T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
222.1 | How much H.P. What do you do with it? | SUBWAY::JANKOWITZ | Forget the lips. Read my mind | Wed Sep 26 1990 11:49 | 54 |
| There are a bunch of things which the proper corner weights depend on.
You use corner weights to help balance the car for the type of driving
you are going to do as well as for the type of car. The weights have
to be biased both front to rear and left to right.
In general you add weight to the corners which you want to get more
traction (to a point). If your car understeers you would want more
weight on the front. If the car oversteers or can't get the power down
you want more weight on the rear.
If you predominantly turn in one direction you would want to put more
weight on the inside wheels. Oval track drivers put more weight on the
left side. When they go through a left turn weight shifts to the
outside giving the outside tires more grip but reducing the grip on
the inside. By starting with more weight on the inside this transfer
will tend to even out the weight and allow you to use all four tires
more efficiently.
For street driving you generally want to balance the car evenly from
left to right. For a track like Lime Rock which only has one left turn
and it isn't too important I put a few percent more weight on the
right side of the car.
The first thing to do before changing anything is to write down what
your weights currently are.
If you generally do street driving with the car and you like the
balance of the car as it is, keep the front to rear percentage the
same and balance the car evenly left to right.
ie: Current Proposed
L.F.: 400 R.F.: 500 L.F.: 450 R.F.: 450
Total Front: 900 Total Front: 900
L.R.: 600 R.R.: 500 L.R.: 550 R.R.: 550
Total Rear: 1100 Total Rear: 1100
It's easiest to get the weights on opposite corners. If you raise the
right front you will be increasing weight on the right rear AND left
front. It can be a real juggling act to get them the way you want.
It helps if you can find someone who weighs about the same as you and
won't complain for a couple of hours sit in the car (and not move).
IMPORTANT::: DISCONNECT THE SWAYBARS -
After you have the weights the way you want, adjust the swaybar drop
links so there is no preload on the bar when you re-connect it.
Drive the car and decide how it feels. Re-balance as necessary.
For my underpowered 914 (mid-engined) I think I started with about 58%
rear and 42% front.
|
222.2 | start with 'em balanced | KOOZEE::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Wed Sep 26 1990 11:54 | 8 |
| In general, for roadracing you want corner weights to be balanced,
left-to-right. Doing otherwise will make the car turn well in one
direction but be a pig in the other. The only time you really want to
get weights dissimilar is when all the important corners (those leading
onto or off of a straight) are in the same direction, like at Lime Rock
here in the USA, or for an oval. Even then you have to keep the car
controlable for the non-critical corners in the other direction.
- Chris
|
222.3 | Answer to .1 | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | Spin? Who Me? I'm only the driver | Wed Sep 26 1990 12:38 | 5 |
| 160-170 Bhp at the flywheel 130+ at the wheels.
U.K. Club circuits including Brands hatch, Silverstone, Thruxton,
Snetterton, Cadwell, Oulton, Mallory. "Street" circuits not "Ovals"
Lotus 23 replica weight about 600Kg
|
222.4 | A balanced opinion | SUBWAY::JANKOWITZ | Forget the lips. Read my mind | Wed Sep 26 1990 17:20 | 18 |
| I know Brands and Silverstone have a good mix of left and right turns so
I would think you want the car to be pretty evenly balanced left to right.
Again, do you like the way the car handles right now? If so keep the front
to rear balance about the same and set the left right weights even. If
I were setting the car up from scratch I would go between 55% to 60% in the
rear to begin with. If you haven't done corner weights before you may be
happy to get within that range with left and right close to the same
weight.
My guess is that if you ran more at Silverstone you would want a little
lower weight in the rear (fast turns probably no problem getting the power
down), and the short course at Brands a bit more weight to the rear to get
the power down in the tighter turns.
Let us know how it goes.
What type of scales do you have?
|
222.5 | this is HEAVY, dudes! | JETSAM::ROTH | | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:39 | 32 |
|
one more (of many) things to keep track of: tire pressures. try to
duplicate the tire pressures that are seen in competition. when you
think about it, the tire pressure is supporting the weight of the car,
not the rubber compound of the tire.
and another; if the floor surface is not level, your corner weights
will not be accurate.
adding to glenn's comment on the swaybar being disconnected during this
procedure, convince that nice person who's weight closely matches
your's to stay in the car while you RECONNECT to swaybar downlinks. (I
use dumbbell weights because that don't talk back, complain about the
garage being a second home, etc. etc. etc.)
and there's more: if you have concerns about cutting minimum car
weight at the end of your race, put the car on the scales, note the
total weight, and THEN refill the tank, noting the difference. also
note if the weight seems to end up on one corner, or evenly
distributed.
and of course you have adjustable shocks, which for one track you like
soft, another you like stiff, and, you guessed it, they also effect
corner weights!!
isn't this FUN!!!!! how much time before that next race?????
and we haven't even touched on suspension geometry yet!!!!
Bob Roth
|
222.6 | 2 Weeks to go | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | Spin? Who Me? I'm only the driver | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:20 | 1 |
| A little over 2 weeks before Brands Hatch.....
|
222.7 | | BEING::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:44 | 22 |
| and as I recall when we did the suspension adjustments on the Royale
(several years ago), the ride heights and corner weights interact, so
you also should check the car's stance as part of the process.
Good point in .-? about rechecking with empty and full tanks, not just
for gross vehicle weight but also for distribution - most good designs
should NOT change the weight distribution as fuel load burns off, but
it's certainly an easy thing to check and could be worthwhile.
Bob's comment about using weights (dumbbells or sandbags are favorites)
to substitute gives a good approximation, you might get a small change
when you substitute a live driver because you have legs and such that
make the distribution somewhat different, but that's probably not
significant on a gross level anyway.
Most important, use a level floor. Also, what mechanism do you have
for measuring each corner? The one we used, which I liked, is four
electronic scale pads connected to one central box that displays all
the corner weights at once. Using anything less precise (eg, bathroom
scales) would probably require some checking for linearity and
reproducibility between all four units before you measure the corners.
|
222.8 | Corner weights have never been done! | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | ............<42`-`o> | Thu Oct 18 1990 07:14 | 2 |
| I talked to the cars original owner/builder and they've never been done!
|
222.9 | corner weights in kilos | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | Network Consultant - Just crashin' | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:31 | 10 |
| old corner weights new corner weights
Front 107 135 118 129
rear 192 179 185 188
---------------- -------------
299 304 303 317 Target
|
222.10 | A now some theory | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | Network Consultant | Tue Oct 29 1991 05:56 | 79 |
| <<< MARVIN::DISK$TOOLS:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CARS_UK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CARS_UK conference >-
================================================================================
Note 576.414 Driving & Racing kitcars 414 of 418
VANTEN::MITCHELLD "Network Consultant" 67 lines 28-OCT-1991 18:16
-< A bit further >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A car has wheels front wheels a left front, b right front, c left rear, d
right rear.
A B
C D
are the four wheels weights.
using moments for any car A+B = K1
C+D = K2
A+C = K3
B+D = K4
where K1, K2, K3, and K4 are constants related to the position of
the C.G. and the total weight and dimensions of the car.
( Note K1+K2 = K3+k4 = total weight of car)
e.g. K1 = (Total weight X C.G distance from rear)/ wheel base
But to prevent diagonal distribution of weight the front wheels
should be loaded in proportion to the total left/right distribution
i.e. A/B= K3/K4
and so the back wheels C/D= K3/K4
A + B = K1 so B= K1-A then
A/(K1-A) = K3/K4
A = ((k1-A)K3)/K4 = K3K1/K4 - K3A/K4
A(1+K3/K4)= K3K1/K4
A= (K3K1/K4)/(1+K3/K4) = k3K1/(K4+K3)
Worked Example: a car was weighed as shown below
40 60
80 30
A=40,b=60,c=80,d=30,k1=100,k2=110,k3=130,k4=90
using the above formula and and similar
The balanced corner weights are
A'= k3k1/W = 100*130/210 = 61.9
B'= K1K4/W = 100*90/210 = 42.9
C'= K2K3/W = 110*130/210 = 68.1
D'= K2K4/W = 110*90/210 = 47.1
Where W is the total weight i.e W = K1+K2 =K3 +K4
Target corner weights are
61.9 42.9
68.1 47.1
Which can achieved by lowering the bottom spring platforms on b and c
From this basic point you can then set it up for a circuit or leave it with
the basic set up for a road car.
|