| Industrial Income has a diversified portfolio right? Health Sciences
sounds like a sector fund...correct?
Sector Funds tend to be much more volatile and subject to strong
moves up or down than their more diversified bretheren. Further,
regardless of how you feel about Clinton's health care ideas,
the mere fact that government is meddling has scared the entire
industry in a fundamental way.
Does Health Sciences hold drug makers like Amgen? The druggies
have gotten a terrible wholloping lately. If your fund is heavily
invested in one of these areas, that could explain a large part
of its recent performance.
Sector Funds are neat, and I like them for a variety of reasons (in
fact, I own one right now and will probably buy another soon),
but you really need to understand completely what they hold, why
they hold it, what their strategy is, and what the sector is all
about and what makes it tick. All in all, unless you're willing
to be diligent, they may not be the best possible investment
vehicle.
Industrial Income will probably do better ("better" here may simply
mean "lose less" however) than a health-care/sciences sector fund,
at least over the short term. However, many folks believe that
a lot of quality got burned with the trash when the health care
stocks got hit, so you may also see an upturn once Clinton's plan
(and Congresses intentions) are more clear.
My $0.02 worth...
./chris
|
| Jayesh,
All health care funds and stocks are down because of Health Reform
coming. I feel they hit bottom. I think this is very good time to buy
more. I don't have health care fund but I have a quite a few health
stocks and I am buying more. I am buying stocks like Glaxo, Merck,
Bristol Myers, and I will buy pretty soon US Surgical.
Bharat Shah
|