T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
731.1 | Lots of Choices For the No-Brainer Fund Investing | POBOX::PATEL | | Tue Jun 07 1994 17:46 | 17 |
| Pick a Growth or Growth and Income or Aggressive Growth Mutual fund
that has a good 1, 3, 5 year track record and invest the money at three
different times (each quarter $500.00) and then sit tight for the Long
Trem Time horion that you talked about.
Berger 100, Kaufman, Janus Mercury, Janus Enterprise, Invesco Value
Equity, Fidelity Balanced etc etc are a few of many choices of funds
that make a lot of sense - especially when you read about the manager's
philosophy of investing. Most of these have low minimums in non-IRA
accounts, no loads (back or front) and OK on expenses --- But GOOD ON
RESULTS.
There are other notes in here that will give you other ideas, but this
is a good starting point.
Ken
|
731.2 | I love that commercial | MSBCS::BROWN_L | | Tue Jun 07 1994 18:13 | 4 |
| I recommend the Southwest Pacific Rim Techtonic Drift Emerging
Continent Contrarian Uncomfortable Investor Equity Value Fund.
You should be in that. ;-) kb
|
731.3 | | ENQUE::TAMER | | Wed Jun 08 1994 17:28 | 4 |
| re .2
What was the name of that fund again ?
|
731.4 | Investment Questions | LEDS::AWILLIAMS | | Mon Jun 13 1994 17:04 | 4 |
| Hello,
I am very interested in investing some money, but I don't know how or
where to begin. Can you make any suggestions?
|
731.5 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | You'll never get out of this maze! | Tue Jun 14 1994 10:35 | 16 |
| re <<< Note 731.4 by LEDS::AWILLIAMS >>>
-< Investment Questions >-
> Hello,
> I am very interested in investing some money, but I don't know how or
> where to begin. Can you make any suggestions?
read lots of notes in here.
read notes in digital_investing
read the business section of your newspaper.
read read read read read.
then, invest.
|
731.6 | Some pointers | SFC01::GREENE | CASE: No Pain, No Gain! | Wed Jun 15 1994 13:21 | 35 |
|
> Hello,
> I am very interested in investing some money, but I don't know how or
> where to begin. Can you make any suggestions?
Send it to me! I'll have a good time in Vegas! ;-)
Seriously, the last note has the best advice: read read read read read.
Where you invest your money depends on a multitude of factors
including how much money you have to invest, your age, your
personality, how much risk you're willing to take, etc.
Some suggested starting points:
* Charles Givens books (e.g., Wealth without Risk): Whether or
not your subscribe to his investment philosophy he describes
various investment vehicles and their relative pros & cons.
Written for the lay person who knows nothing about investing.
Personally, I like his philosophy. It parallels when my
proverbial rich uncles told me. Basically it goes something
like this. Invest 10%-20% of your gross income. Time will
do the rest. Doesn't really matter what you invest in; in
20-30 years you'll be rich. Fortunately for my uncles, they
figured this out when they were 20 and were independently
wealthy by the time they were 40. And don't put all your eggs
in one basket.
* Money Magazine: Lots of good articles. Check back issues at
the library.
Good luck,
Dave
|
731.7 | Reading for Canadians | CGOOA::KLOOSTERBOER | Uphill & against the wind... | Thu Jun 16 1994 18:40 | 15 |
|
Two good books with a decidedly Canadian slant, especially if
you're looking at increasing your net worth overall, not just
what stocks to invest money in are:
The Wealthy Barber
The Ultimate Money Guide for Canadians
Check the "business/financial" section of any mass market book
store in Canada.
And I agree with the read read read read advice. It's a jungle
out there. Also, diversification is good.
\bjk
|
731.8 | The Wealthy Barber | KAOOA::DUNCAN | | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:29 | 8 |
|
I'll second the vote for "The Wealthy Barber". Even though it has a
slight Canadian bias, the principles can be applied anywhere.
It's a very easy read (about 4-5 hours), and it's written in plain
english. It's one of the best I've read.
Good luck
|
731.9 | Novice Investor Seeks Info | CRAMTB::FALKOF | | Fri Jul 01 1994 09:32 | 20 |
| I am also a novice wannabe investor and I have a slightly different
slant. I already have several stocks that I do not want to sell but I
want to understand several options available for me to use their value.
Where, please, can I learn about borrowing against stock, about broker
accounts, broker services, discount brokers and their services, banks
and their services concerning stocks, and so forth. I understand that
if I keep the stocks as their dividends reinvest, the portfolio will
increase in value. At the same time that I borrow against their value
(if that is my best option), I want to minimize my out of pocket
expense as well as minimize my tax obligation.
Please advise me what books, magazines, journals, or people I can speak
to that can help me understand all of these options and possibly open
my eyes to others.
Thanks,
ERIC
PS - Private mail is acceptable too. Thanks.
|
731.10 | 3com info? | ANNECY::HUMAN | I came, I saw, I conked out | Tue Jul 05 1994 09:04 | 16 |
| I have a contact who is in a responsible (ie insider) position in 3com.
This person reckons that their shares are due to go up as a result of
their year end results.
Unfortunately: 1. I know little about share trading
2. Am finding it difficult to find out any info on 3com's
performance on a day to day basis (ie the WSJ Europe/FT Times is out of
date/and or not easy to get hold of).
Does anyone have any knowledge of 3com/performance they could share
with me (on or offline)?
thanks in advance, martin (in France)
|
731.11 | Here's the scoop on COMS (3COM).... | POBOX::PATEL | | Thu Jul 07 1994 01:17 | 22 |
| Well here is some info that I have - It does not have the quartely
breakdown, plus it's just a ton of typing to do for each quarters
results.
1991 1992 1993 1994E
REV 414M 424M 617M 800M
NET INC -24 8M 39M 80M
EPS -.79 .26 1.20 2.45
Zweig rated this stock as #1 (BEST) and Value Line also had this stock
as the stock of the week in early 1994.
The last four quarters have shown increases of 127%, 111%, 125%, 117%.
This is slightly older data (prior to Feb quarter results). This is
trading at approx 20-25 Est EPS'95 so it is not cheap according to the
usual PE Ratio standards (but compared to the growth rate it is
fabulous since it sports a great 4:1 ratio!!!!).
Thats it for now.
Ken
|
731.12 | 3com up; sell? | ANNECY::HUMAN | I came, I saw, I conked out | Thu Aug 25 1994 06:02 | 17 |
| OK well I bought some at ~58, they dropped hahahahahah to ~48 but are
now slicing (from ~1 week ago) back up to ~63 last news I heard. This is
presumed to be in anticipation of a 2-1 split due on Sept 1st.
Information is that 1/2 yearly results will be good in December, when
delivery problems are out of the way.
Any ideas? I'm tempted to sell some around the 28/29th Aug and keep
some on to see what the split does. (I'd appreciate any views you have;
also do I have to do anything about shares I hang on to or do I get
notified of the split and the number of new shares I have?)
Believe me I am one _naive_ user!
Thanks for any help. I'm now investigating WWW server info to try and
chase the ups and downs.
cheers, martin
|
731.13 | A non-hypothetical game... | KOALA::BRIGGS | | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:03 | 40 |
|
This note will sound like many other notes in here. I am a recent college
graduate and would like to start investing. As I was an engineering major, I
never took any business classes, so my knowledge in this field comes from
my personal reading and studying, although I will soon (hopefully) be going
for my master's in finance. I have done some extensive reading about investing
and have even attended a few seminar's that my parents were invited to about
saving for retirement....
....But, back to the real question -
Since I have just graduated, I am very debt-free: my only current bills are
car insurance, as I still (argh!) live at home. Because of this, I have
developed a fairly sizeable amount of savings that are currently wasting away
in a checking account earning a whopping 1.5% rate!
My question is really two parts:
1) As I will be moving out soon, I have to decide to either rent or
buy. What I would buy now would necessarily be fairly cheap, less
than $100k; this rules out most houses, leaving only condo's, which
haven't proven to be the best investment in the past 5 years. So,
do you think I would be better off buying now, spending some of my
savings, and getting a jump on that first home purchase, or should
I rent for a year or two, and use the money I would have used for
a downpayment to augment the amount I invest.
2) As I will be investing no matter what I decide to do (only the
amount will change), where do you think the best place to start
off is? I have contacted a variety of financial services, from
discount brokers (Waterhouse) to full brokerage houses (Fidelity).
I am doing a lot of research into this before I jump in, and I
would like to do more than simply put money in a mutual fund and
let it sit, but as I have no experience, I don't know where to
start. I also don't want to end up spending thousands of dollars
a year in commissions and transaction fees.
So, I guess all of the above really boils down to this: If you were 23 years
old and were looking to finally move out of the house as well as start playing
the investment game, where would you start?
|
731.14 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, AXP-developer support | Tue Nov 08 1994 15:41 | 7 |
| you start with goals. What do you really want to accomplish? Why buy
a house if you aren't going to live in it or rent it or do something
with it? Investments in mutuals take a while. Do you have 5 years to
wait before you want to do something else with your money?
Next comes a plan. How much a month can you afford to invest, and
where?
|
731.15 | | GUIDUK::BRENNAN_CA | Cathy Brennan, 548-8563 | Tue Nov 08 1994 16:07 | 7 |
| Whatever you do, don't buy a house/condo if you're thinking of it as an
investment. Buy it because you want to live there. As a 23-year-old,
probably single (I'm assuming, since you live at home), you're pretty
mobile. What if you decide to transfer to a job somewhere else?
Houses/condos aren't very liquid.
Yes, I'm advising renting.
|
731.16 | some more information... | KOALA::BRIGGS | | Tue Nov 08 1994 16:25 | 24 |
|
Okay, thanks for the quick replies. To answer some of the questions;
I am looking for a place to live - not as an investment. Also, I have lived
in a variety of places growing up due to my father being in the Air Force, and
thus have no "home". I would like to make New Hampshire my "home", at least
for a few years anyway. While I am not unwilling to move, I have no plans on
either a job change, or of leaving New Hampshire/Mass. in the next 5-10 years,
but then again, most people don't.
I am single, although this may not be true in the next 2 years... So, my
goals are really twofold: I am obviosuly starting now in order to save for
a house for my family, kids, college and retirement; in addition I am also
looking for my investment to provide income. So, I am looking for both long-
term investments (20 years) and short-term (under 5 years). I would like
to have a balanced portfolio to insure consistent returns, but also allow for
me to "play" with certain investments, especially in stocks or options.
As far as how much I can afford to invest a month, that will depend to
an extent on whether I rent or buy, and how much that will cost. I have looked
at renting somewhat, and the 1-bedroom rates I have seen are in the $600/month
neighborhood - kind of high for not getting anything in return.
In general though, I plan to be able to invest between $300 - $500 a month.
I hope this has answered some questions.
Rob
|
731.17 | | PARVAX::SCHUSTAK | Digital...AndProudOfIt! | Wed Nov 09 1994 08:10 | 52 |
| Rob...
First, GET MOST OF YOUR MONEY OUT OF A 1.5% SAVINGS ACCOUNT!
IMHO, a great place to start would be either Schwab or Fidelity and
move the money into a money market fund, which should pay in the 3-5%
rate as we speak. Assuming you have => $10k saved, there'll be no
charge for a "sweep" account. I use Schwab...you get a brokerage
account, access to MANY mutual funds, a VISA debit card, etc.
BTW, Fidelity isn't a "full service broker". Fidelity and Schwab are
discount brokers. They won't provide any advice (stock recommendations)
but will execute trades, sell you research reports, and send you well
integrated monthly & annual statements.
I'll finish by echoing the previous notes. Figger out your goals first.
Sounds like you should probably start with (IMHO) a mix of "agressive
growth" and " growth and income" mutual funds (no load), and possibly
some bond funds (tho I've never cared for these). There are many fine
fund families, include Vanguard, Janus, Fidelity, 20th Century, and
many others. Subscribe to Money magazine.
If you plan to invest in individual stocks, fine. I do (in addition to
mutual funds). My own strategy is fairly simple. Know the most you can
about any company you're considering investing in. Know their
industry and competitors. Look at their growth and earnings history and
prospects. Make sure you understand whether you care about dividends or
not. For example, most/all of my investments are in the computer/sw,
pharm/health care industries. I THINK (hope ;-) I have a good
understanding of these industries, and the individual companies in
which I've invested. Diversification is also important. I've had one or
two investments not pan out...despite these, I've averaged about a
16-18% annual return on my personal account and the UGMA accounts I
manage.
Understand the timeframe for your investment...over the short term
(i.e., up to 18 - 24 months), stock prices CAN be largely
unpredictable, as emotions, expectations and a "herd instinct" among
individual and institutional investors can have more impact on stock
price than a companies fundamental value.
And, as was mentioned, if you want to own a home, buy a home. Aside
from the "warm and fuzzies" you'll get, the tax benefits (fed only, I
suppose for NH) help also. If you're not ready to commit for several
years AT LEAST to a single residence, rent, else closing costs and real
estate commissions will more than offset any [potential? possible?
unlikely?] gains.
Also, remember, free advice is worth everything it costs ;-)
Steve
|
731.18 | SAVE | 24353::SLBLUZ::WINKLEMAN | tolerance is tolerable | Wed Nov 09 1994 09:40 | 6 |
| re: .13
Don't forget to sign up for SAVE, even if you only put in 2%.
Time is on your side if you start now!
-AW
|
731.19 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Maybe so, maybe not | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:07 | 51 |
| re <<< Note 731.16 by KOALA::BRIGGS >>>
-< some more information... >-
> Okay, thanks for the quick replies. To answer some of the questions;
>I am looking for a place to live - not as an investment. Also, I have lived
>in a variety of places growing up due to my father being in the Air Force, and
>thus have no "home". I would like to make New Hampshire my "home", at least
>for a few years anyway. While I am not unwilling to move, I have no plans on
>either a job change, or of leaving New Hampshire/Mass. in the next 5-10 years,
>but then again, most people don't.
Rob,
first off, i'm now 29, married 1 yr, recent homeowner, etc. i started investing
when i was about 24 or so, and believe me, it was a smart move! we were able
to buy a nice first house and _still_ keep 60k in investments/savings. it was
thru savings disipline, wise investing, and starting young that allowed us to
do what we did. on that note, here's what i advise:
-definitely rent. if you plan to marry in 2 yrs, your wife might not want to
buy a condo. also with your wife's income/savings, you may be able to afford
a lot nicer home than on 1 income/savings. i suggest for you to move out
and live with others, in a house/apt/whatever to save more money, unless you
have a dying desire/need to live alone. you can easily find a roommate
situation for less than $400/mo. then, when you marry, continue renting for
a while to build even more savings. we lived together before being married
in a dumpy place for $700.00 /mo for 3 yrs. we were able to save 10s of
thousands of dollars in 3 yrs.
> I am single, although this may not be true in the next 2 years... So, my
>goals are really twofold: I am obviosuly starting now in order to save for
>a house for my family, kids, college and retirement; in addition I am also
>looking for my investment to provide income. So, I am looking for both long-
>term investments (20 years) and short-term (under 5 years). I would like
>to have a balanced portfolio to insure consistent returns, but also allow for
>me to "play" with certain investments, especially in stocks or options.
how much under 5 yrs? 1 yr? if the timeframe is really low, look for income
funds. as for your 20 yr horizon, go aggressive growth all the way!! right
now, i think my balance is about 67% aggressive, 33% cash, and we are both
29. forget about buying individual stocks/options for a while. you need to
first get comfortable w/ aggressive MFs first - you need to go thru at least
1 or 2 downturns to see how you stomach it. then, when you're confortable,
increase the risk and do the stocks/options thing. i tell, ya, playing with
stocks and options takes _a_lot_ of dough! IMO...
also, DCA into the aggressive growth fund. find a no-load fund, and invest
automatically on a monthly basis. right now, we DCA 150/mo in a japan fund
and 150/mo into a europe fund.
jc
|
731.20 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Maybe so, maybe not | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:12 | 11 |
| re <<< Note 731.18 by 24353::SLBLUZ::WINKLEMAN "tolerance is tolerable" >>>
-< SAVE >-
> Don't forget to sign up for SAVE, even if you only put in 2%.
>Time is on your side if you start now!
YES! this is a very good point.
in fact, i'd make it #1 priority to do this first, then the MFs.
put the $$ in aggressive growth funds.
|
731.21 | Thanks for the replies... | KOALA::BRIGGS | | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:51 | 32 |
|
Thanks again for the replies. Okay, for starters - I will be enrolled
in SAVE starting this Dec. I decided to not start in Oct. as I first wanted
to investigate all of my investment options - I only started working in June.
Also, I have heard a little about the stock plan here at Digital. Do you
feel that it would be wise to start in that? I would hope the stock would
start to climb back up as a result of the company (hopefully) turning around.
Also, since the money in the SAVE plan is not available, without penalty, for
another 40+/- years, what is your feeling on the amount that is put into it?
I know it is a pre-tax deduction, which helps out with the tax situation, but
what are the relative rates of return for the funds available. In the book
I received, it stated that the the interest rate of the guaranteed income
fund was 8.65%, which seems fairly high - do the other funds return even
higher rates, or is this number out of date (as it looks like the booklet
was printed in 1991) I feel I may start with either 2% or 4% deposits.
I am planning on starting out by investing in mutual funds. Some that I
have already investigated are:
Fidelity Emerging Markets (EmrMk)
Fidelity Eurpoean (Europ)
Fidelity Value (Value)
Templeton Group Growth (Grwth)
I will be looking at more soon once I receive other prospectus. I will
also try to decide which broker I will use once I have reviewed all of their
information. I am currently looking at Fidelity, Schwab and Waterhouse. Any
opinions?
Thanks,
Rob
|
731.22 | SAVE | CASDOC::ETZEL | Mike | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:59 | 17 |
| The three stock funds in the current SAVE plan are fund C
(Vanguard Windsor), fund D (Bankers' Trust Russell 2000
index), and fund E (Vanguard S&P 500 index).
View your SAVE investment as part of your retirement
fund and choose from these stock funds as a long-term
investment. The SAVE plan for 1995 might have more
choices--none of the current funds are aggressive
growth funds.
With the choices for SAVE funds changing soon, we all
may be moving funds around next year anyhow.
When you move the money from 1.5% account to a money
market fund that returns 4% or more, you might choose
a money market fund with a mutual fund family that has
funds you want to invest in.
|
731.23 | max out on ESPP, SAVE, and maybe IRA | NOTAPC::LEVY | | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:32 | 24 |
| re: <<< Note 731.21 by KOALA::BRIGGS >>>
>Also, I have heard a little about the stock plan here at Digital. Do you
>feel that it would be wise to start in that?
Yes. Max out at 10%, if you can. Regardless of what the stock does, you
earn a very nice return if you sell right away. Not participating =
leaving money on the table.
>Also, since the money in the SAVE plan is not available, without penalty, for
>another 40+/- years, what is your feeling on the amount that is put into it?
Again, max out at 8%, if you can. Take full advantage of all
opportunities for tax-deferred income, of which SAVE is one.
Non-deductible IRAs are another. No tax deduction up front, but 40+
years of tax-deferred compounding.
>I am currently looking at Fidelity, Schwab and Waterhouse. Any
>opinions?
Waterhouse is efficient, and low-cost.
|
731.24 | NDB is cheapest | AWECIM::VERMA | Virendra, HLO2-1/A7, DTN 225-6518 | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:23 | 6 |
| >>I am currently looking at Fidelity, Schwab and Waterhouse. Any
>>opinions?
>
> Waterhouse is efficient, and low-cost.
National Discount Brokers are the cheapest.
|
731.25 | | CAPNET::ROSCH | | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:35 | 6 |
| FWIW -
If you save $2,000/year, starting when you are 19, and stop when
you are 29, and leave the money in a money market account, you will
have more when you are 65 than if you saved $2,000/year, every year,
starting when you are 30.
|
731.26 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Maybe so, maybe not | Thu Nov 10 1994 09:22 | 43 |
| re <<< Note 731.21 by KOALA::BRIGGS >>>
-< Thanks for the replies... >-
> Thanks again for the replies. Okay, for starters - I will be enrolled
>in SAVE starting this Dec. I decided to not start in Oct. as I first wanted
>to investigate all of my investment options - I only started working in June.
>Also, I have heard a little about the stock plan here at Digital. Do you
>feel that it would be wise to start in that? I would hope the stock would
>start to climb back up as a result of the company (hopefully) turning around.
i'll echo other's responses: MAX OUT if you can afford it. nearly 15%
guarenteed every 6 months with very little down-side risk is a very wise
investment. if i could put 50% of my pay into it, I would!
>Also, since the money in the SAVE plan is not available, without penalty, for
>another 40+/- years, what is your feeling on the amount that is put into it?
>I know it is a pre-tax deduction, which helps out with the tax situation, but
>what are the relative rates of return for the funds available. In the book
>I received, it stated that the the interest rate of the guaranteed income
>fund was 8.65%, which seems fairly high - do the other funds return even
>higher rates, or is this number out of date (as it looks like the booklet
>was printed in 1991) I feel I may start with either 2% or 4% deposits.
don't even consider funds A and B... they are very conservative and better
fit for someone needing the money in a 0-8 yr timeframe. go with the stock
funds... history says stocks nearly always outperform fixed-income type
funds. and, max out if you can. you can always back it off later if your
financial situation changes. the idea is to put off paying taxes for as long
as possible, and doing 401k on a pretax basis serves this goal.
> I will be looking at more soon once I receive other prospectus. I will
>also try to decide which broker I will use once I have reviewed all of their
>information. I am currently looking at Fidelity, Schwab and Waterhouse. Any
>opinions?
i have Fido and h20-house. Fido is expensive, and they limit the # of quotes
you can get. h20-house has been fine by me, and you can also save another
10% off trades using their touch-tone system. h20-house has always been
easy to deal with, willing to help me, and they never drop anything on the
floor (customer probs,etc, all have been handled with excellence).
|
731.27 | | RANGER::CLARK | | Thu Nov 10 1994 14:44 | 9 |
| >I received, it stated that the the interest rate of the guaranteed
>income
>fund was 8.65%, which seems fairly high - do the other funds return
That info must be a couple of years out of date. According to my last
statement (rec'd yesterday), the *estimated* yield for the period
beginning 10/1/94 is 6.0% (been dropping steadily at each adjustment
[except 2 when it held even] since 7/90, when it was 9.01%).
|
731.28 | BE AGGRESSIVE BUT SMART | NWTIMA::BOUCHARD_MI | | Fri Nov 11 1994 01:23 | 23 |
| RE .13
ROB,
HERE IS MY INPUT FOR WHAT IT IS WORTH...
KEEP IN MIND IF YOU BUY REAL ESTATE THAT YOU ARE GETTING APPRECIATION
ON THE ENTIRE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY NOT JUST THE INVESTED DOLLARS
EVEN THOUGH THE APPRECIATION MAY BE 1-2 % ANNUALLY,NOT TO MENTION THE
TAX WRITE OFF(EVEN THOUGH I AM NOT A FAN OF PAYING $1.00 TO GET .80
BACK).
THE SECOND POINT IS THAT I AGREE THAT INVESTING YOUR MONEY IN MUTUAL
FUNDS IS BETTER THAN THE 1.5% IN THE BANK BUT AT YOUR AGE YOU CAN
I BELIEVE YOU SHOULD BE ALOT MORE AGGRESSIVE THAN THAT.I BELIEVE
THAT YOU SHOULD BE DIVERSIFIED BUT YOU CAN GROW YOUR PORTFOLIO ALOT
FASTER INVESTING IN GOOD STRONG COMPANIES WITH GOOD GROWTH.FOR EXAMPLE
HOW OFTEN DO YOU SEE MICROSOFT STOCK SLIDE AND THAT IS NOT EVEN
CONSIDERED FAST GROWING ANYMORE.TO DO THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE ALOT OF
KNOWLEDGE OF THE STOCK MARKET, WHAT IT REQUIRES IS A GOOD BROKER
BECAUSE YOU BETTER BET THAT THAT IS WHERE THERE MONEY IS GOING!
NOT TO GET TOO TECHNICAL BUT ONE WAY I HAVE FOUND TO MAKE GOOD RETURNS
IS TO SELL COVERED CALLS(OPTIONS) ON GOOD STOCKS YOU HAVE PURCHASED.
IN CLOSING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I STARTED INVESTING RIGHT AFTER
I STARTED AT DEC WHEN I WAS 20 AND AND THAT WAS 11 YEARS AGO AND THINGS
ARE BEGINNING TO SNOWBALL.SO BE SMART AND AGGRESSIVE!!!
MIKE
|
731.29 | Leverage is a two edged sword! | TPSYS::BHAT | | Fri Nov 11 1994 12:48 | 6 |
| RE: -1
Regarding "getting appreciation on the entire value of the property not
just the invested dollars", it can also happen the other way if the
value of the property goes down, as many have found out painfully
during the last few years!
|
731.30 | JUST A THOUGHT | NWTIMA::BOUCHARD_MI | | Fri Nov 11 1994 21:13 | 8 |
| RE .29
THAT IS TRUE BUT IF I FELT THAT WAY ABOUT THE MARKET WHERE YOU LIVE
YOU SHOULD NOT BE BUYING.ALSO FROM BEING DROM SEATTLE AREA WHERE THINGS
HAVE GONE NOWHERE BUT NORTH IT IS HARD TO SEE THAT. AFTER TALKING ABOUT
SOME OF THESE THINGS REGUARDING THIS NOTE I THINK THIS IS A GOOD
CONVERSATION NOTE TO TALK ABOUT ALL THE DIFFERENT STATEGIES... MAYBE
THERE SHOUL BE A NOTE CREATED FOR INVESTMENT STATEGIES... JUST A
THOUGHT...MIKE
|
731.31 | | GUIDUK::BRENNAN_CA | Cathy Brennan, 548-8563 | Mon Nov 14 1994 15:23 | 6 |
| re .30 and things in the seattle area going "nowhere but North"
Would that it were true. Then I wouldn't really have lost the $20K on
my house in Redmond, plus the commission, taxes, ...
Bottom line is you can't count on anywhere going only up.
|
731.32 | Sorry about your losses | NWTIMA::BOUCHARD_MI | | Mon Nov 14 1994 22:29 | 14 |
| re .31 and losing 20k in Redmond
Sounds to me like you bought a house that was 20k+ overvalued since
the price of lumber is up over 40% and I can't imagine that the
lot value has decreased that much.I think alot of people tend to
do that when the market is hot but don't look at the actual value.
And yes you are right you can't count on things going up...but
there are good buys in any market and also I am not looking at it
in the short term.It could have been possible to sell your house
yourself and save the commissions since I think that all that paying
the commission gets you is on multiple listings.Sorry if I made it
sound like it was easy.
mike
|