T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1318.1 | What about the locking especially ? | NOMAHS::SECRIST | Rdb WWS; [email protected] | Mon Mar 24 1997 18:48 | 6 |
|
I'm especially interested in the locking aspects of '.0.
Regards,
rcs
|
1318.2 | | UKVMS3::PJACKSON | Oracle UK Rdb Support | Tue Mar 25 1997 06:01 | 5 |
| If they don't specify anything then Visual Basic will probably use the
ODBC default of automatically committing whenever possible. This would
explain the 'softlocking' the customer is seeing.
Peter
|
1318.3 | This is logical without a SET TRANSACTION, isn't it ? | NOMAHS::SECRIST | Rdb WWS; [email protected] | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:31 | 6 |
|
Thanks, Peter. Has anybody seen the "lock everybody out of every
record I touched" behavior from VB ?
Regards,
rcs
|
1318.4 | | UKVMS3::PJACKSON | Oracle UK Rdb Support | Wed Mar 26 1997 05:20 | 7 |
| >Thanks, Peter. Has anybody seen the "lock everybody out of every
>record I touched" behavior from VB ?
Not really, but that is the behaviour I would expect with explicit
transaction control.
Peter
|