T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
335.1 | Why an ARM? | STAR::BOUCHARD | The enemy is wise | Mon Dec 21 1992 14:18 | 6 |
| With fixed-rate mortgages at almost the lowest level in decades I
wouldn't generally think that a conversion to an ARM would be a good
idea, unless you can do this with almost no closing costs and you only
plan to hold the new mortgage for a short period of time. Nobody can
truly accurately predict future rates, of course, but they sure look
low to me today!
|
335.2 | Why... | RANGER::GORCZYCA | PATHWORKS/NetWare Product Manager | Mon Dec 21 1992 14:42 | 23 |
| RE: .1
WHY?
Well, maybe because I'm old and cheap.
When I was younger, I used to walk 4 miles to school in the snow..., oh, that's
another story.
When I was younger, mortgage rates were in the 7-7.5% range while bank savings
deposit interest rates were 5%. So fixed rates in the 8.75% range just don't
sound that low to me, especially with savings rates in the 2-3% range.
I just don't want to be caught in the old thinking that fixed is good, when it
may be that ARMs are both fair and maybe better. For example, maybe banks are
still afraid of giving fixed rates that are "reasonable", but are more willing
to give ARMs that are "reasonable" for BOTH them and the consumer...I don't
know.
I do appreciate your viewpoint though...I'm not sure that 8.75% is all that
bad, it's just that 4.75% looks much better.
JOHN
|
335.3 | Be careful | KYOA::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Dec 23 1992 10:29 | 9 |
| As one who had an ARM and saw it go all over the place,let me tell
you-short rates are volatile! Although short rates appear to be quite
favorable over long rates,be aware thast the adjustable amortization
schedule is recalced every year using a method that tends to cost you
$50 a month over the preferable method.
Banks in the second year run a 29 year amort schedule instead of doing
a 30 and having you pay year 2. All in all if you can switch with
little or no points ,then do it but otherwise....tread carefully.
|
335.4 | Go for the ARM | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire. | Wed Dec 23 1992 12:10 | 11 |
| > Obviously, I need to guesstimate how likely it is that the T-BILL rates will
> quickly rise to 6.5% or more...and stay there, in order to make some kind of
> intelligent decision.
This is exceedingly unlikely. It would almost require the FED to hike
interest rates repeatedly, and is just not in the cards. High interest
rates choke the economy, thus precipitating low interest rates...as long
as you have an inflation-fighting FED, anyway. If Greenspan is replaced
then the game changes.
John
|
335.5 | First off, forget that 4.75% rate, because | CSSE::NEILSEN | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:48 | 17 |
| it is probably just a loss-leader. A 4% T-bill rate is a reasonable guess for
1994, and that would put you at 6.5% next year.
>My problem is that I have no idea how the T-BILL rate varies, thus I don't
>really know what kind of a chance I'm taking to refinance now.
The T-bill rate varies all over the place, from about 3% to about 15% in the
twenty years or so I have been watching it. I think the max was about 18% in
the 1970s, but I would have to look it up.
Averaged over several years, the T-bill rate seems to hover around 1-2%
above the inflation rate. This means that if you consider 5% inflation
probable, you can also consider a 7% T-bill rate probable.
I'll agree with John that this won't happen soon, but you have to think about
how long you expect to hold your mortgage. Three years from now we could have
a much different situation.
|