T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
271.1 | Boring will make gain | RT95::HU | Olympic Game | Tue Sep 01 1992 11:38 | 23 |
|
Rule #1, never invest your money in the same company you work.
(Unless it is MicroSoft, Bill Gate will tell you so !!)
Rule #2, be diversify and long term
Rule #3, Try to educate yourself by go to bookstore 1st, Money
Magazine ($3.00 nice investment) should be good start.
Rule #4, As to your portfolio spread is depend on your age, and
retirement goals. (Ref to book, magazine, and this conf)
Rule #5, Hang this rule in your yearbook and review your portfolio
once a year at least and adjust your award/risk ratio
base on your stomack.
Rule #6, Loop all above steps another 30-40 yrs until your retirement age.
Michael... (Investing is boring for sure)
|
271.2 | Be your own planner or let Fido do it. | ASDG::WATSON | | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:32 | 16 |
|
This month's Kiplinger's rates all the stock and bond funds.
Chose a no load (no sales charge) fund of your choice from
the groups of funds you think would fit your tolerance for risk
and the amount of time you have until needed the money.
Fidelity has been sending me a letter a week lately on their
Asset Manager Fund. They become your financial planner and
shift %s around between cash, stock and bond funds depending
on the market conditions as they see them. This is a good fund
for poeple with a lower risk tolerance that thinks 3% in a money
market is a little too safe.
Fortune also is rating funds this month I think. The Janus Fund
made both top 20 lists. (It's not been a great performer this past
year but over the long haul should still be a good investment.
|
271.3 | any opinions on Fidelity's Asset Manager? | RUSTIE::NALE | Sue Nale Mildrum | Tue Sep 01 1992 15:31 | 26 |
|
.2 mentioned Fidelity's Asset Manager. Has anyone else looked at
this fund? What do you think of it? I'm also in the same boat
at .0: I'm a beginner invester who'd like to start building a
balanced portfolio. Interesting stats:
I'm 27, husband is 28 (both engineers, he's not with w/DEC)
Own DEC stock
Put 7% of my salary into SAVE (Funds C and D)
The Asset Manager appeals to me because it seems to provide a
somewhat balanced portfolio in and of itself. The minimum investment
is $2500 (I've got the prospectus). If I tried to diversify
by investing in several different funds the initial investment
would likely be too high for me ($2500 is about all I want to spare
right now).
I'd like the money that I invest to be relatively liquid. One
financial goal is to save for the downpayment on a house, which we
might want to buy within the next year.
BTW: I've gotten a lot of great information from this conference.
I've read Jane Bryant Quinn's latest book, Making the Most of Your
Money and that's helped to get me started.
Sue
|
271.4 | | BRAT::REDZIN::DCOX | | Tue Sep 01 1992 16:24 | 32 |
| re .3
I am going to presume that, since you are looking for liquidity, you are NOT
looking to be a long-term investor. That is, you might not be comfortable
riding out the low cycles of a mutual fund. Therefore, you should be looking
for conservative Income investments as opposed to aggressive Growth investments.
Since you are both engineers, it is possible that your combined salary puts you
into a high tax bracket, worse if you are not saddled with a monstrous mortgage.
These lead me to recommend investing in a Municipal bond fund. There are many
that are comprised of high quality (your investment is relatively risk free)
bonds that are free from Federal taxes. Depending on the state where you reside,
you may even get into a fund that is tax free for that state as well as for
Federal.
Since you are already looking at Fidelity, their High Yield Tax Free fund is
paying monthly dividends at an annual TAX FREE rate of 6% (their Aggressive Tax
Free does better, but aggressive:==risky). The real risk is from daily NAV
fluctuations. You may buy at $12.00/share, but watch it move +/- a few cents
each day. As for liquidity, they provide you with a book of checks; that's about
as liquid as it gets. Of course, the paperwork can be a struggle since each
check is considered a "sale of shares" and you need to keep track of them.
IF you have more than 20% of your assets in cash or other close_to_cash buckets,
now is the time to be looking for long term, growth investments. If you do not
have a comfortable cash position, start building one. If your temperment is such
that you will lose sleep if the market "tanks" and your $2500 investment drops to
$2000, do not invest in anything other than US Savings Bonds. Right now, their
rates are reasonable competitive, even if you cash out early.
Just my opinion, of course. Good luck.
|
271.5 | Good planning required to make right choices | MEMORY::BEAULIEU | | Fri Oct 02 1992 18:21 | 37 |
| Last spring my husband and I took a money management seminar which was
offered at Quinsigamond Community College called "Successful Money
Management". The course ran 3 consecutive Tuesdays and cost only $85
for BOTH of us. Also included in the price was a session with one of
the financial planners that conducted the seminar in which you
discussed your personal needs and goals and got recommendations from
them as to how to proceed (which of course you were not obligated to
accept if you chose not to). The course discussed and compared many
aspects of investing including the risks and rewards of each. The
topics covered included bank offerings (ie savings accounts, CD etc),
insurance, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, gold. At the 2nd session
everyone was given a "personal financial analysis" type form to fill out
(which took about 3 or 4 hours to do but was a real eye-opener).
Completing the form really helped you to see where your money is going
now, where your money will probably be going in 5 or 10 years from now,
how much you will probably need at retirement (in today's dollars) and
how much you will need to start saving today in order to meet your
future and retirement goals. In my opinion, this type of analysis is a
GREAT place to start as it is difficult to be able to meet your goals
unless you have first identified them and then set up a strategy to help
you realize them. As the saying goes "most people don't plan to fail, they
fail to plan"
Anyway, after the course was completed we went to see the financial
planner who recommended a reasonably priced universal life policy on my
husband (I did not need further life insurance as what I have here at
DEC more than met our needs). Then he got us started in a "AAA" rated
mutual fund which we contribute to on a monthly basis and were able to
start with as little as $25.00 per month (although we could put in more
if we chose to) which we have set up as a variable annuity so we will
be able to get at the money if we need to use it without waiting until
age 59 1/2 like we would have to do with an IRA.
I could go on and on here but the point is that the best investments
for me might be totally wrong for you. The best way to invest is to get as
much information as you can then determine what your financial goals are,
how much you money you will need and how soon you will need it, and how
much risk you are willing to take. Usually once you have done this, your
investment choices will be obvious.
|
271.6 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Oct 05 1992 10:36 | 26 |
| RE: .5
> be able to get at the money if we need to use it without waiting until
> age 59 1/2 like we would have to do with an IRA.
This type of statement always bothers me, so let me correct it.
You can withdraw money in an IRA *ANYTHIME* for *ANY REASON*. If
you choose to take your money out of an IRA before age 59-1/2 you
must pay 10% of the amount withdrawn as a penalty, in addition any
income tax due.
At some point between roughly 5 and 10 years the benefit of
tax-free compounding becomes greater than the 10% penalty.
I find this a plus over DECs SAVE and other 401K plans which have
strict limits on when/why you withdraw plus, I believe, the same
penalties.
I also find that the ability to withdraw may be preferable to the
ability to "borrow your own money", as some plans allow.
An IRA may or may not be part of YOUR financial planning, but
don't discount it because your money is "locked up". Money in an
IRA may be more available to you than money in other retirement
savings vehicles.
|
271.7 | IRA's not necessarily the "wrong"choice | MEMORY::BEAULIEU | | Mon Oct 05 1992 11:07 | 14 |
| I should have been a little clearer. In our particular case, we already
had an IRA type investment, as we were already participating in the DEC
SAVE plan. We chose the variable annuity route as a means of saving to
meet our 7- 10 yr or so goals. We have the annuity in ADDITION to the
IRA. I agree that an IRA can be a valuable asset at any time and I was
in no way intending to put them down. The real point I was trying to
make was that in order for someone to determine the best investments
for them, they must first get a clear picture of where they stand
today and where they would like to be in the future. Once they have set
some definite goals it will be easier to decide which investment
vehicles will best meet their needs. In OUR particular case and with
OUR personal goals in mind, we chose the annuity. This in no way means
that chosing an IRA would be wrong for someone else.
|
271.8 | | BIG::SCHOTT | | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:16 | 7 |
| <<< Anyway, after the course was completed we went to see the financial
<<< planner who recommended a reasonably priced universal life policy on my
<<< husband (I did not need further life insurance as what I have here at
<<< DEC more than met our needs).
Why does someone who already has investments set up buy whole life insurance?
This is one of the worst financial mistakes you can ever make.
|
271.9 | Still need insurance protection | MEMORY::BEAULIEU | | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:50 | 13 |
| We are just beginning to invest and don't have any significant
amounts of money set aside yet. If something were to happen to my husband,
we would not only lose our main source of income but I would need to use
all(and more) of what is currently invested just to meet day to day
expenses. At this stage, we need to carry some insurance in order to be
sure that I would be able to maintain the house and raise my children
until they were old enough to be on their own. Right now, we need the
insurance in order to protect what little investments we have and provide
a means of maintaining our current lifestyle in the event that the
worst should occur. Yes, buying insurance you don't need is a financial
mistake but protecting yourself from a devasting loss which could wipe
you out is a necessity.
|
271.10 | | BIG::SCHOTT | | Mon Oct 05 1992 15:45 | 11 |
| I was referring to the type of insurance you got talked into buying,
that is universal life! Why pay 3-5 times more for life insurance than
you need to? I'm sure you could have gotten a term policy for 30-70%
less then you are paying for the cash value. You must understand that
you are paying extra to have a cash value account that is not yours.
If you die, you lose the cash value, if you want the cash value you
must borrow it. Borrow your own money? Lose the cash value if you
die? You probably won't even have any cash value for 2-3 years.
Why would you want this type of insurance? Sounds like this financial
planner is a high commision insurance agent too.
|