T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
499.1 | Minimum Wage | SALEM::BOUTHILLIER | | Tue Jun 15 1993 11:12 | 3 |
| Tough question, but I do know the minimum wage was .65cents an hour
which was what I received as a stock clerk.
Rog
|
499.2 | A dollar isn't equal in all parts of the Country. | NAC::HEERMANCE | Belly Aching on an Empty Stomach | Tue Jun 15 1993 11:59 | 7 |
| The other big problem is that different products increased in
cost at different rates in different parts of the country.
My parents live in upstate New York and the cost of housing did
not increase in cost nearly as fast as New England.
Martin
|
499.3 | Cheaper to live back then | ASDG::HORTON | | Tue Jun 15 1993 13:35 | 18 |
|
A few items I can remember:
1955 1993
First class postage $0.03 $0.29
Coke, vending machine, 12 oz. 0.10 0.70
Milk, whole, one gallon 0.35 2.00
Candy bar, Snickers 0.05 0.50
Loaf of white bread 0.20 1.69
Movie theater ticket 0.35 6.00
Electronic computer, 1000 bytes RAM $10M 39.95
|
499.4 | dollarettes! | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Tue Jun 15 1993 15:07 | 4 |
| Well, in 1955, my parents bought their first house, when I was two. It
cost just under half of what we just paid for a CAR.
/Charlotte
|
499.5 | | CADSYS::BOLIO::BENOIT | | Tue Jun 15 1993 15:12 | 7 |
| if you use the Consumer Price Index published by the Department of Labor..using
1959 as the base....
$1.00 (1959) = $0.24 (1991)
/mtb
|
499.6 | Two bits for a dollar... | ASDG::HORTON | | Thu Jun 17 1993 14:03 | 8 |
| Re -.1
Don't you mean:
$1.00 (1991) = $0.24 (1959) ?
/jrh
|
499.7 | And now for something completely different ;-) | VNASWS::RANZINGER | I learn by going where I must go | Tue Jun 22 1993 07:31 | 9 |
| Thank you for your help so far.
Q1: What is the current minimum wage in the US ?
Q2: What would be a good guess for the buying power of the US$ of
pre-WWII (1938) as compared to today ?
-- Hubert
|
499.8 | Bad answers are easy to get | TLE::JBISHOP | | Sun Jun 27 1993 15:28 | 53 |
| Q1: I don't know.
Q2: This is not hard to give a bad answer to (you can look
up GNP deflators and CPIs and such and get an answer along
the lines of one 1928 dollar is worth five thirty five* today),
but this certitude is misleading:
1. Relative costs of material and labor have shifted over the
years: in 1938 labor was cheaper in terms of material: so
things we now would replace would have been fixed, and so
on;
2. The relative wages of skilled and unskilled labor were
different: skills (particularly professional skills) were
far more highly rewarded than they are now: in 1938 it
wasn't uncommon for families of lawyers and engineers
to have a servant or two. So a lawyer in 1938 would
seem richer to us while an unskilled laboror would seem
poorer.
3. Taxes have changed (upwards, alas). Accounting for this
is difficult--are taxes an expense (government getting
more expensive) or a dead loss of income, or something
in between?
4. People bought different things. While we can compare
prices of bread, for example, most of what people now
spend money on didn't exist or has changed greatly
(e.g. people still buy cars as they did in 1938, but
the cars are very different on the inside). Worse,
the purpose and use of cars has shifted from a luxury
and a toy in the 'teens to necessity now. The motives
for purchase of a car and thus the amount a person
would be willing to spend on a car have changed since
1938.
5. Peoples' expectations change: 1938 was no longer the
depths of the Depression, but people had been trained
by necessity to do a lot with a dollar.
At a guess, if you wanted to write a novel in which the suburban
east-coast family of an engineer were doing '90-ish things like
going to movies and eating food bought at the grocery store, a
good approximation would be about 20-to-1, but with the more
modern goods much more expensive (price a refrigerator!) and
the local tomatoes and comic books and the like far cheaper.
Read old stories and novels, look up prices in old newspapers,
and ask an older person for prices and wages they remember.
-John Bishop
* Don't trust this 5.35 figure--it's one of the 82% of all
statistics that are just pulled out of the air.
|
499.9 | PRICE inflation is not everything | MAYDAY::ANDRADE | The sentinel (.)(.) | Wed Jul 07 1993 06:06 | 20 |
| re .0
If it helps $1 (1948) = $3.74 (1986)
re -.1
Its does not matter that what people buy has changed since 1928
or whatever. What matters is the relative buying power of $1,
when used to buy the things people want (whatever they may be).
However having said that, I have to say that PRICE inflation is
not evrything there is also PAY inflation (ie salary increases),
as well as TECHNOLOGICAL and INDUSTRIAL and ECONOMIC development.
What really counts is the STANDARD OF LIVING, and THAT by any
comparation you want to make is better today (1993) then in 1928.
People live longer, healphier, are better informed, and exist
in greater material confort and security.
Gil
|
499.10 | hours of labor required for purchase | 18943::HOM | | Wed Jul 07 1993 09:17 | 24 |
| The most meaningful metric that I've seen is
the number of hours required to purchase a given
product. It factors in wage inflation as well as
price inflation.
Some typical but unscientific numbers:
1973 1993
Sporty car $2,500 $ 13,000
Average Eng Salary 10,000 30,000
Car as % Salary 25% 43%
McDonald's BigMAC $1.00 $1.70
Min Hourly wage 2.00 3.50
Hours for a BigMAC 0.50 0.48
One could do this for refrigerators, homes, etc. You can even
compare across country borders.
Gim
|
499.11 | Auto inflation | SALEM::BOUTHILLIER | | Thu Jul 08 1993 07:31 | 3 |
| Interesting auto cost comparison is a 1957 chevy bel air cost $2600.
today a ford taurus cost approximately $16500.
|
499.12 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | this space for rent | Thu Jul 08 1993 11:58 | 15 |
|
The American Automobile isn't a good example of real world economics.
I've never bought a new car, the jack the price up to some silly
amount, then give you some back as a 'rebate', then set an arrangement
for a 5 year loan to pay for it!
Colorado Springs has a lot of flash cars, mainly bought by all the
military here. They get into these silly arrangements for super flashy
new cars that cost $200/month, for 5 years. How are folks supposed to
save?
sorry, anybody notice a hot-button here? 8-)
Simon
|
499.13 | Stamp prices aren't a good indicator of inflation. | MARVA2::BUCHMAN | UNIX refugee in a VMS world | Thu Dec 16 1993 13:02 | 11 |
| Re: .3 -- of course, the price of a postage stamp was also $.03 in
*1855*. The original intention of the 3� silver piece and the 3�
"nickel" (first coin to be called a nickel, by the way, since 5� pieces
were silver half-dimes) was for the convenient purchase of postage
stamps. That was also the purpose of the $3 gold piece minted around
that time: to buy stamps in sheets of 100.
Re: .7 -- I think the minimum wage is now $4.10, due to a recent act of
Congress.
Jim B.
|
499.14 | min. wage is $4.35 I think | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | | Thu Dec 16 1993 16:29 | 1 |
|
|