Title: | MS Windows NT Developers |
Notice: | See note 1222 for MS bug reporting info |
Moderator: | TARKIN::LIN EIBER |
Created: | Mon Nov 11 1991 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jun 03 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3247 |
Total number of notes: | 15633 |
One of our software partner is trying to use CAP (NT Call Profiler) on his application's dll. They claim that CAP does not report symbol names on Alpha/NT. It only reports symbol addresses. On Intel/NT, it reports both symbol names and addresses. They are using the same compiler/compiler flags on both Intel/NT and Alpha/NT. Is this a known problem ? Or are they missing anything? Thanks in advance Navin
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3226.1 | DECC::OUELLETTE | mudseason into blackfly season | Tue Apr 22 1997 17:56 | 5 | |
Visual C++ for Alpha questions are best asked in DECWET::VISUAL. I've forwarded your question to the developers so they'll see it promptly and get back to you. R. | |||||
3226.2 | DECWET::MUPOPA | Wed Apr 23 1997 10:35 | 13 | ||
What are the respective versions of compiler/linker used on both Intel and Alpha? Has it worked before on Alpha or is this the first time they try it? Could there be a difference in CAP versions for Intel and Alpha ? What are the results of using the VC++ linking to dump symbols? i.e. Link -dump -symbols foo.dll or Link -dump -all bar.dll on Intel and Alpha images ? |