Title: | Market Investing |
Moderator: | 2155::michaud |
Created: | Thu Jan 23 1992 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1060 |
Total number of notes: | 10477 |
Does anybody know what the rules are for when you are required to file for NH income tax on interest and dividends, and what the appropriate form is? Bob
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.1 | NH tax information | SOLVIT::BOWLES | Wed Feb 26 1992 16:49 | 12 | |
Bob, The dates for filing are the same as that for the federal (approx April 15). I don't know the form number but you can get them at most N.H. banks / Post Offices in N.H. / your local N.H. library. The instructions come with the form ( approx 4 to 6 pages of instructions). If you have over $1200 of interest and/or dividents from non N.H. sources, you will have to file a return. Glenn Bowles | |||||
79.2 | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Thu Feb 16 1995 09:57 | 6 | |
Gov. Merrill has announced his proposed budget. Hidden in it is this change: "Imposes the 5% tax on bank account interest held in VT and NH banks, ending a blanket exemption now threatened by a state lawsuit." | |||||
79.3 | NH's always had an "income tax". | SOLVIT::CHEN | Thu Feb 16 1995 15:46 | 6 | |
re: -1 I though NH always had a 5% tax on "unearned" incomes - if the income is greater than $400(?) per year. Have I missed something? Mike | |||||
79.4 | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Thu Feb 16 1995 16:57 | 8 | |
> I though NH always had a 5% tax on "unearned" incomes - if the income > is greater than $400(?) per year. Have I missed something? You missed the last part of the quote in .2. That "income tax" has been under fire the last couple of years (or longer?) as illegal or something like that. Ie. you could consider it a voluntary tax. Sounds like Merril wants to make it mandatory by closing up the loophole or whatever it is .... | |||||
79.5 | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Wed Feb 22 1995 13:43 | 6 | |
The 5% tax is on "unearned" interest and dividends EXCEPT for interest from NH Banks (DCU Qualifies, as (I believe) Shamut does now with NH offices) VT Banks, and dividends from NH and VT Corporations. Bill | |||||
79.6 | We need to keep information up to date. | SOLVIT::CHEN | Wed Feb 22 1995 17:26 | 3 | |
> from NH Banks (DCU Qualifies, as (I believe) Shamut does now with NH Correction: Shawmut is history. It should be Fleet Bank now. :-) | |||||
79.7 | NPSS::RAUHALA | Fri Mar 03 1995 18:52 | 12 | ||
re: .6 The Fleet/Shawmut merger is not a done deal, lawsuits have been filed from both sides! re: .4 How "voluntary" is this tax? I have read multiple accounts of people getting charged with penalties and interest for not paying the tax. The penalties and interest owed was greater than the original tax. I guess I could not pay and then make NH take me to court but it hardly seems worth the trouble given the amount of money involved here. any idea who to contact to find out more about this? | |||||
79.8 | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Fri Mar 03 1995 18:58 | 10 | |
> How "voluntary" is this tax? I have read multiple accounts of > people getting charged with penalties and interest for not paying > the tax. I've been following the newspapers on this for the last several years and they've never mentioned the above. > any idea who to contact to find out more about this? good question. i don't know :-( | |||||
79.9 | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Mon Mar 06 1995 10:16 | 33 | |
The following was in Sat.'s Nashua paper. I think it addresses why I said up to this point you could consider the tax voluntary (because of it's un-constitutionality). Get your refund requests in for past years in ASAP ..... > Concord Bill would reform tax on investment earnings [] Fewer rich retirees would pay. CONCORD (AP) - About 9,000 fewer people would have to pay a tax on interest and dividends under a proposal to address concerns that the tax is unconstitutional. Currently, the tax must be paid on interest or dividends from out-of-state bank accounts or investments, but not on those in NH or VT. Opponents say that violates interstate commerce principles, and are challenging it in court. A bill to reorganize the tax would remove the exemption. Gov. Steve Merrill favors the change to prevent the state from paying more refunds if the tax is ruled unconstitutional. Although people would have to begin filing returns on interest and dividends earned in VT and NH, the bill raises the excmption from $1,200 to $2,400, and $3,600 for people over 64, so fewer people would pay, said V. Hummell Berghaus of the Dept. of Revenue Administration. At current interest rates on bank accounts, an elderly couple would be able to have $240,000 in savings before paying the tax, Berghaus said. About 55,000 people pay the tax, which brought in $36 million last year. The state would bring in $350,000 in extra revenue under the bill, Berghaus said. In addition to the constitutional questions, the tax has become more difficult to administer since it was implemented in 1923 because of changes in the banking industry. "Since the interest and dividends tax has not changed along with the times, it has become more and more difficult to properly ascertain what income is exempt," he said. Problems arose with the advent of interestate banking, with NH branches, and with out-of-state companies that also operate in NH. |