T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
789.1 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Starfleet Security | Thu May 04 1989 02:19 | 14 |
| re:.0
There are a number of topics on Heinlein (DIR/TITLE=HEINLEIN),
and there's bound to be some discussion of STARSHIP TROOPERS
in one of them.
Not to dump on your favorite, but I found it quite literally
unreadable. I've tried a few times to read it and never got more
than about a third of the way through it (and that was pushing
it). But then, I have a notorious anti-Heinlein attitude (well,
I'm not really *anti*-Heinlein, I'm just not pro-Heinlein; I've
never been able to figure out what people see in his work).
--- jerry
|
789.2 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Thu May 04 1989 09:12 | 6 |
| I thought it was okay. I liked the political philosophy (one must
serve the community to be a full part of it), thought the plot was
passable, but didn't think much of the "dulce et decorum est...."
thread that ran thru the book.
=maggie
|
789.3 | good book | STUDIO::JPETERS | Be Nice or be Dog Foood | Thu May 04 1989 11:00 | 6 |
| This is one of my favorites too. I like the way this book shows that
duty and patriotism are important without be obvious about it. One person
doing his duty and doing some good in the world. He may not understand
the big picture all the time but he gets the job done and the world is a
little better for it.
Jeff Peters
|
789.4 | HaHaHaHaHahaHa | CSCOA3::CONWAY_J | Marietta Cuisenart | Mon May 08 1989 09:43 | 2 |
| Without being obvious about it?!! and I like the way Wilt Chamberlain
is tall withour being obvious about it.
|
789.5 | I like it... | 3284::GRIER | mjg's holistic computing agency | Mon May 15 1989 23:00 | 21 |
| I just happen to be re-reading it, and I enjoy it.
His moral commentary is interesting. While I personally could not and
would not put myself in the position of the protagenist(sp?), Johnny Something-
or-other, it gives me more insight into the views and values of a "military
man". (This from a person who almost was thrown out of his house over long
hair and disagreements about the military with his father... what can I say,
I've learned to value differences... :-)
I also enjoyed especially to see the parallels with the marines of
Aliens. Maybe not 100% direct tie-ins, but there were many aspects of
Heinlein's M.I. which I saw in those Marines, but maybe those are just common
aspects of all persons of a military (especially Marine!!) nature. It's the
only book I can recall reading which examines the military creature in any
kind of internal depth. (I've seen the movies, and read about "space battles"
before, but nothing that really dove into the mentality and philosophy of it
all.) Didn't the power-loader remind you at ALL of powered armor?
All-in-all, it's typical of early Heinlein.
-mjg
|
789.6 | On the Bounce | UBOHUB::J_SMITH | Big Horse | Thu Jun 01 1989 09:32 | 22 |
| I was also re-re-reading it last week during a nostalic phase!!
My thoughts about the book have changed slowly over the years. I
first bought the book in 197mmble and read it as a "cowboys and
indians" story (only being kneehigh to a skinny at the time). Gradually
it has changed (for me) through being a tongue-in-cheek anti-war
novel to what seems to be a quite unusual view of the military way
of thinking. It shows the soldier as being neither a bloodthirsty
facist fiend nor an altuistic liberal...both points of view having
been thoroughly aired over the last few years. The people seem to
be ordinary guys who have ended up in the M.I. for (sometimes) no
concrete reason and who are doing the best they can.
I also like the idea that you should *already* have contributed something
to society, and put your life on the line, before being allowed to
exercise the ultimate democratic power (ie the vote). It probably
would never work in practice but it makes you think about the
possibilty!!
Most of all I read 'cos I enjoy it!!
The Real John Smith
|
789.7 | I like it, but I'm not mad for it | HPSCAD::WALL | You and me against the world: attack! | Thu Jun 01 1989 10:23 | 9 |
|
I think you had to perform Federal Service (which covered a lot
more things than the military) before getting the vote. So, it
wasn't government by ex-military people, strictly.
I find Heinlein largely unpalatable, but I think this one and The
Moon is a Harsh Mistress were okay.
DFW
|
789.8 | "Look out, Hugh!" | STRATA::RUDMAN | Defenceless,adj. Unable to attack. | Fri Jun 02 1989 15:44 | 8 |
| Well, here I go again:
When I hear someone use words like "unpalatable" I recommend they
read "...All You Zombies." If you didn't like it then you're
definitely not Heinlein-reader material. (If you do I pass you
on to ORPHANS OF THE SKY.)
Don
|
789.9 | A Twofor | EDUHCI::SHERMAN | Barnacle 1 | Thu Jul 20 1989 16:43 | 11 |
|
I like it for two reasons:
1. It's a "good read."
2. It made the crowd at The New Yorker and The New York Times so
mad they had a stroke.
KBS
|
789.10 | Love the Suits, Hate the Bugs | VAOA02::JSTEWART | RMS is a LAYERED PRODUCT... | Tue Jan 23 1990 21:53 | 16 |
| RH taught me to read... and Starship Troopers remains one of my
favorite reads...
I am afraid, however, that I have outgrown it's simplistic political
philosophy. The problem with the "federal service" notion as expressed
in this story is that the *definition* of service is purely the perogative
of the *state*. There seems to be little room in this world for
the constructive debate that is the key characteristic of a healthy
democracy. In fact, if a "citizens'" idea of service differs from
that of the state, he is automatically disenfranchised.
The political world of Starship Troopers would be at least as
unresponsive and inflexible as some of our contemporary Communist
states.
js
|
789.11 | I liked it too...there is an anime version of Starship Troopers | AV8OR::REN | I will not burp in class | Thu Jun 14 1990 19:03 | 14 |
| I just read Starship Troopers very recently, and I enjoyed it a lot. The only
thing I didn't like was a lot of the moral philosophy stuff. I found it too
simplistic, and very preachy. I did like the insights into military life (not
just the battles) and military thinking (although having never served in the
military, I can't say anything about how real or unreal it was).
For anyone who is interested, there is a Japanese animated version of Starship
Troopers. Like some of the other Japanese adaptations of novels, it is a very
loose adaptation (one other example is Lensman). The first half kind of follows
the book, and the second half diverges all together...(of course, with me not
understanding Japanese, and also not having a translated script...it was hard
for me to tell). The Bugs are completely different from the novel.
-Eric
|
789.12 | If you liked "Starship Troopers" try "Armor". | CSC32::T_HUTCHIN | | Tue Feb 19 1991 11:01 | 11 |
|
Sorry, but in spite of it's somewhat simplistic views, it's still
one of my favorite Heinleins. (Maybe it's due to a wish that
sometimes life could be more simple.)
If anyone liked the powered armor in "Starship Troopers", pick up
a copy of John Stakely's "Armor". The protagonist in this one
will send chills up your spine.
Terry
|
789.13 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Feb 26 1991 12:30 | 7 |
| Armor was excellent.... I just reread that after several years.
I thought I saw another novel by Steakley out in hardback, but I was
really in a rush and had to zoom.
Anybody see something new by him?
Mike JN
|
789.14 | _Vampire$_ | OASS::MDILLSON | Generic Personal Name | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:33 | 6 |
| Yep.
He has a new book out called _Vampire$_ about a group of fearless
vampire hunters. He has had this book written for at least 10 years
because I heard him read it at a Chattacon that long ago. It is an OK
read. This book is out in trade PB now.
|
789.15 | A disenting opinion | SNDPIT::SMITH | Smoking -> global warming! :+) | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:16 | 4 |
| Sorry, I thought Armor was pretty awful. Nothing like Starship
Troopers or The Forever War....
Willie
|
789.16 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Technical Support;Florida | Mon Nov 25 1996 20:28 | 43 |
789.17 | The Way of the Warrior | WHOS01::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Wed Nov 27 1996 10:16 | 6
|