T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
839.1 | some of my preferences | USHS05::VASAK | Sugar Magnolia | Mon Jan 10 1994 14:23 | 61 |
|
Ok, I'll take a tab at ansering my own question.
Hmmm. It depends :-)
For some parrots, I prefer really well-socialized handfed babies.
Senegals, Meyers, and other sort of "high strung, nervous" parrots just
don't seem to make good pets unless handraised. My spectacled amazon
is a really nippy little jerk even if he is a handfed baby, so I
shudder to think of what sort of little terrorist he might have become
if he had been parent-raised.
For some reason I have never been completely able to understand, tamed,
parent-raised African greys seem to be more outgoing overall than
handfed ones I have met. The handfed ones seem to bond very closely to
one or two people and don't seem to tolerate anyone else.
Parent-raised greys are a pain in the butt to tame, and take tremendous
patience - but once tamed, have been some of the most gregarious and
wonderful birds I've met, real "party animals".
I have a parent-raised umbrella cockatoo and a handfed citron cockatoo.
The handfed bird is a demanding, noisy, dependant, spoiled, neurotic
little monster (but sweet - I DO love the little bugger). The
parent-raised umbrella seems much more independant, more able to
entertain herself, far less noisy and demanding, more poised and
confident. On the other hand, the parent-raised bird has LIMITS; there
are things that she WILL NOT tolerate, things that are clearly an
assault to her dignity, and she will let you know where her boundries
are in no uncertain terms :-) The handfed cocktoo doesn't seem to be
at all worried about his dignity (or total lack thereof) and is willing
to be hung upside down by his feet, tossed around on his back, will
wear ridiculous little hats, and other such things that his
parent-raised buddy would NEVER permit. Overall, I find the
parent-raised bird to be an easier and happier pet, and since cockatoos
tame so readily, I'd get another parent-raised bird.
Budgies and cockatiels seem to be pretty much naturally friendly (well
except for the occasional Biting Budgie Hen From Hell :-) and seem to
do well enough if handled young that I don't believe handfeeding is
critical to producing a nice bird.
Finches and canaries are intensely difficult to handfeed, but get
super-tame in a way that is pretty abnormal for these little guys. I
met a bold, crazy, handfed white java rice bird that I am in love with
:-) Hard work, but worth it!
I have read that green cheek conures are actually tamer if
parent-raised and then handled. I read that handfed greencheeks are so
confident and bold that they may form vicious biting little gangs!
Maybe Linda C. can enlighten us here - has this been your experience?
I think that having birds parent-raised eliminates some of the problems
associated with handfed birds - adolescent rebellion and difficult
socialization - but may cause problems, in general, with more shy
species. I think that many species do pretty well (if the parents are
tame and not overly protective) with parent-raising and early, frequent
handling. YMMV.
/Rita
|
839.2 | this is long..... | ABACUS::MACDONALD_M | The Tincture Tree | Mon Jan 10 1994 14:49 | 67 |
|
Ok here goes...
first let me say that I am not a breeder (of any animal) and my track
record as far as pet birds is not all that great. However I consider
everything as a learning experience and feel that there is a reason why
things happen as they do. I have taken what I have learned and offer
my knowledge to others to help make their lives and the lives of their
pets the best it can be.
Now, I never really thought about the differences until I had the
chance to study both parent raised and hand fed side by side. After
having dealt with an import yellow nape as my first big bird I agreed
that hand fed was the only way. Then I ended up rescuing some
cockatiels. These birds were young, parent raised birds with no human
contact. They were fully flighted and had free access to the previous
owner's house. When I got them they were pretty wild but once they
were separated from each other in individual cages, and had some time
to adjust i began to work with them. They were all nice birds and
tamed easily. The birds were all available for adoption and one by one
they went to their new homes except for two. At the time I also had a
hand fed tiel. Sydney, my hand fed was very demanding, even though she
was never spoiled, (kept on a schedule as to when free time was etc)
she had toys, an outside view, other birds but she was soo imprinted on
people and my husband in particular that all she did was call for him.
On the other hand, and there wasn't much difference in age between
Sydney and the rescue birds, the rescue birds played with their toys,
and amused themselves in their cages but were very happy to come out
and spend time with you. They also know how to act with other birds.
Sydney did not. In short, they knew they were birds and I think that
is very important. I've had other hand fed birds and one, my moustache
parakeet was returned to the breeder and put in a breeding situation.
I guess the biggest thing is that each species needs to understand what
it is. Hand fed birds are caught in the middle of imprinting on humans
and trying to behave as humans want but genetically they are still
birds.
I have seen many behavior broblems in dogs and some cats when they are
either weaned too early, or are a litter of one. Aggression, lack of
social "graces" and litter box problems are probably the most frequent.
To me it stand to reason that birds have problems too. And I know
we've all read/heard about the pluckers and the screamers. Many
problems caused by owners but even when we try our best and follow
every rule in the book we still have some problems.
As for wanting a really tame, friendly bird, I think if birds are
raised by the parents till they fledge, removed and put in separate
cages, give individual attention by a caring, responsible person than
why can't we have a super nice bird. A lot of a birds behavior and
characteristics are inherited so that must be taken into consideration
when setting birds up for breeding. So much more goes into breeding
that just putting two animals together.
Well enough rambling, bottom line is everyone has a preference. I
guess I just want a bird that knows it's a bird. A bird that has a
health respect for me as a human. In turn I will give that bird
everything in my power to provide it with the best possible life.
oh yeah , why would I only consider a hand fed budgie, cause even when
my little budgie attacks me (which she now does, appearing confused
because she wants attention but then doesn't know what to do and so far
has wanted nothing to do with any other budgie) it doesn't hurt! ;')
whew!
MaryAnne
|
839.3 | It's the bird that counts.... | GLITTR::COMPTON | | Mon Jan 10 1994 17:13 | 34 |
| rep. to .1 - My experience with handfed maroon-bellied conures (similar
to the greencheeks) was once only, and I had to pull the babies from
2 to 6 hours after hatching because the parents tried to do them in.
So.....they were not afraid of anything or anyone. The little one,
last to hatch, turned out to be the true terror of the group. I have
some incubator hatched birds of other species and I don't have a
problem with them (pionus and cockatoos). So I think that it is the
species...also checked with other breeders and hand-feeders after
going through the ego-crash of staying up for days keeping these
chicks alive, only to have them turn out so awful. I assumed I did
something wrong or they were pulled to young. No on both counts (I
am sparing you a lot of details of this research-trust me or send
mail for more info). Peach-fronted conures are apparently often
nippy and cantankerous as well.
IMNSHO, the individual bird is what counts, not whether it was
parent-raised or hand-fed or incubator hatched or whatever. I could
fill pages here with examples of sweet and not-so-sweet birds from
each of these categories, and my experience is certainly *not* all
encompassing, so I am assuming others could add their anecdotes here
as well. Single chicks, if parent-raised or hand-fed, have been
more socialized, in my experience, than chicks kept with clutch-
or brooder-mates.
What I have noticed is what seems to be a connection between
the sweetness, calmness, steadiness (not necessarily the *tameness*)
of the parent birds, except for chicks that are incubator hatched or
taken from the nest the first couple of days of life (they latter have
not 'experienced' their bird parents in the same way a chick does that
is with the parents until the chick opens its eyes).
So, let's hear from some others out there!
Linda
|
839.4 | | ALFA1::COOK | Chips R Us | Mon Jan 10 1994 17:13 | 13 |
| Another perspective on the birds knowing they are birds line.
Do you think it makes any difference in a hand fed baby if it gets
to stay with its siblings a little while after it's been weaned?
Do you think that helps them to learn bird behavior while also being
a sweet pet?
I've put a deposit on a peach fronted conure who will be weaned in
a couple of weeks. He (or she) has only one sibling but I wonder
if he (or she) would benefit from some extra time with that sibling.
gwen
|
839.5 | Bring your companion home.... | GLITTR::COMPTON | | Mon Jan 10 1994 17:19 | 15 |
| to .4
No, don't have it stay with the clutch-mate. Bring it home and have
it rely on you as soon as possible as its friend and companion.
Especially a peach-fronted conure. If they are worked with and
trained, in all the best senses of that word, to share space and
time with you, not dominate it, you'll be better off. Some of the
other smaller species of conures share this need to have roles
and the dominance factor established very young. To relate to dogs,
you need to be the 'alpha bird' to your hand-fed peach-front!
Others will probably disagree with me....But what fun would the
notesfile be without a little friendly sharing of opinions? ;')
Linda
|
839.6 | Is-a-simple! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Mon Jan 31 1994 02:37 | 25 |
| Handfed �r parent-raised? It does not have to be or, it should be a
combination of both �nd "kindergarten" raising.
Let me explain. Parrots are social birds which, in nature, are raised
by their parents IN THE DARK OF THE NEST HOLE, untill they fly out.
Then they mingle with the group and, most naturally, associate with
birds of approximately the same age. Th�s is the time when they learn
what being a parrot is all about.
Looking at this, the optimal thing would appear to be: parent raising,
"kindergarten"-raising. However as the bird intended for either
breeding or pet-keeping will face captivity conditions it better get
used to these when raised because this reduces stress when adult
GREATLY.
So, �f one has the opportunity: have the parent raised, depending on
the species, untill 3-5 weeks, then raise them by hand untill some 6-8
weeks and then put them in a group. Keep giving them additional
handfeeding untill say 16 weeks. Leave them in the group for as long as
possible untill they either leave or get sexually adult.
If you stop to think about it logically, it is a small wonder that some
hand-fed birds do NOT scream.....
Also, parrots should have a feathered mate, be it a true mate or any
other parrot.
Peter
|
839.7 | Pros and Cons! | SWAM1::DEFRANCO_JE | | Tue Feb 01 1994 17:23 | 14 |
| RE .6
What do you feel are the pros and cons about having feathered
mates/friends for ones parrot as opposed to having only human friends?
I am considering a mate for my parrot but I am "very much" afraid of
destroying his wonderful pet qualities.
Presently, my parrot shares his room with 3 cockatiels and has NO LOVE
for them in any way. I'm sure he would hurt them badly if given the
chance. With this in mind, I wonder if he would accept any other
parrot in the house?
Jeanne
|
839.8 | cons | MTADMS::DOYLE | | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:06 | 21 |
| I have a mitrid conure and a cherry head conure and the two of them
seemed to have an infatuation with meeting each other so I carefully
let them closer and closer and they got along great...it worked out
great because I was able to have them out in the tv room with me
together on the T-stand...however after 1 or 2 times together they
became very hostile towards me and if I tried to separate them they
both made serious attacks on me!!!! As a team they became very
hostile..all they wanted was to be together...I lost all human contact
with my Mitrid for a good two months because he kept biting me and kept
screaming for the other one...it took that whole two months for tham
both to get each other out of their minds....I have them each in a
separate room now and even if I put one on the T-stand and one with me
on the couch they will try to fall to the floor and meet there...they
did that twice to me and when they got together on the floor they
attacked my feet and legs and although it may sound funny it was
actually frightening and had they got a hold of me they would've hurt
me pretty bad....it took me 30 minutes to somehow separate them and put
them away from each other...now they are almost never in the same
room............
just be careful and aware that you may lose you
bird to the other bird.................mary
|
839.9 | one more thing.. | MTWASH::DOYLE | | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:08 | 7 |
| re: .8
just one more thing.....my Mitrid pretty much stopped talking
too and it really was a bummer to see him change so much...
mary
|
839.10 | Depends.... | SPARKL::COMPTON | | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:25 | 15 |
| I think you'l lose the bird to its new friend, as described above by
Mary. I have had similar experiences. If you get the bird a mate and
they produce offspring, you could save one of the chicks for your new
companion bird, but the whole cycle can start again with that bird
(do I, do I not, get it a companion of its own species??).
Companion (pet) birds whose owners can spend enough time with the bird,
give it enough cage space and in-cage activities, as well as quality
'out-time' may wish to comment here on keeping a single bird happy and
*not* getting a feathered friend?
I saw a note here recently from P_BOSMAN advocating a feathered
friend for a pet parrot....perhaps he will add his thoughts as well?
Linda C.
|
839.11 | how about a small flight | BRAT::MACDONALD_M | The Tincture Tree | Tue Feb 08 1994 10:10 | 6 |
|
My budgies seem to do a great job of entertaining my parrot during the
time he must spend in his cage. Perhaps a flight of small birds would
be enough to keep a big bird company without losing it to a mate.
MaryAnne
|
839.12 | small birds might help! | 23997::VASAK | Sugar Magnolia | Thu Feb 10 1994 18:38 | 7 |
|
Interesting idea, MaryAnne - my cockatoos enjoy watching tthe flight of
zebra finches, and my grey had a parrotlet that she really enjoyed.
/Rita
|
839.13 | Any Comments? | SALEM::ANGELICAS | | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:41 | 14 |
| I've been thinking, for over a year now, about getting my
Sampson,O.W.Amazon, a keet or something to keep him company while
I'm at work. Samps is an import,parent raised, and is a great talker
and a very friendly bird. He's very attatched to me and doesn't seem
to mind the recent move-in of my girlfriend. I'm reluctant to get
a small bird for him because I think he might get jelous? He likes
to watch the wild birds feed outside at my feeder, something that
took him over a year to get used to. He still don't like crows,herins,
hawks,or any other LARGE birds. My main question is, has anyone ever
got an additional bird and the origional one attack it? Of course
they would never both be out of thier cages at the same time. I'm
also wondering if it would be fair to the small bird,because I know
I would not give this bird the attention I give Sampson. Limitted
time you know. Any suggestions,comments are welcome. Thanks Mike.
|
839.14 | get more than one | ABACUS::MACDONALD_M | The Tincture Tree | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:51 | 12 |
|
Mike,
If you don't feel that you would have time for one-on-one with
another bird how about a pair or a few? A pair of budgies can amuse
themselves and a bigger bird as well. I would imagine, like in Rita's
case finches would also be a good choice. Small birds are relatively
easy keepers, though they can get a little messy with the seeds, a
quick sweep of the broom solves this. Just be prepared for your
Amazon to start making very loud budgie/finch noises! ;')
MaryAnne
|
839.15 | Little birds seem O.K. | SWAM1::DEFRANCO_JE | | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:35 | 19 |
| re .13
I have a pair of finches and a canary that my parrot doesn't seem to
mind. But, he hates my three cockatiels. He likes nothing that
interferes with his getting full attention. I don't know if all
parrots suffer from this jealousy or if mine is just spoiled rotten.
I must be very careful to keep everyone well clipped because I'm sure
the parrot would hurt the cockatiels if he could ever get to them.
I'm considering a mate for my parrot but where he is so jealous, I
don't know if he would accept a mate any more than he accepts the tiels.
I've heard that birds like to watch fish swimming in tanks. That might
be good, non-threatening entertainment for your bird.
Jeanne
|
839.16 | Thanks | SALEM::ANGELICAS | | Fri Feb 11 1994 12:11 | 12 |
| Thanks Maryanne for idea about 2 little birds. That sounds exactly what
I need. And thanks Jeanne for idea about the fish tank, but I tried
that for 2 years and he had no intrest in my fish tank, he really
disliked it. It might of reminded him of the terrible time he went
through when his previous owner sold him to a pet store. Imagine
living in a home for years and then being sold in a pet store. He
was so upset that he plucked his chest and legs almost BARE! I'm so
glad that I saved him and thats maybe why he loves me so much. By
the way he is NOT a feather plucker..
Thanks again
Mike
|
839.17 | Th�ir interest should come first! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Mon Mar 07 1994 02:46 | 30 |
| As mentioned in an earlier note, I strongly feel that ALL parrots
should be kept with a mate. As most are endangered species a mate from
the opposite sex of the same (sub) species should be preferred.
Secondly I am convinced that new parrot owners should only consider
buying captive bred young, raised in the way I described. These will
stay perfect pets in all circumstances, the breeding season excepted.
Now, if you already have a parrot, handfed or wildcaught you may
encounter a situation less ideal:
- Wild caught specimen will very quickly revert to their wild
state, preferring their natural partners. To my mind this goes to show
how much you are depriving the bird of if you don't give it a bird.
You will gain the opportunity to witness a range of interesting
behavior, and sure you will loose some of it's "pet" value but if you
care for the animal.....
- Hand-fed birds that have not been raised with other birds are very
likely to have become imprinted to recognise humans as their species.
They will not accept any other bird as a mate. These are the ones most
likely to "talk". However cute these birds may seem and however happy
they appear, these are caricatures of b�rds. (Please note I am NOT
saying or implying that these birds are not cared for or loved!)
So if you already have a bird, depending on the situation, strongly
consider getting it a mate.
If you are in the process of acquiring a bird, get two or nothing!
Have fun and enjoy your birds, b�th as pets and as �nimals.
Peter
|
839.18 | paired??? NOT!!!!! | MTWASH::DOYLE | | Mon Mar 07 1994 09:34 | 19 |
| Just my opinion......but I still don't agree at all......
I have had nothing but trouble when I pair my birds up....they lose all
respect for me as their owner and I lose all control over them....I
have my "baby" that I will never pair with any bird because I like his
friendly personality and I WILL NOT lose that to another bird.....plus
i have one bird that I got as a hardship case because noone wanted him
because he was vicious.....I have made outstanding progress with him as
he will give me kisses and let me pat him and he will come up onto me
now too......HOWEVER, If I let him with the other bird even for 5
minutes, he turns so vicious it is scary.....so I thought ok..they want
to be together I will let them....but I can hardly walk into the room
with out them trying to lunge at me .....I would rather have 3 tame
birds who are separated then have 3 vicous birds with mates!!!!!!!
Buyer Beware.....and make sure that you want a pair....if you want a
bird to play with and cuddle and such DO NOT pair them up...........
mary
|
839.19 | It's no longer our priviledge to decide on this! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Tue Mar 08 1994 02:07 | 31 |
| Mary,
The thing to remember is, that "untamed" birds are scared for man and
will have quite abit of reserve before attacking. Mind you, they will
defend when you come to close, but that stands to reason. Now, "tame"
birds have lost all fear from man and will attack if they feel the
need.
This is also the reason why no falconer is his right mind wants an
imprinted birds of prey larger than a Kestrel: they are DANGEROUS
whereas wildcaught birds are timid.
Put this together with the fact that wildcaught birds prefer their
own...and you and up with a bird that wants nothing to do with man �nd
is not affraid to show it! Even so, on behalf of the bird this is to be
preferred to keeping it as a solitairy charicature and I herald you for
letting them enjoy eachother!
For wildcaught specimen it seems to be better if they are NOT tamed
before pairing.
Also please note that I made an excemption for the breeding season: all
parrots will become quite actively defensive, properly socialised ones
included. So please beware of these then.
PAIRED? YES! It's a moral obligation and not even a discussion point
anymore. Most have just become too rare for the individual to have the
right to deprive future generations from possible offspring. The Spix
is a nightmare example of what WILL happen if the oldfashioned bird-"lovers"
are allowed to foolhard in their ways.
So once again, good for you to have paired you parrots up! I realy hope
you may at one time enjoy a cluster of eggs laid.
Peter
|
839.20 | paired ???NOT!!!!!!!! | MTWASH::DOYLE | | Tue Mar 08 1994 07:40 | 11 |
| Peter,
I think there is a difference in topics here. I am soley talking
about handfed/handraised birds and none of these birds are in danger of
being extinct.....and my birds are not paired to mate...they are paired
to keep each other and now only for an hour or so.....there is a big
difference between acting defensively to protect its self as opposed to
just plain aggressive or vicious!!!!! I have NEVER given ANY of my
birds any reason not to trust me or for any reason to fear that I would
ever harm them....in fact thay are treated like gold.....besides we are
only talking about conures here not endangered bald eagles or
anything.. ................anyways to each his own.....JMO..mary
|
839.21 | Compromise! | SWAM1::DEFRANCO_JE | | Tue Mar 08 1994 12:57 | 23 |
| I think both Peter and Mary have valid points. I've decided not to
pair up my bird for several reasons. He is hand raised and very much
imprinted on humans. He really hates my other birds. His breed, White
Capped Pionus is not presently in danger and someone is home with him
all day to give him lots of attention.
Although it's very important to breed even the common species, there is
still room for pet "only" birds. It would be nice if all bird lovers
could have a (or a few) "pets" and a few breeder birds. Unfortunately,
due to the expense of owning birds, this arrangement is not always
possible.
I feel that if bird lovers keep the common species as pets and leave
the more endangered species to the breeders we will be in good shape.
As with any issue, compromise and good management is key to success.
As a group, I feel that bird lovers are concerned for the endangered
birds of the world. With responsible people like Mary who keep common
breeds as pets and with dedicated breeders like Peter to care for the
endangered ones, I think we are going in the right direction.
Jeanne
|
839.22 | It's what the b�rd makes of it! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Wed Mar 09 1994 03:03 | 50 |
| Mary,
Wether or not you ever gave reason to the birds is not a decisive
reason for the bird. All parrots, and especially Conures, are highly
defensive creatures in their natural behavior and it's th�ir perception
that triggers their behavior. For the �nimal there is NO difference
between agression and defense. Also, malice is not a motive! They
behave instictively and though they can and will learn, the way it
falls into place and the efeect it has on behavior is pre-programmed by
their evolutionary path. However, this behavior can sure hurt in more
ways than physical sometimes. I know, I have come a long way concerning
animals! All this wonderfull looking after, the best of intentions and than
still they appear to be out to get you...
Don't make any mistakes about them being threatened. Even Conures are
a threatened group. Some species more then others but the the Queen of
Bav. Conure p.e. is mighty rare and I can think of quite a few more
rare Conures!
The destruction of habitat of ALL parrots goes on at an alarming rate
an be assured that all but the culture follwers among them are or will be
endangered very shortly.
To address your referrance to the Bald Eagle: these are no longer
threatened with extinction because they have been very well established
in sevaral captive breeding programmes. In fact, I was offered chicks
from coming breeding season of 5 of the large Eagles, including the
Bald Eagle. Hopefully one day all parrot species will reach the point
at which both habitat-protection and captive breeding is well
established.
To end the discussion my, personal, viewpoint is:
1. Parent-, Hand-, community-raised birds(parrots) should be preferred
2. Parrots should be paired up if possible
3. Pairing-up should idealy be with breeding possibilities
In my, once again strictly personal, opinion parrots are wonderfull and
very rewarding animals to keep but their needs are not compatible with
them being kept solely as pets.
That's it. Anybody sharing my view and in need of info about breeding
parrots can write me a letter:
P.Bosman
Boeier 02-08
8242 CC Lelystad
Netherlands
Also I wrote a book about parrot breeding in Dutch:
De (Baby)Papegaai
ISBN 90-5266-089-1
Enjoy your parrots!
Peter
|
839.23 | paired???NOT!!! | MTWASH::DOYLE | | Wed Mar 09 1994 08:05 | 18 |
| Peter,
Thank you for sharing that with us. I am not here to argue back
and forth about the issue nor will I. I was just sharing some very
negative experiences that I have had instead of misleading people by
only stating the good points...and generally I am talking about
extremely common pet birds....my conures are Cherry Head, Jenday, and
Mitred..none of which are in danger....and if I had one of the last
of a breed OF COURSE I would see that they reproduce......I am very
comfortable that reguardless of pairing up or not, my birds will live
their lives EXTREMELY content and they won't miss what they have never
had......and I know for a fact that my Jenday does not like other birds
and shows no interest except he would rather sit with me on the couch
than with the other birds....and the bald eagle remark by me was just
an example, not a fact to be corrected! I was just trying to make a
point...well, don't take it so hard that not everyone wants to breed!!
J.M.O. ........Mary
|
839.24 | Long story..... | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Thu Mar 10 1994 06:05 | 57 |
| Mary,
If I in any way offended you, that was completely unintentional, nor do
I take it hard that some people have no wish to breed their animals;
that's an entirely personal decision which I should and do respect.
Also my statement about the Bald Eagles was not a "correction". I
merely used your example to get my point across and appearantly failed.
It is alway VERY difficult to separate ethical views from individual
circumstances. So, my apoligies for any misunderstandings.
Unlike the purists I consider the motives for personal
interest/satisfaction of the keeper very valid reasons for keeping
non-domesticated animals.
In fact there are quite a few strong arguments supporting captive
breeding by private persons: the perigrine falcon, the Hawaiian goose,
several raptors etc.
Both these views make me an adamant supporter for the possibillities
for keeping even threatened species by private persons. I strongly feel
that Zoo's, because of their commercial limitations, can defacto NOT
be the best and only guardians of our natural heritage.
Keeping non-domesticated animals however does put quite an extra
responsibillity on the private persons shoulder as catering for these
animals' wellbeing often involves requirements incompatibel with
pet-keeping. So yep, there sure are definite disadvantages connected to
breeding or even keeping these animals under ideal conditions!
Allthough I am NUTS about parrots, I recently decided I could not cater
for my parrots realy properly. Quite a long time ago we had concluded
that they were best of as couples in spacey aviaries. We and the
neighbours however had to put up with just too much noise. Noise
reduction measures all meant a compromise on the wellbeing of the birds.
So....I passed them on to an acqaintance who does have the perfect
conditions. This was an extremely hard decision and I can quite
understand the motives of anyone that will compromise. This goes for
the motives for not breeding and for pet keeping as well.
However what does get to me is that quite a few people
are not admitting to their personal interests and "selling" their
decision as in the interest of the animal, which it rarely is. Obviously
exceptions do occur and individuals are sometimes completely unsuiteble
for breeding and some even are best of as pets.
Also, someone keeping a rare animal as a pet may very well have the
best of intentions and may equally well do an excellent good job caring
for it. So please do not in that way take my remarks as personal
critisism.
P.e. I know darn well that my owls would perhaps be better of flying free
and the only real motive for me keeping them is the satisfaction of my
personal fascination with them. To justify my decision to myself I keep
only captive bred specimen and in a large aviary in a pairs under near
ideal breeding conditions. To justify my decision to the "layman" I use
the captive-breeding-of-rare-raptor argument.
Much the same goes for most of our other animals like the Hawaiian
geese. In fact, probaly the only exception are the tortoises for which
our real motive indeed is their possible extinction in the wild.
So keep caring for your birds and enjoy them the way you choose, as long
as you've thought about it...!
Peter
|
839.25 | respect | MTCLAY::DOYLE | | Thu Mar 10 1994 07:52 | 7 |
| Well, Peter....
Thank you for the respect.....maybe someday in the future I
will be able to pair and mate them but I am only in an apt. and there
just isn't enough room, plus they( all being Conures) are a bit loud at
times and in a small apt. 3 loud birds is enough for now...What else
besides the owls do you have?? ......................Mary
|
839.26 | done ? | ROYALT::PULSIFER | UNHAMPERED BY FACTS AND INFORMATION | Thu Mar 10 1994 12:42 | 5 |
| Rita,
Did you get your question answered sufficently ?
Doug
|