T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
210.1 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | think of it as a precise estimate | Tue May 26 1992 16:02 | 16 |
|
I have stock in it and have high hopes. I'm English and now work and
live in the United States. Many times I've travelled across the Channel
via ferry. There is a definite market for the tunnel! Plus I expect
you'll see a lot of freight using the tunnel, as time is money for
truckers.
I don't see the tunnel collapsing under the weight of its financing.
Duty-Free will not go away at the end of 1992, so that will help
revenue.
So, I'm bullish. But definitely long-term.
Simon
|
210.2 | a roadblock? | MUHIS::HSTOECKLIN | | Wed May 27 1992 05:10 | 8 |
|
That's what generates my optimism, too. On the other hand, what
moderates my optimism, is that the English tend to use the wrong
side of the road ... ;-) I mean that could be a real 'road'block;
but, I have to admit, that I've never been to GB by car.
What do you think?
helmut
|
210.3 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | think of it as a precise estimate | Wed May 27 1992 14:57 | 24 |
|
The British already cross the channel in huge numbers by car to go on
vacation. Trust me, I've done it a million times. You soon forget which
side of the road you're supposed to be in, and just follow the cars in
front.
I belive traffic will be greater than it is now via ferry
1. Direct London - Paris/Berlin/Brussels trains will replace flying.
This will be city-centre to city-centre without having to leave your
chair.
2. Disneyland. Euro-Disney is up and running. Expect to see many
tourists travelling from England to Euro-Disney via train. I expect
they'll be a booming charter business from all corners of the
country.
It is my believe that the current high level of cross-channel traffic
is under its potential, and is constrained by the method of
travel(ferry or plane). Once convenient trans start running, I expect a
lot of new travel will start.
Simon
|
210.4 | No Light at the end of the Tunnel | SUBWAY::SAMBAMURTY | Raja | Thu May 28 1992 12:18 | 5 |
| There is an article in The New York Times (today, 28-May-1992) which
suggests that the eurotunnel is tettering on bankruptcy (I didn't read
the whole article). Evidently its share price on the London & Paris
exchanges have been going down in anticipation. Those of interested in
investing in EuroTunnel may want to read this article.
|
210.5 | No Dividend this century | NEWOA::MACLEOD | | Tue Jun 09 1992 08:23 | 6 |
|
It is regarded as a very risky stock. It will open (sometime), the
French will not let it fail. But because of the massive cost overrun,
if you do invest you're unlikey to see a dividend this century.
|
210.6 | fast channel ferry | SORGEN::HELMUT | | Thu Jun 11 1992 11:37 | 10 |
|
Sure, I don't expect any dividends to be paid within the next
eight years. But I if I'm willing to stay long-term with this
stock it might become a "tenbagger" (Peter Lynch).
By the way, I recently heard rumours about a fast channel ferry
(more than 300 mph ! ) going to be build. Can someone point to a more
serious source of information?
helmut
|
210.7 | 300mph is scary!!! I wouldn't go on it. | SSDEVO::RMCLEAN | | Thu Jun 11 1992 13:30 | 9 |
| >>>
>>> By the way, I recently heard rumours about a fast channel ferry
>>> (more than 300 mph ! ) going to be build. Can someone point to a more
>>> serious source of information?
No but assuming ferry means boat... That's REAL scary at that kind of
speed. Most of the trains only do 1/2 that and this is over water which
you have much less control. I presume this is a hovercraft type of thingie.
|
210.8 | How fast for a _boat_?? | SSBN1::YANKES | | Thu Jun 11 1992 14:26 | 6 |
|
Re: last two
I don't think that even racing boats go anywhere near 300 mph.
-craig
|
210.9 | an ferry=aircraftship | SORGEN::HELMUT | | Fri Jun 12 1992 06:41 | 10 |
|
ok., ok. should have asked my english teacher ...
what I had in mind when I used the term 'ferry' was
a combination of an aircraft and a ship, that could carry
about 400 people . Of course it has to behave like an aircraft
when crossing the channel, otherwise it would show a large
'hit rate' ;-).
helmut
|
210.10 | Still sounds a bit fast... | SSDEVO::RMCLEAN | | Sat Jun 13 1992 18:26 | 2 |
| Sounds more like a hovercraft and I sure wouldn't want to try that at those
speeds. Yes they fly but... not very high.
|
210.11 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | think of it as a precise estimate | Mon Jun 15 1992 13:15 | 8 |
|
you probably saw popular mechanics like I did.
The Russians are building a huge plane that "flys" in ground effect at
50ft or so. 300+ mph very possible. They've tested it over the Russian
plains in the North.
Simon
|
210.12 | Sorry, I couldn't resist | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire. | Mon Jun 15 1992 16:15 | 3 |
| > They've tested it over the plains in the North.
A steppe-by-steppe process, no doubt...
|
210.13 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 07 1992 08:18 | 17 |
|
You aren't EVER getting me in a tunnel.
The ferry companies are investing in larger and faster transport to
get the traffic now, and keep the people happy. P+O could be a good
bet!
The areas where I think the tunnel could attract is city-to-city
people, (airlines) and maybe heavy goods - depending on the high speed
rail-link, which is still under debate.
I'm not an high risk investor, and would go for the ferry companies,
not the tunnel. I'd avoid the airlines - they seem to be on a
loose/loose
Heather - of course, if the roads remained blocked much longer, then the
airlines might just be worth a flutter :-)
|
210.14 | 3 years later | EVMS::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Fri Jul 07 1995 16:52 | 3 |
| Any owners want to comment on how Eurotunnel stock is looking these days?
John
|
210.15 | �1.85 | CHEFS::MACLEOD | | Fri Jul 21 1995 06:46 | 5 |
|
Currently �1.85 sterling, I don't know what the French price is.
But the trains are running.
Ferdy
|
210.16 | Even lower | CHEFS::MACLEOD | | Mon Sep 25 1995 11:30 | 6 |
|
Now at �0.98, all time low.
Comments about 'pulling the plug' would be in poor taste......
Ferdy
|