T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
800.1 | | NOVA::SMITHI | Don't understate or underestimate Rdb! | Tue Apr 01 1997 23:31 | 7 |
| ~ Who is writing to rdb$workload, how is concurrency handled ... ?
The optimizer collects the statistics during processing the query. We flush
the ICG information to RDB$WORKLOAD during commit processing, in the same way
we flush cardinality updates.
Ian
|
800.2 | bottom line ? | 12293::ALLEMEERSCH | In Flanders fields ... | Wed Apr 02 1997 03:39 | 5 |
| So to reassure the customers, we could have a position along the
lines: 'If you can live with cardinality updates, workload collection
should not have more observable overhead' . Right ?
_Luc
|
800.3 | | NOVA::SMITHI | Don't understate or underestimate Rdb! | Wed Apr 02 1997 11:51 | 5 |
| I didn't say that, but we designed the system to have as low an impact as
possible. However, there is an impact and the user must decide if they want
to incur the read/write overhead for collecting this data.
Ian
|