T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1059.1 | "hold" is the keyword | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Mar 12 1997 21:14 | 17 |
| > As of close on Friday, March 6, 1997
> Symb LastTrad SoldAt Diff #Shares
> U 22.375 6.625 15.75 4000 $63,000.00
> AMD 39.5 17.375 22.125 200 $ 4,425.00
As of close on Wednesday, March 12, 1997
Symb LastTrad Change %Chg Bid Ask DayLow DayHigh 52Wlow 52WHigh
U 26.5 +1 +3.9 V: 1541500 25.25 26.625 15.125 26.5
AMD 45.375 +3.625 +8.7 V: 318300 43.625 47.75 10.25 42.25
which translates to an additional 4.125/share gain (or another
$16,500.00!) I missed out on US Air[ways] and 5.875/share
gain (or $1,175.00) on AMD.
AMD was upgraded from buy to strong buy by some analyst, and U
was given as the top airline stock to buy by the guest market
analyst on last Friday's NBR.
|
1059.2 | | AOSG::HITT | I break for ACCVIOs | Thu Mar 13 1997 10:54 | 23 |
| I believe you're basically right Jeff - in the short time I've traded stocks,
I would have done much better to just 'sit tight' on some of them rather than
sell off. Some notables for me have been AMAT (bought at ~37, dropped to mid
20s, sold when it rebounded to 39, now it's about 51), CPQ (similar story -
sold off at about break-even around 47, now around 79), and others - all just
in the past year.
I've been hurt by watching my portfolio too closely and seeing negative
numbers next to a certain stock for too long. I end up feeling that I'd better
cut my losses, when instead I end up locking them in and missing a potential
gain.
If the health of the company really isn't a question in your mind, you should
probably just hold the stock until it comes back in favor. But if a stock goes
down and the reasons you bought the stock in the first place change, you do
need to evaluate whether or not you'd buy it at the current price (ignoring
the fact you already own it). If not, then you may want to sell. However if
the long term prospects still look good, you may want to hang on.
I've gone to both extremes, however in this market it appears that eventually
every dog has its day.
-Jeremy
|
1059.3 | We are in the same boat | NCMAIL::YANUSC | | Fri Mar 14 1997 09:37 | 41 |
| Jeff,
I commend you for putting out there what many have suspected for some
time now - that you don't know stocks from a hill of beans!
Just kidding. I commend you for admitting what many find unable to do,
which is admit that we tend to misstime the market when purchasing
individual stocks. It is easy to do - we don't have nearly the time to
research the markets correctly, we rely upon our human emotions, and so
forth. I, too, can admit that I have made many mistakes in this
regard, Digital stock being the most apparent. And while I have had
some notable successes, where I have doubled or tripled my $ in a short
period of time, I suspect that I would have been further ahead by
following another path, namely:
1. Invest in a solid portfolio of mutual funds, such as a variety of
index funds, not just the S&P500. This group has not always had the
success it has had recently, so be prepared for its eventual downturn
by investing in other indices, too.
2. If you want to continue to invest in individual stocks, and are not
that speculative of an investor, build a portfolio of strong, dividend
paying (if possible) stocks. They weather downturns much better than
non-paying stocks, and generally give excellent returns over time.
One of the problems I think many investors have right now is this push
to deliver market-beating returns. While admirable, it causes many of
us to take undo risks, which is murderous to our net worth over time.
For recent market investors, used to seeing 20+% returns from the last
few years, it is difficult to imagine the historic market average over
time of 10% or so. At 10% your money will double in approximately
seven years. That is a solid return, but most people are very
dissatified with that. But I suspect that the approach I mentioned
above in #1 and #2 will give at least those rates of returns. For
those who try individual stocks, especially the uninitiated, I daresay
the returns will be somewhat less.
Enjoy reading your notes, Jeff.
Chuck
|
1059.4 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Mar 26 1997 20:52 | 16 |
| > I commend you for admitting what many find unable to do,
> which is admit that we tend to misstime the market when purchasing
> individual stocks.
I think you mis-understood, my problem is not mis-timing the
market when "purchasing" individual stocks, but when "selling"!
> 2. If you want to continue to invest in individual stocks, and are not
> that speculative of an investor, build a portfolio of strong, dividend
> paying (if possible) stocks. They weather downturns much better than
> non-paying stocks, and generally give excellent returns over time.
Well there is a downside to dividend paying stocks, at least
if living here in NH. We don't have a broad based income tax,
but we do have a dividends and interest tax (with an exemption
for the first so much $). But we have no capital gains tax.
|
1059.5 | :-((((((((((((((((( | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Apr 24 1997 00:53 | 25 |
| >> As of close on Friday, March 6, 1997
>> Symb LastTrad SoldAt Diff #Shares
>> U 22.375 6.625 15.75 4000 $63,000.00
> As of close on Wednesday, March 12, 1997
> Symb LastTrad Change %Chg Bid Ask DayLow DayHigh 52Wlow 52WHigh
> U 26.5 +1 +3.9 V: 1541500 25.25 26.625 15.125 26.5
:-(((((((((((( Talk about selling the goose that lays the golden
eggs :-((((((((((((
That's *exactly* $110,000 of *additional* gain/profit I missed
out on by selling 2 years too early :-((((((((((((((((((((((((
Symbol: U (USAIR GROUP) [NYSE]
Last Trade: 34 3/8, Change 5 1/2 (19.05%) at Apr 23 4:01:46
Low & High: 29 1/4 & 34 3/8 (spread 5 1/8)
52 Week Low & High: 15 1/8 & 29 1/8 (spread 14)
Volume/# of Trades: 4167400 / 793 (5255 shares/trade)
P/E: 10.70, EPS: 2.70, Market Cap: 1573.00, Beta: 1.11, EPS Growth: 82.80
FWIW, the airline released MUCH better than expected earnings today,
a good profit compared to a loss same Q last year.
From $4/share on Dec. 30th 1994, to almost $35/share today,
talk about a growth stock!!!
|