T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
775.1 | Motorola and AT&T were rumored to be the possible suitors | TPSYS::BHAT | | Fri Oct 07 1994 19:11 | 10 |
|
There was a rumor mentioned in yesterday's Boston Globe about Motorola
being the possible suitor, and Apple's stock was up about $4 or so in
heavy trading. They speculated that Motorola, buying Apple, would be able
to ensure the continued demand for PowerPC.
Again, it was the rumor of the day on Wall Street. As always, they also
mentioned AT&T as another possible candidate to buy Apple!
/P.B. Bhat
|
775.2 | VOGON is the Answer | POBOX::PATEL | | Sat Oct 08 1994 12:55 | 4 |
| I saw the news story appear in VOGON News - Please go into VTX and
extract the story.
Ken
|
775.3 | | MARVA1::BUCHMAN | UNIX refugee in a VMS world | Tue Oct 11 1994 13:55 | 6 |
| What I heard yesterday on Marketplace is that IBM and Apple plan to
forge closer ties in the development of the next generation of personal
computer. It was mentioned that IBM may buy a 20% stake in Apple as
well. Apple was up again yesterday as a result. The commentator
referred to it as "Forrest Gump's favorite stock". :-)
Jim
|
775.4 | I would prefer IBM than APPLE *right now* | CSCMA::BALICH | | Wed Oct 12 1994 14:19 | 10 |
|
Also, it appears IBM will benefit from this agreement (ie More exposure
of os/2... The stock of IBM has *unbelievably* been rising, its up
to 73 /share today. I think Apple's stock has risen too much lately
for it to be a buy now (ie The rumor is built in already in the current
stock price). I think if the agreement fails, apple's stock will fall
too. But a positive yesterday about APPLE was that its earnings was
going to be above analyst expectations.
|
775.5 | parachutes ready! | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Fri Aug 25 1995 11:56 | 5 |
| newspaper report says that Apple set up separation agreements with its
top execs. in case they were dismissed in a takeover, etc. Apple says
that no takeover is imminent.
Mark
|
775.6 | Recent downturn | NWD002::THOMPSOKR | Kris with a K | Mon Sep 18 1995 19:19 | 14 |
| Apple was hit hard last few days because of problems meeting delivery,
and the San Jose Mercury News tried to link Apple's woes with the first
loss of the Harlem Globetrotters in 13 years (?) or so. A stretch?
Perhaps, but the hometown paper was especially harsh, showing a color
photo of the team with their Apple laptops with a caption pointing out
they lost two days later.
Ouch! And I thought the Boston Globe was tough.
Anyway, Apple is down to 36 11/16 from a 52 week high of 50 (low of 32
1/2) Trading at about 9 times earnings.
Some say it is "do or die" time for Apple. I think they might be ripe
for a take-over. Any thoughts now? What about a buy at 36?
|
775.7 | Hopefully a buy at $36.15 this afternoon?? | MSBCS::HURLEY | | Wed Sep 27 1995 13:21 | 6 |
| Apple is down to 36.3125 as of 11:47 this morning. I'm real close to
jumping in and picking up so shares at < 36.15. I think it will be do
or die time for apple between now and xmas and if they bomb look for
them to be gobbled by motorola or Ibm.
Time will tell..
|
775.8 | Re: .7; what is book value? | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, Objectbroker | Wed Sep 27 1995 13:50 | 0 |
775.9 | Time to give up the gains from earlier in the year | EVMS::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Wed Sep 27 1995 14:39 | 7 |
| .7> Apple is down to 36.3125 as of 11:47 this morning. I'm real close to
.7> jumping in and picking up so shares at < 36.15. I think it will be do
It's at 34 7/8 right now. You'll get a much better price on AAPL, and
most other stocks, in another 5 weeks. Do yourself a favor and wait.
John (a.k.a. "Criswell")
|
775.10 | | MSBCS::HURLEY | | Wed Sep 27 1995 17:20 | 4 |
| Thanks for the info John..
Why do you say wait another 5 weeks?? Whats coming down the road
that you see??
|
775.11 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | Wanna see my scar? | Wed Sep 27 1995 19:43 | 3 |
| re .10
October is coming!
|
775.12 | Unfriendly October | EVMS::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Thu Sep 28 1995 09:52 | 11 |
| Not all Octobers are bad, of course. Just those that follow good summers.
I don't have the numbers handy, and probably would violate copyright
restrictions if I quoted, but basically when there's a good market
run-up in the early part of the calendar year then you have a > 2/3rd
chance of a substantial retracement in October.
Not to mention the possible "train wreck" in mid-November. I pick 11/14
as a good day for a selling climax (i.e., buying opportunity).
John
|
775.13 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, Objectbroker | Thu Sep 28 1995 11:10 | 10 |
| > I don't have the numbers handy, and probably would violate copyright
> restrictions if I quoted, ...
if you quoted a snippit you'd be fine.
> Not to mention the possible "train wreck" in mid-November.
there won't be a train wreck as the political ramifications for
the republicans are worse than those for the pres. (based on
current public opinion polls).
|
775.14 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Thu Sep 28 1995 14:22 | 2 |
| The Business Week from two weeks ago had an article on Apple and
its takeover chances.
|
775.15 | | SLOAN::HOM | | Thu Sep 28 1995 15:23 | 11 |
| Apple as a stock could prosper under three senarios:
1. stock market takes off even further,
2. the market/technology forces of Microsoft/Intel, plan or
unplanned cause customers to move back to Apple,
3. Takeover, LBO.
I have no insight into 1 or 3. For #2, take a look at the notes
on Intel and Microsoft.
Gim
|
775.16 | Apple stock plummets | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Mon Jan 06 1997 14:29 | 76 |
775.17 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Mon Jan 06 1997 15:18 | 2 |
775.18 | Can someone explain this ??? | CSCMA::BALICH | | Thu Mar 27 1997 13:34 | 15 |
|
Reported in todays MERCURY TIMES .... Oracle mulling takeover of Apple.
Ellison said that if he makes an offer, it would give current
shareholders 60 percent in cash and 40 percent equity in the new
Apple. But that would happen, he said, only if shareholders were
willing to sell at the current share price.
Apple's stock was up 87 1/2 cents per share, or 5 percent, to
$17.62 1/2 in midday trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
My question:
xxx Why would a stockholder be willing to sell at current price just to
get 60 percent in cash and 40% in new company ... HOW is this better than
just selling on open market at 17/share(current price) ???
|
775.19 | They'd hope to increase the value of the 40% | UNXA::ZASLAW | Steve Zaslaw | Thu Mar 27 1997 18:19 | 22 |
| > My question:
> xxx Why would a stockholder be willing to sell at current price just to
> get 60 percent in cash and 40% in new company ... HOW is this better than
> just selling on open market at 17/share(current price) ???
Hope this makes sense:
The stockholders might feel that the takeover would turn Apple around,
resulting in an increased stock price. They may be holding on in hopes of the
stock turning around, as are some of us with DEC stock. They can either
reinvest the cash they get in Apple, or in something less risky than the
success of a turnaround, and still they'd have 40% of their stake in Apple
left.
So for example, suppose Compaq made a similar offer to DEC shareholders. Compaq
would offer to purchase 60% of stockholders' shares at $28.25/share, and they'd
keep the other 40%. Compaq would then control DIGITAL and there could be a new
management. To the extent that a DEC stockholder believed this would enhance
share value compared to the status quo, s/he might welcome such a deal. This
scenario represents a rumor that was discussed in the DIGITAL_INVESTING
conference and some employees expressed a hope it would become reality, perhaps
in consideration of the value of their DEC holdings.
|
775.20 | | UCXAXP::KIMMEL | | Thu Mar 27 1997 19:13 | 4 |
| A management team that understands software in control of a
hardware company......
Doesn't sound too bad at the moment.
|