T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1165.1 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Sep 13 1993 15:14 | 5 |
| It wasn't as bad as I was led to expect, and it has one of my favorite
TV actors (Don Franklin), so I'll be watching (or at least taping) for
a while longer.
Major complaint: Wesley Crusher is back! Aaauuuuuggghhh!
|
1165.2 | That's not all I would call him... | STRATA::MMURRAY | I wanna go 300mph scale speed... | Tue Sep 14 1993 07:45 | 15 |
|
RE: -.1
No, no. It's Wesley Crusher with an attitude. Much more in line
with today's youths... :^)
I quite liked it, other than that it's nice to know that once
we humans manage to develop a way of living, working underwater
we'll exploit it's resources...
Thank goodness for SeaQuest! :^)
Bye,
Mike.
|
1165.3 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Sales Support;South FL | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:31 | 16 |
| I rather liked the pilot: predictable, but a nice setup for some (possibly)
interesting characters. I have always liked Roy Scheider, and the other
supporting cast was decent. The writing wasn't too bad for the pilot.
What I did like was some of the throw-away stuff. For example, all through
the pilot we saw Wesley Cru... excuse me, Lucas Wolenczak wearing a Florida
Marlins baseball shirt with the logo "World Champions 2010". For someone
who is living in South Florida and hearing the hype about the Marlins first
season (and the perpetual coverage of their owner Wayne Huiznega, whose
background matches Lucas's father in the show *perfectly*), it was amusing.
The problems I can see come in future shows writing. The pet dolphin is
sick and might need to be released? This is of paramount concern to
every person on the SeaQuest and/or everyone on earth? Give me a break...
-- Ken Moreau
|
1165.4 | Still going for the lowest common denominator | VERGA::KLAES | Quo vadimus? | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:58 | 15 |
| The following quote is from an article in THE BOSTON SUNDAY
GLOBE'S TV WEEK magazine, September 12-18, 1993, page 2, written by
Bruce McCabe of the Globe staff. The quote is from seaQuest DSV
executive producer David J. Burke (he shares this job with Steven
Speilberg):
"My work comes out of our characters, who are military and
scientific people. I'm not plot oriented. Still, we've got our
share of fantastic stories and sea monsters. At the moment,
we're working on a good ghost story for Halloween."
Now, don't you feel better about the future of SF television?
Larry
|
1165.5 | Not Impressed at all | AKOCOA::PALAZZOLO | | Fri Oct 01 1993 16:26 | 14 |
| I don't know who they consulted in the design of the SEAQUEST or the
pirate sub in the pilot, but I'm sure Dr. Ballard knows better. What
type of fluid dynamics was considered in the utterly cluttered,
protuberance studded, hull forms. NONE. Those hulls were about as
streamlined as a 1920 Rolls.
I caught a recent episode concerned with the discovery of part of the
library of Alexandria. What did they do with a fairly good premise?
Lybian terrorists and an ESP lover for the C.O..
They will have to do a lot better to hold my interest.
Joe P.
|
1165.6 | oh no | PEKING::WOODWARDP | | Thu Oct 14 1993 07:59 | 6 |
| Seaquest starts in the UK tomorrow. the news that Wesley Crusher's in
it fills me with dread. Star Trek TNG was awful (social workers in
space). Previous comment suggest DSV will be more of the same twaddle.
Woody
|
1165.7 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Oct 14 1993 11:08 | 7 |
| Unless I am missing something, and I haven't seen the premiere episode,
the references to "Wesley Crusher" are metaphorical, right?
There is a teen-age geek who is the software whiz who solves problems
on the fly and write SW to translate dolphin to English,
but he's played by another actor, NOT the same guy who was Wesley Crusher.
- tom]
|
1165.8 | | KAOFS::B_ZINN | SANITY: a fictional state of mind | Thu Oct 14 1993 11:53 | 5 |
| Yes, it's a different actor....and the character does not save the ship
every other week.
Brenda
|
1165.9 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Thu Oct 14 1993 19:01 | 1 |
| No, he takes turns with the dolphin....
|
1165.10 | When & where? | SIOG::S_FARREN | Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster anyone?! | Fri Oct 15 1993 09:35 | 5 |
| re .6
Starts in the UK? What time & what channel?
Sean.
|
1165.11 | don't bother | PEKING::WOODWARDP | | Mon Nov 08 1993 09:31 | 3 |
| ITV on Sundays. Seen the first episodes...Awful. Real drivel.
woody.
|
1165.12 | Even the lamest Star Trek episodes were better | VERGA::KLAES | Quo vadimus? | Mon Nov 22 1993 13:31 | 7 |
| Apparently the motto for this series is "Millions for special
effects but not one cent for original plots or characters." No
wonder the general public still tends to look down on SF. SQDSV
is doing little to change that misleading image.
Larry
|
1165.13 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Nov 22 1993 16:09 | 21 |
| Re: .4
>The quote is from seaQuest DSV executive producer David J. Burke (he
>shares this job with Steven Speilberg):
>
> "My work comes out of our characters, who are military and
>scientific people.
Empirical evidence demonstrates otherwise, I think.
I would _love_ to see some kind of "letters to home" episode. It would
tell us who the characters have to write to, it would show us life on
the seaQuest and it would let the characters interact with each other
for a change. Plots come and go, characters stay. They need to invest
more in them.
Obviously, I'm still watching. Of course, I tape it (while watching
_Lois & Clark_) so I have the option of fast-forwarding. While it has
never quite sunk to the depths I dread (and the fact that I think them
capable of reaching those depths is illuminating), it has never come
close to what I originally hoped for it.
|
1165.14 | ba dum THUMP | NEMAIL::CARROLLJ | aka Dr. Emilio Lazardo | Tue Nov 23 1993 10:08 | 8 |
| Re -.1
> While it has
> never quite sunk to the depths I dread (and the fact that I think them
Pun intended, I sincerely hope . . . :-)
- jim
|
1165.15 | yawn | MARX::GRIER | mjg's holistic computing agency | Wed Nov 24 1993 18:45 | 7 |
|
Oh, is it still on?
(I think that sums up my feelings...)
-mjg
|
1165.16 | | BAHTAT::EATON_N | Smile when you say that! | Mon Nov 29 1993 08:59 | 16 |
|
I watched the first twenty minutes last night.
Drivel.
We have a character suffering from some lurgey that means he can't open
his hand, until he forgets in the next scene and starts waving them
about like Marcel Marceau....
We have the Captain trotting around 21st century Paris in a *2CV* for
goodness sake!
What a waste. They've obviously spent quite a bit on the sets, pity they
economised on everything else......
Nigel
|
1165.17 | Haven't been following this show at all... | OKFINE::KENAH | I���-) (���) {��^} {^�^} {���} /��\ | Mon Nov 29 1993 09:28 | 2 |
| What's a 2CV?
andrew
|
1165.18 | hokey, hokey, hokey | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:05 | 10 |
| I was flipping through the channels while setting up to tape DS9 last night,
and one character caught my eye. I said to myself, "Hey, it's Ilya!"
Kuriakin, aka David McCallum from "The Man from U.N.C.L.E." Then watching
a bit further I saw it was seaQuest, and I flipped over to "Lois and
Clark"!
I think McCallum is supposed to guest on Babylon 5, which I'd be more
interested in watching him in.
PeterT
|
1165.19 | | BAHTAT::EATON_N | Smile when you say that! | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:42 | 13 |
| re .17
A 2CV is a small French car, which is now out of production. The idea
that one would still be kicking about as (presumably) a hire car in the
21st Century is laughable.
I assume it was a fairly pathetic attempt to impart a little French
"atmosphere".
Tosh, utter tosh.
Nigel
|
1165.20 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Jan 03 1994 16:11 | 4 |
| Hey! They finally found someone who could write!! Not only do we have
all sorts of excitement plot-wise, but they fit in lots of little
character interaction (developing the Bridger/Ford relationship, for
example). Now, let's see if they can keep it up.
|
1165.21 | | CSOA1::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Wed Feb 02 1994 06:49 | 3 |
| Did the show change time-slots, or has it bit the dust?
Dave
|
1165.22 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Feb 02 1994 17:51 | 3 |
| No, it's just been pre-empted lately. It's back this weekend. I just
hope they don't go all stupid again; they've been quite tolerable in
the last 2-3 episodes.
|
1165.23 | Okay, Nathan. Think of something intelligent to say. | RAGS::GINGRAS | | Thu Jan 12 1995 14:51 | 14 |
| Nobody's mentioned this show since its first season. Well, here it
is in the 2nd season. I have to admit that I really like the
show's characters and I like the casting.
But the writers for this show are absolutely awful. The stories
are completely ridiculous and the episodes that have reasonable
storylines are poorly written and executed.
What they need is to get story ideas from real SF fans and then have
the ideas written into scripts by people who have knowledge of what
makes good science fiction.
The two hundred foot, Jurassic crocodile from last week was definitely
weird. If DS9 was still on Sunday nights in this area, I wouldn't have
seen this or any other SeaQuest episodes this year.
|
1165.24 | Pee-u! | BICYCL::RYER | Don't give away the home world.... | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:46 | 5 |
| Yes, the shows are stinko. I can't believe they're still suckering me into
watching these with their promos. I'm gonna switch over to Lois & Clark, or
something. That CA crocodile was just stupid, and poorly animated.
-Patrick
|
1165.25 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Jan 13 1995 13:46 | 6 |
| Re: .23
>What they need is to get story ideas from real SF fans
Right now I think they're getting their story ideas from the National
Enquirer. (They're both based in Florida; coincidence?)
|
1165.26 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Tue Jan 17 1995 08:54 | 10 |
| This week's show set a new low. Ghosts, curses, racial memories,
virtual reality via telepathy, manifestation of a physical object after
a telepathic experience, et cetera. It was just awful.
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
1165.27 | No imagination | TROOA::TEMPLETON | | Thu Jan 26 1995 22:33 | 14 |
| I agree the people are all right but I am beginning to think I have
seen it all before in an earlier life ( shades of Bridey Murphy) did
any of the writers have anything to do with the old Voyage to the
bottom of the sea series? I also think the Seaview was a better looking
boat with a little more imagination in the design but the stories were
a little on the trite side, of course I am just showing my age as a lot
of you folks reading this may not know what I am talking about.
to quote from "The complete directory to prime time TV shows" One of
TV's all time favorite science-fiction series, it ran from September
1964 until september 1968, it followed the exploits of the officers and
men of the Seaview a glass nosed atomic submarine that roamed the seven
seas fighting villians both human and alien. Does that sound familier?
Joan
|
1165.28 | Of course, now I can watch the rerun of B5 when SQ is on... | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Fri Jan 27 1995 10:42 | 7 |
| Unfortunately I can't compare them, at least favorably. Not because I never
saw Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, in fact I watched them all when they
first came out. But SeaQuest just offends my sensibilities so much that
I find it unwatchable. If I had to watch something with Quest in the title,
I'd much prefer Johnny Quest!
PeterT
|
1165.29 | Things change | TROOA::TEMPLETON | | Sun Feb 12 1995 21:32 | 8 |
| I too liked Voyage to the bottom of the Sea when it was new but now
after watching some of the new SF shows and then seeing Voyage (we have
a station here that runs it every sunday night) it does not have the
same appeal as it used to.
joan
|
1165.30 | ..... | SWAM1::MEUSE_DA | | Tue May 16 1995 15:56 | 5 |
|
This show will be back in the fall according to NBC.
I'm not a big fan, just an occasional viewer.
|
1165.31 | comments | POBOX::SEIBERTR | | Tue May 23 1995 10:46 | 7 |
| Well, almost everyone may have died last night. I wonder who wants
out of the contract? It is interesting that now they are stuck on
a strange planet with no way home....much like ST: Voyager. It opens
up many new doors for them. I think they were getting into a rut
on earth. Hopefully the writing will be better next season.
RS
|
1165.32 | very strange | EVMS::SCHUETZ | VMS Clusters, Memory Channel 381-1663 | Tue May 23 1995 14:13 | 14 |
| Yeah, it struck me as a Producer's Ideal Season Finale;
If any actors get uppity about salary, well, they died in the last
episode.
I like the Dagger character, but the rest of this season's
new actors I could do without. I liked the Dr and 2nd mate from
last year better. Telepathic characters conflict with plot consistency
from episode to episode. And this season, everyone seemed to keep
changing posts.
Let's hope the plots and direction get more believeable next year.
There were too many aliens shooting at them in the last scenes
for everyone not have been wiped out. If they had halved the number
of opponents, then it would have been more reasonable.
|
1165.33 | moving | POBOX::SEIBERTR | | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:07 | 12 |
| I just read in TV guide that Mad About You will be moving into
this time slot. Knowing that Seaquest got renewed, I wonder where
they will put it?
Too bad for Mad About You. I think I remember reading somewhere
that Sunday is not a big tv night (you think it would be...) and
as we know from SeaQuest, Sunday shows tend to get prempted
for ball games or long movies. It sounds like a bad move for
Mad About You, but it will probably work out in SeaQuest's favor
---if they don't put them up against ER or something!!
RS
|
1165.34 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Jun 12 1995 13:27 | 1 |
| I think seaQuest is moving to Thursday (maybe Wednesday).
|
1165.35 | comments | POBOX::SEIBERTR | | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:39 | 8 |
| Lots of changes on this show for next season. Michael Ironside
will be the new captain with Roy having guest shots. Lots of crew
die in the season finale fight...Wendy, Piccelo (sp?), Brody
and Ortis. Ted Rami wants to come back, but so far doesn't have
a contract. There is a new girl signed up to an ensign. The
new day is Wednesday at 800est.
RS
|
1165.36 | | CSOA1::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Mon Jul 10 1995 12:07 | 1 |
| I wonder how many of the writing staff also get the axe? :-)
|
1165.37 | comments | POBOX::SEIBERTR | | Tue Jul 11 1995 09:52 | 3 |
| Hopefully, a lot. Definitely need better writers.
RS
|
1165.38 | No more giant squid shows, please. | RAGS::GINGRAS | | Wed Jul 12 1995 13:07 | 7 |
| The final thing they should do to this show is rename it
SeaQuest 2099 and relocate it 75 years or so further into
the future. Everything on that show seemed too implausible
for the year 2020. They might be able to disclaim any
association to the previous show, keep the best of the actors
and just give them new names. I'd buy it if the show wasn't
stupid anymore.
|
1165.39 | update | POBOX::SEIBERTR | | Fri Sep 01 1995 09:06 | 18 |
| I checked into the internet yesterday and only two people will not
be coming back, Ortis and Wendy. Lucas will also have to wear a
uniform this season. They have 4 new members to the writing staff.
It sounded like one of them also wrote for ST:NG. Has anyone
peeked into the the America Online newsgroup for this show? It sounds
like some of the big wigs who work on the show such as Lee Goldberg
the Production Supervisor and a few others note in there frequently.
I can't believe the fans who write in there! They are outright RUDE.
They are accusing Lee and the others of not doing their jobs, telling
them to quit, accusing them of being "plants" and not who they say
they are and so forth.....it was pretty crazy in there!!!!
Maybe
they are justified for saying those things since I didn't see any
of the original postings, but it sure sounds like a really bad way
to go about getting the show to be better.
RS
|