T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
160.1 | | MR4DEC::GREEN | | Thu Apr 16 1992 16:37 | 3 |
|
Mass taxes any income earned in the state, as NH residents are acutely
aware.
|
160.2 | As I recall... | HABS11::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Thu Apr 16 1992 16:45 | 6 |
| Or, to put it another way (which I think is correct in all but the
cleverest of cases): If you live OR work in MA, they get you for the
taxes. And that includes the difference between the rate in your state
(if you pay state taxes there) and in MA, if MA is higher.
Cheers...Gary
|
160.3 | | GUIDUK::BRENNAN_CA | Cathy Brennan, Boeing Business Group | Thu Apr 16 1992 18:23 | 13 |
| Who defines what "work in MA" means? Following from the base note, what
if I were able to have my paychecks issued through my cost center, which
would remain in Washington? Would I pay MA taxes on that? If so, maybe
there are other things I could do. I have a lot of variables I could
play with here, so it may be possible to avoid taxes on at least
investment income.
I don't expect to get a real answer with a list of steps to take to
avoid paying MA income tax from this file; I know it's not that easy
(if it's even possible). But what kind of professional would I talk to,
to find out how, legally, to avoid these taxes, or to convince myself
that I'd talked to those who know best, and it's just not possible?
Would that be a tax lawyer? Anyone have any recommendations?
|
160.4 | Where you get paid... | HABS11::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Thu Apr 16 1992 18:58 | 8 |
| When I was in the MA tax situation, it was the location from which you
were paid. I worked in Marlboro, and lived in NH. They would not move
my pay location to NH until I worked more than half time there. It was
at least immoral, and probably illegal, to do so. Digital (still, I
think) cares about that kind of thing. If your company has no locations
in state, you might not get hit.
Cheers...Gary
|
160.5 | "Tax's... What taxs????" | MIMS::MACIOLEK_M | Mad Mike | Fri Apr 17 1992 10:05 | 35 |
| Hi,
I was in the same situation. I was a "Connecticut resident" working
in Ohio for 7 months. I had an "office" in Ohio, but I maintained
a home in Connecticut. Since I was working at a company based in
Ohio, my company based in Mass. had to withhold ohio income tax.
This pertained to wages only. I recieved money from other sources
such as investments which were "earned in Connecticut".
When I filed my Ohio State income tax, I filed as a resident alien.
What happened was this:
What was my Gross earnings PERIOD (regardless of where it was earned).
How much of it was earned in Ohio
How much of it was earned in another state
How much money did you pay to other states in taxs ($0)
You monkey around with the figures a little bit and come up with
how much you owe. Then, of course Connecticut just introduced it's
income tax. I figured that on the day they introduced the tax, I
didn't live in Connecticut anymore. Now I live in Georgia. If I
did file in Connecticut, there tax method is the same as Ohio.
What was your gross income. I said "Not again". I'm bummed out
about that even though I earned most of my money outside of Ohio,
Ohio taxed EVerything I made, when everything was adjusted for
being paid to other states, I found I still came out behind.
I guess the moral of this story is:
You can say you live anywhere you want.
Your company will withhold money from wages earned in Mass.
If you have any money withheld for state income taxs' you should file
a Mass income tax return to try and get some of your money back.
File as a resident of Washington. You'll be responsible for paying tax's
on the wages earned in Mass. Don't try and pull a Leona Helmsley, it
ain't worth it.
- Mike
|
160.6 | Relying on a poor memory... | BASEX::GREENLAW | I used to be an ASSET, now I'm a Resource | Fri Apr 17 1992 15:14 | 8 |
| I seem to recall where MASS was taxing members of visiting football teams
on 1/16 of their salaries because the money was "earned" in Foxboro. I do
know that I once worked for a gentleman who lived in NH, worked in Mass, and
traveled to Michigan. He would keep tract of the days he actually spent in
the MASS office so that he would only pay taxes on that amount of his salary.
FWIW,
Lee G.
|
160.7 | you may not have to pay | STOKES::NEVIN | | Thu Apr 30 1992 12:39 | 31 |
| According to the Mass Non-resident state tax book, you do not have to
pay taxes if you business in Mass is "casual, isolated and
inconsequential". This is defined by the following criteria:
1) less than 10 days and less than $6000 (you do not qualify on this
one)
2) gross income from business in Mass does not exceed $6000 (in some
cases this would contradict 1, but in any case, you probably would not
qualify under this one)
OR--
3) "the nonresident's presence for business in Mass is ancillary to the
nonresident's primary business or employment duties performed at a base
of operations outside Mass, as with an occasional presence in Mass for
management reporting, planning or training, and other similar
activities which are secondary to the individual's out-of-state
duties."
My feeling is that you could make a good case for number 3. You can get
a copy of the non-resident regulation from the
Rules and Regulations Bureau
Mass Dept of Revenue
100 Cambridge St
Boston, MA 02204
Good luck,
Bob
|
160.8 | | GUIDUK::BRENNAN_CA | Cathy Brennan, 545-4512 | Tue May 05 1992 11:34 | 1 |
| Thanks for the information in .7, and for the address.
|