T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
578.1 | Barnes & Noble | LMOPST::AUDIO::MCGREAL | | Thu Sep 30 1993 08:28 | 6 |
|
Their listed on the NYSE currently at 28 5/8.
They have great book stores and their prices are excellent.
I wonder what their financials look like?
|
578.2 | | DSSDEV::PIEKOS | Zoo TV | Thu Sep 30 1993 09:28 | 8 |
| > I wonder what their financials look like?
I believe that they have a lot of debt. A few weeks ago the WSJ had a story
on their IPO stating that this was the second attempt at it, with the first
failing because of a very poor (very high debt) balance sheet. They did
some restructuring, and the IPO happened the second time.
John Piekso
|
578.3 | Shorted it at $29 | MROA::BONVALLAT | | Thu Sep 30 1993 13:14 | 21 |
| My opinion is that the valuation on Barnes & Noble at current prices
looks terrible.
I studied the prospectus a couple nights ago. Barnes & Noble (BKS)
lost money the past 2 fiscal years, largely due to big interest expenses.
This year they should be marginally profitable. Next year they should
make good money- say net earnings of about $15-20 million - or .50-.70/share.
This assumes a nice gain in their operating profit (EBIT) and much lower
interest expenses as a result of the $160 million they received from the
offering.
Even under the most optimistic forecast, BKS is now trading at 41 times
NEXT years earnings (and 58x earnings of .50/share). For a company that
should likely grow at 30%/year at best, and more likely about 20%/year,
this earnings multiple looks a bit rich.
One caveat would be that crowd psychology can override sound reason
(valuation analysis) for long periods of time, so the stock could rise
for awhile despite the lousy valuation. Look at Snapple for instance.
Personally, though, I don't think BKS has a high enough growth rate to
excite investors for long, and I'm short the stock.
|
578.4 | Short 'em | WEEKS::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Thu Sep 30 1993 14:03 | 14 |
| I like the local B&N bookstore; in fact every time I enter it's usually
$100 to get out :-)
But B&N has no proprietary secret. Anybody could open a competing
store and in fact I think we'll see more catalog-type stores offering
the same B&N service and overnight delivery. Less inventory, smaller
staff, no real estate, thus better profit margin. (I'm not talking about
closeouts like Publisher's Central bureau, I'm talking about current
best-seller catalog bookstores).
I don't see how B&N's profits and growth can be sustained; they will
attract too much competition.
John
|
578.5 | Don't overlook this segment | ICS::KAUFMANN | Life is short; pray hard | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:11 | 4 |
| One area that B&N has a good market in is college bookstores. College
texts always make a lot of money for the booksellers.
Bo
|
578.6 | There will always be competition | 11SRUS::DENNY::PERIQUET | Dennis Periquet | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:55 | 18 |
|
Of course if there's profit to be made in a business, this will
eventually attract competition. Currently, I don't think that BKS's
has much competition right now. Has anyone been to a better bookstore?
I certainly haven't.
Eventually, competition will come up and then it may be time to start
thinking about getting out. But for now, I'd say they are in a good
position.
Snapple flourished for a while with its ice tea beverages; but when the
larger companies started to compete, Snapple had serious competition.
Does anyone have more info on BKS's capital structure? What is the
debt/equity ratio? and is it comparable to other companies in its
class (i.e. retail booksellers)? Also note that BKS's parent I believe
is B Dalton Booksellers.
|
578.7 | BKS valuation more reasonable | MROA::BONVALLAT | | Mon Jan 17 1994 12:42 | 11 |
| I posted an earlier note mentioning that I was short this stock.
I am no longer short, having covered last week at 21 5/8.
BKS no longer looks extremely overvalued to me at these prices (although
its no great bargain either), and it is a good company.
I have a little adage about shorting - I feel the last 10% of a move in
a rising stock which you own is worth holding on for, but the last 10%
in a declining stock which you are short is not worth waiting for.
The reason being that when you short stocks you receive diminishing return
as it goes down. 10% down from $20/share is less money in your pocket
than 10% down from $30/share was. The reverse happens with long positions.
|