T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
275.1 | It's a loaded fund | SOLVIT::CHEN | | Tue Sep 15 1992 10:37 | 9 |
| I don't deal with the Templeton funds. I only buy no-load funds and
this is not one of them. As far as I can tell, they have some VERY
HEAVY loads (at least on their stock funds anyway). There are so many
no-load funds that have equal or better performance. I don't see any
reason to buy into this one. Except...
BTW, is your friend a brooker or a "financial planner"? :-)
Mike
|
275.2 | Gee, how did you know? | POCUS::GRENINGER | | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:39 | 6 |
| As a matter of fact he is a "financial planner". He has just started
doing this nine months ago. I thought he was biased for a reason, but
I was just curious what people thought about the Templeton family.
Thanks for the reply
|
275.3 | | YAMS::SCHOTT | | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:57 | 1 |
| I thought that Templeton funds had an excellent track record? no?
|
275.4 | | BOXORN::HAYS | Every silver lining has a touch of grey... | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:12 | 11 |
| RE:.3 by YAMS::SCHOTT
> I thought that Templeton funds had an excellent track record? no?
They do. Mr Templeton has done a wonderful job of calling market moves AND
picking stocks since well before I was born. However, Mr Templeton is well
over 80, and it's not clear how much longer he will be taking an active role
in management of his funds. Or how well his replacement will do.
Phil
|
275.5 | Value Investing successfully applied globally | MCIS2::BONVALLAT | | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:38 | 19 |
|
I'll second the opinion that past performance is not an accurate
guide to future performance here.
Templeton applied his "value-investing" approach on a global scale
to buy European stocks in the 50's when they were dirt cheap,
Japanese stocks in the '70s, and U.S. stocks in the '80s.
There aren't many (if any) mutual funds that can match that long-term
record. Of course, until the past decade, there were very few funds
that even invested internationally.
Sir John is quite a guy - a gentle and wise person.
I hope he lives to be 160, but even if he does I think he has already
turned over most of the fund management responsiblities.
Jeff
P.S. Anybody want to hazard a guess as to what region will feature
the best stock markets of the 1990s? (I'll stick with South America)
|
275.6 | -- I'm no John Templeton -- | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire. | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:54 | 9 |
| It may not have been stated precisely, but one point behind earlier
replies was that the "Templeton formula" is well-known and widely
imitated. All the more reason past performance is no indication of
future performance.
Plus, it would be wise to hold off investing until after October, maybe
after the election. 'Tis the season for sudden drops...
John
|
275.7 | Did Sir T. retire? | TPSYS::SHAH | Amitabh Shah - Just say NO to decaf. | Wed Sep 16 1992 16:25 | 2 |
| Didn't John Templeton recently retire and sell his fund family to
a large brokerage house (the name escapes me)?
|
275.8 | MORE ON TEMPLETON FUNDS | CGVAX2::CARLTON | | Wed Sep 16 1992 18:03 | 16 |
| Re: .7, yes Templeton Funds is (are?) merging into the Franklin Group.
Templeton has turned over daily operations of all his funds to his
protoges some time ago. Their track records remain excellent, and the
loads have recently been reduced from the ionosphere (8.5% - 9.3%)
down to the stratosphere (@ 5.3% if memory serves me...). One thing to
consider beyond the loads, Templeton fund management expenses are among
the LOWEST in the international funds area, typically around .75% -
.80% of assets annually. International funds often are well over 1%.
This can more than offset the cost of the load for a long-term
investor, even if Templeton fund performance regresses toward average
in the future. I would consider dollar cost or similar periodic
investing into Templeton funds for international exposure worth looking
into along with other no-load or load alternatives. International
investing is still an area where stock picking, market selection,
weightings, etc. can lead to consistently better performance by some
fund managers vs. others.
|
275.9 | performance | SASE::RAUHALA | | Thu Oct 01 1992 18:19 | 16 |
| I was looking at a chart of how Templeton Growth performed vs.
the S&P 500 in the 1980's. Considering that Templeton Growth
invests mainly in foreign markets, it's interesting that it
has tracked the S&P 500 almost step for step throughout the 80's.
As of June 30
Templeton 13.4% 9.1% 17.7%
S&P 500 13.4% 9.7% 18.4%
1year 5years 10years
While it hasn't underperformed the market, it hasn't out performed it
either.
It charges a sales load of 6.1%, down from 9.3%, and it's
annual expense is listed as 0.96%
|
275.10 | | MSBCS::HURLEY | | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:11 | 7 |
| My financial planner has suggested that I jump into the Templeton World
fund. This will be my 7th Mutual fund but the first one that invests
international. There is a 5.75 load on this and I'm wondering what the
thoughts/comments are out there.
Also does anyone know what % of the load the Financial planner gets
for having his clients go into these funds??
|
275.11 | I'll see if I can get more info | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:24 | 9 |
| I just got into this one myself. I'm not crazy about loaded funds,
but this one has done quite well. My father has been in it for a while
and has done very, very well. I think the fund mgr spoke in Boston a
few months ago and those that went were very impressed. Just ask your
planner what he makes! I'd hope you have a good relationship with him.
(If he wont tell you, let me know, I'll ask mine!)
Note real specific, but hope it helps.
|
275.12 | | SOLVIT::CHEN | | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:31 | 10 |
| re: .10
The 5.75% load sounds very hefty to me. I believe your "financial
planner" gets the whole 5.75%. Why not look for a noload fund instead?
Janus, T. Rowe Price, 20th Century, Scuder and many others all offer
either international noload funds or global noload funds. I believe you
can find quite a few of them with respectable returns and track
records.
Mike
|
275.13 | | ZENDIA::SCHOTT | | Fri Oct 08 1993 11:35 | 2 |
| 1 to 2% of the load will go to the fund. Your planner will probably
get a % of the remaining amount.
|
275.14 | | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:13 | 6 |
| Hmm, jump into the Templeton Funds when they have been sold to Franklin
(? is that the right one) and John Templetonis getting out of them (his
money that is).
Probably not on my part.
|
275.15 | The load is too high. | BROKE::SHAH | Amitabh "Leadership DECAF? Yuck!" | Wed Oct 13 1993 09:33 | 7 |
| Re. .14
> and John Templeton is getting out of them
In fairness, it must be mentioned that he is only getting out of
one of them, and that too temporarily, before he gets into another
(Templeton) one.
|
275.16 | | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Wed Oct 13 1993 09:41 | 9 |
| > In fairness, it must be mentioned that he is only getting out of
> one of them, and that too temporarily, before he gets into another
Watch what they do, not what they say.
I never thought I'd see the day when John Templeton would attempt to
time the market, but that is exactly what he is doing.
John
|
275.17 | | SOLVIT::CHEN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 10:30 | 8 |
| > I never thought I'd see the day when John Templeton would attempt to
> time the market, but that is exactly what he is doing.
Maybe it's his age start to catch up with him. It not only affects his body, it
also affects his mind and his way of thinking. His record speaks for itself.
But, the time has changed, can he still maintain his sharp mindedness?
Mike
|
275.18 | | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:35 | 2 |
| Gee, isn't he only in his 80's ?
|
275.19 | | SOLVIT::CHEN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 16:51 | 3 |
| With all due respect to Mr. Templeton, 80's is not a young age. Some
people don't even live to see their 80's. I am not saying he *IS* out
of it. It's just a question.
|
275.20 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Red X | Thu Oct 14 1993 10:55 | 10 |
| "young" is relative: i go camping in NH during the colder season (now) and
there is this one couple who camp each fall at this place in NH. they have a
huge live-in sorta tent complete w/ a woodstove. they gather wood together,
etc. and often stay until thanksgiving.
he's 93.
she's 87.
incredible if you ask me! matter of fact, i heard they may make TV in the near
future.
|
275.21 | | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:47 | 5 |
| I just talked to my financial planner. He gets 2.5% and the balance
goes to the fund mgr. Still a hefty load, but the dev nations fund
is up over 50% since Jan. Go figure.
-Brian
|
275.22 | | CADSYS::BOLIO::BENOIT | | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:54 | 4 |
| Scudder Latin America fund opened up the second week of January at $12.50 a
share....it's at $18.64....and I didn't have to pay any load.
/michael
|
275.23 | Standard diatribe against load fund "planners" | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:35 | 17 |
| .21> goes to the fund mgr. Still a hefty load, but the dev nations fund
.21> is up over 50% since Jan. Go figure.
Here's what I figure: I figure your salesman is looking at a table of
results and picking the best-performing load fund, and pitching that
to you. Why isn't he offering, say, Fidelity Select Toothbrush or
Twentieth Century Jackhammers? Well, he _would be_ if they existed and
did better than TDN, and gave him a commission. The commission part
is very important. Note that he can ALWAYS find a good-looking load fund
and show you how well it's done recently. This is worth \your/ money???
Before giving this guy any money, grab this weekend's _Barron's_, it's
going to feature their quarterly Mutual Fund Review. If all you want
to do is pick the fund with the best return in a given category, you
can do that without the aid of a salesman.
John
|
275.24 | | SUBPAC::SEAVEY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:49 | 5 |
| Note the article in the Oct. 11, 1993 Barron's, page 44, "Calculating Costs"
with the subtitle: "In Long Run, Load Fund Can Be Cheaper".
There a couple of interesting tables comparing fund expenses, loads and times.
|
275.25 | | SOLVIT::CHEN | | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:55 | 6 |
| Without seeing the article, I suspect that what they are talking about
is the total expense ratio. It's not the "load" that makes the fund
cheaper in the long run. I guess that's the reason why alot of people
are staying away from the Kuffman Fund.
Mike
|
275.26 | More on Templeton | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Tue Nov 23 1993 13:04 | 46 |
| The table below was reprinted without permission from te WSJ, 11/22/93
The Templeton Emerging Markets fund was the five year winner.
Mutual Fund Score Card/Closed-End Equity
Investment Objective: Primary portfolios of Equity securities; some can
leverage; funds have fixed number of shares outstanding
Top 15 performers based on past 12 months
Total Return in period ending 10/31
One Since One Five
Month 12/13 Year Year
Turkish Investment Fund 10.81% 106.35% 102.39% na
European Warrent Fund 12.02% 88.66% 94.08% na
BGR Precious Metals INc 9.77% 82.85% 81.49% 62.10%
Singapore Fund 9.11% 56.52% 71.29% na
First Financial Fund 5.50% 46.44% 69.51% 208.83%
Templeton Emerging Markets 2.59% 61.38% 64.79% 376.70%
ASA Limited 15.12% 63.37% 60.34% 19.07%
Emerging Markets Telecomm 7.50% 50.00% 55.09% na
Brazilian Equity Fund 7.19% 50.90% 54.79% na
M. Stanley Emerging Mkts 10.11% 56.74% 53.80% na
Asia Pacific FUnd 19.49% 64.10% 52.28% 261.38%
Malaysia Fund 2.91% 55.93% 50.12% 193.88%
First Australia Fund 11.91% 44.61% 49.46% 34.79%
Latin American Discovery 3.66% 33.82% 48.43% na
Japan Equity Fund 4.61% 47.94% 47.94% na
Bottom 10 Performers
Global Health and Science 4.03% 7.62% 3.56% na
Taiwan Fund 2.97% 1.58% 2.90% 2.92%
General Amer INvestors 2.97% 7.77% 1.87% 119.30%
Berstrom Capital Corp 5.60% 6.58% 1.50% 139.73%
Roc Taiwan Fund 1.29% 1.76% 1.30% na
India Growth Fund 1.24% 9.46% 0.97% 69.73%
H&Q Life Sciences Invtrs 5.73% 9.66% 0.22% na
Alliance Glb Envr 0.54% 3.52% 1.86% na
Jundt Growth Fund 5.85% 1.00% 5.91% na
Americas All Season 3.12% 8.78% 6.43% 23.05%
Source Lipper Analitical service Inc
|