might be an ok movie but did they have to include a
CAT? (it's a long story but,the last feline that was forced on me is
now in "the great cathouse in the sky" after my wife was forced to
choose between me and "whiskers".pheww! it was a close call but *I*
survived) But alas,I'll probably have to sit through it when it comes
out on video. Maybe I can convince the kids to get "old yeller"{
instead.
Ken
|
30.6 | keep your nasty opinions to yourself | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | i'm the bad guy? | Mon Feb 15 1993 11:55 | 5 |
| re .5, Sorry to hear of your wife's foolish choice. I think any woman
who would pick a man over a cat is nuts.
Lorna
|
30.7 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Feb 15 1993 12:49 | 32 |
| Went to see this over the weekend (sans earplugs). It's your basic
Disney-esque family-style movie (this may be a good thing or a bad
thing depending on your tastes), with some really fine performances by
the animals (and their stunt doubles and their trainers, etc.). The
children in the audience seemed to love it unequivocally; the adults
groaned at some of the lines, but generally liked it too. (My
companions and I were not the only people sniffling happily into our
tissues at the appropriate moments.)
The voice-overs were annoying most of the time, though I'll admit that
some of the commentary by the Brash Young Dog was pretty funny. There
were some supposedly serious, mood-setting scenes that I thought would
have worked better without the voices - the animals' "body language"
was very expressive - but it may be that the kids in the audience
appreciated having things spelled out. (I, too, was surprised to find
out who'd done the voices; I'd only been able to guess one out of the
three.)
The parts I enjoyed the most all involved the interaction between the
animals, whether they were loping across mountain meadows, playing
tricks on each other, or trying to facilitate a jailbreak. Heck, all it
took was one shot of the three of them setting out across the mountains
as the music swelled to make me choke up (but I'm a soft touch). The
trainers really did a marvelous job.
(One cautionary note: The animals' dialog included a number of fat
jokes and rather nasty name-calling during one sequence involving a
portly animal-shelter employee; this sequence seemed to be pitching a
"fat people are appropriate targets" line that felt seriously out of
place in a "family oriented" movie.)
-b
|
30.8 | | 16564::NEWELL_JO | Jodi Newell - Irvine CA | Mon Feb 15 1993 14:43 | 11 |
| I wanted to take my two kids to see this movie this weekend.
My seven year old daughter refused to go. She is terrified
of being subjected to films where animals die. Since I know
relatively little about the outcome of this film, I couldn't
reassure or deny her fears.
Could someone (behind a spoiler or thru mail) tell me if the
movie involves animal death or serious injury?
Thanks, I want to see this film with my kids.
Jodi-
|
30.9 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Feb 15 1993 14:57 | 22 |
| Re .8: <spoiler warning: ending discussed>
[Skipping some more lines, just in case. If you really don't want to
know, pass on by.]
Should be safe - the only things that actually die in this one are some
fish, and the ending is triumphantly happy. HOWEVER... there are a
couple of segments where the fate of one animal or another is in some
doubt, and sensitive kids may need encouragement to get through these
(or hints as to when to stop watching, and when to open their eyes
again). [I sympathize; heck, _I_ had a rough time watching the river
sequence, even though I could tell that the "cat" in the long shots was
stuffed. Dunno if it would help to explain to her how the special
effects were done, or just to keep reassuring her that it's going to be
OK...]
-b
|
30.10 | | BOOKIE::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Fri Feb 19 1993 17:17 | 4 |
| RE .8 -- David Letterman asked the same thing of Michael J. Fox when he (Fox)
was a guest on his (Dave's) show the other night... :-)
-- Nina
|
30.11 | | 3270::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sun Feb 28 1993 17:19 | 6 |
| Didn't Disney do this movie already back in the 50s?
What was the one about the pet that got left behind? No, not "E.T.",
the one about some cat or something that chases its owners halfway
across the country on foot without even a map or compass?
|
30.12 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Mar 01 1993 09:09 | 14 |
| Re .11: Yep, Disney did an earlier version - a decent job, and
_without_ voice-overs for the animals (though I'll admit that the
animal performances in the newer version are much livelier).
Re pets left behind: "Lassie Come Home" would be your classic example,
I think, but the story's quite common. Heck, half of Albert Payson
Terhune's books (and 90% of all "Lassie" episodes!) seemed to feature
it...
I don't suppose the "Jaws" series counts, though the shark and its
descendants certainly did a fine job of tracking down the family
wherever they went. ;-)
-b
|
30.13 | One Big Thumbs Down | 56517::ROSENBERG | D. Rosenberg TAY2-1/H15 227-3961 | Tue Mar 02 1993 12:15 | 7 |
| I have to throw in a dissenting note. I found the movie EXTREMELY
painful to sit through because of the voice-overs. It was irritating
and annoying, and I'm being kind. Yes, the emotional parts were
emotional, the scenery was beautiful, but the movie stunk.
Dick
|
30.14 | cute movie - nothing more, nothing less | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | is that a dagger or a crucifix | Tue Mar 02 1993 13:29 | 14 |
| My daughter and I saw this because the two movies we'd rather see were
both sold out. :-) Actually, I thought it was quite cute and fairly
enjoyable. As a cat lover, though, the cat made it for me. She was
*lovely*, just lovely, and the the prettiest leading lady I've seen in
any recent movie.
It was sort of a sappy story, but since I love animals, I was able to
sit through it.
I read the book a long time ago, and recall that I thought that was
wnderful, at the time.
Lorna
|
30.15 | Kleenex movies | 32198::KRUEGER | | Fri Mar 05 1993 11:43 | 5 |
| I absolutely cannot watch "Dumbo" or "Old Yeller" ... here I am, a
grownup, and I even cry over cartoon animals!
I want to see this movie, though ...
|
30.16 | | 3270::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sun Mar 07 1993 09:34 | 13 |
| RE: .13 by 56517::ROSENBERG
>I found the movie EXTREMELY painful to sit through because of the
>voice-overs.
Sort of like how Dudley Moore's voice-over ruined that Japanese-made
film about this puppy and kitten who get losy and then find their way
home. That would've been a wonderful movie with no dialog, just the
action, scenery, and music.
Come to think of it, there were no voice-overs in "The Bear", were
there?
|
30.17 | | 9006::LARY | Laughter & hope & a sock in the eye | Mon Mar 08 1993 02:59 | 10 |
| > Sort of like how Dudley Moore's voice-over ruined that Japanese-made
> film about this puppy and kitten who get losy and then find their way
> home. That would've been a wonderful movie with no dialog, just the
> action, scenery, and music.
"Milo and Otis" - Moore narrated, and he did cloy a little at times, but the
overall effect was that of a "bedtime story" which (given the intended
audience) seemed appropriate to me...
|
30.18 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | just another tricky day | Thu Mar 11 1993 10:24 | 6 |
| Actually, what I liked best about this movie was how funny the cat
looked, running through the woods and fields, trying to keep up with
the two dogs. I was laughing out loud watching, she was so cute.
Lorna
|
30.19 | *** | 57133::RYDBERG | | Tue Mar 16 1993 14:34 | 5 |
| I enjoyed this movie. I thought the voice-overs were very appropriate
to the animal's actions and expressions. I can't imagine the movie
without that dialogue. I think because we attribute human emotions to
animals so much of the time is what makes them endearing, no? Plus the
fact that they have fur and we don't.
|
30.20 | | UNTADI::SAXBY | Something Olympian about him | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:43 | 13 |
|
I don't think this film can be all bad, but it reduced my nearly 3 year
old to tears near the end. We were a bit stunned that she really
understood what was happening...Never underestimate kids.
BTW to show what totally hopeless parents we are we let her watch
Jurrassic Park too, because she's hooked on dinosaurs. It didn't
provoke any tears, frights or nightmares.
I guess the moral is, if your worried about letting your children see
Jurassic Park, keep them well away from this one!
Mark
|