| Title: | MS Windows NT Developers |
| Notice: | See note 1222 for MS bug reporting info |
| Moderator: | TARKIN::LIN EIBER |
| Created: | Mon Nov 11 1991 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jun 03 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3247 |
| Total number of notes: | 15633 |
-- Cross posted in OPEN3D ---------- A customer wants to write an application on Windows NT that will display 4000 5-pixel vectors, every 5 ms. Questions: - Which configuration will do that? PPRO 200 with a Matrox board? A Miata with a 3D30? Which is the best? - What are the possible way to write the software and achieve this kind of performamance: using VC++ and MFS? Using GDI calls? Both? Thanks, Yossi.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3213.1 | y | BGSDEV::LANGONE | Fri Apr 18 1997 15:14 | 11 | |
The 3D30 is not yet supported on the Miata(it was going to be supported
but there were firwmare problems).
We've been doing some line performance analysis and there are some
performance bottlenecks w/ lines and the 3D30 that may be related
to the software/hardware interface.
I'd be interested in knowing hwo the customer fairs with the
PPRO 200/Matrox configuration.
| |||||
| 3213.2 | We offered AS500/500 with 3D30 and NT | TAV02::GLASS | Yossi Glass, 882-3254 | Sun Apr 20 1997 01:00 | 18 |
> -< y >- > > > The 3D30 is not yet supported on the Miata(it was going to be supported > but there were firwmare problems). > > We've been doing some line performance analysis and there are some > performance bottlenecks w/ lines and the 3D30 that may be related > to the software/hardware interface. > > I'd be interested in knowing hwo the customer fairs with the > PPRO 200/Matrox configuration. We are offering the customer an AS500/500 with 3D30. If they try it, we will let you know what the perf is. Thx, Yossi. | |||||